Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The evolution of canadian government
Self - government in canada
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The evolution of canadian government
Nearly 300-400 years have passed by since King Louis the XIV of France ruled over New France. During this long span of time our lifestyle has changed a lot, but there are also some things that have remained the same. Religion, education, and government are three of the many topics that help us distinguish between the French Colony and modern-day Canada. Yet, these subjects help us recognize the similarities between the two societies as well. For instance, one third of the Canadian population is Catholic (as of 2006), compared to New France, where everyone practised Catholicism. This 66% decrease may seem like a lot at first glance, but since it has happened over a very long period of time it is not very much.
Firstly, both New France and
…show more content…
Canada have a very large Catholic population. A third of the population are Catholic (as of 2006) as mentioned above.
This is quite a lot, considering the fact that Canada is a multicultural country. Likewise, all the settlers were Catholic in New France. Additionally, churches play a religious role during both time periods. Even though the Roman Catholic Church played a large role in education, healthcare, and government as well as religion; its religious role was prominent. Lastly, in both eras churches do missionary work. Back in New France the religious conversions were more forceful. The nuns and priests tried to convert the Native Peoples from their original religion to Catholicism. Nowadays, missionary work is optional and more about persuading than force. Although some things have stayed the same, many things have changed about religion since the 1600-1700s. In New France everyone practised Roman Catholicism, as Cardinal Richelieu and the King of …show more content…
France had passed a law that only Roman Catholics could travel and move to the Royal Colony of New France. However, Canada has become a multicultural country. These days there are Synagogues, Mosques, and Temples as well as churches. Moreover, modern-day priests and nuns mostly do religious work, such as, conducting weddings and funerals, baptizing babies, etc. Lastly, much of the residents’ social life was based on the Roman Catholic Church. The priests and nuns did not only take care of the sick and needy, but also had a religious and educational role in the society. Even though, education was good back then especially for girls compared to other European countries, the education system is very different nowadays. To begin with, the Roman Catholic church was the only source of education in the 1600s-1700s. Nuns taught the girls and priests taught the boys, but in Canada the education system is a provincial responsibility. Besides, education was not equal for both genders in New France. Currently, the lack of education for girls is a big problem in many third world countries. Yet in New France, the boys were the ones not getting a very good education. Unless boys chose to become a priest, their education was minimal, and they often stayed illiterate. This is, because they were needed on the farm, and knowing how to read and write were not necessities when working as a farmer. The lack of priests in the Royal Colony was also a leading cause of this problem. On the other hand, the girls enjoyed a much better education thanks to the nuns. For example, the Ursuline Nuns established a school in Montreal for girls, and then one in Quebec. On the other hand, we have an equal chance to get a good education regardless of our gender in Canada. In New France, three subjects were taught: reading and writing in French and Latin, and arithmetic. However, in Canada we have a much larger variety of subjects, and the arts are taken much more seriously. Furthermore, there are many more levels of schooling nowadays. We have pre-school, elementary, secondary, and post-secondary. On the contrary, in the 17th and 18th centuries, education was much shorter and much simpler. In present-day Canada school is mandatory until the student is between 16 to 18 years old depending on the province. That said, in New France you were not required to go to school unless you were planning on becoming a priest or nun. Despite all of these differences, education in Canada and New France have some things in common. Firstly, both girls and boys get an education in both societies. Although the quality of the education is quite different, both genders get some education in both time periods. Also, students in both Canada and New France can get homeschooled. Even though it was not necessarily called “being homeschooled” in New France, many school-age children learned the little French they knew from their parents and older siblings. In modern-day Canada students can get homeschooled as well. Lastly, during both areas the same basic subjects are taught: math, and reading and writing in French. However, Latin is not taught in Canadian schools. Even though the nuns played a very big role in the education system back in the 1600s-1700s, the government was run by men only. Firstly, the government was run by men only as mentioned above. Women played absolutely no role in the government in New France. On the contrary, in Canada women play a big role in the government. For example, 50% of the current ministry (cabinet) members are women in Canada. Furthermore, New France was a Royal Colony run by the absolute monarch of France, King Louis XIV. An absolute monarch has the power to make all the decisions for the country/colony and does not have to follow any constitutions or by a parliament. In this monarchy majority rules does not exist. Instead, minority and one-person rule. The monarch has the power to choose the government officials who help him/her make decisions, but he/she does not have to listen to their suggestions. Unlike New France, Canada uses the democratic system. This system uses elections to choose its officials, and majority rules in this system of government. Moreover, the levels of government are very different in the two societies. In modern-day Canada, there are three levels of government: federal, provincial, and municipal. They are run by the Prime Minister, Premier, and Mayor. This is while the main source of power in the New France government was the Sovereign Council, which consisted of the Bishop (François de Laval), The Intendant (Jean Talon), and the Governor General (Comte de Frontenac.) These three officials lived in New France, and reported to the King and his advisors who were back at France.
