Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between religion and science
Analysis of Mary Shelley Frankenstein
Critique of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The relationship between religion and science
The concept of man creating life is a subject matter people don’t really take into account. Have you ever contemplated how the world would be like if one day, a curious soul decided to create life? Would people of future generations possess and comprehend religious beliefs when they discover that human beings have the ability of creating life? Would the science of life be altered eternally? The novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley truly depicts the significance of this topic. In this novel, the author tells a story in which an inquisitive, eager man decides to create a living creature. This creature forms a mind of it’s own; a mind capable of much more than that of a human’s. Surprisingly, this creature finds a way, on his own, to absorb knowledge …show more content…
John Dalton devised the atomic theory, thus changing the concept and perspective of organisms. Because of his theory, we now know that all matter is made of atoms. Charles Darwin conceived the theory of evolution by natural selection. Because of this theory, many people believe that all life is linked and has descended from a common ancestor and that natural selection acts as a preservation in order to enable a species to compete better in the wild. These two theories affected religious beliefs to a point it caused a number of people to dispute holding a religious perspective and confide in science. People started believing that men evolved according to their ancestors and that God did not create man from the image his mind possessed. – This is exactly what Shelley is implementing in the novel. She distinctly portrays this exact situation. In the novel, the character, Victor, tests God’s ability by creating life. Most religious beliefs comprise the act of believing that God, and only God, can create life. Shelley casts doubt upon this belief by telling a story other wise. In Deuteronomy 4:35 of the bible, it is stated that “there is none else beside him (God).” This is a substantial statement in the religious belief system and Shelley clearly disproves and casts doubt upon it by creating a character that is capable of God’s powers; that is creating
In Lisa Nocks article appropriately titled “Frankenstein, in a better light,” she takes us through a view of the characters in the eyes of the author Mary Shelly. The name Frankenstein conjures up feeling of monsters and horror however, the monster could be a metaphor for the time period of which the book was written according to Nocks. The article implies that the book was geared more towards science because scientific treatises were popular readings among the educated classes, of which Shelley was a member of. Shelley, whose father was wealthy and had an extensive library, was encouraged to self-educate, which gave her knowledge of contemporary science and philosophy, which also influenced Frankenstein as well as circumstances of her life.
In both John Gardner's Grendel and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, creation is a central theme. Victor Frankenstein is inexplicably driven to make a creature like himself, though he doesn't have any external reason for doing so. The monster himself enacts a kind of creation; he seeks to understand the truth of human nature by reading man's works, but also indulges in his own stories and fantasies of a life lived among friends. Shelley explores to some extent the morality of such creation (at least on the part of Victor Frankenstein), but Gardner is more interested in what the act of creation reveals about the nature of existence.
American psychologist and well renowned author Jerome Kagan states “Genes and family may determine the foundation of the house, but time and place determine its form.” The topic of nature vs. nurture is highly known to the English literature community and is classified as a major aspect of gothic works. In the novel Frankenstein the author Mary Shelley uses the monster’s constant rejection from society to demonstrate that an individual’s traits are affected more by their environment and their surroundings than by nature.
This desire for scientific advancement which Shelley writes about must be similar to what motivates scientists even today. In the last century scientist have been attempting to find ways to create life by artificial means. Scientists have made in-vitro fertilization possible, allowing thousands of infertile couples to have biological children. When in-vitro fertilization was introduced it was seen as completely unnatural and going against all religions. I am sure there are still people who view in-virto fertilization as wrong, but the vast majority of the world can see it for its benefits at this point. Although it must be said that it did take a while for people on a whole to accept this method of conceiving a child.
The theme of creation in "Frankenstein" touches on the notion of how modern science plays God. This is illustrated through the attempt of replicating a human by means of science, using the main character Victor as the god-figure. Unfortunately, Victor Frankenstein did not consider the effect his creation would have on the outside world and, more importantly, his internal self and his creation.
Life is a gift – and that is the key philosophy of the novel. If you give life to somebody as a parent or produce a life like Victor Frankenstein you have to know earlier what to do with it and be able to take full responsibility for giving the best to your creation. The creature was Victor’s toy and Victor was the doll of his parents. Everything occurred in a chain reaction. One good deed makes another good deed and vice versa – one evil generates
In Shelley's Frankenstein, it's interesting to use the text to ask the question, whose interest's lie at the heart of science? Why is Victor Frankenstein motivated to plunge the questions that bringing life to inanimate matter can bring? Victor Frankenstein's life was destroyed because of an obsession with the power to create life where none had been before. The monster he created could be seen as a representation of all those who are wronged in the selfish name of science. We can use Shelley's book to draw parallels in our modern society, and show that there is a danger in the impersonal relationship that science creates between the scientist and his work. It seems to me that Shelley was saying that when science is done merely on the basis of discovery without thought to the affect that the experimentation can have, we risk endangering everything we hold dear.
