Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social and cultural influences on personal identity
The role of language in cross cultural communication
Multiculturalism and its influence on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social and cultural influences on personal identity
Culture gives each society a form of collective meaning within a variety of social contexts. Culture is described by authors of The Sociology Project as a system of learned behavior that is used to determine individual values through biography, beliefs, and knowledge (Molotch, 2013, p. 74). While integration of cultures has occurred over time, there is always an inferiority that persists and persuades one culture to reject ideas of another culture. Multiculturalism is defined by Dictionary.com as “the preservation of different cultures or cultural identities within a unified society as a state or nation.” In effect this cross-cultural connection seems to be creating a global network of shared culture instead of unity of multiple cultures; this shared culture could ultimately be construed as an Americanized society. The strict definition would ultimately fail and lead right back towards ethnocentrism on a global scale. In order to determine this occurrence, this paper examines the history of culture and language in a context comparable to where the direction of society may lead us back to today. An opposition to the acceptance of multiculturalism, especially since ideas of one true meaning in life would shift and implicate shifting values as well, and lastly how multiculturalism would have to define every way of life, and integration into society is a necessary step to a complete multicultural nation-state almost in comparison with a Utopia.
Before 19th century, taste and class determined culture; it can be argued that they still do. Hierarchical rule was common, giving power to the monarch whose customs were superior to the poor and middle class and emphasized the outcome of a superior culture. Suggesting there ...
... middle of paper ...
...directly to the middle class. This separation is one culturally that a wave of multiculturalism wouldn’t be able to change, the wealthy will always be a separate culture than lower class economy. Only recently have high class culture and middle class culture merged into a mass culture. The U.S. Is a mass consumer of its own materials and widely of foreign materials such as cars or phones that consumers believe are better simply because they're foreign. High culture literature, as another example, has been mass consumed as movies and TV series, effectively merging two cultures into one. But the elite culture still retains its high status via wealth and the ability to live without “living wages.” Taste determines class and society, even food or how we walk is determined by our status, there's always going to be cultural differences, especially between classes.
Cultural relativism was introduced in the U.S. by Frank Boas in 1887 (ibid). This theory postulates that cultures must be understood in terms of the values and ideas of that specific culture; the underlying objective here was to delegitimize notions of ethnocentrism (the belief that one culture may judge another based on their cultural standards) (Miller, 12-3). Though this theory seems to provide a framework to eliminate a discriminatory belief, it would not allow then, for example, people to attack the events that took place in Germany circa 1930s-40s (Miller, 23). Critical cultural relativism avoids this ‘homogenizing trap’
Culture often means an appreciation of the finer things in life; however, culture brings members of a society together. We have a sense of belonging because we share similar beliefs, values, and attitudes about what’s right and wrong. As a result, culture changes as people adapt to their surroundings. According to Bishop Donald, “let it begin with me and my children and grandchildren” (211). Among other things, culture influences what you eat; how you were raised and will raise your own children? If, when, and whom you will marry; how you make and spend money. Truth is culture is adaptive and always changing over time because
In the article, “Multiculturalism: Battleground or Meeting Ground,” Takaki starts out addressing the difference in philosophy between him and Woodward when it comes to cultural diversity. Woodward strongly disagrees with Takaki when it comes to the topic of cultural diversity. They both are seeing issue threw two difference lens. Woodward attacked Takaki on the issue when Woodward reviewed Takaki’s “Iron Cages: Rave and Culture in Nineteeth-Century America” book in the “New York Review of Books,” saying it was too narrow in focus (Takaki, n.d). Woodward rebuttal was that the book did not contain any balance, and should have touched on “national issues” to have that balance and not just the American south. Woodward even said that Takaki was
Integration of culture within the United States has become a difficult task for government officials who follows the Multiculturalist approach. Culture is the diversification of one’s being as regards to their immutable traits being learnt from the time of their births. Linda Chaves’s essay “Demystifying Multiculturalism” points out that the accommodation of equal rights between whites and non-whites is not a problem it is education. However, multiculturalist believes that non-whites are becoming a threat to their population and will eventually change the American culture. The demographic tidal wave illusion from the business sectors is merely an exaggeration as they believe that non-white’s will eventually whip out United States white’s population. Chavez gives attention to the fact that ‘judgment should not be based on skin color but by content of one’s character’ (6). Furthermore, she doesn’t only criticize the Multiculturalist techniques but emphasizes through reasoning why the Multiculturalist approach would imposed negative attitude towards the non-whites in the United States. This will not only create negativity but a racial chaos between whites and non-whites living in the United States.
This sociological study will define the definition of “multiculturalism” in terms of the Americanized version of “culture” put forth by Ben Agger. Agger’s perception of multiculturalism is part of the French system of post modernism, which developed in the dynamic philosophies of Lyotard, Foucault, Derrida, and Baudrillard. In this manner, Agger, defines the underlying postmodernism of French philosophy to be a definition of an Americanized ideology that sought to expand the study of class, race, and gender. More so, Derrida (1970) defines the diversity of social meaning in society, which goes beyond the generalization of Marxism and positivistic thought: “The total body of myth belonging to a given community is comparable to its speech” (p.6 of file--no page numbers shown). This definition provides an acute and multivariate understanding of the dynamics of Agger’s version of multiculturalism in terms of the postmodern French movements of the mid-20th century:
The multiculturalism idea is about how to respond towards challenges that are associated with religious and cultural diversity. The term is used as a descriptive term that characterizes the diversity facts in the society. The proponent of multiculturalism rejects the melting point idea though the term has encompasses a variety of claims. The melting point idea is that members of the minority group maintain a distinct collection of practices and identities.in general multiculturalism means the practices and policies that respond and recognizes ethnic diversity (Roach et al, 2005 pg. 37). The first black president elected in us Barack Obama describes the different points of view regarding multicultural societies. Though each Atlantic side are
Experiencing a society of multi-cultures is beneficial through a variety of concepts to epitomize each individual identity. A person may vary in the degree to which he or she identifies with, morals, or...