They told him how things were going or if they needed support. Moreover, the Sovereign Council could elect other officials such as five councilors, a clerk, and an attorney general if deemed necessary. Lastly, the Roman Catholic Church played a very big role in the government. For example, they registered births and deaths, relayed government announcements, etc. On the other hand, in Canada these are done by the different branches of the government. While there are many differences between the government in New France and Canada, there are some resemblances between the two as well. To start with, both governments have important official(s) who make the make the major decisions. In New France, the Monarch made these choices. In Canada, the Prime Minister does. Additionally, both systems have a Governor General. Even though, they play different roles, they do
exist.
Quebec’s social identity and defining characteristics contradict and conflict with those of rest of Canada. Since the genesis of our country, the political, social disagreements, and tensions between Quebec and the rest of Canada have been unavoidable. Utilizing Hiller’s key contradictions in the analysis of a Canadian society, we will compare and contrast the nature of the societal identity in Quebec compared to that of rest of Canada, emphasising on the major differences and tensions between the province and the rest of the country.
For nearly two centuries the inhabitants of New France lived their day to day lives
The government also started to replace programs the Church previously ran, which included hospital insurance, pension schemes and the beginning of Medi-Care. For these programs, the Quebec Liberals had to struggle with Ottawa for a larger share of the tax dollars. One of the greatest reforms was the modernization of the entire school system. The Church used to own the schools of Quebec. Most of the teachers were Priests, Nuns and Brothers.
Two history texts by Bumstead and Silver will be considered. The manner in which they organize Canadian history into logical and comprehensive periods will be taken into account. Each text establishes a chronological framework and within this, creates historical periods. Each period is intended to represent as logically as possible, the major cultural inclinations, political and social events, and thematic trends occurring within that period. Bumstead and Silver outline several broad periods, then delve into each period with a precise focus. Silver has a social focus within each period, and Bumstead has a thematic focus.
The fall of Quebec was a turning point in Canadian history, changing it from a French colony to a British colony. Had this battle gone the other way, English might be the second language, not French. The battle of Quebec was one of many battles during the 'Seven Year War'. They called it the Maritime War. It was officially declared in May 1756. Britain and Prussia were on one side and France, Spain, and Austria on the other. The war moved across the Atlantic Ocean from Europe because the French and the British were fighting over furs and land. Britain, while subsidizing and aiding Prussia, its only European ally, sought victory in America and sent what was for that century an overwhelming number of regular troops in order to stiffen the military of the American colonies.
To decide what to do after Quebec separates, First Ministers and the ROC, must first look at why it happened. Perhaps Quebec's profound nationalism and unique national identity conflicted with citizens in the ROC; in order to gain understanding of their decision the ROC must look at Quebec's past. Quebec was not always treated fairly nor where they given many rights in regards t...
