Bad men are very popular and grab more attention from girls. Many people tend to relate the word “bad man” and “Wolf”. It fact, I think it’s very reasonable. “Healthy” wolves and “Healthy” men have many things in common. Such as keen intuition, fun nature, full of curiosity, tough, courageous, and they know how to adapt to different environments. However, for people that are viewed as a bad man or a “wolf”, they have been subjected to unfair adjectives about them like dangerous or cunning. Sometimes, man would also spurn those bad men, but in the end, a lot of them became the people like them. Often, women say that they are going to stay away from bad men, but they fall in love with them afterward. It is intuition, also it’s the domino effect. …show more content…
It's just a part of them. This link to a phase, what you see is what your world looks like, and vice versa. In fact, so-called bad men have many reputations, such as fun, colorful, adventurous, ambitious, wild, arrogant, inconsiderate and so on. In general, you could slowly find the word "bad" is a word showing vitality. They are like a hurricane, craze sweeping people's attention. They can bring you excitement in the relationship and you could experience new things with them. They have good execution and imaginations. To some extent, the bad men can be compared to hunters, and women are like prey in their view. But in fact, some women are willing to get "captured" and feeling superior about it. Which woman doesn't like men with energy and excitement and also having an optimistic feeling towards their life and be able to fight and go for what they truly want. A society is like a jungle and it applies the law of the jungle, the one who survives at the end will be able to protect the ones standing behind him. Women find it protective, fun to be with when they are with the people who were being called as bad men by other …show more content…
Think of some of the great people, could it be said that they are all good men? Certainly that I don’t recommend anyone to make judgments to say right or wrong on this title. There is an anime called The Giant Strike. In the first episode, all human beings, but the protagonist were willing to be trapped inside a safe castle to escape from the giant attacks. However, only the protagonist wants to go outside to see the world even his idea has gotten ostracized for uncountable times. And isn’t that the reason that he becomes the protagonist. This scene insinuated the situation in real life. There are a number of men who live ineffectively every day and only a few people are willing to break their comfort zone and try something unknown. Think back to our circle of friends, you may find that we all need a few existence of these people, we need their tenacious vitality. In my opinion, bad is also a reflection of some kind of vitality, it does not always mean that they are crazy or out of control, or give up the original social rules or even deviate from human nature. In contrast, it is tolerant, compatible and positive. All of the unknownness can be fearless for
It was good to be bad; it was something that made them hip and cool. They were bad characters indeed, except that their idea of what it is to be a bad person seems to be very much romanticized. It was as if they grew up watching "National Lampoon's Animal House&...
Flannery O’ Conner’s short story, “A good man is hard to find”, explains emotional reactions, betrayal, and violence. The misfit is an example of a devil figure. This character archetype is best seen when we see the misfit’s true colors shine as he murders the grandmother and her family. O’ Conner uses setting archetypes best when she uses a clear bright sky or an open dirt road, which can mean a variety of outcomes. This helps understand the many plot twists in the story. We best see symbolic archetypes as the three bandits including the misfit. They represent a mock of the holy trinity and represent evil. “The fall” is a good archetype that shows the misfit’s lack of innocence when he betrays the grandmother. This best explains the whole
On the other, men are just defined as people who are the opposite of evil. There can be multiple people in a story who can be characterized as men. They don’t all necessarily have to be heroic to be considered as men. In the literature pieces of Macbeth, Beowulf and Frankenstein there are countless instances where one might be able to distinguish between Monsters and Men. But they all fall into different genres.
Stories usually include the archetype bad guys that seem to be evil, but in numerous stories, the “bad guy” persona becomes clouded. In the short stories, “Where Are You Going? Where Have You Been?” by Joyce Carol Oates and “A Good Man is Hard to Find” by Flannery O’Connor there are centralized antagonists, Arnold Friend and The Misfit, that are the archetype of a bad guy with a troubled past. Both short stories have subliminal messages hinting towards the devil. But if you start reading deeper you can see that’s not all they are portrayed, as seen in the short story, “A Good Man is Hard to Find”, the Misfit could also be portrayed as an archetype as a savior or a seer that has lost his way, although in “Where Are You Going? Where Have You Been? “, Arnold Friend could be portrayed as a satyr, a mischievous demi god. While it can be argued that both characters are completely evil or not, they both have similar and their own personal qualities like the need to inflict pain upon others although they go about it in different ways.
For example John Proctor he portrayed evil by committing adultery with Abigail and while all the hysteria was going on he wasn’t really attempting to do much until the end, when it directly affected him. However John is good because he wanted to protect his wife, and friends and he did what he felt was right. Another character that portrayed both good and evil is Reverend Hale. In the beginning in a way he provoked the confession out of Tituba, and helped create the hysteria. However, he was good because in the ending he realized the truth and tried to save the lives of innocent people by begging them to confess.
The film 12 Angry Men depicts the challenge faced by a jury as they deliberate the charges brought against an 18-year-old boy for the first-degree murder of his father. Their task is to come to an impartial verdict, based on the testimony that was heard in court. The group went through the case over and over while personal prejudices, personality differences, and tension mounted as the process evolved. While the scorching hot weather conditions and personal affairs to tend to led the juror to make quick and rash decisions, one juror convinced them the fate of the 18 year old was more important than everyone’s problems an convinced them that they could not be sure he was guilty. Juror three took the most convincing. After fighting till he
Standing up for what one believes in is not always easy. The book Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose should be taught in schools for many reasons. The book is about the trial of a sixteen year old boy accused of killing his father. The boy’s fate is determined by the decision reached by twelve jurors in a New York jury room. Twelve Angry Men displays the effects that one person can have on a group, it teaches the value of being part of a jury, and it explores how stereotypes and prejudices can have an effect on someone’s decision or beliefs.
