Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Roles of women in combat civil war
Mental and physical consequences of war for soldiers
Essays on women and war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Roles of women in combat civil war
The Work of Death seemed inevitable to soldiers who embarked on the journey known as the Civil War. Throughout the Civil War, human beings learned how to prepare for death, imagine it, risk it, endure it, and seek to understand it. All the soldiers needed to be willing to die and needed to turn to the resources of their culture, codes of masculinity, patriotism, and religion to prepare themselves for the war ahead of them. Death individually touched soldiers with it’s presence and the fear of it, as death touched the soldiers it gave them a sense of who they really are and how they could change on their death bed.
Although there was quite a bit of death, the whole motive of the book was to inform people how the soldiers coped with death,
…show more content…
killing, burying friends and family, and realizing their understanding of it. Faust included the steps of the techniques of dealing with death; he made them the chapter titles, sort of ironic if you think about it. He also included the blacks reason for fighting in the Civil War. Faust described the horrible events that happened to the blacks to a point that one could imagine standing there enduring it along side them. He includes the reason for vengeance against the South; the way death is bringing different religions together for soldiers to have a “good death,” and most importantly the fundamental purpose of the War. In the textbook America, the South argued that the fundamental purpose of the War was not about slavery but about the South’s effort to defend the state’s rights.
But in reality that was just an excuse to real cause, the abolishment of slavery. The southern states didn’t want to have their slaves taken away and Lincoln told them that they could retain their slaves, if they were to join back into the Union. Slavery was the fundamental for the Civil War, it made soldiers become “hard,” numb, and “calloused” or indifferent to others deaths in prospect of their own death. Slavery was mostly killing, which was the essence of the …show more content…
War. From reading This Republic of Suffering: Death and the Civil War and the textbook America, I gathered that This Republic of Suffering: Death and the Civil War go more into the blacks reasons for fighting in the War. In America, it only tells one that they passed the Militia Act to allow freed slaves as soldiers or laborers, the textbook doesn’t actually go into depth about the freed blacks and the war. Not only were the slaves fighting for their freedom but they were fighting for a claim to their humanity, which to many seemed that it was inseparable from avenging the slave system for the wrongs it did, that rendered the slaves as property rather than men. It also states that the deaths of the blacks promised political as well as spiritual redemption; black soldiers sought out to win a place in politics, as citizens and as men, through the willingness to give up their lives. This Republic of Suffering also tells one deeply about the way bodies were handled after death. Many of the soldiers were in unnamed graves because the hospitals failed to keep a careful record of the dead. The only way they knew where soldiers were buried was because of makeshift grave markers made of hardtack, pieces of board from ammunition boxes, and crossed fence rails. Whereas the textbook had no knowledge of that at all. It is said that the burying the dead during the Civil War seemed as an act of improvisation, and many were left laying in the field dead or dying for hours or even days. Because of dead being left in the fields death left a stench so morbid that people had to carry a bottle of pennyroyal or peppermint oil to counteract the smell. As the argument of This Republic of Suffering, continued the soldiers, as most believed that they were destined to die on the battlefield came to terms with it. Everyone in the Civil War was willing to die for his country. The soldiers heavily relied on their religious backgrounds to make sure that they died a “good death.” All of the religions shared beliefs about life’s meaning and life’s appropriate ending. The soldiers often gathered together for a sermon no matter their religion because they shared the same belief when dying. While many of the soldiers were on their death bed, they wrote letters to their loved ones back home describing the war and telling them that they were dying and would be dead soon. So, Faust argued that death would be unavoidable and he was correct and soldiers took that into consideration and still fought for the thing that they thought was right. Faust said that the distinction between men and animals threatened to disappear. Yes, the Civil War was a major confrontation in America but it was basically inevitable in the universe. In the Civil War there is bound to be death and This Republic of Suffering perfectly described it in full detail with experiences from actual soldiers incorporated in the story. This Republic of Suffering, it had the strength of pathos following it. Faust used examples from actual soldiers, nurses, and civilians during the war to make the reader almost cry while reading. With the strength of pathos, it is possible that Faust had used too much of it. He tended to get off topic when trying to describe an event or he would use too many quoting from sources. He would drift into what someone thought, such as G. R. Lee describing the procedure in his unit for burying the fallen soldiers but after that the author didn’t make much commentary, so it was hard to go on the topic, instead he went into another example and didn’t further explain that. People who would like this selection of reading would probably have to be Civil War enthusiasts or people crazy about death. Some one would really have to be interested in death or the Civil War to be able to read it unless its for a grade and enthusiasts are people who like anything Civil War almost like they are obsessed with it. Civil War enthusiasts and Death enthusiasts would most likely read This Republic of Suffering because Faust went into excellent detail with everything that happened and his examples. In conclusion, the book This Republic of Suffering: Death and the Civil War shared the gruesome details of death, where soldiers had to embrace death, risk their life for it, and rely on their religion to help them through the hard time known as the Civil War.
