Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aristotle on friendship essay 1000 words
St. Thomas Aquinas Essay
Topics in aristotle's nicomachean ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Aristotle on friendship essay 1000 words
While taking a quick look at the Catholic faith, one might say that Jesus’ teachings are the only sources used for the foundation of ethics for Catholics, but this is not true. By taking a deeper look into the history of the Catholic religion, one will discover there are many other figures that helped establish the foundation of ethics in the Catholic faith. One of these figures is Aristotle. He was actually one of the first to define ethics and place it in a systematic way. Aristotle really started to play a part in the Catholic religion when Saint Thomas Aquinas took his teachings and related it to the faith. Jesus is still the main and primary source of our ethical faith, but Aristotle also played a part in creating the foundation. While both their views of ethics are similar, they also differ in several ways.
Aristotle differs
…show more content…
from Jesus’ views of ethics mainly because Aristotle based his beliefs off of reasoning, while Jesus’ were mainly related to God.
Aristotle believed that a key factor of happiness was friendship. “Without friends, no one would want to live, even if he had all other goods” (Aristotle). In this quote Aristotle explains that if someone has no friends or no genuine friends, they are more likely to be depressed. Even if they live a fulfilling life filled with blessings, if a person has no friends that cannot be truly happy. Aristotle believed in three types of friendship, and if any friendship is based of anything but virtue, it is not a true friendship. If it is based off of pleasure or usefulness it isn't a true friendship. It isn’t genuine if you base a friendship off of how useful or convenient a friend is to you. To have a real friendship it must be based of virtue and ethics. Aristotle created the term nicomachean ethics which is a philosophical inquiry into the
nature of the good life for a human being. He believed we all had an ultimate good or goal we all work for over the span of our life. Aristotle defined the purpose of our lives the “Telos of humans.” Our purpose or goal is happiness which he called “eudaimonia,” and it means blessed living or happiness in greek. We see his belief that everything in our lives was built for a purpose or goal reflected in ethics for the Catholic religion. Saint Thomas Aquinas took Aristotle’s view and transformed it into a key factor of Catholic ethics. As Christians, St. Thomas Aquinas made our ultimate goal God. That as Catholics we dedicate our lives to loving God and serving by spreading the word of God. Even though Aristotle’s views were not from a religious background, he paved the foundation for the Christian ethical teachings. In Catholicism, our Lord Jesus Christ is our ultimate role model; after all, he is the founder of the religion. Christ spent his ministry years teaching and spreading the Word. One of his many famous ethical teachings is the golden rule. In Matthew chapter seven verse twelve, Jesus says, “Do to others whatever you would have them do to you.” This is a key teaching that Catholics take from the bible and relate it to their ethical views. It is not a complicated teaching, and its simplicity is what makes it so important. Everyone can relate to the concept that if you do not want to be treated unfairly then treat others the way you want to be treated. God created us all in his image and likeness, and with that we each receive an undeniable trait called dignity. With this, we all must treat each other equally and with respect. Although two wrongs do not make a right, if you treat someone poorly then you can not be surprised when they treat you poorly as well. According to Jesus, the second greatest commandment is: “Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself” (Matthew 22:37–40). This follows the same ethical view that we should love others how we want to be loved. This teaching is one of many of Jesus’ ethical beliefs and is very important to the ethical foundation of the Catholic religion. Aristotle and Jesus are both significant founding members of what ethics really is. They have many similar and many different views and beliefs on what ethics really is. A difference between Aristotle’s teachings from Jesus’ is that Aristotle really focused on what the right thing to do is, not what the right type of person someone should be. While the both of them focus on ethical living and character, Jesus really narrows in on what it means to live as an ethical person, and Aristotle focuses on what it means to live an ethical life. Aristotle believed that or goal as humans is to achieve happiness by living a moral and ethical life. Jesus believed that our goal is to love and treat people with dignity by being a moral and ethical person. Another difference between the two is our ultimate goal as humans. Aristotle believed that our goal was happiness, or as he called it, “eudaimonia.” For Jesus and Saint Thomas Aquinas, our ultimate goal is to reach heaven and live in Salvation with God. All in all, both Aristotle and Jesus were, and still are primary sources of Christian ethics. They have many similarities and differences in their teachings, but all are important. We owe the both of them and their teachings for helping develop and ultimately create the foundation and definition of ethics.
