Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Human nature in the Frankenstein
Critical analysis of frankenstein monster
Critical analysis of frankenstein monster
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Human nature in the Frankenstein
People are quick to claim responsibility for a creation or idea that prospers, but not so much when it comes to one that did not do so well, or gain as much positive recognition. It's in our nature to try to deny or avoid our mistakes so that we do not get blamed and punished for them. In the father-son like relationship between Victor Frankenstein and the monster that he created in Mary Shelly's, Frankenstein, it’s made clear that Victor unsuccessfully tried to avoid his mistake. The monster mistakenly became Victor's worst nightmare because he turned against his creator and several others. Although it was the monster who committed such heinous acts, one cannot put blame on the creature because it was Victor who created the monster. Evaluating
Certain creations have been thought of, but never attempted out of fear of something going wrong. The idea of creating life is forbidden knowledge because it is not possible to know if that life will be good or evil. Creating human life is a divine power that Frankenstein had great interest in. “It was the secrets of heaven and earth that I desired to learn,” (Shelley 46). Frankenstein wanted more than to be educated, he wanted to create. This desire was the start of Frankenstein's mistake (the monster). There is a reason some things are left unknown and unspoken about; they're either dangerous or too sensitive to speak about. Frankenstein crossed all of these boundaries, as if trying to become some divine power himself. There are reasons, such as a dreadful monster being created, that a divine power stays a divine power, and humans do not interfere. In Joanna Kempner’s article “Forbidden Knowledge: Public Controversy and the Production of Nonknowledge” she discusses some repercussions that go along with craving to know the unknown. “This knowledge is considered dangerous because it fails to keep separate the spheres of the sacred and the profane,” (Kempner 478). There needs to be a discernible line between what a human can create and what a higher power can create, for the simple reason that humans are not advanced enough. Humans do not possess enough knowledge to know how that artificially created life will turn out. Having crossed these boundaries, Frankenstein was left in a dangerous situation with the quickly turned evil life he had created. Had Frankenstein not had an interest in possessing the power of creating life, the monster would have never been created or murdered several people. Having manipulated human life without possessing enough knowledge, Victor Frankenstein is the obvious blame for
In Frankenstein, everyone treats Victor’s creation like a monster including Frankenstein himself. This leads to the creation accepting that title and going on a murder spree. His creation says “When I reflected on his crimes and malice, my hatred and revenge burst all bounds of moderation” (69). Victor’s creation shows that
Although humans have the tendency to set idealistic goals to better future generations, often the results can prove disastrous, even deadly. The tale of Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, focuses on the outcome of one man's idealistic motives and desires of dabbling with nature, which result in the creation of horrific creature. Victor Frankenstein was not doomed to failure from his initial desire to overstep the natural bounds of human knowledge. Rather, it was his poor parenting of his progeny that lead to his creation's thirst for the vindication of his unjust life. In his idealism, Victor is blinded, and so the creation accuses him for delivering him into a world where he could not ever be entirely received by the people who inhabit it. Not only failing to foresee his faulty idealism, nearing the end of the tale, he embarks upon a final journey, consciously choosing to pursue his creation in vengeance, while admitting he himself that it may result in his own doom. The creation of an unloved being and the quest for the elixir of life holds Victor Frankenstein more accountable for his own death than the creation himself.
As a tragic hero, Victor’s tragedies begin with his overly obsessive thirst for knowledge. Throughout his life, Victor has always been looking for new things to learn in the areas of science and philosophy. He goes so far with his knowledge that he ends up creating a living creature. Victor has extremely high expectations for his creation but is highly disappointed with the outcome. He says, “I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart” (Shelley 35). Frankenstein neglects the creature because of his horrifying looks, which spark the beginning of numerous conflicts and tragedies. At this point, the creature becomes a monster because of Victor’s neglect and irresponsibility. The monster is forced to learn to survive on his own, without anyone or anything to guide him along the way. Plus, the monster’s ugly looks cause society to turn against him, ad...
