Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on slave rebellion
History of slave rebellion essay
Slavery and oppression
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on slave rebellion
The Scorpions Sting is a very interesting book written by James Oakes. The book is outlined with four chapters. Chapters one through three explain the Republicans anti slavery policy, which significantly ties directly in with the metaphor and name of the book The Scorpions Sting. The Republicans believe that slavery could easily be done away with without any implications (War and Federal Government getting involved) and their way of doing this way by withdrawing federal support for slavery as a whole. To implement this idea the Republican Party would: stop promoting the spread of slavery, stop allowing it to show up in Washington D.C. and in U.S. military places, stop helping slave owners with the recapture of run-aways, and they also believed that they could try and surround slave states with free …show more content…
states.
They called it “ a cordon of fire,” then they figured “slavery, like a scorpion, would sting itself to death”(pg. 20). They used state-by-state emancipation, starting with the Border States, and then working their way down. Once the war started, they applied their scorpion sting strategy once again through military emancipation, this is the forth chapter. This chapter amalgamates three different things: arming slaves, freeing slaves, and ending slavery. The U.S. Military emancipation was the permanent end to the Institution of slavery. After all was said and done it seemed like a good idea, a scorpion can kill itself with the small amount of venom it had, but this was a beast of a problem, like a whale sized problem compared to a scorpion sized problem. War really was the only outcome, I mean slavery was a huge problem, but that’s all the South had really ever known. Without it, the south would struggle to survive, because that’s how they thrived, through farming, sadly it had become a way of life in the South, in a dark part of history for the United
States. It seems as though Oakes is trying to fill in a gap of history. This gap resides between the period of abolitionism and anti slavery government. The book seems to favor a republican party committed to the eradication of slavery in the United States of America through policy of ending support for the institution, a policy that is insufficient and almost makes it seem like they weren’t really sincere with its establishment. Oakes takes us back, making us take a long hard look at the Republican’s policy to bring a halt to slavery in the U.S. , while many see their policy as underachieved, this book adheres the reader to take the Republican Party’s policy serious. Oakes’s knows that policy would not be enough to destroy slavery, nothing that big can be eradicated through policy and law. He wants us to think about what exactly was going on in the minds of the party and that in all efforts they were trying to avoid was at all cost. In Conclusion, The Scorpions sting really clears up the smoke around the Republicans policy at the time, there was little about the war, but I feel that was Oakes biggest goal. Oakes used the book to take a look inside the heads and hearts of the Republican Party and its policies through the abolition of slavery. Oakes concludes that things went far from going as planned, but impedes that there was no easy way to abolish slavery.
In Apostles of Disunion, Dew presents compelling documentation that the issue of slavery was indeed the ultimate cause for the Civil War. This book provided a great deal of insight as to why the South feared the abolition of slavery as they did. In reading the letters and speeches of the secession commissioners, it was clear that each of them were making passionate pleas to all of the slave states in an effort to put a stop to the North’s, and specifically Lincoln’s, push for the abolishment of slavery. There should be no question that slavery had everything to do with being the cause for the Civil War. In the words of Dew, “To put it quite simply, slavery and race were absolutely critical elements in the coming of the war” (81). This was an excellent book, easy to read, and very enlightening.
As the Civil War came underway the South’s military, smaller than the North’s, would take heavy blows from the decisions of the Confederacy. First of all they knew that if all their plantation owners fought in the war, their crops would possibly die out or not produce as much. To combat this problem they decided in the Conscription law that if someone had twenty or more slaves, they didn’t have to fight in the war. This caused the price of slaves to increase and caused crops from small slave holding plantations and yeoman farmers to do terrible. Since most Southerners fell into that category, the South would really feel the damage. Also the Impressment Act would take food from farmers to help feed the armies. This would demoralize the small Southern farmers and cause desertions, poor riots and ultimately put a negative face on the new confederacy. These internal divisions weren’t only a Southern problem, in fact the North had bitter divisions over conscription, taxes, suspension of habeas corpus, martial law and emancipation. “If anything, the opposition was more powerful and effective in the North than in the South.” (Why Did the Confederacy Lose?, pg 120) However the powerful opposition in the North w...
South Carolina was one of the only states in which the black slaves and abolitionists outnumbered their oppressors. Denmark Vesey’s slave revolt consisted of over nine-thousand armed slaves, free blacks, and abolitionists, that would have absolutely devastated society in South Carolina for slave owners, and could have quite possibly been a major step towards the abolishment of slavery in the United states. Robertson succeeded in describing the harsh conditions of slaves in pre-civil war Charleston, South Carolina. This book also helped me to understand the distinctions between the different groups. These groups including the black slaves, free blacks, extreme abolitionists, and the pro-slavery communities.
The Civil War marked a defining moment in United States history. Long simmering sectional tensions reached critical when eleven slaveholding states seceded from the Union and formed the Confederate States of America. Political disagreement gave way to war as the Confederates insisted they had the right to leave the Union, while the loyal states refused to allow them to go. Four years of fighting claimed almost 1.5 million casualties, resulting in a Union victory. Even though the North won the war, they did a horrible job in trying to win the peace, or in other words, the Reconstruction era. Rather than eliminating slavery in the South, the Southerners had a new form of slavery, which was run by a new set of codes called "Black Codes”. With the help of President Johnson, the South continued their plantations, in essence becoming exactly what they were before the war. Overall, the South won Reconstruction because in the end they got slavery (without the name), they got an easy pass back into the Union, and things reverted back to the way they had been prior the war.
The existence of slavery was the central element of the conflict of the north and south. Other problems existed that led to this succession but none were as big as the slavery issue. The only way to avoid the war was to abolish slavery, but this was not able to be done because slavery is what kept the south running. When the south seceded it was said by Abraham Lincoln that “ a house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free.” Because slavery formed two opposing societies and slavery could never be abolished, the civil war was inevitable. These were all the reasons why the south seceded from the union, this succession was eminent and there was no plausible way to avoid it.
