Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Socialism jungle upton sinclair
Socialism jungle upton sinclair
Socialism jungle upton sinclair
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“You don't have to be satisfied with America as you find it. You can change it.” (Sinclair). We look around the world in which we live, and based on the moral decline surrounding us, we are dissatisfied. Racism and sexism race throughout our cities; moral relativity without absolutes reigns king of confusion; selfish decisions destroy the lives of innocent people around us. A world similar to ours is what Upton Sinclair viewed around him. It was this disgust with the failures of humanity that spurred his decision to change the world, and he sought to do this through his novel, The Jungle. Sinclair intended to fix the world through Socialism and utilitarianism; yet closer looks show that socialistic views of utilitarianism has caused …show more content…
the problem. Socialism is a system of governance that is based on utilitarian ideals. Utilitarianism is the view that the ends justify the means; that the most beneficial action is the right one, regardless of moral principle (Pojman). Instead, to fix a broken society, kindness must be shown by all, to all. In 1906, Upton Sinclair released a novel describing the race of survival for European immigrants in America.
The Jungle vents the often overlooked trials and baffling tribulations of Lithuanian newcomers. Upton Sinclair, a well known political activist for the Socialist party writes this story as a glance into the events happening during his life-span. At the time of The Jungle's publication, Sinclair was twenty-eight years old, and he used the profits from his book to run for Congress. During this time, many things were happening in America: the Industrial Age was at its peak; child labor was running rampant; immigration through Ellis Island boomed; and the Communist witch hunt began. These time-markers are viewed through the lens of the setting, the industrialized city of Chicago. The summary of The Jungle is one of a depressed and deceived Lithuanian man. Overall, The Jungle is a book which reflects the frenzied fight for survival in a new land. The Lithuanian people, along with many others, had come to America under the presupposition of a better life. Instead of finding happiness, freedom, and glorious wealth, they found disease, injustice, and meaningless …show more content…
death. Jurgis Rudkus, Ona Rudkus, Marija Berczynskas, and Teta Elzbeita are the four main characters in The Jungle; the lucky few able to journey and begin a new life in America. They were promised jobs in America; these jobs hypothetically presented better opportunity than those found in Lithuania. Yet as they trudged through their lives, they discovered that their hopes of a new future was founded on the lies they had been told. Jurgis worked hard to purchase passage from Lithuania to America for himself and his family. After the family arrived in Chicago, Jurgis found work in a meat packing plant, where he witnessed the horrors of food processing. Marija, Ona's older cousin, a strong and tough woman, worked several jobs to help pay for the family's expenses once they arrived in Chicago. Unfortunately, while working in a factory, she cut her hand. Because of this accident, her hand had become infected with gangrene; amputation was unavoidable. For some time, Jurgis left his wife and family in a quest for employment. While he was away, the family was evicted from their small house as they could not pay their rent. As a result, they returned to a boarding house. After months of being away, Jurgis returned home to find his wife Ona dying on the floor. Taking the news soberly, he stumbled into a bar and spent the entire family savings on beer. Only a few short days after the death of his wife, his only child, Antanas, fell off a sidewalk and drowned in a huge mud-puddle. With no wife or child to provide for, Jurgis abandoned his remaining family to the streets of Chicago. As life had dropped him on the bottom of the heap, he roamed the streets until he stumbled across a Socialist rally, and stopped in to listen. He found much interest in this subject, and agreed to speak at different rallies, telling how Capitalism ruined his family, and his life. This book captivates the reader and draws emotions of sympathy and compassion for the immigrants who had so many struggles thrust upon them. The Jungle depicts immigrants as the victims of racial hate and social injustice – these issues still plague our society today. In this book, there is helplessness, hopelessness, the frantic rush for survival, unjustness and xenophobia (prejudice). Xenophobia is an unreasonable fear and hatred of foreigners and foreign things. An example is found in the American workplace. Conner, a worker in Ona's unit, attacked her after work-hours. The police offered no assistance to her while her attacker was let off without reprimand. Government officials viewed immigrants as lower than people. Considered sub-human, nothing was done to ease their path of life. As stated previously, utilitarianism is doing what is best for the many at the expense of the few (Pojman). When the police forces and employers of America scowled upon the immigrants, they were working towards their own intentions instead of justly helping those in need. Unequal pay, harsh working conditions, and general lack of respect crushed the wealth-less immigrants, but caused the heartless business owners to prosper. Utilitarian Socialism, not Capitalism, as commonly perceived, crushed the life out of many immigrants. When Ona was attacked in her workplace, the police remained uninvolved in this obvious crime. After learning about what happened to his wife, Jurgis pounded Conner, the attacker, into a pulp. When Connor was attacked, the police immediately became involved, dragging Jurgis into prison