The four fundamental claims of the Catholic Intellectual Tradition, Human beings exist in a relation to a triune God, God’s presence in the world is mediated through nature and reality, faith and reason are compatible, the dignity of the human being is inviolable and therefore the commitment to justice for the common good is necessary. However, the great books in the Catholic Intellectual tradition show that they represent these fundamental claims in a broad distinctive way. This essay will show that these readings better represent one of the fundamental claims, human beings exist in a relation with a triune God, from the view point of three great books from the bible, Genesis, Exodus and the Gospel of Matthew. The Bible clearly supports the
He believes that someone can 't just decide whether they were happy or not, but rather that there were certain virtues that if preformed would enable somebody to be happy. Virtues acts such as courage, temperance, wittiness, modesty, patience and friendliness are a few of these virtues. In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle defines virtue as “a characteristic involving choice, and that it consists in observing the mean relative to us, a mean which is defined by a rational principle, such as a man of practical wisdom would use to determine
Aristotle presents his view of the mutual desire for good in others, or Friendship in his work, The Nicomachean Ethics. He asserts that friendship comes in three types, Virtue Friendship, Use Friendship, and Pleasure Friendship. He distinguishes Virtue Friendship as the perfect friendship, leaving Use Friendship and Pleasure friendship as deficient friendships. C.S. Lewis presents his view of friendship, which is motivated by appreciation love, in his book The Four Loves in a manner seeming to correspond to Aristotle’s concept of Virtue Friendship. Lewis also presents his perception of Companionship, which seems to correspond to Aristotle’s notion of Use and Pleasure Friendships. Lewis presents a more modern and seemingly accurate rehabilitation
Late one evening, curled up in her nest, Harriet lay thoughtfully reading the last of Aristotle’s model of friendships: the perfect friendship. Though no secret to Harriet, Aristotle presents the idea that it is the most desirable and genuine of the three forms. The foundation of this friendship is not trivial, but instead the relationship is built on a common good and virtuous nature. As Aristotle explains, “those who love for the sake of utility love for the sake of what is good for themselves, and those who love for the sake of pleasure do so for the sake of what is pleasant to themselves.” Aristotle continues, “Perfect friendship is the friendship of men who are good, and alike in virtue; for those wish well alike to each other qua good, and they are good in themselves.” (concluding sentence or two...)
II In Books VIII and IX, Aristotle discusses the role of friendship in the good life.
Aristotle believes that everyone is in need of some type of friend, he states that “for rich people and those who rule and have power, there seems to be the greatest need for friends.”(page. 144, book VIII) Aristotle believes that we as humans benefit greatly from having friends, no matter who we are or what position we are in wealthy or poor. There are three distinct types of friendship that Aristotle directs his beliefs towards. These three types of friendships include: Utility, pleasure, and Goodness or virtuous friendship. Aristotle believes that friendship is something that is extremely important to have and should be held above many things. Friendship Utility is unlike the friendships of pleasure or goodness because as Aristotle puts it is “for the old” he explains that friendship Utility is a friendship that two people may have where they only communicate with one another for self-benefit or to gain something for one’s self. These two people are not likely to live with each other and at times may not even be nice to th...
In conclusion, Aristotle’s elucidation of happiness is based on a ground of ethics because happiness to him is coveted for happiness alone. The life of fame and fortune is not the life for Aristotle. Happiness is synonymous for living well. To live well is to live with virtue. Virtue presents humans with identification for morals, and for Aristotle, we choose to have “right” morals. Aristotle defines humans by nature to be dishonored when making a wrong decision. Thus, if one choses to act upon pleasure, like John Stuart Mill states, for happiness, one may choose the wrong means of doing so. Happiness is a choice made rationally among many pickings to reach this state of mind. Happiness should not be a way to “win” in the end but a way to develop a well-behaved, principled reputation.
Let us first examine the similarities of friendship with that of happiness and virtue, which we discussed previously is the most necessary part of a happy life. Aristotle describes happiness by saying “happiness is most choiceworthy of all the goods (1097b17-18).” His idea of choiceworthy is something we choose “because of itself, never because of something else (1097b).” Friendship is seen as similar to happiness when Aristotle describes friendship as “choiceworthy in its own right (1159a27).” Proven earlier, virtue is necessary for a happy life because “happiness is a certain sort of activity of the soul in accord with virtue (1099b26-27).” Since virtue is such an integral part of happiness, the similarity between friendship and virtue is relevant to the relationship between friendship and a happy life. Aristotle describes virtues as “states (1106a14),” and at the same time describes friendship as “a state (1157b30),” as well. He goes on further to say, “Just as, in the case of virtues, some people are called good in their state of character, others good in their activity, the same i...
