Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison and contrast about rich vs poor
The differences between rich and poor
How social class affects success
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparison and contrast about rich vs poor
Only a small percentage of the world’s population is rich. A source states, “The richest 1 percent of the world’s population currently controls 48 percent of the world’s total wealth” (Shin). With the rich being a considerably small amount of the whole population and controlling almost half of the wealth in the world, it is hard to imagine that the rich have any similarities with the majority. Well, according to another source, “the difference between the upper and lower class is empathy” (Kraus). Whatever the claim may be regarding the difference or differences between the rich and the majority, it is generally true that the rich are different than the majority of people who are not because they have a different mindset than those who are …show more content…
The rich tend to think bigger than everyone else; they are more optimistic about things such as opportunities and obstacles. A rich person would not be as discouraged if something did not go their way, whereas a person who is not rich would probably be discouraged and possibly not even try to attempt the obstacle again. Lucas Falconer states in his article that one of the ways the rich differ from the poor is “Rich people concentrate on opportunities and this allows them to eventually reach their goals”. Also, in the article, “How the Rich are Different from the Poor II: Empathy” Michael Kraus says, “The main difference between individuals from relatively upper- and lower-class backgrounds lead to differences in empathy”. This prediction stems from the fact that the environment has an impact on how one was brought up, for instance, the source states that ” lower-class individuals are more dependent on the social environment, while the social economy and resources allow upper-class individuals to navigate the social world” (Kraus). A poll taken in 2012, shows that rich people are actually 43 percent more likely to be hardworking than the average American …show more content…
Rich people form groups together and surround themselves with like-minded people, while average people think rich people are snobs. The truth is, the rich would just rather not surround themselves with negativity, and when they surround themselves with people with a like mind, it helps them to stay positive and stay on track with their goals. This is one reason why the rich are rich; it has to do with who they choose to be surrounded by. Most of the time, the average person would just assume it is impossible to be rich, and they think of all the things they cannot do, but the rich chose not to think that way, and that is another reason why the more wealthy folks are different from the people who are not. The last reason the rich are different than the majority is because the rich actually spend their money differently than those who are not. Of course the rich and the not so rich have to spend their money on the necessities such as food, water, shelter, and etc. but rich people just spend on a much larger scale and they will focus more on the quality of what they are purchasing, especially when it
According to Gregory Mantsios many American people believed that the classes in the United States were irrelevant, that we equally reside(ed) in a middle class nation, that we were all getting richer, and that everyone has an opportunity to succeed in life. But what many believed, was far from the truth. In reality the middle class of the United States receives a very small amount of the nation's wealth, and sixty percent of America's population receives less than 6 percent of the nation's wealth, while the top 1 percent of the American population receives 34 percent of the total national wealth. In the article Class in America ( 2009), written by Gregory Mantsios informs us that there are some huge differences that exist between the classes of America, especially the wealthy and the poor. After
... that they affect one another. A person who lives by a lower income will not have that mines and chances of become wealthy. A person in the other spectrum, which is born into a higher class, will most likely stay wealth. This leads to an endless cycle of generations staying within the working class realm. The likely hood of a person moving up a class is rare but it does exist. People need to be pushed and have a drive to keep going and to keep trying. That is why we are told we have an equal chance in life so we can all strive for better even though in reality we do not all have an equal chance. But nonetheless people should try to become successful even if they never make it in life because a life without purpose, goals, or ambitions is a meaningless life. As humans we need a reason to live, another day for people to take advantage and make the best of it.
Time and time again we hear politicians and office holders preach the need for a powerful middle-class. You may then be surprised to hear that “about 82% of America’s net worth belongs to the top 20%, the next 80% of people only own about 18% of America’s wealth” (UCSC). Some may argue that this disproportion is the beauty of capitalism, the chance to create an empire. I argue that the proportions are simply unfair. Why is it that “ the average CEO makes 350X as much as his/her employee” (UCSC)?