and imposing a gargantuan fine on him and his family. Despite the similarities between these two instances, both were treated with different punishments. When the American attacked the immigrant, police and government turned a blind eye to the situation. However, when the immigrant attacked the American, all hell broke loose. Moral relativity ran rampant through American during this time. Moral relativity is an ethically and logically absurd notion; not everyone can be correct on opposing issues at the same time. How is it ethically permissible for the American man to attack the unarmed immigrant woman? How is it ethically corrupt for the immigrant husband to avenge his wife? They both reflect opposite sides of the same coin. Neither of the actions were ethically permissible, both should have been justly punished. The immigrants were treated with injustice; the worked like dogs in unhealthy conditions, not paid half of what their proper wages should have been. It was largely due to these ill working conditions and lack of money that led many immigrant workers to their deaths. With slight amounts of care and consideration shown to them, many people, both in The Jungle and in real life, would have survived. None of the working immigrant family-members even thought to inquire about a raise. Because of their illiteracy, the children starved and eventually, the home that Jurgis, Elzbeita, Marija, and Ona had striven to purchase, was revoked from their grasp. " The family had moved; they had not been able to pay the rent, and they had been turned out into the snow, and the house had been repainted and sold again the next week." (Sinclair). The Jungle depicts how harsh and unwelcoming many Americans acted towards the immigrated people.
The bluntness in which The Jungle tells its woes is its strength, yet also its weakness. To sum up in a single word, this book is depressing; it shows the selfishness of mankind, the racial discrimination, and the willingness to benefit at the expense of others. These ethical issues, and many others, run rampant through The Jungle. Because of the selfish nature so common in all people, only a few of the characters survive in their tragic life. Jurgis, Teta Elzbeita, Marija, and a few children are the only survivors of a once-large and happy family. In poverty, possession of any food was difficult, especially possession of healthy food. Antanas, Jurgis' son, died in a freak-drowning accident, and his mother died in her second childbirth. Two of Teta Elzbeita's children died from eating contaminated meat, another from being eaten by rats. Dede Antanas, Jurgis' father, died because the chemicals he worked with ate away his clothing, and worked their way into his shoes, eventually destroying his feet. “Then, too, a still more dreadful thing happened to him; he worked in a place where his feet were soaked with chemicals, and it was not long before they had eaten through his new boots. Then sores began to break out on his feet ... he learned that it was a regular thing-- it was the saltpeter."
(Sinclair). Had kindness rather than selfishness been given to Jurgis, or any of his family, it is probable that many of them would have survived life in America. Because of the egoistical and selfish ways of the people, many immigrants suffered; not only did they suffer from lack of physical needs, but they also emotionally suffered in their isolation from human kindness. Kindness, and other virtues of love, are the only things that can reverse such an evil. However, in The Jungle, this evil never was reconciled. Depression and anger motivated Jurgis to become a Socialistic activist; further encouraging and empowering the movement that ruined his family. Since The Jungle is a novel written with socialistic intent, it portrays how Capitalism ruined the innocence of a once-happy Lithuanian family. To a society of young people, those who are not properly educated in the lies of Socialism, a socialistic government and viewpoint may appear to be a wondrous idea. However, Socialism roots deeply in utilitarianism. Initially, it seems like an effective way to live, as those who practice it generally prosper. If the life and existence of a person is the means to any end, regardless of circumstance, there is no justification for the action. Despite pleasant appearances, utilitarian ends never justify the means. Upton Sinclair, as a Socialist, wrote this to be a story of helplessness and the malignant grip of the Capitalism crushing the poorer people; this story was meant to stir up riots and rallies against the capitalistic government. Despite its socialistic views, The Jungle is an incredible novel. Not only does it portray the trials and trickery that many immigrants endured, but it is an example of what we must not become. Poverty and sickness, death and disease, all run rampant in this book. Many of the situations that bring about poverty and death can easily be avoided by simple acts of ethical kindness. Instead of existing in a self absorbed manner, individuals should focus on those less fortunate with a helpful attitude. This novel should inspire readers to make differences within their communities. Thankfulness should overwhelm readers. Our grandparents and great grandparents journeyed to America long before we were even imagined. They suffered through injustice and lives of confusion all for the hope of a better tomorrow. Though they did not always have kindness shown to them, yet they persevered. The world of yesterday had many of the same trials we face today; the failures of humanity fueled the fire of determination found in our ancestors. They were not satisfied with the America they found, and so they changed the face of the nation. This is, perhaps, the greatest ethical kindness of them all. Instead of utilitarianism, selfish gain at the expense of others, we have been given the gift of hope, a little suffering in the present for boundless joys.
