Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The bond between animals and humans
The bond between animals and humans
Human and animal relationship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The bond between animals and humans
In a human life, there are so many relationships like the one between husband and wife, between mother and child, or between brother and sister. Besides those relationships, there can also be a connection between human and nature. Nature is comprised of a variety of things, such as plants, landscape, other features, and animals. There are plenty of relationships between natures, like relation with animal and plants. The book H is for Hawk by Helen Macdonald talks about the relationship between her and a hawk. She got the hawk after her dad die. There is a strong connection between them that helped her got over the grief of losing her father. In the book I and Thou by Martin Buber, he talks about the I and Thou relationship between human and …show more content…
nature. After reading the two very different books, one is a philosopher book and one talks about the connection between human and the hawk, I do agree, that one can certainly have an I- Thou relationship with nature. Nature is wonderful. Everything from the spring flowers, the green of summer trees, the autumn leaves and the winter snow are all beautiful. It provides the busy human mind a calm and relaxing place to go to. Once a connection is established with it, one feels nature differently. According to “I and thou”, Martin Buber stated: “that as I contemplate the tree I am drawn into a relation and the tree ceases to be an It” (page 58, Martin Buber). Most of the time, people see nature as an object, an I- It relationship, people do not usually connect with it. However, when people appreciate their relationship or connection with nature, it will be no longer It but it will be Thou, an I- Thou relationship. When saying It, it sounds like there is no emotional connection, no emotion in it. But when saying using Thou or treat objects as Thou, it sounds like there is an emotional and deep connection with it. One of the great examples that emphasize this concept is the relationship of Helen and the hawk in “H is for Hawk”.
As taken from page 89, “as I sit there happily feeding tidbits to the hawk, her name drops into my head, Mable. From amabilis, meaning loveable or dear” Helen mentioned (page 89, chapter 9). As Helen was watching the bird, one could say that she fell in love. She named her hawk Mable. A name is something that identifies a person. It, however, can be more than just a term of reference for humans give names to the things that they love. For example people name their dogs, cats, and fish. The names can represent their personalities, which is why the giving names can convey some sort of connection between human and animal. The name given is what one thinks best fits the animal being named. No one names their pet unless they want to treat it as a human or even, as a friend, who they can play, talk, or spend time with like a real human being. Calling names rather referring to a dog or a cat shows more affection towards the pets. Through this detail, it is proving that Helen looked at the hawk as a being I- Thou relationship, something that she loves and cares for, not as an object. Besides the naming, the author of the book “H is for Hawk” also feels her connection with her hawk somewhat resembles a mom’s connection with child. She stated: “she is a child… I reach down and start, unconsciously as a mother helping a child with her dinner, plucking the pheasant with the hawk” (page 184, chapter 19). Helen feels like she was a mother and the hawk was her child. She was helping the hawk to eat like a mother preparing a meal for her child. The relationship between a mother and child is quite unique in a way that it can shape a person’s life. Through this point, it shows that there is a very strong connection between Helen and the hawk. Though it might not be the same as the I-Thou relationship, the motherly love is as strong love as that of the I- thou
