Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Exploring genre in film
Analysis of movie genres
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Exploring genre in film
The Royal Tenenbaums was released back in 2001 and is directed by Wes Anderson. Since the films release it has become The film stars an ensemble cast with Gene Hackman, Anjelica Huston, Gwyneth Paltrow, Ben Stiller, and Owen Wilson (who also served as co-writer). With a film that has so many characters none of them really feel underdeveloped. Thanks to the great editing in the film, nothing is left unknown to the audience. The film uses cutaways and flashbacks much to its advantage. From all of the Wes Anderson films that I have seen I think this one has to be my favorite. I don’t think that statement means all that much though because I find all his films quite similar. The only thing that I could think of that the audience would need to know …show more content…
All of our main characters backstories are fleshed out and explained clearly to the audience within just six minutes. This film explains more in six than some films do in their whole runtime. Wes Anderson wasn’t as much of a household name as he is now back in 2001. When Anderson releases a film now audiences usually now what to expect since he has a very distinct style. Anderson had only one feature film before The Royal Tenenbaums was released, and that film had not been as marketed as much as TRT. Even though the only marketing TRT had really had was posters, television advertisements and a few lesser known talk show …show more content…
Good thing Hackman did take the role, because he ended up winning a Golden Globe for his performance. The film having as much star power as it did probably swayed more average moviegoers into seeing it. A typical movie going audience reacts differently to a film depending on a number of different factors. These factors can include the type of film, the nature of the viewer, level of identification, ideological perspective and aesthetic considerations. One of the most important ones in relation to TRT would probably be the type of film. What does TRT sell itself as? At face value a typical movie-goer would probably say that TRT is a comedy because it’s funny, they wouldn't be wrong but their missing the point. TRT is a blend of comedy with a dash of drama. Because the audience is aware of the fact that Royal is not actually dying the dynamic between him in the family is played off as drama since the audience knows he is not telling the truth. The drama in the film mostly derives from one scene, that scene being Richie’s (Luke Wilson) suicide attempt. This scene kinda comes so out of left field so I can understand why a typical movie going audience would be shocked by that scene. “--Richie becomes more difficult to view as Richie given the dramatic change” (Gooch, Joshua. “Making a Go of It: Paternity and Prohibition in
One of the main products of this movie that popped out to me was the stars. They all seemed to be great actors even though I only knew one of them. For example, I thought that Ian Michael Smith did a great job portraying Simon Birch. He made the movie cute and funny all at once. I also thought that Joseph Mazello did a great job portraying relatable feelings in the movie. You could tell by his facial expressions what his mood was. All the actors did a great job and I can’t pinpoint one of them who did worse than the
Hitchcock has characteristics as an auteur that is apparent in most of his films, as well as this one.
Alfred Hitchcock’s 1954 film Rear Window is truly a masterpiece, as it uses fascinating cinematic elements to carry the story and also convey the meaning of voyeurism. Throughout the film we are in one room, yet that does not limit the story. This causes the viewer to feel trapped, similar to the main character, while also adding suspense to the detective story. The opening scene itself, draws the viewer in. In just five minutes and 27 shots, the viewer is given an introduction to the main character, his lifestyle, his condition, and his neighborhood. The lighting, the costumes, and the set are all presented in a way to catch the viewers eye, compelling them to crave more. Combining vivid lighting, edgy cinematography, and unique set design, Rear Window, proves why Hitchcock is still remembered as one of the greatest and most influential directors of all time.
...the predominant theme of disorientation and lack of understanding throughout the film. The audience is never clear of if the scene happening is authentic or if there is a false reality.
In the movie, the three main types of comedy I recognized were farce, parody, and satire. Farce is comedy designed to provoke the audience into simple, hearty laughter and often uses highly exaggerated or caricatured character types and puts them into improbable and ludicrous situations. It also makes use of broad verbal humor and physical horseplay. Some examples of farce in the movie are:
Alfred Hitchcock’s unique sense of filmmaking and directing has allowed him to become a very famous and well known film maker of his time. He uses similar recurring themes, elements, and techniques in many of his films to engage the viewers in more than just the film, but the meaning and focus behind the story.
In one particular scene, director was truly a great one, featuring special focus on his dad life and the Colorado River. It was so cool to highlights of the movie by one of his favorite poem written by his dad when he was born, the Important Place. Also, this film was a good length, not excessively long but long enough to tell the story. This is really important today there were no such unwanted scene in the film, which literary the most closely and accurately delivered. In my opinion, this film is forced to possess the characters of a great aspect, and turns to make for quite the adventurous. There was no special character encounter rather than his dad, learned something from the secret Colorado River. Another great aspect of the film was the special footage that were introduce in this film was an enjoyable aspect to be a good documentary film, and that’s how this film is different from the rest.
Wes Anderson is a renowned American film director, screenwriter, film producer and actor. Commonly described as ‘the auteur of our generation (1)’, Anderson is widely known for his distinctive strong visual appeal and narrative style (2), shown predominantly throughout his films. Two of the most common films that Wes Anderson has directed are: The Grand Budapest Hotel (2014) and Moonrise Kingdom (2012) both of which frequently
For this assignment I have chosen to analyze a scene from the 2001 film The Royal Tenenbaums, directed by West Anderson, where Richie Tenembaum, portrayed by Luke Wilson, attempts to commit suicide. This scene provides a shift from the previously established editing style of the film, its mood, pace, and camera movement as the filmmaker presents the climax in this one character’s story. This is done through the use of a specific mise en scène and an editing style which conveys the emotion behind the character’s actions.
Through unique camera shots, Stanley Kubrick vividly captures and displays an emotional roller coaster of the facial expressions of Jack, Wendy, and Danny as they experience horror straight from hell. The Shining goes above and beyond the average horror film because of Kubrick’s brilliant vision and technical understanding of camera, lighting, and film. His choice of actors is phenomenal, and the script is changed in ways from the book that benefit the film medium and pulls on the emotions of its viewers.
With the help of superb editing, sound, mise en scene, and cinematography, this film cannot be topped. The fist scene of the movie creates an atmosphere that helps the viewer know that he/she will enjoy this wonderful classic. Throughout the movie there are surprises and fun that makes this a movie that people will want to watch again and again. Gene Kelly said it best when he said, "Dignity, always dignity. " That is what this movie has from beginning to end, dignity.
film was much too serious and I did not like the factor that most of the
The Shining. Dir. Stanley Kubrick. Perf. Jack Nicholson, Shelley Duvall and Danny Lloyd. Warner Bros., 1980. DVD.
It's an 1 hour and 21-minute visual essay by XXX on the complete history of the films. It breaks down each one and goes into wonderful detail of how all this confusing mess came to be. The other features aren't as lengthy, with the interview with Sid Haig (who was in the Blood Bath versions of the film) is only roughly 4 minutes and the archival interview with Jack Hill clocks in at 3 minutes. Your money is definitely going that one lengthy feature and one feature alone.
The following report will discuss the differences between 4, 5 and six year old in terms of language, motor skills and the way they interact. Throughout the discussion an explanation of how play help to promote these developments. The report is based on the Chanel 4 documentary, The Secret Life of 4, 5 and 6 year olds and the SQA unit Play in Practice.