As Frankenstein is enroute to his pursuit of gaining more knowledge, he states, “I wished, as it were, to procrastinate all that related to my feelings of affection until the great object, which swallowed up every habit of my nature, should be completed” (Shelley 41). Frankenstein’s decision in allowing his intellectual ambitions to overpower everything else in his life leads him to be blinded to the dangers of creating life. He isolates himself from his society when creating the monster, letting himself be immersed in his creation while being driven by his passions, allowing nobody to be near him. The fact that he allows this creation of a monster to consume his total being reveals how blinded he is to the immorality of stepping outside the boundaries of science and defying nature. His goal in striving to achieve what wants to in placing man over nature makes him lose his sense of self as all he is focused on is the final product of his creation. He starts to realize his own faults as after he has created the monster, he becomes very ill and states, “The form of the monster on whom I had bestowed existence was forever before my eyes, and I raved incessantly concerning him” (48). His impulsive decision to make the monster leads him to abhorring it as it does not turn out to be what he has expected. Because he chooses to isolate himself in creating the
When a crime is committed, the blame is usually placed on the criminal. This is because a crime cannot take place without a criminal. However, a lawbreaker generally has reasons for his misdeed. For a crime to occur, a criminal must have incentive. Consequently, the causes of a wrongdoer’s motivation are also responsible for the offence. In addition, crimes can be avoided if the proper precautionary measures are taken. Therefore, anyone who could have stopped a crime from happening is partially accountable for it. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, a creature created by Victor Frankenstein kills several of Victor’s loved ones. These murders could be blamed on the creature, but he is not solely responsible for them. The root cause of the murders is Victor’s secrecy. His concealment causes his obsession, a lack of preventative measures against the creature, and his fear of appearing to be mad.
Monsters, in myths and legends, are ugly beasts with vicious tendencies and overbearing powers who bring suffering and agony to those who cross their paths, regardless of intention. However, the same cannot be said for Mary Shelley's monster, the Creation. Victor Frankenstein's lab experiment emphasizes the danger of not taking responsibility for one's own actions and knowledge, by being an instrument of Victor's suffering.
Throughout Frankenstein, one assumes that Frankenstein’s creation is the true monster. While the creation’s actions are indeed monstrous, one must also realize that his creator, Victor Frankenstein, is also a villain. His inconsiderate and selfish acts as well as his passion for science result in the death of his friend and family members and ultimately in his own demise. Throughout the novel, Shelley investigates the idea of monstrosity. She makes the point that a monster does not have to be genuinely evil in order to be considered monstrous.
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein, the protagonist, produces a monster and instead of teaching his monster the mannerisms and norms of society, he abandons him. Victor expects his monster to make it in the harsh, critical society without being taught correct demeanors because he believes that having correct mannerisms is intuitive. A common viewpoint of the book is that Frankenstein’s monster should receive the blame, because he should have had proper nature, but in reality, society nurtured him to act out. Victor isolated the monster, and other members of society followed in Victor’s example and also treated him as so; which made the creature’s actions monstrous. Frankenstein played God, causing society to view his creature as a monster and as a risk to the public, but Frankenstein did not intend to create the monster as dangerous in nature; society nurtured him to act as a beast.
As a romantic novel Victor is responsible, because he abandoned his creation. As an archetype novel, Victor is the villain, because he was trying to play god. Finally, Victor as a Gothic novel, Victor is at fault, because, he and the creature are two different parts of the same person. If Frankenstein is looked at as a romantic novel, Victor, not the creature, is truly the villain. When Victor created the creature, he didn't take responsibility for it. He abandoned it, and left it to fend for itself. It is unfair to bring something into the world, and then not teach it how to survive. The creature was miserable, and just wanted a friend or someone to talk to. On page 115, the creature said, "Hateful day when I received life! Accursed the creator. Why did you form a monster so hideous that even you turned from me in disgust." This line shows the agony the monster was in, because of how he looked when he was created which led to even Victor running away from him. If Victor didn't run, he could have taught the monster and made his life happy. After the creature scared the cottagers away he said, "I continued for the remainder of the day in my hovel in a state of utter ...