relationship. Nature is so beautiful that one can definitely have a relationship with it. As in the three spheres, in which the world of relation arises, that Buber mentioned; one of the three spheres that he talks about is life of nature. He said: “Here the relation vibrates in the dark and remains below language. The creatures stir across from us, but they are unable to come to us, and the You we say to them sticks to the threshold of language” (page 57, Martin Buber). The You here means I- Thou relationship. This refers to us, who are making an I-Thou relationship with objects. This means that the relation is hidden in the dark and has a limit of language. Natures are all around in our every daily task, but we do not usually connect nor have a relationship with it. We see natures as an It. But once we treat it as Thou, we will reach the border of language, an obstacle which separates human and nature. Overcoming that obstacle by seeing nature as Thou, we will have connection with it. Taken from H is for hawk, “I was turning into a hawk” (page 85, chapter 9) said Helen. She felt like she was turning into a hawk. She tried to understand the hawk’s state of mind by looking at its postures and movement of feathers, so she could figure out what the bird needed. By understanding body languages of the hawk, she can tell how the hawk is really feeling. The author tried to make connection to the bird in different ways. By doing so, she felt like she was literally turning into a hawk. She felt so connected with the hawk, she was aware of the meaning of every action of the hawk like it was communicating to her. A similar quote that points out the I- Thou relation by Helen is: “hunting with the hawk took me to the very edge of being a human” (page 195, chapter 21). By being close to the hawk for some time, she felt like the hawk is making her felt like she is on the edge on human and hawk. By running after the hawk when it hunts the prey, the author feels like she was merged with nature and becomes a hawk. When the hawk got the prey, however, she pulled herself back to human. Another point about the I- thou relationship between author and the hawk is that she denied everything in her daily life to be with the hawk. She said: “in two months, I will have no office, no college, no salary, no home. Everything will be different” (page 124, chapter 13). She denied her job that was offered. All she wanted to do was to fly the hawk. She had no ambition for her career like other people usually do. She could not see anything else beside the hawk in her coming days, or perhaps months and years. At this point, it shows that the relationship between her and the hawk is very strong, which made her unable to leave the hawk. These details show that what Helen did is matched with Buber‘s statement, which is mentioned above. At first when Helen got the hawk, she saw it as an It. She could not understand the hawk nor did the hawk understand her. There was a barrier between them that prevented them from connecting. But by trying to understand the hawk’s mood, and felt that she was transforming into a hawk, seeing It as a Thou, helped them get over the obstacle, the “threshold of language”. They understood each other more and more, to the point where Helen sacrificed her everything for the Hawk. Helen’s human- nature relationship was strong to the point of sacrifices being made for her hawk. Life is both coincidence and chance. It is filled with all surprises, one won’t know what he is going to get. Buber stated: “the You encounters me by grace- it cannot be found by seeking…all life is encounters” ( page 62, Martin Buber). The relationship I- Thou are by encounter, by chance, not by seeking it out. Like in the H is for hawk when she first encountered Mabel. Helen said: “this is not my hawk” (page 5, chapter 5). This is what the author said when she saw the bigger bird’s eyes even though she was assigned to the bigger bird. After she saw the smaller bird, she felt like there is a connection between her and the smaller bird, and not the bigger bird. The author encounters the smaller bird by chance and it is also by chance that she wanted to keep her. It was by chance that the bigger bird happened to have a wild look in her eyes. Helen was somehow scared in a way and did not want to take in the bigger bird, instead, she wanted the smaller bird. As mentioned above, the relationship between I- Thou can very much be similar to the relationship between Helen and Mable, who she sees as Thou and nature. Both of them are similar in the aspect of love with nature, encounter, and a strong connection of love. Encounter here means that the relationship between the two is random, coincidence. By this factor, it will change the perspective of that person. It will make the relationship become deeper and stronger. Even though I and thou is more of a lover relationship, the relationship between mother and daughter is just as strong as that of I and Thou. Helen was willing to give up everything for her hawk, she was in love with the hawk, she can prefer the hawk as I- Thou.
In Emerson’s article, Nature, the passage shows great value of how man and nature can be similar. The article shows in many ways how man can represent nature, and how nature can represent everything. Emerson’s Nature can be related to Guy Montag’s journey into nature in Fahrenheit 451, and the author’s ways of showing similarity between man and vegetable can be presented as showing how nature is mixed in with literature and humans.