Since 1982 and the creation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canada has asserted itself in the promotion of multiculturalism and equality of all citizens. Canada is a democratic society which stands to address the needs and desires of individuals in a fair and open approach. In addressing multiculturalism, understanding how some specific groups may be at a significant disadvantage based on their perception in society. It is argued that the ideals and laws incorporated in the Islamic religion and culture make it challenging for individuals to successfully immigrate and adapt into a western democratic society. There are significant challenges in all aspects of their lives, that make them find difficulty in adopting a new way of living while still adhering to their faith and culture. Post September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks have left Canadian immigrants and citizens who are of the Islamic religion and culture, the most scrutinized members in a country that promotes multiculturalism. This is due to negative media connotations, the failure of the government perpetuating fear and allowing concepts like Islamophobia to be produced among citizens.
Students attending American schools are taught clearly about the United States’ image as a melting pot; however, there is evidence to support that, while there is not an official federal stance on the matter (Sengupta), the amount of assimilation required to be legitimately considered a “melting pot” is not being reached. Although similar, there is often confusion about the differences between “multicultural” and “assimilated” communities. By definition, assimilation is the complete “merging of cultural traits from previously distinct culture groups” (Dictionary), while multiculturalism is delineated as the “preservation of different cultures or cultural identities within a unified society, as a state or nation” (Dictionary). Early to mid-1900’s America entertained the idea of a melting pot, where people from all parts of the world would join together and assimilate. It seems, however, that the growing trend has been to treat America as more of a “salad bowl” (Porter), in that people are joining together but instead of merging as one unit, are maintaining a majority, if not all, of their primary culture with little attempt to adapt. This underachievement has left America to unintentionally become a multicultural society. The clear differentiation between expectation and reality brings vast amounts of controversy among the nation’s people.
Living in a multicultural society can be seen as a blissful experience. Society has the chance to expose themselves and enjoy human richness culturally. However, people are not taking advantage of that, instead, making unnecessary judgments based on the color of their skin. This mental sickness has caused the widespread of racism around the world. As for today, many people believe that racism has been eradicated throughout every corners of the world. In the American society, they believe in the virtue and purity in its country. Americans like to believe that racism is a thing in the past, and they are the leading example for the world. For instance, America has an African-American president, interracial marriage is legal, and living life in the American dreams—the notion that anyone could achieve
In his article “The Failure of Multiculturalism”, Kenan Malik uses the diverse European culture to study and explain the irony of multiculturalism. He defines multiculturalism as “the embrace of an inclusive, diverse society” (Malik 21). Integration between cultures is practically inevitable, but several nations view this as a threat towards upholding their culture. Due to this, many countries have made attempts at properly integrating new people and ideas while trying to prevent the degradation of their own. This can result in unjust regulations and the reverse effect of an intended multicultural society.
Globalization is becoming one of the most controversial topics in today’s world. We see people arguing over the loss of a nation’s cultural identity, the terror of westernization, and the reign of cultural imperialism. Through topics such as these we explore the possibilities or the existence of hybridization of cultures and values, and what some feel is the exploitation of their heritage. One important aspect that is not explored is that such influences can also be more than just a burden and an overstepping of bounds. These factors can create an educational environment as well as a reaffirmation of one’s own culture.
Around the globe all individuals participate in their own cultural practices and traditions. Multiculturalism is an extremely controversial issue that arises from different views and opinions, and is currently under attack by various leaders in our world today. Since the late 1960s and 1970s multiculturalism has been supported, denied, and continuously discussed because of its strong emphasis on cultural diversity and equal opportunities. Multiculturalism is the co-existence of all diverse cultures that include religious, racial, or cultural groups and is expressed in customary traditions, values, behaviors, and ways of thinking. Multiculturalism is also relevant in society through different government policies that enable individuals to have
This research project is centered upon the idea that individuals, specifically those in second and third world countries, need to protect their cultural identity by combating the imperialism of western, dominant cultures. According to research, some reasons behind this imperialism are war, totalitarianism, tourism, the need to fit in, peer pressure, immigration, and globalization. These reasons are prevalent in today’s society and can be seen worldwide. Some solutions to the problem that I found in my research are to create a multicultural society that embraces diversity, encouraging a multilingual society along with preserving dying languages, and protecting smaller villages and towns from tourism, industrialization, and globalization. While
In my readings, I have agreed with the term for culture in the book?? Cultural Diversity?? written by Jerry V. Filled. It states that "One 's culture becomes one?s paradigm, defining what is real and what is right.? in other words culture is taught to children by family it is a variety of learned behaviors, beliefs, values, traditions etc. All of which help shape a person and is a huge portion of who they are.