Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of the French Revolution in Europe
Summary of Germany n ltaly unification
The immediate origins of the Franco-Prussian War concerned
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of the French Revolution in Europe
The Role of Bismarck in Bringing About the Unification of Germany
Bismarck certainly played an important part in the unification of the
German states. His intentions are shown in his ?iron and blood?
speech, where he set out his aims to protect the king and to unify the
German states by isolating Austria. However, many historians argue
that Bismarck?s plan relied on luck, and that events unravelled
greatly in his favour. Even Bismarck later admitted in his memoirs ?
?I was like a man wandering in a forest. I knew roughly where I was
going but I didn?t know exactly where I would come out of the wood?.
There where also other, arguably more important factors that
contributed to unification. Cultural and economic nationalism had
already established itself, and had brought Germany closer to
unification through passion for the country and potential economic
gain. Therefore, Bismarck?s role in German unification has been
overstated.
By the time Bismarck had been made minister president in 1862,
nationalism in the German states had been around for almost half a
century. The French revolution left many Germans disappointed after
Napoleon failed to deliver the promises of ?liberty, property,
security and resistance to oppression? set out by the Declaration of
the Rights of Man. His ?France before all? policy was resented across
Europe and, although Napoleon changed the structure of the German
states for the better by reducing the number of them from over four
hundred to just thirty nine, the German people realised that the
French revolution was far different in theory than in practise, and
the German states were again stuck in a regime th...
... middle of paper ...
...driving force behind unification. Some historians argue that Bismarck
single handedly unified Germany, and that he had a master-plan from
the moment he was made minister-president, while others think that he
was in the right place to take credit for unification at the right
time. However, the opinions of most historians lie somewhere between
the two extremes. There is no doubting that Bismarck was an
outstanding opportunist who took full advantage of the situations that
arose, but as historian W. Carr says ? ?If he played his hand with
great skill, it was a good one in the first place.? At best, Bismarck
sped up the process of unification. The economic situation and the
growth of cultural nationalism were already moving Germany toward a
unified state, and Germany would have unified without the intervention
of Bismarck.
The focus of this study is the effect that Otto Von Bismarck's leadership and politics had on Pre-World War One tensions in Europe. This study investigates to what extent the actions of Otto Von Bismarck led to World War One. The focus of this study is the period between Bismarck's appointment to Minister President of Prussia on September 23, 1862 and the Austro-Hungarian declaration of war on Serbia on July 28, 1914. Bismarck's earlier career is discussed briefly but only as a method to understand his political attitudes. And similarly, as Bismarck was removed from office in 1890, the only events discussed between 1890 and 1914 will be based off of policies instilled by Bismarck, not those of Wilhelm II.
In 19th century Italian states united to make Italy while the Germanic states united and made Germany. For Italy there were three people who had a major role in unifying Italy. They were Mazzini, Garibaldi and Cavour. For Germany it was more like one person who united the German states to make Germany and that was Bismarck. On the other hand there was a strong Austrian empire that would not tolerate any nationalist feelings to rise anywhere in Europe.
In the late 1800s, Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck used different strategical plans in order to gain as much power possible, the majority of the plans consisted of him taking advantage of the different political parties. Bismarck used many traditional political strategies in order to gain the power he craved for, such as creating harsh laws and prohibiting certain beliefs or ideas. Unfortunately, these strategies did not satisfy the people, so Bismarck later started to increase the welfare of the working class, apologized to the Socialists, and did much more to obtain more political strength which eventually created a new conservatism. In an effort to increase political power for the Kaiser, Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck uses liberal and traditional
his words. Possibly the greatest orator of his time, his speeches such as "Give Me Liberty
I Have a Dream; a speech given by King in front of the Washington Memorial
Patrick Henry's Famous Speech Give me liberty or give me death. These famous words were uttered by Patrick Henry on March 23, 1775, as a conclusion to his speech delivered to the Virginia House of Burgesses. Within his speech, he uses the three rhetorical appeals (ethos, logos, and pathos) to convey a feeling of urgency toward the changes occurring in policy within the Americas implemented by the British government. He cleverly uses these appeals to disrupt the paradigm that Great Britain is going to let the American people have any liberty. The purpose of this speech is to gain support for a freedom movement from the British government.
