Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of social class on student's education attainment
Does a student social class affect their success
Zimbardo stanford prison experiment paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Timo’s Relationship with Coach Carter’s Zimbardo-esque Loss of Liberty To create a basketball team that can provide benefits to the Richmond community, Coach Carter imposes strict and regimented practices limiting the liberties of the players. A star player on the team, Timo Cruz, initially rejects Coach Carter’s sudden aggressive coaching style and loss of individual liberties. Whereas before, Timo was allowed to control the team using his talent as a validation for his power.Coach Carter’s removal of Timo Cruz’s liberties and personal choice is similar to the tendencies described in Philip Zimbardo’s, “The Stanford Prison Experiment” in regards to the guard’s behavior when controlling, dehumanizing and dictating prisoners (Zimbardo 108). …show more content…
A lot of power dynamics between Coach Carter and his players, such as Timo, is reminiscent of the prison guards. To Timo, his success is being the star player of his high school basketball team but is forced to give up his status when he is thrown off the team by Coach Carter. Initially shocked, Timo was forced to leave his high school’s team in favor of being around his cousin, a drug dealing gang-banger in a less affluent area of southern California with the only hope of returning to the team is through physically impossible exercise (Carter). Although Coach Carter’s methods were less extreme to an extent compared to the prison guards, the methods used both mirror one another remarkable well. The prison guards were instructed to, “utilized psychological state of imprisonment… through the usage of solitary confinement… and ‘deindividualization’” which matches Coach Carter’s structure of expulsion from the team and strict regimented control over aspects of life such as dress and grades (Zimbardo 109). Coach Carter imposes strict grades and business dress code to remove the team from their disorderly dressed peers and create an easily identifiable whole. The new coach also enforces a strict academic standard, utilizing the influence of a signed contract to keep the student’s grades up (Carter). Timo, however, rejects these dress codes and academic standards, and is cast into solitary confinement with his only way of release submitting to the punishment dealt by Coach Carter. Zimbardo’s guards were instructed to dehumanize and isolate prisoners to force obedience, Coach Carter replicates this with Timo, forcing him to submit (Zimbardo 111). Timo’s solitary confinement is where Jason Lyle voluntarily embraces Timo as a teammate, disobeying Coach and retaking liberties of choice to decide what is best for the team. Jason
In conclusion, correctional officers such as Ted Conover may think they hold all the power but due to the sudden increase in prisoners and not enough staff, the officers are starting to see how difficult it is to obtain power. The Stanford Prison Experiment also gives us a good sense of the change of power that goes on in a correctional facility and how sometimes the prisoners hold power over the guards. And lastly, inmate power can be seen through the contraband that is made/ brought in on a regular basis.
The first personal traits that Coach Dale was forced to exhibit were his toughness and his assertiveness. On his first night in Hickory he met the men of town in the barbershop who were all willing to provide their experience and insight on the team and how to coach. Coach Dale had enough self confidence to know that none of these “insights” were going to help the Hickory team win basketball games and let them know they weren’t welcome by turning his back and walking out. Additionally, he was forced to demonstrate his toughness twice more on the first day of practice by telling the temporary coach, “Secondly, your days of coaching are over,” and then by standing up to the group of men after he dismissed Buddy from the team. These actions made no friends of the men; however, th...
The author of “Sports’ Bully Culture” John Amaechi, throughout his essay focuses on the bully that very few consider, the coach. He presents an example that most, parents in particular, have heard about; Mike Rice, the former coach at Rutgers University’s. Amaechi recognizes that he can agree with the end result but he also recognizes the need for a different approach and continues to share his view. Amaechi then shares his own personal experience with this kind of bully when he was in university. Even though what he says appeals to many, some coaches, disagree with Amaechi view. He continues to show that these coaches are not just a select few, and the result of these coaches is severe. The essays purpose is to change the audience’s perspective
Without a body man has a mind, but lacking a sound man then man has nothing. That theory is the basis behind why psychological warfare is successful. However, problems arise when psychological warfare becomes used on the wrong people. Evans D Hopkins, a former prisoner himself, wrote the short story “Lockdown” to discuss the act of prison lockdown and the changed prison system mentality during his jail time. Vivid delivery and style delivers the experience to the naive human who does not understand how prison currently functions. The light shining on prisons though is problematic. Prevalent issues exist through the system change, and lockdowns do not provide assistance to jailors or inmates. A look inside the ineffectual
The Implications of the Stanford Prison Experiment In 1971 Dr Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment in the basement of Stanford University. This involved imprisoning nine volunteers in a mock up of Stanford prison, which was policed by nine guards (more volunteers). These guards had complete control over the prisoners. They could do anything to the prisoners, but use physical violence.