The people of the North and South each believed fiercely in their cause, one for a free people the other for life servitude. Neither group, based on the documents presented were willing to budge regarding their beliefs. They North wanted to abolish slavery completely and the South could not understand why they had to give up their way of life because the concept was so ingrained in them as a people. The two completely different ideals could not co-exist peacefully and therefore the eventual climax of this issue, the war, was an inevitable
...ong the various sections of the United States increased. The country, similarly to the democratic party, shattered along sectional lines due to the individual interests of the sections. The south, above all, was bonded in an effort to preserve and spread slavery through the usage of popular sovereignty. New England was bonded together with the conviction that slavery was immoral and that the spread of slavery should be hindered. The west was bonded together over a mutual appreciation of democratic principles such as popular sovereignty as well as an understanding that slavery was undesirable within their own states because it would add additional competition. As the nation turned upon itself there was no other alternative but war which would ultimately pit one section of the nation against the other in a battle of slavery, moral conviction, and personal liberties.
The majority of speculations regarding the causes of the American Civil War are in some relation to slavery. While slavery was a factor in the disagreements that led to the Civil War, it was not the solitary or primary cause. There were three other, larger causes that contributed more directly to the beginning of the secession of the southern states and, eventually, the start of the war. Those three causes included economic and social divergence amongst the North and South, state versus national rights, and the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Dred Scott case. Each of these causes involved slavery in some way, but were not exclusively based upon slavery.
But in reality that was just an excuse to real cause, the abolishment of slavery. The southern states didn’t want to have their slaves taken away and Lincoln told them that they could retain their slaves, if they were to join back into the Union. Slavery was the fundamental for the Civil War, it made soldiers become “hard,” numb, and “calloused” or indifferent to others deaths in prospect of their own death. Slavery was mostly killing, which was the essence of the
However, the South painted him as a South-hating abolitionist who vowed to entirely destroy slavery. Even though after Lincoln won the election he assured the South no end to slavery, the Civil War was initiated at the Battle of Fort Sumpter. Lincoln and his staff maintained that the purpose of the war was to save the Union. This reasoning was given to retain the support of the border slave states and prevent Democrats from being alienated. However, pressures of the war prompted Lincoln to change his mind. Many Republicans pressured Lincoln to free the slaves as they no longer had an obligation to respect the Southern peculiar institution. They also pointed out slavery was what caused the war and would have a foreign policy advantage: repelling Britain from recognizing the Confederacy’s sovereignty. Also during this time, the Union was growing weary in response to a number of military failures and the enlistments were down; freeing that slaves would mean the Union recruit free blacks into its armed forces. Finally, it freed millions of innocent blacks from their shackles, which represented the American ideal of opportunity and equality. Despite all the pressure, Lincoln resisted. However developed a compromise: a gradual emancipation plan and colonization program. It was aimed at keeping Britain neutral, freeing the slaves, weakening the
In the 1800s, Florida was giving the southerners a hard time in that runaway slaves would hide there. In addition, a group of Native American clashed with the American settlers across the borders of Georgia. In addition, there was great tension between the North, the South, and the West regarding slavery. These regions were arguing on whether slavery should be outlawed. Because cotton was a skyrocketing industry, the south needed the slaves to do the tiresome and dreadful field work of separating the cotton from its pod for later manufacturing, therefore, the southerners, unlike the northern region, were against the outlawing of slavery. Issues regarding this topic were escalating, this is when the Missouri Compromise had risen. This act was an attempt to de-escalate the conflict between the regions and bring peace to the country, it passed a law that “the further introduction of slavery or involuntary servitude be prohibited...and that all children of slaves, born within the said state, after the admission thereof into the Union, shall be free but may be held to service until the age of twenty-five years." (Edward Channing. 360), this act, however, was only a temporary
“War is at best barbarism….Its glory is all moonshine….War is hell. (Union General William Tecumseh Sherman) A wise quote by an even wiser man, The Civil War was agreed a “hell”. For four years (1862-1865) a war was fought between both Northern Union states and Southern Confederate states over the matter of slavery. During this time period many changes were happening in the United States; the election of an anti-slavery president, Southern states trying to secede to become their own independent country. These factors and many more including slavery were the main causes of The Civil War. To begin slavery was the main income for southern states.
After thoroughly assessing past readings and additional research on the Civil War between the North and South, it was quite apparent that the war was inevitable. Opposed views on this would have probably argued that slavery was the only reason for the Civil War. Therefore suggesting it could have been avoided if a resolution was reached on the issue of slavery. Although there is accuracy in stating slavery led to the war, it wasn’t the only factor. Along with slavery, political issues with territorial expansion, there were also economic and social differences between North and South. These differences, being more than just one or two, gradually led to a war that was bound to happened one way or another.
From the inauguration of Lincoln and the secession of eleven states to the Union to the first exchange of fires at Fort Sumter, the inevitable Civil War began. Ever since America began to expand as an independent country, sectionalism (where the North wanted the abolition of slavery while the South wanted slavery) and growing conflicts between the north and south has always closely revolved around the issue of slavery. This long due problem finally blows up in the “United” States of America’s face as the Civil War. Conflicts relating to African Americans caused the war, changed the course and complications of the war, and shaped the war results in both informal and formal ways.
...ding the Jacksonian Democrats. Even government authorized establishments lent a hand in the continuation of slavery, such as the Post Office. It honored a request from the South Carolina legislature in 1835 to prevent the transmission of anti-slavery propaganda into the state. The Jacksonian Democrats, in attempts to guard the Constitution, had missed some points, such as "all men are created equal."