When Otto von Bismarck was recalled from Paris to become Minister-President of Prussia in 1862, German nationalism was already more than 40 years old. First apparent in the opposition to Napoleon´s occupation of the German states, national feeling grew into a movement after 1815. This feeling was encouraged by a growth of interest in German literature and music and by increased economic cooperation between the north German states. By 1848 it was strong enough to make the creation of a united Germany one of the main demands of the revolutionaries. Otto von Bismarck was a Prussian patriot who inherited the traditions of love of king, army and country from his family.
The understanding of European politics during the latter half of the extended nineteenth century, particularly from 1848 onward to the First World War, is as much about the European political climate as a whole as it is about the key figures within this climate. For example, one cannot fully understand the multitude of independence and nationalist movements in the Balkans during this time without first understanding the outside pressures placed on these movements by the three competing empires of the Russians, Habsburgs, and Ottomans; and only then delving into the multitude of persons whom inspired the individual movements. Likewise, understanding the German situation at this time is just as much about the European picture as a whole, as it is about the people within the German system itself; of which, Otto von Bismarck is clearly the synonymous figure. With that said, it follows that a purely biographical approach to this turbulent time in German politics, focused on Bismarck, will leave one largely without the knowledge of the greater European situation; however, this same biographical approach also helps to understand the political interworking and personal relationships that forged a unified Germany, something that the study of the European climate as a whole fails to do.
Kings use of rhetorical devices throughout his speech allows him to clearly and efficiently make points. He uses hypophora on line 69: “…There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights “When will you be satisfied?” We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro
Analyse the Effects of the 1848 Revolution in Prussia and the Eventual Unification of Germany.
... He showed his people in his speech that he was a strong leader and had the mindset to overcome a war. Not only did he appeal to ethos, but also he connected to his people emotionally through pathos. The King asked them to stand firm and unite in this time of trial. The King did not demand them to do this, rather asked this of them. By using this formal approach to reach out to the nation, he showed that he cared about them on a respective level. The King did not talk down to the nation when giving this speech. He made this speech as formal as possible because this speech was given one day before the outbreak of World War II and he wanted to show the nation he cared and they could overcome this time of terror. Through using these rhetorical devices, The King empowered the nation and reminded his citizens of their strength and abilities to overcome adversity in life.
The last battle of the Bismarck changed the tides during World War II. The Bismarck was Germany’s most famous battleship during World War Two, and was sunk on May 27, 1941. The Bismarck had already sunk the battleship HMS Hood before being sunk herself. For many, the end of the Hood and Bismarck symbolized the end of the time when battleships were the dominant force in naval warfare, to be replaced by submarines and aircraft carriers and the advantages these ships gave to naval commanders.
In his speech, King uses different types of rhetorical guidelines. He uses them to show his points in a better and easier way to understand .At the beginning he successfully uses a mythos. A mythos has a deep explanatory or symbolic resonance for the audience. In mentioning the Emancipation Proclamation he shows that our ancestors signed a contract, in which all human beings are created equal, and therefore should be treated in the same way as others. He also visualizes his ideas with visual examples, which everybody can understand. “America has given the black population a bad check, which has come back marked insufficient funds”( I Have a Dream)
Throughout the history of the world, there have been many great nations to rise and make an impact on the entire globe. One of the most well known of these nations is the country of Germany. In its history, Germany has been one of the most influential countries in all of Europe. This great nation holds many geographical locations of historical significance as well as beautiful scenery. History, for centuries, has held the German people in high regard for their militaristic capabilities and ingenuity. They have also been responsible for many technological developments and changes throughout the entire world. For these reasons, the country of Germany is unforgettable.
Prior to unification in 1871 the territory that would become Germany was comprised of thirty-nine independent states and city states joined together in a loose German Confederation. The most powerful among these states was Prussia, both geographically the largest state and that with the largest population. The influential politicians and policies that came out of Prussia were instrumental in the gradual formation of a united Germany. Beginning with the rise of Napoleon, the nineteenth century was a time of incredible change which dramatically altered the political balance of Europe. In order to understand the factors that culminated in official German unification on January 18 1871, it is necessary to examine the preceding decades. No single factor can be credited for the unification of the German states. Rather, the combined forces of social change, economic strength within a unified customs union, the moral justifications provided by nationalism, Bismarck’s careful manipulation of internal politics and the advantages gained through military action resulted in the unification of Germany.