The bond between humans and nature, it is fascinating to see how us has humans and nature interact with each other and in this case the essay The Heart’s Fox by Josephine Johnson is an example of judging the unknown of one's actions. She talks about a fox that had it's life taken as well as many others with it, the respect for nature is something that is precious to most and should not be taken advantage of. Is harming animals or any part of nature always worth it? I see this text as a way of saying that we must be not so terminate the life around us. Today I see us a s experts at destroying most around us and it's sad to see how much we do it and how it's almost as if it's okay to do and sadly is see as it nature itself hurts humans unintentionally
"Nighthawks" (1942), a famous painting from Edward Hopper, has been the subject of many poems. Most of the poems attempt to tell the story of the four people painted in the scene. The scene portrays a diner during the night or early morning before the sun comes up, and it is viewed outside on a dark street as someone is looking in. There is nothing threatening about this scene and it suggests there is no danger around the corner; it gives the people in this painting a kind of serenity. The painting is an oil and canvas work and set in the 1930’s or 1940’s. I can tell by the diner’s architecture, clothing, hairstyles and hats of the customers, also by the five-cent cigar sign. This diner looks like it should be
The tile of the poem “Bird” is simple and leads the reader smoothly into the body of the poem, which is contained in a single stanza of twenty lines. Laux immediately begins to describe a red-breasted bird trying to break into her home. She writes, “She tests a low branch, violet blossoms/swaying beside her” and it is interesting to note that Laux refers to the bird as being female (Laux 212). This is the first clue that the bird is a symbol for someone, or a group of people (women). The use of a bird in poetry often signifies freedom, and Laux’s use of the female bird implies female freedom and independence. She follows with an interesting image of the bird’s “beak and breast/held back, claws raking at the pan” and this conjures a mental picture of a bird who is flying not head first into a window, but almost holding herself back even as she flies forward (Laux 212). This makes the bird seem stubborn, and follows with the theme of the independent female.
From the lone hiker on the Appalachian Trail to the environmental lobby groups in Washington D.C., nature evokes strong feelings in each and every one of us. We often struggle with and are ultimately shaped by our relationship with nature. The relationship we forge with nature reflects our fundamental beliefs about ourselves and the world around us. The works of timeless authors, including Henry David Thoreau and Annie Dillard, are centered around their relationship to nature.
Since its first appearance in the 1886 collection A White Heron and Other Stories, the short story A White Heron has become the most favorite and often anthologized of Sarah Orne Jewett. Like most of this regionalist writer's works, A White Heron was inspired by the people and landscapes in rural New England, where, as a little girl, she often accompanied her doctor father on his visiting patients. The story is about a nine-year-old girl who falls in love with a bird hunter but does not tell him the white heron's place because her love of nature is much greater. In this story, the author presents a conflict between femininity and masculinity by juxtaposing Sylvia, who has a peaceful life in country, to a hunter from town, which implies her discontent with the modernization?s threat to the nature.
the nonspecific or universal role of relationships been analyzed in the context of the larger novel.
Emerson explains Fate through nature. "Nature magically suits the man to his fortunes" (1118). Society, slouching in its custom-made "civilization", looks down on nature and it’s cruel and nonsensical disposition. Emerson even states, "Nature is no sentimentalist…the world is rough and surly, and will not mind drowning a man or woman; but will swallow your ship like a grain of dust. The diseases, the elements, fortune, gravity, lightning, respect no persons" (1105). But Emerson pushes beyond the contradiction of "civilized society" versus "savage wilderness", and shows how the very essence of existence---the patterns of life---are displayed and enacted perfectly in nature. For example, forrest fires which scorch hundreds of acres upon acres of life, are essential in the cycle of growth. Life grows out of that devistation. Fate, then, being the idea that nothing happens by "chance" and everything in interconnected, is embodied in nature’s processes. He states, "Wonderful intricacy in the web, wonderful constancy in the design this vagabond life admits" (1120). The web is the web of life; a metaphor often associated with Native American spirituality depicting the interconnectedness of all life.
In “The Fish” by Elizabeth Bishop, the narrator attempts to understand the relationship between humans and nature and finds herself concluding that they are intertwined due to humans’ underlying need to take away from nature, whether through the act of poetic imagination or through the exploitation and contamination of nature. Bishop’s view of nature changes from one where it is an unknown, mysterious, and fearful presence that is antagonistic, to one that characterizes nature as being resilient when faced against harm and often victimized by people. Mary Oliver’s poem also titled “The Fish” offers a response to Bishop’s idea that people are harming nature, by providing another reason as to why people are harming nature, which is due to how people are unable to view nature as something that exists and goes beyond the purpose of serving human needs and offers a different interpretation of the relationship between man and nature. Oliver believes that nature serves as subsidence for humans, both physically and spiritually. Unlike Bishop who finds peace through understanding her role in nature’s plight and acceptance at the merging between the natural and human worlds, Oliver finds that through the literal act of consuming nature can she obtain a form of empowerment that allows her to become one with nature.