They are characters that the audience can empathize with because a single human is born with nothing but as they walk life they will be neither purely evil nor good but a mix of both. These characters are timeless for if you want to label them as purely evil or purely good it’s impossible because they aren’t. These characters touch upon issues that society are conflicted about and allow the audience to work out these issues for their self throughout the story or play letting us decided the truth within these stories. Like how Mary Shelley had force the reader to see within the heart of the creature and the society viewpoint for us to decide for their self who we thought were the real monsters within the story of Frankenstein. These characters are also seen as more realistic because even if they are the most pure characters the audience may had read about with the purest intentions they may still fallen to their darkness in the end showing that the world isn’t filled with demons or angels that like humans these characters can feel, they can wary and fall to their temptation, that they can still hope, get hurt, cry, feel guilt, depression, happiness, and paranoia. Because like in reality the audiences are living in a morally ambiguous world where most of the world 's solutions to their problem aren’t clear and may be difficulties in choosing what the right thing to do. This makes the story more engaging, realist, and makes it easier
When people hear the word stereotype, they usually think of black people, Mexicans, Native Americans, women, and other races. Most people do not think there could be a stereotype against white males. People usually think that it would be the white male that would stereotype other races and not be stereotyped themselves. The truth is that white males get stereotyped just as much, if not more, as other races. White males have been categorized as hateful, major racists, skinheads, and over-privileged. In today’s society, a white male can’t criticize any other race without fear of being called a “hater” or a “racist”. One of the biggest forms of racism towards the white male is what the government calls “Affirmative Action”. Affirmative Action is something the government made to insure ...
Society is defined as being “an enduring and cooperative social group whose members have developed organized patterns of relationships through interaction with one another” (Merriam-Webster). The relationship between men and women has played a large role in its culture; “gender hierarchy has been the implicit operating model for understanding. past societies.” (Stokett). As stated, gender hierarchy defines the relationship between the genders as unbalanced in respect to each other, typically placing men as the dominant gender compared to the roles females play.
“The essence of this trope is the suggestion that, while male villains can be evil by nature or by choice, such depths of evil are not natural for women, and so, if a female character has truly evil thoughts, a man must be ultimately responsible for putting them there, even if her actions and behavior don 't hint at it. Thus, when facing in-universe justice, she is more likely to receive a less severe fate for the same crimes as a male villain might.”
After reading the play 12 Angry Men and watching the movie, it is easy to tell that some of the changes made in the movie makes it worse than the play. Reginald Rose wrote the characters to be less personal and more stereotypical in terms of their characteristics. In the movie, we get to know the jurors on a more personal level. For example at the end of the movie juror Eight and Nine are on the courthouse steps when they introduce themselves. This does not happen in the play because the playwright decides to show that the jurors were more like stereotypes of themselves (the bigot, the old man, the immigrant, ext.) and they were just hiding behind anonymity. It doesn't make sense for Eight and Nine to introduce themselves because the point
In today’s society there are many stereotypes surrounding the black community, specifically young black males. Stereotypes are not always blatantly expressed; it tends to happen subconsciously. Being born as a black male puts a target on your back before you can even make an impact on the world. Majority of these negative stereotypes come from the media, which does not always portray black males in the best light. Around the country black males are stereotyped to be violent, mischievous, disrespectful, lazy and more. Black males are seen as a threat to people of different ethnicities whether it is in the business world, interactions with law enforcement or even being in the general public. The misperceptions of black males the make it extremely difficult for us to thrive and live in modern society. Ultimately, giving us an unfair advantage simply due to the color of our skin; something of which we have no control.
The definition of ‘man’ has always been related to human beings, though some etymologists link it to the root word ‘-men’, which means ‘to think’. In contrast to this, the word monster, derived from the Latin ‘monstrum’, can be taken to mean either ‘object of dread’, ‘awful deed’, or ‘abnormal’. If we are to consider the etymology of these two words when classifying monsters and men, the definition becomes more complicated than the conventional bipolar explanations of men being ‘good’ and monsters being ‘evil’. If a man is considered to be ‘one who thinks’, and a monster is considered abnormal (i.e. unable to think), it can be concluded that monsters are simply those incapable of making a clear judgement regarding good and evil. This difficulty in classifying monsters and men is explored in Mary Shelley’s ‘Frankenstein’, Angela Carter’s ‘The Bloody Chamber Collection’, and in Charle’s Schug’s article, ‘The Romantic Form of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein’. In addition to looking at the difficulty in defining these groups, this essay also explores the fluid nature of good and evil, how evil can be considered inescapable, the concept of monsters as a social construct, and how both ‘good’ and ‘evil’ can exist in monsters and men alike.
As a woman, I always find myself longing after a totally unsuitable man. My head tells me one thing yet my heart tells me another. What is the pull that bad boys have on us? Why are we so attracted to guys who treat us like trash? i analyzed the similarities and differences between these two very different types of men and I found three main ways the relate to each other are through money, attitude and their personalities toward women.