The Saints And The Roughnecks Summary

424 Words1 Page

After reading the article “The Saints and the Roughnecks” by William J. Chambliss it was surprising to me how two groups of kids are treated drastically differently yet appear to make the same amount of mischief. Though I can see how this happened. By this I mean the Saints were able to manipulate people because when the public is asked about their view on the Saints they said they were, “well dressed, well mannered, and had nice cars (Chambliss 3).” While when asked the public was asked to give their opinion on the Roughnecks the answer was the opposite of the saints. As I was reading the article I could easily tell that with the Saints advantages they are able to get away with most of the pranks. For examples, in the article it says, “The Saints had access to automobiles and …show more content…

I didn’t dislike article but the part that really stood out to was near the end when talked about how most of the Saints graduate while the Roughnecks only two of them graduated. This made me wonder if the groups were switched would the members of the Roughnecks actually go to college and if the Saints were the ones percieve poorly by the community would they have even gone to college. This article relates to sociology because it deals with differential justice which is the difference in the way social control is exercised over different groups (Schaefer 171). In this case, it's the Saints and the Roughnecks since the Saints are perceived as the good group while Roughnecks have a bad reputation but still get into the same amount of mischief. Another is conformity which is going along with peers--individuals of our own status who have no special right to direct our behavior (Schaefer 161). This is shown throughout the article because they believe the Saints would be the ones who become successful while the Roughnecks are pretty much be the

Open Document