In his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle works to foster a more precise understanding of complex ideas including justice and friendship. Of course, he assigns varying levels of importance to qualities depending on how necessary they are to becoming a happy and self-sufficient individual, which he sees as the ultimate aim for human beings. As such, he seems to create a hierarchical structure in which aspects that push an individual closer to happiness are effectively superior to those which do not. Yet, as he develops the ideas of friendship and justice more, dividing them into their constituent categories, the hierarchy between them begins to become more obscured, suggesting that, rather than the two existing in service of one or the other, the
Aristotle wrote on many subjects in his lifetime but one of the virtues that he examines more extensively is friendship. Aristotle believes that there are three different kinds of friendship: utility, pleasure, and virtuous friendships. He also argues that a real friendship should be highly valued because it is a complete virtue and he believes it to be greater than honor and justice. Aristotle suggests that human’s love of utility and pleasure is the only reason why the first two types of friendships exist. Aristotle also argues that humans only set up these types of relationships for personal gain. But when he speaks of the virtuous friendships, Aristotle states that it is one of the greatest attainments one can achieve.
Every individual has certain rules and guidelines by which they base their decisions off of. There are certain rules that determine people’s actions and these rules may differ from one individual or group to another. These rules are the principles that direct an individual’s actions and are collectively known as ethics. Ethics is important because it helps one differentiate between what is right and wrong when making decisions. Ethics also includes the moral codes or values that a person holds, which are more personal than the codes of ethics. In the role of morality I identify myself most with the philosopher Immanuel Kant because of the similarities shared between our philosophies.
Two aspects effect happiness in Aristotle’s mind: external goods, and other’s relating to one’s self. External goods entail wealth, family, friends, positive experiences, tragedies in life, and self-appearance. One may ask how these obscure factors effect one’s happiness. A person who has all the money in the world, has the means to do whatever they please to affect the greater good. If they want to donate a million dollars to charity that person can make a huge difference in the world. An ugly person in the eyes of society, may be persecuted daily for his appearance. Experiences and tragedies would ultimately sway your happiness one way or another by effecting the way you perceive your life. Aristotle highlights this by saying “while a single man may suffer many turns of fortune's wheel.” Family and friends with a negative atti...
His philosophical theory was very simple and he wanted to teach people how to be happy. He stated “In all our activities there is an end, which we seek for its own sake, and everything else is a means to this end…Happiness is this ultimate end. It is the end we seek in all that we do.” What Aristotle means is that everything we do in our daily activities and actions is all leading up to the end result which is happiness. For example, I work and attend school full time and everything that I do is sub goals leading towards being a successful person which causes me to be happy. Aristotle says happiness is also found in our feelings. A personal example is I love my family and it makes me happy having people to care about and to support them. Sub goals on the way, such as making an A in a class or finishing college and getting a degree are self-awarding pleasures that create happiness. Those are a few examples that make me happy and doing well and succeeding is the key to happiness. For happiness to happen in general, people need to have a reason or virtue in our lives. That everyone has their strong suites about themselves and we need to express and share them with others to help others grow as well. What I understand from Aristotle’s theories of happiness is that our feelings and good actions and being able to control them is what makes us
Happiness can be viewed as wealth, honour, pleasure, or virtue. Aristotle believes that wealth is not happiness, because wealth is just an economic value, but can be used to gain some happiness; wealth is a means to further ends. The good life, according to Aristotle, is an end in itself. Similar to wealth, honour is not happiness because honour emphases on the individuals who honour in comparison to the honouree. Honour is external, but happiness is not. It has to do with how people perceive one another; the good life is intrinsic to the...
When considering morality, worthy to note first is that similar to Christian ethics, morality also embodies a specifically Christian distinction. Studying a master theologian such as St. Thomas Aquinas and gathering modern perspectives from James Keenan, S. J. and David Cloutier serve to build a foundation of the high goal of Christian morality. Morality is a primary goal of the faith community, because it is the vehicle for reaching human fulfillment and happiness. Therefore, great value can be placed on foundations of Christian morality such as the breakdown of law from Aquinas, the cultivation of virtues, the role of conscience in achieving morality, and the subject of sin described by Keenan.