Upon his 1906 publishing of The Jungle, Sinclair was coined as an avid “muckraker” when President Roosevelt addressed an audience in April of that year. When asked whether or not the novel provided a realistic account of workers conditions within the Chicago meat packing industry, Roosevelt accused Sinclair of being a liar in an attempt to discredit him. A large part of this was credited to Roosevelt’s personal distaste for Sinclair’s apparent link to the Socialist party but, Roosevelt was also unaware that Sinclair had worked undercover at the plant to gather first hand and accurate accounts. The Jungle shined light on the poor working conditions of workers in a meat packing facility. Throughout the novel, Sinclair gave gruesome examples of what workers went through each and every day. Each department of the facility was faced with its own risks and challenges, “There were the wool pluckers, whose hands went to pieces even sooner than the hands of the pickle men; for the pelts of the sheep had to be painted with acid to loosen the wool, and then the pluckers had to pull out this wool with
The difficult living situations for many people in the early 20th century were discussed in the novel The Jungle, written by Upton Sinclair. The book describes an immigrant family’s struggle to survive after moving to America. The family experiences unsafe working conditions, dangerous child labor and poverty. Sinclair uses these images to shed light on some of America’s troubles, to disparage capitalism and to promote socialism.
Upton Sinclair's Purpose in Writing The Jungle Upton Sinclair wrote this book for a couple of reasons. First and foremost, he tries to awaken the reader to the terrible. living conditions of immigrants in the cities around the turn of the century. Chicago has the most potent examples of these. conditions.
In Upton Sinclair's 1906 novel, “The Jungle,” he exposes corruption in business and government and its disastrous effects on a family from Lithuania. The novel follows immigrant Jurgis Rudkus as he struggles against the slow ANNIHILATION of his family and is REBORN after discovering that socialism as a cure away to all capitalism’s problems. The Jungle is an example of protest literature because it exposes in a muckraking style the DANGEROUS, INHUMAINE conditions that workers lived and worked in, corruption in business and politics and the unsanitary meat that was sold.
The United States of America is known as the land of opportunity and dreams. People dream of migrating to this nation for a chance of a better a life. This belief has been around for many years, ever since the birth of the United States; therefore it’s a factor in which motivate many people migrate to the United States. Upton Sinclair, author of the Jungle, narrates the life of a Lithuanian family and there struggles with work, crime, family loss, and survival in the city of Packingtown. Sinclair expresses her disgust as well as the unbelievable truth of life in the United States involving politics, corruption, and daily struggle that many suffered through in the 19th and 20th century.
Capitalism underwent a severe attack at the hands of Upton Sinclair in this novel. By showing the misery that capitalism brought the immigrants through working conditions, living conditions, social conditions, and the overall impossibility to thrive in this new world, Sinclair opened the door for what he believed was the solution: socialism. With the details of the meatpacking industry, the government investigated and the public cried out in disgust and anger. The novel was responsible for the passage of The Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906. With the impact that Sinclair must have known this book would have, it is interesting that he also apparently tried to make it fuction as propaganda against capitalism and pro-socialism.