In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, the concept of "discovery" is paradoxical: initial discovery is joyful and innocent, but ends in misery and corruption. The ambitions of both Walton and Frankenstein (to explore new lands and to cast scientific light on the unknown, respectively) are formed with the noblest of intentions but a fatal disregard for the sanctity of natural boundaries. Though the idea of discovery remains idealized, human fallibility utterly corrupts all pursuit of that ideal. The corruption of discovery parallels the corruption inherent in every human life, in that a child begins as a pure and faultless creature, full of wonder, but hardens into a self-absorbed, grasping, overly ambitious adult. Only by novel's end does Walton recognize that he must abandon his own ambition (the mapping of previously uncharted land), out of concern for the precious lives of his crew.
Analysis of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. Analyzing a book can be a killer. Especially when it contains tons of subtle little messages and hints that are not picked up unless one really dissects the material. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is a prime example.
One theme discussed by Shelley in the novel is birth and creation. She does this through the main character, Victor Frankenstein, who succeeds in creating a 'human' life form. In doing this, Frankenstein has taken over the roles of women and God. Shelley discusses how Frankenstein has used his laboratory or 'workshop of filthy creation' (page 53) as a kind of 'womb' as he has worked on his creation. He also refers to his task as his labour, suggesting that he has literally given birth to his creation.
The wise Uncle Ben once told Peter Parker, “remember, with great power. Comes great responsibility.” There is no greater power than that acquired by the infamous Victor Frankenstein in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein when he discovers the secret to creating life. Shelley’s Frankenstein is a tale of creation that depicts acts of human conception and discovery. The Oxford English Dictionary defines creation as “the action or process of bringing something into existence from nothing by divine or natural agency; the fact of being so created.” It defies the natural order of things and creates a world of its own. The multiple acts of creation and discovery bring upon a certain set of responsibilities and implications as depicted by David Collings who analyzes the responsibilities that come as a result of these acts in his essay “The Monster and the Maternal Thing: Mary Shelley’s Critique of Ideology”. The main act of creation is evident through Victor Frankenstein’s creation of the Being which is depicted most prominently in the novel. However, there are multiple other acts of creation and discovery that may not be apparent at first sight. One of the most important being, Victor’s discovery of the knowledge required to create life. Apart from initially creating the Being, Victor also plays a critical role in the Being’s evolution into a raging and vengeful creature. Perhaps above all other acts of creation and discovery is Victor’s personal creation of himself into a monster. As stated by Collings most of these acts of creation on Victor’s part are subconsciously brought upon because of their lack of a maternal figure but also in part because of his desire for fame and glory. However, he is blinded by his motives and forgets that with his...
“I discovered the secret of life… and I control it: said Victor Frankenstein. Clerval responds “You are not god and you cannot create like god”. The creator’s ambition to be all powerful and god-like brings him to generate a creature that later he would regret making. The scientist allows his zeal to take control of his. He believes he is omnipotent. A morally irresponsible scientific development can release a monster that can destroy human civilization itself. The film Frankenstein from the author David Wicks indicates that playing with creation has dreadful consequences.
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley is a gothic science fiction novel written in the romantic era that focuses on the elements of life. The romantic era was sparked by the changing social environment, including the industrial revolution. It was a form of revolt against the scientific revolutions of the era by developing a form of literature that romanticize nature and giving nature godliness. This element of romanticized nature is a recurrent element in Frankenstein and is used to reflect emotions, as a place for relaxation and as foreshadowing. Frankenstein also includes various other elements of romanticism including strong emotions and interest in the common people.
Not everything necessarily has to change. Nature had been around for thousands of years before the Industrial Revolution without nearly any flaws, why would it needed to have been changed? Shelley clearly thought that the scientific discoveries being made to overcome nature were an unneeded and extremely dangerous change. Her opinions towards scientific discoveries and overcoming the natural will of God written throughout Frankenstein proved that she was unfond of the profound terrors that science could bring, and the dangers of what man thinking he was greater than god could lead to. With the creations of atomic bombs and new weapons of terror years after Shelley’s death, one has to think, did she have it right all
Which is more powerful science or nature? Author Mary Shelley shows us exactly what could happen when science and nature are pitted against each other in her novel “Frankenstein Or, The Modern Prometheus”. In the novel the life of a scientist named Victor Frankenstein spirals out of control after the death of his mother. He consequently becomes dangerously obsessed with death. His mission becomes to go against nature in order to figure out the science of life. In his journey of giving a “torrent of light into our dark world” (Shelley, 61) Victor Frankenstein is faced with the consequences going against nature. I believe that Mary Shelley was against science that went over the bounds set by nature.