Colonists from France came to Canada and settled in Acadia also known as present day east coast colonies during the seventeenth century. The name given to the French colonists from the time of arrival to Canada was the “Acadians”. The Acadians from France continued their formal lifestyle by farming, fishing and maintaining a close family oriented culture in Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick. The Acadians had created a prosperous agriculture economy up until the late eighteenth century, when there was a colonial struggle in power between the French and the British. British had conquered Port Royal and the Acadians refused to recognize British rule, wanting to keep their religious freedom and not wanting to be obliged to bears arms in the event of war. In this essay I will show that the impact from the England colonial rules led the Acadians to be deported and there they made a decision to settle in the Southern United states. This research essay will discuss why the they settles in the Maritime Provinces, what conflicts arise for in order for the British to exile them and why they chose the Southern United States to settle during the seventeenth and eighteenth century.
Thompson, John Herd, and Mark Paul Richard. "Canadian History in North American Context." In Canadian studies in the new millennium. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008. 37-64.
...nguage, and religion all make up Canada’s human face, but also front how the cultural accommodation will continue with the risk of losing Canada’s main traditions. Faultlines again come into perspective within demographic issues, especially with newcomers/old-timers, aboriginal population expansions, and French/English language. The core/periphery model is also represented. The end of the chapter places a focus on Canada’s economic face as well, dealing with stresses inside the global economy as well as its strong dependency on the U.S markets (Bone, 169) especially with the stimulating global recession. Canada’s economic structure leans on the relative share of activity in the primary (natural resource extraction), secondary (raw material assembly), tertiary (sale/exchange of goods and services), and quaternary (decision-making) sectors of the economy (Bone, 166).
Canada is known by outsiders to be a very peaceful country. But if you ask any Canadian they well tell you that is unfortunately not the case. For there is a large ongoing conflict between Canadians. The conflict is between the French and the English, or more specifically between Quebec and the rest of Canada. As a result of this conflict, along with some wrongdoing and propaganda. Quebec has considered and has gone as far to hold referendums over Separatism (Surette,2014). Separatism is that the province of Quebec separates from the rest of Canada to form its own country. Which would have immense effects on indubitably Quebec but also the rest of Canada (Martin, 2014). This report will focus on the root causes and origin of Quebec Separatism, the current state of Quebec Separatism and finally how we as a society can act towards Quebec Separatism.
The culture of Canada refers to the shared values, attitudes, standards, and beliefs that are a representative of Canada and Canadians. Throughout Canada's history, its culture has been influenced by American culture because of a shared language, proximity, television and migration between the two countries. Over time, Canadian-American relations have helped develop Canada’s identity during the years 1945-1982; thus introducing changing social norms, media and entertainment. In support of this, due to the United States being approximately 9.25 times larger in population and having the dominant cultural and economic influence, it played a vital role in establishing Canada’s identity. With Canada being its neighbour, naturally, the United States would influence their way of life upon Canada.
acquired by Great Britain in the Treaty of Paris of 1763. The mass majority of
government, t. p. (n.d.). Quebec Nationalism - Quebec History. Faculty.marianopolis.edu. Retrieved May 27, 2012, from http://faculty.marianopolis.edu/c.belanger/quebechistory/events/natpart4.htm
“ Canada 's national obsession seems to be its own identity.” For many years Canada has feared the increasing influence of its North American neighbors on its culture - the United States . It has become a matter of growing concern for the people of power and influence in Canada to maintain their separate cultural identity and to promote their own cultural norms. Gaetan Tremblay presents his views on this topic and does this from the perspective of a person living and working in Quebec.
In the FEudal system, social roles were rigid and unchanging. In Canada, you can change your role in society, even if it may be difficult. During the Middle Ages, it was nearly impossible to do so. If you were born as a peasant, that is what you would be until your death. This means that you had no chance to change who you are, while Canada supports change and believes that it is a crucial part of life. THe social roles of the Feudal system also differ from the ones in Canada today. The Feudal system only had a monarch, nobles, knights, clergy, tradesmen, and peasants. Nowadays, we have more people in our government than just a king. There are a variety of different roles in Canada today, so it is easier to find a role that suits the person in that role. Unlike in the Middle Ages where people would be forced into one of very few roles. How the social roles are treated and the social roles themselves are different in Canada and the Feudal