The Jungle, the 1906 exposé of the Chicago meatpacking industry. The novel focuses on an immigrant family and sympathetically and realistically describes their struggles with loan sharks and others who take advantage of their innocence. More importantly, Sinclair graphically describes the brutal working conditions of those who find work in the stockyards. Sinclair's description of the main character's
How The Jungle Influenced Social Reform and Socialism Beginning in the late 19th century, many people became concerned with many social problems resulting from the industrialization period of the United States. People began to demand reform. The writing of the book The Jungleby Upton Sinclair was one of the most influential tools used to reform many American industries. In this book, Sinclair focuses on the unsanitary conditions and corruption that was involved in the Chicago meat packing industry.
Discuss how Upton Sinclair portrays the economic tensions and historical processes at hand in the late 19th and early 20th centuries
Cohesively, the chosen primary sources from the early 1900’s all show the negative connotations that were associated with Upton Sinclair, whether or not the writers manifested through that is a different layer. Today the American people see Upton Sinclair as a muckraker and activist with little attachment to the great knowledge he attained. We attribute Upton Sinclair to one book he wrote, The Jungle, when he wrote numerous books that were widely publicized and talked about during his day. The articles from his time appeared to include his overall literary importance. The single thing that has differed from the way he is viewed now as opposed to how he was portrayed during his time is that we removed the negative assessments of him based on his political and social beliefs. American people currently recognize how beneficial he was to our history.
Socialism versus Capitalism in The Jungle by Upton Sinclair Even before the beginning of the twentieth century, the debate between socialists and capitalists has raged. In The Jungle, by Upton Sinclair, he portrays capitalism as the cause of all evils in society. Sinclair shows the horrors of capitalism. In The Gospel of Wealth, by Andrew Carnegie, he portrays capitalism as a system of opportunity. However, both Carnegie and Sinclair had something to gain from their writings; both men had an agenda.
What if a book that lacked literary expertise according to critics still managed to change a whole system of industry? A book that literary critics would call sub-par but would could cause an uproar solely by revealing the unsanitary conditions of a workplace. Such is the case with Upton Sinclair’s 1906 book The Jungle. Often not considered one of the legends of writing, Sinclair published over ninety literary works that received little attention and readership. Among his works, only a few stood out. He received the Pulitzer Prize for fiction in 1943 for his work Dragon’s Teeth. But he is most known for his controversial novel, The Jungle. Sinclair was a target for criticism largely due to his
In the novel, The Jungle (1906), author Upton Sinclair, Pulitzer Prize winner, and avid socialist, asserts that a combination of oppression and corporate abuse prevent immigrants from attaining the American Dream. This becomes a running theme throughout the novel as he suggests Socialism as the answer to the evils of capitalism. Sinclair appears to write in hopes of advancing socialist ideology, to get Americans to see that individuals among them, namely immigrants, work tirelessly, yet have a poor standard of living, because of systematic oppression. Because of the author’s condemnatory tone, it would seem as though he writes for a Capitalist and covertly classist American society.
I do not think that anyone truly has a right to disclaim what he wrote considering that those who will probably eat three meals a day with a roof over their head. I find The Jungle to be rational as it does not come right out and state all the horrible things the urban poor face, but instead presents it as cause and effect. An example would be because Jurgis hurt his ankle, he lost his job and the family became low on money. Then he was forced to work at the fertilizer plant and Ona prostituted herself to keep her job which ultimately led to Jurgis going to jail and Ona dying. The events that occur one after another are very realistic during that time and, I consider, what probably happened to many impoverish families living in cities. Sinclair is not trying to manipulate the reader and,yes the horrible events happening to one single family may not be true for everyone one but even if he was exaggerating what harm could be done? It is a fact that living conditions in cities during the early 20th century were bad and unpleasant; cities were covered in sewage, children played in trash for amusement, and people were constantly starving and getting sick with different types of diseases. If Sinclair truly did overemphasize the living conditions of the poor (which in parts I am sure he did to get his point across) what “horrible” things could occur? Give people better places to live that were insulated in the
In the Jungle by Upton Sinclair it focuses on the evil of Capitalism. The book shows how capitalism fails and how the author views it as horrible, inhuman and destructive. The main family, the Jurgis’s, in the book suffer the consequences of Capitalism as the economic system destroys them and the working class altogether. The Jurgis’s like most in their day believed in the American Dream, which would soon be shattered as all their hard work got them nowhere but further in turmoil. The novel uses this family and the other characters mentioned to stand for the stories of millions of people affected by Capitalism. The Jungle wasn’t written to be complicated and it’s easy