Author Drew Faust hit key points on his argument about death all throughout the book and completed it outstandingly. He went into depth of how the dead were handled and how nurses wrote the families by using pieces from the letters. In any way a person can try to describe a war, no one can make it a good thing even though the union soldiers were fighting for a good thing because it is and will always be known as the most bloodiest war in American
History.
The war had a lot of emotional toll on people it destroyed their personal identity, their moral/humanity, the passion to live was lost and the PDS they will suffer post war, resulting in the soldiers to understand what war is really about and what is covered up. There are scenes that support the thesis about the war like "As for the rest, they are now just names without faces or faces without names." Chapter 2, p. 27 which show how the soldiers have emotional detached themselves from life. Also, when the novel says “I saw their living mouths moving in conversation and their dead mouths grinning the taut-drawn grins of corpses. Their living eyes I saw, and their dead eyes still-staring. Had it not been for the fear that I was going crazy, I would have found it an interesting experience, a trip such as no drug could possibly produce. Asleep and dreaming, I saw dead men living; awake, I saw living men dead.” Which to me again shows how the soldiers are change throughout the war losing the moral and humanity. Lastly what he says “ I’m not scared of death anymore and don 't care whether I live of die” is the point where I notice Phillips change in
The American Civil War is one of the biggest turning points in American history. It marks a point of major separation in beliefs from the North and the South and yet somehow ends in a major unification that is now called the United States of America. It still to date remains the bloodiest war in American History. The book “This Republic of Suffering, death and the American Civil War” by Drew Gilpin Faust better explains the change in thought from the American people that developed from the unexpected mass loss in soldiers that devastated the American people. Throughout this review the reader will better understand the methods and theory of this book, the sources used, the main argument of the book, the major supporting arguments, and what the
As with any genre, all novels termed ‘war stories’ share certain elements in common. The place and time settings of the novels, obviously, take in at least some aspect of at least one war or conflict. The characters tend to either be soldiers or are at least immediately affected by the military. An ever present sense of doom with punctuated moments of peace is almost a standard of the war novel. Beyond the basic similarities, however, each of these battle books stands apart as an individual. Charles Yale Harrison’s World War I novel, Generals Die in Bed is, in essence, quite different than Colin McDougall’s Execution. Coming years earlier, Generals can almost be seen to hold the wisdom one would expect see in an older sibling, while Execution suffers the growing pains that the younger child inevitably feels.
In Apostles of Disunion, Dew presents compelling documentation that the issue of slavery was indeed the ultimate cause for the Civil War. This book provided a great deal of insight as to why the South feared the abolition of slavery as they did. In reading the letters and speeches of the secession commissioners, it was clear that each of them were making passionate pleas to all of the slave states in an effort to put a stop to the North’s, and specifically Lincoln’s, push for the abolishment of slavery. There should be no question that slavery had everything to do with being the cause for the Civil War. In the words of Dew, “To put it quite simply, slavery and race were absolutely critical elements in the coming of the war” (81). This was an excellent book, easy to read, and very enlightening.
Despite these minor flaws, the book has many positive aspects to it. Probably most important, the book gives the reader an up close and personal account to the war. Each battle comes alive for the reader as a veteran vividly describes what he experienced. For example Vincent Walsh describes his first encounter with a violent death as follows: “we had occasion to pick up a dead pilot. They fingerprinted him and then he was wrapped in a piece of canvas and he went into a meat box” (Tomedi, 155). Lines such as this, puts a personality behind the speaker and makes it more personal. Also, the stories in the book present the same situations as other oral history novels. A good example of this is when Robert Roy claims “…I could see a line of tanks coming down the road, which we never expected…I could see the rounds explode against the tank, but the tank just kept going” (Tomedi, 10-11).
"War is hell . . . war is mystery terror and adventure and courage and discovery and despair and . . . war is nasty (80)." When it all happened it was not like "a movie you aren't a hero and all you can do is whimper and wait (211)." O'Brien and the rest of the solders were just ordinary people thrust into extraordinary situations. They needed to tell blatant lies" to "bring the body and soul back together (239)." They needed to eliminate the reality of death. As ordinary people they were not capable of dealing with the engulfing realities of death and war therefore they needed to create coping skills. O'Brien approaches the loss of his childhood friend, Linda, in the same way he approaches the loss of his comrades in the war as this is the only way he knows how to deal with death. A skill he learned, and needed, in the Vietnam War.