Twenty-four average men were entered into a fake prison setting, twelve of which who had been given the role of prisoner and twelve with the role of guard. Throughout the course of the experiment we see the environment effect negatively on the actions of the group of guards, clearly demonstrating that situational forces can force a person to cross the line between good and evil. We see this heavily embodied in the guard Dave Eshelman AKA ‘John Wayne’ – nicknamed by the prisoners in the study – the most brutal guard of them all, the one who demonstrated all the findings on the influence of power and authority and human behaviour. “I was kind of running my own experiment in there, by saying, “How far can I push these things and how much abuse will these people take before they say, ‘knock it off?'” But the other guards didn’t stop me.
A local newspaper ad reached out for volunteers to participate in a Psychological study, created by Philip G. Zimbardo and his research team, which sounded interesting for many individuals. Was it the best option to follow through with it? Volunteers were given a promise of being paid fifteen dollars a day of the study. Multiple members probably considered this a once in a life time event that could result in quick, easy money. Many may have heard about the Stanford Prison Experiment, but may not have been aware of the scars that it left upon the participants. Taking a deeper look into the study and the impacted outcomes on individuals will be elaborated on (Stanford Prison Experiment).
People will do some of the craziest things when any level of force is placed upon them. People will succumb to the pressure of doing things they had never imagined they could do. Just recently people can look at the events of the revolts in Northern Africa and the extremes the people did to over throw their governments, events at Abu Ghraib, and the recent riots in Missouri. When mass hysteria or force from others is involved people will succumb to the situation and may do things they would normally deem immoral.
Phillip Zimbardo conducted the Stanford experiment where 24 physiologically and physically healthy males were randomly selected where half would be prisoners and the other half prisoner guards. To make the experiments as real as possible, they had the prisoner participants arrested at their homes. The experiment took place in the basement of the Stanford University into a temporary made prison.
For years there have been a countless number of people who have tried to bring the subject of prison reform to the light of the public eye. In the book Prison Writing in 20th- century America edited by H. Bruce Franklin, there are featured excerpts from authors Donald Lowrie and Malcom X’s novels that are based around their life changing personal experiences in prison in the early to mid1900s. Whereas Lowrie’s excerpt tells a story omnisciently of how a single warden was able to initiate a major change in San Quentin Prison in only 6 months; Malcom X however tells his readers firsthand of his transformation during his incarceration in two different prison colonies. Although they share their stories from different points of view, they both express similar motifs of change and share a common external conflict of dehumanization in prison.
Social psychology is an empirical science that studies how people think about, influence, and relate to one another. This field focuses on how individuals view and affect each other. Social psychology also produces the idea of construals which represent how a person perceives, comprehends or interprets the environment. Construals introduce the idea that people want to make themselves look good to others and they want to be seen as right. It is also said that the social setting in which people interact impacts behavior, which brings up the idea of behaviorism. Behaviorism is the idea that behavior is a function of the person and the environment.
To begin the experiment the Stanford Psychology department interviewed middle class, white males that were both physically and mentally healthy to pick 18 participants. It was decided who would play guards and who would be prisoners by the flip of a coin making nine guards and nine prisoners. The guards were taken in first to be told of what they could and could not do to the prisoners. The rules were guards weren’t allowed t o physically harm the prisoners and could only keep prisoners in “the hole” for a hour at a time. Given military like uniforms, whistles, and billy clubs the guards looked almost as if they worked in a real prison. As for the prisoners, real police surprised them at their homes and arrested them outside where others could see as if they were really criminals. They were then blindfolded and taken to the mock prison in the basement of a Stanford Psychology building that had been decorated to look like a prison where guards fingerprinted, deloused, and gave prisoners a number which they would be calle...
Would you go into prison to get paid? Do you believe that you will come out the same or become different? Do not answer that. The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment that was conduct in 1971 by a team of researchers led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo. Seventy applicants answered the ad and were narrowed down to 24 college students, which half were assigned either to be guards or prisoners by random selection. Those 24 college students were picked out from the of 70 applicants by taking personality tests and given diagnostic interviews to remove any candidates with psychological problems, medical disabilities, or a history of crime or drug abuse. The experiment lasted six days but it was supposed to last two weeks, it was so traumatizing that it was cut short. Zimbardo was the lead researcher and also had a role in pretend prison. Zimbardo’s experiment was based on looking
“The Stanford Prison Experiment was a landmark psychological study of the human response to captivity, in particular, to the real world circumstances of prison life. It was conducted in 1971 by Philip Zimbardo of Stanford University”. The Stanley prison experiment was conducted in 1971 by psychologist Philip's Zimbardo along with some of his fellow graduate students. The experiment was supposed to be based on obedience, he wanted to expand Stanley Milgram's research, also created a similar study that was based on obedience. Zimbardo selected up to 24 undergraduate students, 12 were prisoners and 12 were guards, they were supposed to play these roles up to two weeks in exchange for $15. According to
Second, in an environment in which the concentration is on punishment, politicians and the American public are frustrated with prisoners living in a “resort-like” facility which might include opportunities to participate in: watching cable TV, weightlifting rooms, free education, religious affiliations, and libraries. The average cost of keeping a prisoner...