Many people who have done despicable deeds in history would seek to blame, or at least offer by way of explanation, terrible things that may have occurred in their childhoods. Shelley is sure in the case of Frankenstein to spell out clearly that this is not applicable in this case. As Victor himself explains to Robert Walton, “No human being could have possessed a happier childhood than myself. My parents were possessed with the very spirit of kindness and indulgence” (Shelley, 1998, p...
Since the beginning, this case has obviously been pinned against Ms. Justine Moritz without any solid evidence. “But I do not pretend that my protestations should acquit me; I rest my innocence on a plain and simple explanation of the facts which have been adduced against me.” (Shelly 65) The trial against her only lays on the fact that she had the necklace William was wearing. Yes, she confessed, but only because she was scared and confused. Why go off this flimsy evidence when the real murderer, the Creature, has confessed in full detail to what happened? Victor Frankenstein, who built the creature, holds a significant amount of guilt to what has happened, as he should. “Justine also was a girl of merit and possessed qualities which promised to render her life happy; now all was to be obliterated in an ignominious grave, and I the cause!” (Shelley 64)
The concept of man creating life is a subject matter people don’t really take into account. Have you ever contemplated how the world would be like if one day, a curious soul decided to create life? Would people of future generations possess and comprehend religious beliefs when they discover that human beings have the ability of creating life? Would the science of life be altered eternally? The novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley truly depicts the significance of this topic. In this novel, the author tells a story in which an inquisitive, eager man decides to create a living creature. This creature forms a mind of it’s own; a mind capable of much more than that of a human’s. Surprisingly, this creature finds a way, on his own, to absorb knowledge
While the monster gains a feeling of hatred and a desire for revenge after he is abandoned and treated pitifully, Frankenstein continuing reinforces the suffering of his creation, and likewise the suffering of himself. Frankenstein is completely to blame for the misery that he endures. Victor creates a being only for his own fulfillment, and afterwards abandons the great responsibility that he bears for it. To make it worse, Frankenstein intentionally ruins the monster 's happiness and gives him the same horrendous treatment that the rest of mankind gives the monster. Victor 's selfish actions cost him his family, bring him to the brink of insanity, and make a terrible creature out of a loving and compassionate being. Victor Frankenstein is a true
In this story we see one of the main characters Victor get really obsessed with learning about the body and eventually blocks out all family and friends to create his ‘creature’. Once Victor creates the monster he realizes how hideous his creature is he decides that he wants nothing to do with it and leaves it. Mary Shelley, purposely calls the monster or ‘creature’ because that is his name throughout the story to remind the readers that even though the creature seems to have feelings and do other things humans do, he will never be human.
For Frankenstein created a monster who had no identity, and was willing to murder all of Frankenstein's loved ones if Frankenstein did not create another female creature. Victor Frankenstein refused to create another female monster to accompany his monster. Thus, the monster felt that he had no choice but to take away Frankenstein's family, just to show how Victor Frankenstein would feel being alone in the world. The murder of William Frankenstein (Victor's younger brother) caused Victor to believe that his own creature had murdered his younger brother because "nothing in human shape could have destroyed that fair child." (Frankenstein, pg.74) Frankenstein knew from then on that he had "turned loose into the world a depraved wretch, whose delight was in carnage and misery." (Frankenstein, pg.74) Frankenstein's monster caused "the death Frankenstein not only blamed the murders of his loved ones on his monster, he blamed himself for creating the monster. Throughout Frankenstein, the words "friend, monster, daemon, vile insect, enemy, and abhorred devil" were used by Frankenstein to describe the monster he had created.