The poet Wilfred Owen was one of many poets who were against war. He reflected this idea of anti-war in his poems, one of his poems called “Anthem for Doomed Youth”, mirrors most aspects of war all put together in this short still deep poem. An example of that would be when the speaker stated,” What passing-bells for these who die as cattle?”(1) The speaker asks is there any sound that marks our soldier’s death other than the sounds of church bell’s which are mostly rung to represent somebody’s absence? Clearly, the speaker sets anger as the tone of the poem through this question to show that soldier’s death is unremarkable.. The speaker compares the soldiers to a “cattle” which illustrates that soldiers are treated more like animals with no feelings and also shows how they are killed indiscriminately in war. Finally the line ironically contains an iambic pentameter which is a natural rhythm for such dark, grim, dull subject. The two novels, The Red Badge of Courage by Stephen Crane, and All Quiet on The Western Front by Erich Maria Remarque, both present a similar idea of how soldiers are killed out there in the front comprehensively and the dehumanization of war towards its soldiers. The first novel is set during the Civil War, and it focuses on the psychological aspects of one soldier named Henry Fleming and how his naive thoughts about war constantly change through the course of the novel. The second novel presents the life of a soldier named Paul Baumer and his friends who were faced with the terribleness of war and how severely it affected their lives. The Red badge of Courage and All Quiet on The Western Front are similar in the way of how the main characters develop through the novel to change from naïve and innocent men ...
The three incredible works of literature by Owen, OBrien, and Sassoon give a true sense of what fighting for ones country was really like. The battles, soldiers, and wars that most of the public see is glorified tremendously through movies and books mainly. These writers wanted a change and they went about this by giving the true and honest facts of what happened. War should be thought of as a tough obstacle that no one should ever have to go through, a sad occurrence, or a horrible burden, but not as a glorious victory. In order to reach that victory, the road is anything but sweet.
In conclusion the election of Lincoln as president in 1860 caused a civil war because it was falsely perceived by the south that Lincoln would threaten the state’s constitutional right to slavery. This false idea was due to a rift between the northern and southern states in both an economic and ideological manner. That is the north was based on industry and generally was opposed to slavery. But the South was an agricultural society which ran on slavery and, due to Nat Turner’s Insurrection and John Brown’s stand at Harper’s Ferry, was fearful of the north’s involvement in the governing of states as well as being opposed to this on the basis of state’s rights. The election of Lincoln caused the south to succeed from the union causing civil war.
This reader’s rating for this book is average. It is a very well written book but it may not appeal to some people. If the reader was familiar with the war then this would be a wonderful book to read. This reader thought it was interesting but not as enthralling as it should be. The book was mainly made out of quotes or dialogue from the men in the war. This was a very different way of writing but it was interesting. Many of the veterans had interesting stories to tell and how it felt like to be in the war. Overall it was a book to consider if you’re into war stories.
After an event of large magnitude, it still began to take its toll on the protagonist as they often “carried all the emotional baggage of men who might die” during the war (O’Brien 1187). The travesties that occurred with the brutality of war did not subside and began to affect those involved in a deeply emotional way. The multitude of disastrous happenings influenced the narrator to develop a psychological handicap to death by being “afraid of dying” although being “even more afraid to show it” (O’Brien 1187). The burden caused by the war creates fear inside the protagonist’s mind, yet if he were to display his sense of distress it would cause a deeper fear for those around him, thus making the thought of exposing the fear even more frightening. The emotional battle taking place in the psyche of the narrator is directly repressed by the war.
One of the worst things about war is the severity of carnage that it bestows upon mankind. Men are killed by the millions in the worst ways imaginable. Bodies are blown apart, limbs are cracked and torn and flesh is melted away from the bone. Dying eyes watch as internal organs are spilled of empty cavities, naked torso are hung in trees and men are forced to run on stumps when their feet are blown off. Along with the horrific deaths that accompany war, the injuries often outnumber dead men. As Paul Baumer witnessed in the hospital, the injuries were terrifying and often led to death. His turmoil is expressed in the lines, “Day after day goes by with pain and fear, groans and death gurgles. Even the death room I no use anymore; it is too small.” The men who make it through the war take with them mental and physical scarification from their experiences.
Tim O’Brien’s use of torment and uncertainty does engage me as a reader. The torment was such an awful experience. The soldiers survived off of the substance of weed and intoxicating liquid called beer. They deadened their senses doing drugs so they would not feel the overwhelming fear. The descriptions are engaging and well thought out. The descriptions used are severely depressing, I came to realize that although they had a war they were fighting in, they lost friends, they lost limbs, and they went beyond the call of war and kill innocent babies. Even in killing innocent babies and young children you cannot fully blame them for their actions as they were acting out of complete loss of security, fearing every step they took wondering when they would take their last step on Earth. Many times the soldiers were out in unknown territory with people shouting at them in a language they did not understand which caused a defensive reaction to take over the body of the soldiers. I found that within this paper the argument presented was that soldiers go to war to protect the country they love
First, the book tells about the experiences of the soldiers at the front, during many different battles and also while
All Quiet On the Western Front was a very emotional book, when they are there at the western front there are a lot of fatalities for people who are not paying attention.. On the frontlines you can never let your guard down. Some of the new recruits that are put with them don't know anything. Most of them are so scared they let fear over take them then they get killed in action. Even for