Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The differences between different cultures
Cultural differences ssay
The differences between different cultures
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The differences between different cultures
By portraying women that find themselves in extraordinary situations at various points of their lives, Nair and Lahiri-whose novel does not focus primarily on women-challenge the traditional roles Indian women, are ascribed. Most of the women they depict in their novels are particularly strong women who are determined to fight for themselves no matter what. Doing so, they often break the codes the society has imposed on them, either deliberately or as a side effect. Crossing the lines of what is and what is not allowed in human relationships is what Nair's novel examines, as well as the consequences that it brings for all who are involved either directly or indirectly. The characters in “Namesake” are strong women who fight for their rights and are prepared to face the consequences. None of them is, however, able to imagine how different-and much crueler-the real consequences can be from what they expect. There is a great discrepancy between what they imagine would be an appropriate punishment if they cross the lines and what they really have to face when they do. What might seem to be a normal behaviour to a Western woman can have literally lethal consequences if performed by a South Indian middle class woman, acting on a whim or following one's dreams regardless of what the others may say is a behaviour that not only is not tolerated, but is punished rather severely.
Also in “Mistress” there are a number of women who decide to follow their dreams and thus cross the line of what an appropriate behaviour for a woman is. Nonetheless, the novel focuses rather on the introspective of the characters than on the reactions their social environment. Two women stand out from the crowd especially, namely Saadiya and Radha. The characters ...
... middle of paper ...
...ian experts who attribute all the sufferings of subalterns to colonial rule and western culture. And further from her depiction we can also see that in her understanding the modernization of India not only means the reassessment of colonial rule and its leftover but also the re-examination of their own tradition which is cherished by the nationalists. Anita Nair’s women characters do not frequently take such a severe step. Here Radha becomes known as the strongest self, though the strength was born out of interruption and lack of expectation. This character has at last liberated her from all the restrictions of marriage, the ‘honourable bondage’ that she was handling with her husband for a long period. The man in the story that is Shyam appears as the most disgraceful character, living with his wife’s assets and at the same time torments her in the name of marriage.
Shyam’s idea of marriage is to keep a pretty wife, indulge in her wishful fancies and make her reliant on him. He does not want a confident woman as a wife. Radha and Shyam are mismatched in many ways and she feels suffocated in her marriage. She compares herself to the butterfly she wrapped up and stuck to a board as part of biology assignments in school and feels that her heart aches to fly somewhere departing from her husband. Shyam’s nature symbolizes the typical, Indian governing and trying to rule over every aspect of his wife’s life.
It’s pretty clear that film and literature are very different mediums and when you try to make one into the other, such as an adaptation, you’re going to have some things that are lost in translation and seen in a different light. When an original work is made into a movie, I think they’re kind of at a disadvantage because they only have a few hours to get the whole story across while also keeping the viewer intrigued by what is taking place on the screen right in front of their eyes. Movies are able to contain special effects, visuals, and music though which can impact a viewer and make a scene stay in their mind longer which is a plus side to being able to view something. Literature on the other hand, has a greater advantage. They can keep the reader entertained for a considerably long time and you’re able to get more information about people and events such as what a character is thinking or what is happening behind the scenes during a specific event. I understand that people are going to have different opinions when it comes to whether a book or film adaptation of a work is the best and it is not always going to be the same for each and every piece of work. One thing I think though, is that The Namesake in both the film and the movie, they’re both accurate and concise in the way that they relate to one another.
Namesake by Jhumpa Lahiri, is an extraordinary attempt at weaving together the strings of love, family, friends, culture commingling with the essence of responsibilities and understanding. The tale revolves around the ups and downs of a Bengali family settled in Massachusetts, United States, the inevitable circumstances they step upon and the treacherous trials at accepting the western culture over an epoch. It is quintessential an immigrant novel, written with a great deal of sensitivity for both the parent and children’ generation.
Kingston’s aunt could not stand and respond to her village’s judgments, soon leading to her death and her ongoing silence. This voicelessness that women face is a recurring theme throughout the story as Kingston develops her understanding about her power as an individual. By relating to her aunt’s voicelessness in the No Name Woman, Kingston reinterprets the importance of her aunt’s predicament, growing to understand that culture does not define or fully control people.
Redefining the concept of Third World Feminism, Nair emphasizes on the importance of the female voice. We encounter the bride, Aditi, for the first time, on the sets of Delhi.com as the camera zooms in to focus on an intimate kiss that she has with Vikram. A savvy woman of the city, she does not get sentimental about the possibility of Vikram divorcing his wife for she has read too many magazines to know that it might never happen. She enters into an arranged marriage with Hemant not out of any kind of parental pressure or hopelessness but out of the choice to settle down. She makes rational decisions but not at the cost of curbing her desire. Even as the family engages in the preparations for the wedding, she is found to be repeatedly making phone-calls to her ex-boyfriend. This stands in contrast to the western portrait of third world women, usually idealized as the subjugated subject. Even before the wedding, she sneaks out of the house at midnight to meet him. Through the scene of lovemaking, she emerges as a woman who has power over her body, one who can make her own sexual choices and can also, literally, drive away from the man who leaves her vulnerable among the police to face the consequences. As women who exercise their agency, the film portrays characters who take the risk of transgressing the normative order. Pimmi may transgress by smoking, though behind closed doors while Ayesha will make no mystery of her desire for Rahul. Sexual
One can say “Namesake “and “Mistress” are portraitures of Indian women who rebel against the tradition bound old mode of life. Anita Nair and Jhumpa Lahiri through their novels, “Mistress” and “Namesake” questions our hopeless certainty at our imagined knowledge of worldly wisdom, our false joy in unproductive routine of life, in short, our state of being. Anita Nair’s characters are so real and close to life. We do not find many who live a life advertised by existential philosophers.
