Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Liberal victory in 1906 what happened to the electorate
Short term and long term effects of the south african boer war
Why did the liberals win in the 1906 election essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Reasons for the Liberal Election Victory of 1906
The Liberal election victory of 1906 was due to key issues that the
Liberals manipulated to their favour whereas the exhausted
Conservatives barely defended their actions. This election victory was
on the back of Unionist dominance that had spanned a decade driven by
three key issues: "the crown, the church and the constitution." After
the Second Boer War in South Africa, everything began to go wrong for
the Unionists who then found their own leader, Balfour, losing his
seat in his own constituency of Blackpool.
The key areas of victory are the Tory blunders and the Liberal
successes. The decline of the Unionists seemed to begin after the 1900
Khaki election when things began to go wrong in South Africa.
Guerrilla Warfare began, and for a while, the sure victory appeared to
become a long, hard struggle. This raised questions within Britain at
the army's strength and the countries health. Firstly, "22,000" were
killed in South Africa and this raised questions about the army's
competence as they resorted to "Scorched Earth and concentration
camps" which raised ethical questions in Britain. Secondly the army
rejected "34.6%" of volunteers which also suspected the health of
Britain's youth as it would be them who would have to fight in the
future. This coincided with the studies of Rowntree and Booth, who
concluded Britain was poor and becoming poorer. As a result, people
would think that Britain was not as secure under the Unionists as it
could be under the Liberals and this would be a reason for their
election loss. It can be seen that the Unionists won the 1900 election
mainly ...
... middle of paper ...
...is issue.
Overall, the Liberals won the 1906 election due to the Tory decline
and Liberal supremacy. The Liberals had good organization attacking
key areas and issues with powerful and crowd pleasing speakers. The
Unionists however were weak and exhausted. They had run out of ideas
and looked lethargic. They were beaten on key issues such as Tariff
Reform and had incited people who would not usual vote, to vote
against them. They even turned their own supporters against them on
moral issues and were badly divided on Tariff reform. Britain was
going through bad times as Rowntree concluded and the Unionists were
not inspiring the county to change this. Overall as Churchill said the
Unionists lost as they were exhausted this explaining the need to call
an early election, which in the end turned out to be their downfall.
It could be argued that Gladstone’s failure to unite his party, during a time when their ultimate support and confidence in his leadership was crucial, was a significant tactical error that contributed heavily towards the failure of the 1886 Home Rule Bill. The results of the 1885 general election were to have a significant impact on the political landscape of Britain; despite winning the most seats, the Liberals did not have an overall majority.As Parnell and the Irish Parliamentry Party (IPP) held the balance...
Assess the Claim that the Labour Governments of 1924 and 1929-31 Were Unable to Achieve Anything
who had been seen by many Tories as a future leader of the party lost
for the split in 1931. It was also not easy for the labour party when
rrick Thomas To conclude, in my opinion it would be fair to allocate much of the blame for the result of the 1906 election to the Conservative Party under Balfour. Though in fairness the Liberals, through clever policy did capitalise on Balfour’s mistakes. Perhaps Balfour’s biggest mistake was his constant misjudgement of public opinion, this is especially true in regards to the working classes. Between 1900 and 1906 Balfour failed to realise the potential of the working class, he continued to upset them through such political misjudgements as Taff Vale, or the Unemployment Workers Act 1905.
During the First World War, Britain introduced conscription for the first time to massively increase the input of power of their army had and forced men aged 16-19 to serve in the army. However, a group of roughly 16,800 men refused to serve. These groups of people were called Conscientious Objectors; sometimes called COs or Conchies; and many were very religious and believed that thou shall not kill as it is a sin in the Bible. This was a main point that most Conscientious Objectors did not take any part during the First World War as they believed it would result in pointless bloodshed. The Government’s and general public’s view on Conscientious Objectors was that Conscientious Objectors were unpatriotic cowards and the Government used propaganda to manipulate the general public’s view on Conscientious Objectors by showing that they would not aid the Britain and were weak. As a result they were treated harshly. The Government made being a Conscientious Objector very hard and difficult as they would enforce tribunals which consisted of ex- military officials who were biased as they were for the First World War. Therefore, these people gave huge prison sentences to Conscientious Objectors as a scare tactic to reduce the number of Conscientious Objectors. Historians use interpretations to show the message behind each source to see it’s reliable or useful. Also this is done to see if the source itself is a primary or secondary interpretation which shows if the source’s view and meaning is from the author of sources (primary interpretation) or giving a generalised views on people who were there at the time (secondary interpretation).
To begin with, this era was more a victory for liberalism through many aspects one being politics. The first change progressives wanted in politics was the "initiative were voters could initiate laws instead of waiting for legislatures to do it. Another was the "referendum" were voters could vote proposed bills into law, once again taking power away from the legislatures and giving it to the people. Others included the recall, where voters could remove elected officials from power, the secret or "Australian Ballot" which allowed for more privacy when voting thus encouraging a more true vote and less intimidation at the polls. Also, Roosevelt, who at the beginning of his presidency may have been classified as conservatist, moved more towards progressivism as he pursued his "three C's ", (Control of corporations, Consumer protection, and Co...
Earl of Derby seemed to be the only suitable leader but he was considerably apprehensive and unenthusiastic to say the least, the Duke of Newcastle wrote to him expressing his eagerness for Derby “allow us to rally to you as our “great captain” but Derby responded by saying that he did not hold the ambition to become the leader of party. Nevertheless Der... ... middle of paper ... ... ort from the emerging middle class, with drive and clarity of vision by an appropriate leader I believe the conservative party could have been re-born and turned into a major political force long before they fully recovered from the effects of the split.
we see a drowning man we do not drag him to the shore. Instead, we
wins in a row was an advantage to the labour party. Though at the time
Previously Whigs would have benefited from this however; as Farmer argues, “the Whig collapse has often been seen as a direct result of the Kansas Nebraska Act”. This emphasises that all the factors are linked as the actions of politicians with the Kansas Nebraska Act and the decisions over slavery caused the Whig party failure. This all built up created the tensions that resulted in the Civil War. Another reason for Whig's failure was their inability to deal with the two major issues of immigration and Catholicism.
The reasons why the 1968 elections did not work because of the PNC which was led by Burnham who rigged the elections. As a result of the elections enabled the PNC to stay in power. The government ...
It is said that the New Labour won the election, because they have tried to
Their initial victory was “followed by an ensuing struggle to implement change”. The people had taken to the streets not knowing what they would do if they did manage to take power. Now that they had, because of their different individual aims, they found it hard to compromise. This eventually led to a growing split between moderates and radicals, as well as between social classes, particularly in France. The moderates did not want a government based on universal male suffrage and the middle classes were determined to resist the demands of the lower classes....
The Liberal Party was created a short time after confederation. It had little luck a first being considered a minority government, but in 1873 Canada formed its first liberal government with Alexander Mackenzie as the leader (image on right), he was the second prime minister following Sir John A MacDonald. Edward Blake later took over the position of the liberal party due to Mackenzie's lack of ‘political vision’. Blake was the only leader to never become Prime Minister until the 21 century (Christina.M McCall). After that the leaders of the liberal party included Sir Wilfrid Laurier, William Lyon Mackenzie King, Louis St Laurent, Lester. B Pearson, Pierre Elliott Trudeau, John Turner, Jean Chretien, Paul Martin and the current