The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison by Jeffrey Reiman and Paul Leighton has been used for years as a way to address issues such as ideologies and class struggles within the criminal justice system. The book focuses on controlling crime, defining crime and disparities between social classes. I believe the book makes some very interesting points but was overall a waste of my time to read because most of what is said were things I was already very much aware of.
Sklar, Holly. “The Growing Gulf Between the Rich and the Rest of Us”. They Say I Say. Gerald Graff, Cathy Birkenstein, Russel Durst. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2009. Print.
With each class comes a certain level in financial standing, the lower class having the lowest income and the upper class having the highest income. According to Mantsios’ “Class in America” the wealthiest one percent of the American population hold thirty-four percent of the total national wealth and while this is going on nearly thirty-seven million Americans across the nation live in unrelenting poverty (Mantsios 284-6). There is a clear difference in the way that these two groups of people live, one is extreme poverty and the other extremely
Those who are rich are happier and feel superior. Those who have less money get discouraged and unhappy. In ways as the game continues, players emotions mirror real life. Those in the upper class have a lot of money and an easier time full of joy. Those in the middle class will own a little property but they won't ever earn enough to move up in social status. Those in poverty sink lower and lower into debt and struggle to stay afloat.
Wealth inequality is a real issue that needs to be fixed. The imbalanced growth of the upper class compared to the middle class is a danger to American society as a whole. The rich becoming richer while the middle class remains the same leads to a power imbalance, with the rich using their money to run the country the way they see fit while the middle class speaks to ears that do not listen. The issue of wealth inequality needs to be fixed by raising taxes on the rich.
This can be seen in the criminal justice system to support their claim. The upper class or 1% passes laws designed to benefit themselves. These same laws are detrimental to the working class. Both groups commit acts of deviance, but the system the finically wealthy created defines deviance differently for each group. The criminal justice system judges and punishes each group differently. In addition, the elite can often afford expensive lawyers. Members of the working class generally do not have these same advantages which then usually causses ciaos and deviance within society.
...’s Ripple Effect” explains “A person is rich in proportion to the number of things he can afford to let alone.” That is what defines being rich? Money may buy a lot of things, but it can’t make your life better by the soul. We need to broaden our view of the world we live in and delve into its beauty. We are all so blind to our lives.
One of the biggest differences in the two groups of people rich and poor is the types of jobs they are working. You do not see too many millionaires getting their hands dirty working in the field, construction, and doing the dirty jobs that no one wants. Reich even says in his essay the rich people are the ones who are the creators and the poor are the ones doing manual labor. “Most of the poverty in the United States is artificially manufactured. It is poverty created in the pursuit of “free market ideals.” (Davidson) In this the people who are working shift work do not have the time to worry about how the stock market is doing, but they think they have to live up to the standard of the people who do have money so they are pretending to be someone who they are not. Another important factor is their attitudes poor is hardworking and never give up kind of sense while rich is not afraid to throw anything away and have people do the dirty work for
“The real measure of your wealth is how much you’d be worth if you lost all your money.” (unknown). All families are not perfect, they all have problems that they struggle with daily, they all go through tough times that cause unhappiness, but the thought that these factors have no affect on rich people is completely untrue. In Judith Guest’s Ordinary People and Jo Goodwin Parker’s “What is Poverty” both address how two families relationships, happiness and daily struggles are affected by the amount of money they have, which shows that the more money a person has does not necessarily make that person happier.
This article claims that the problem with rich people and there ethics aren't the problem, its how we look develop stereotypes about them. We often percieve rich people as being treacherous and mean to people of less wealth than them and laugh when great affliction comes there way. That perception of the rich people isn't good to have at all. Stereotypes about the rich, poor, mean, and nice is good to use. In the article, it talks about how authors such as Amit Bhattacharjee, Jason Dana, and Jonathan Baron, gives an anti-rch/anti-business sentiment from their series studies. In the article it says "These authors asked participants not to evaluate people, but to evaluate different firms and industries (some real and some hypothetical)." To
Rich people are the selfish people that only care about their wealth and about their
Almost everybody hopes to be rich. Society believes that only the social status can define the kind of person you are. Majority of