As a common theme in society, politics, and books, gendering originated from mythology. Hindu mythology repeatedly reinforces gendering in Indian society, in which the males have a certain point to prove and the females are forced to sacrifice their own happiness. In the Ramayana, a ruthless villain Ravan kidnaps Sita. Her husband, Rama, saves her, but then doubts her chastity because she has lived with another man for so long. Sita is then forced to prove her innocence. Stories with this same archetype are repeated throughout the Mahabharata, another Hindu mythological text. In this story, the female character, Draupadi, is the common wife for a group called the Pandavas. The Pandavas pawn her as a prize in a game against a villain named Duryodhana. The Pandavas lose, and Duryodhana takes Draupadi captive. As a standard characteristic of Hindu mythology, the female sacrifices for the male's ego. Hindu mythology epitomizes the roles of males and females, which as a result, influences gendering in modern-day society by disadvantaging females.
Do our names give us meaning or do we give meaning to our names? From the moment we are born our parents are the ones to give us our name without knowing our personality, only hoping it fits who we grow up to be. In Jhumpa Lahiri’s novel The Namesake, the protagonist is struggling with a conflict within himself whether to accept his Bengali culture or to embrace a new way. The American way. Being the son of two Bengali parents Ashoke and Ashima Ganguli were in a rush to name their newborn child after never having received the name sent by the protagonist’s grandmother. In this moment, at the rush of the hour the child was named Gogol, taking the name of an author of the book that saved the life of his father after having been in a horrible
...e few to even fathom the thought of a life of passion. I understood why everyone felt as though she had other choices, they imagined her to have the same options as the women today in their society have. They looked at her life in the perspective of the third generation of feminism. But that generation hasn’t arrived in this novel, or in many places of the developing world I’ve lived in. I couldn’t have come to the same conclusion if I had been immersed completely in the societies of both the modern and developing societies. My insight into patriarchy was molded through my experiences and similarly most of the comprehensions of the cultural barriers I face are molded when the different ideologies of my roots come together only to clash. The adversity of it all however is only the initiation of an explosion of epiphanies that build upon my soul to make me who I am.
Jhumpa Lahiri’s novel, The Namesake, follows the journey of a Bengali-American man named Gogol Ganguli and his struggle to find his identity. Lahiri prefaced the novel with the quotation: "The reader should realize himself that it could not have happened otherwise, and that to give him any other name was quite out of the question," by author Nikolai Gogol. The quote itself foreshadows the basis of the novel as Gogol discovers his true identity through his family and himself. Gogol was brought into the world without an intended identity.
Ramamoorthy, P. “My Life is My Own: A Study of Shashi Deshpande’s Women” Feminism and Recent Fiction in English Ed. Sushila Singh. New Delhi: Prestige, 1991.
In her novel, Markandaya is all out to enhance the traditional picture of the Indian woman as a docile, weak before her life partner. She reshapes her women characters like Rukmani in Nectar in a Sieve as forceful blasters of male self image hierarchy. From this overview one can get two sorts of parts played by women characters in Indian Women Fiction: the traditional and the modern. The female novelists attempt genuine endeavours to extend the suffering of women with a specific goal to educate men and their cognizant. The unconventional are seen to suffer for their violation of accepted norms of society or for questioning them; death is the way out for them, unless their experiences teach them to subdue their individuality and rebelliousness
women.” And along with this, a similar plot progresses in the backdrop, that of India’s
In keeping with the trend set up in this field by the pioneer, namely Margaret Atwood and Shashi Deshpande weave their narratives around female protagonists and delineate their struggle as neutral observers. These novelists write in a context of increased activity and new possibility. Even though preoccupied with the personal life of their protagonists, these writers also address social and intellectual
Shashi Deshpande is one of the prominent contemporary women writers in India writing in English. She excels in projecting a realistic picture of the middle class educated women who are sandwiched between tradition and modernity. She is entirely different from any of her contemporary women writers. Although critics indiscriminately dub her as a feminist, she is not a feminist in the sense that is probably applied to certain women writers. During the course of her narration while unfolding the drama of an individual is life – a women’s life, “ she almost compatibly portrays Indian middle class women with their turmoils, convulsions, frustrations endurance .”( Sabita Ramachandran: Sashi Deshpande’s Craft as a novelist”)