The poems, "The Bull Moose" by Alden Nowlan, "The Panther" by Rainer Maria Rilke, "Walking the Dog" by Howard Nemerov, and "The Fish" by Elizabeth Bishop, illustrate what happens when people and nature come together, but the way in which the people react to these encounters in these poems is very different. I believe that when humans and nature come together either they clash and conflict because individuals destroy and attempt to control nature, which is a reflection of their powerful need to control themselves, or humans live peacefully with nature because they not only respect and admire nature, but also they can see themselves in the nature.
Nature is often used as imagery in Alexander Pope's, Eloisa to Abelard, as well as descriptions of heaven, holiness, God, being wedded to God, Jesus' sacrifice, the sacred, solitary confinement, crime and offense, desire for submission to God and often tears and weeping. As the poem is about Eloisa and Abelard being in love, married and having a child, then being separated and Abelard castrated and Eloisa forced into a convent, descriptions of nature are useful imagery, because it is used to explain Eloisa's conflict between what is natural for her to feel. More specifically, Eloisa is torn between being a devout Christian and her love for Abelard that has been condemned. She struggles between following God and loving Abelard because she feels it is natural to do both, yet she is being forced to choose, however, she cannot. Although, if she must decide, she chooses Abelard, against what she has been taught she must do, which is to serve God piously. Eloisa is forced into a kind of purgatory, caught between loving mortal and carnal desires, and higher divine love.
bird as the metaphor of the poem to get the message of the poem across
Nature influences the world through its effects on civilization and how it is perceived by society. Ecocriticism is the theory that nature is an important aspect in a literary work that affects the interpretation of the story. Ecocritics view the story through a lens that observes the story’s representation of nature and extend the use of ecocentric concepts for aspects other than nature such as energy, balance, and imbalance. Peter Barry writes of how ecocritics see nature in Beginning Theory, “For the ecocritic, nature really exists, out there beyond ourselves, not needing to be ironized as a concept by enclosure within knowing inverted commas, but actually present as an entity which affects us, and which we can affect, perhaps fatally, if we mistreat it” (Barry 243) The Heart of Darkness contains vast amounts of situations that portray nature as a dark, mysterious, and untamed wild. The fear of the jungle, relationships between natives and the company, and Kurtz’s conversion are three aspects that are affected by the power of nature.
Ralph Waldo Emerson(1803-1882), the leader of the Transcendentalism in New England, is the first American who wrote prose and poem on nature and the relationship between nature and man Emerson's philosophy of Transcendentalism concerning nature is that nature is only another side of God "the gigantic shadow of God cast our senses." Every law in nature has a counterpart in the intellect. There is a perfect parallel between the laws of nature and the laws of thought. Material elements simply represent an inferior plane: wherever you enumerate a physical law, I hear in it a moral rule. His poem The Rhodora is a typical instance to illustrate his above-mentioned ideas on nature. At the very beginning of the poem, the poet found the fresh rhodora in the woods, spreading its leafless blooms in a deep rock, to please the desert and the sluggish brook, while sea-winds pieced their solitudes in May. It is right because of the rhodora that the desert and the sluggish brook are no longer solitudes. Then the poem goes to develop by comparison between the plumes of the redbird and the rhodora . Although the bird is elegant and brilliant, the flower is much more beautiful than the bird. So the sages can not helping asking why this charm is wasted on the earth and sky. The poet answers beauty is its own cause for being just as eyes are made for seeing. There is no other reason but beauty itsel...
Exploring the essence of what it means to be human as well as the essence of nature connects the relation between the two more closely. For instance, in Bookchins reading he mentions the difference between first and second nature, where first nature can be related to the concept of nature as an essence. First nature deals with the biological evolution of nature, so in other words the qualities constructed in order to identify something. If humans are able to realize that every living thing as an essence, the natural world becomes more interrelated to humans. By viewing nature as having a specific type of essence, individuals are able to understand that nature is characterized by being natural and pristine and must remain in this way. For example, problems such as pollution can be seen as unnatural and caused by the carelessness of humans. When individuals realize that this is unnatural they are able to protect and sustain nature in order to keep the natural