The Labour Government and Its Success in Achieving Its Aims in 1924
In January 1924 Ramsey MacDonald formed labours initial administration
in coalition with the liberals his appointment of red clydesider and
fellow Scot John Wheatley as health minister raised hopes of social
change in Scotland. The labour and liberal governments were able to
out vote the conservatives over political issues.
Wheatley's 1924 Housing Act attempted to initiate an agenda of slum
clearance and subsidised housing but it died with the Conservative
triumph in the General Election in October. In 1929 there was a
minority government so passing laws were complicated, however, the
liberals supported the labour party.
The labour government had many aims for Britain in different areas of
politics. The financial issues affecting the British population and
the government were that the government required to decrease the total
of expenditure; this enabled them to steady the economy and help to
finance the country. In 1929 the country had suffered economic
depression from the Wall Street crash this also contributed to the
decline of trade in Britain and the economy slumping.
There was a large dilemma of unemployment in Britain and the
government wanted to get rid of poverty. Sickness and old age also
contributed to this poverty. The living conditions in Britain were
very low people lived in cramped houses close together, which were a
large concern as this was main cause of ill health, and contributed to
the unemployment, as individuals could not work when they were in
sickness. The 1924 government was determined to reduce this poverty
and harsh living condit...
... middle of paper ...
...aintain an economic
equilibrium in Britain at this cruel time. This was the major reason
for the split in 1931. It was also not easy for the labour party when
they were branded as a communist party as they lost support, and gave
way for the conservative party to take over. MacDonald was alleged as
an unreliable, erratic prime minister and was a contribution to the
lack of achievements, however MacDonald is not exclusively to blame as
there was other state of affairs out of his control which also
contributed to the downfall and discontinued MacDonald as prime
minister. I consider the labour government as successful in achieving
some aspects of their aims but did not accomplish the criteria of
their principles, and their outlook towards governing Britain was
unreliable and showed MacDonald as an unskilled prime minister.
Assess the Claim that the Labour Governments of 1924 and 1929-31 Were Unable to Achieve Anything
Gladstone’s Ministry of 1868-74 as a Great Reforming Government ‘We came in on the principle of not harassing the country’ Benjamin Disraeli on the 1874 general election. Gladstone’s ministry of 1868-74 was renowned for reforming, this is largely due to the number of reforms passed in the six year period and the vast variety of the reforms. Indeed there were thirteen reforms during this ministry and they covered areas such as: education; the armed forces; trade unions; Ireland the electoral system and many more. Despite this to truly gauge how great a reforming government this was one must consider what ‘a great reforming government’ is. For instance, was the large number of reforms unusual to ministries of this time?
The Significance of the Liberal Election Victory of 1906 “A quiet, but certain, revolution, as revolutions come in a constitutional country” was how Lloyd George hailed the election victory of 1906. The significance of the Liberal election victory of 1906 is that it laid down solid foundations to provide the welfare state we have today. It also saw the rise of the Labour Party, giving the working class its own political voice. The results of the 1906 election were literally a reversal of the 1900 election. The Liberals enjoyed the landslide victory that the conservatives had six years earlier.
The growth of government from 1877 through 1920 was the worst example of “America the great exception” because every time the government took one step forward toward making America better, it would inevitably take 5 steps backward.
The Reasons for the Liberal Election Victory of 1906 The Liberal election victory of 1906 was due to key issues that the Liberals manipulated to their favour whereas the exhausted Conservatives barely defended their actions. This election victory was on the back of Unionist dominance that had spanned a decade driven by three key issues: "the crown, the church and the constitution. " After the Second Boer War in South Africa, everything began to go wrong for the Unionists who then found their own leader, Balfour, losing his seat in his own constituency of Blackpool. The key areas of victory are the Tory blunders and the Liberal successes. The decline of the Unionists seemed to begin after the 1900 Khaki election when things began to go wrong in South Africa.
This was the only opportunity for work at the time for most. Politically, today's issues are handled differently and there is less support and teamwork within our society. In the 1930’s, the majority, including the candidates and congress, were supportive and willing to work together as one, and were not afraid to make mistakes to see what needed to be eliminated and what was a success that could be kept.
Was it because of his part in the decline of the Liberal party? Or was
one that was affected by there being no ships as the ships ran on coal
The Effect of World War I on Social and Economic Life in Britain The First World War changed a lot of things social and economically for Britain. These changes consisted of the diminishing international trade, the woman’s role, and changes in political issues and different attitudes to the war. I will show how far Britain’s economic and social state changed due to the war, causing negative and positive changes. Britain’s international export trade was a problem for Britain as during the war Staple industries relied heavily on exporting; they also relied on old markets such as Russia, the Far East and elsewhere which were closed to them because of the war.
The Strike of 1934 On May 9th 1934 a organized labor strike started in San Francisco that would snowball into a city crippling strike. The International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) declared a strike for all longshoremen on the west coast, until they received better wages, a union-administered hiring hall, and union membership as a prerequisite for employed longshoremen. The Strike of 1934 lasted for three months, stopping maritime trade in the ports of the Western United States, from San Diego to Seattle. The clash was between the Industrial Association (IA), composed of big business and employers wanting to break the strike, and the ILA, along with other unions that dealt with maritime trades.
Following the conclusion of the Great War, the 1920s were an age of dramatic economic, social and political change. By definition, change refers to a difference in a situation at different points in time. Heraclitus was the first philosopher known to have directly concerned change with certain aphorisms such as "one cannot step into the same river twice" . This is generally referring to the contradiction between calling the river the same, while knowing that the materials of the river, the waters, have completely changed – but nothing ever truly ‘changes.’ This principle can be applied towards the quote “the more things change, the more they stay the same.” The boom and bust of America and the coming in and out of isolationism. The eternal
What Happened in Britain During the Great Depression? It is easy to hear “Great Depression” and immediately think only of the United States. The reason for this is that the Great Depression began in the United States, but the effects were far from isolated to the United States. Though Britain was affected in many ways by the Great Depression, I believe that the greatest overall effect of the Great Depression on Britain was a high and unrelenting unemployment rate.
After World War one, industrialization took action. This provided many jobs, but many problems also arouse. To help the working conditions, working people relied on the government and private citizens to induce a positive change.
Lenin's Economic Policies in 1924 When the Bolsheviks seized power in October 1917 they inherited many of the problems faced by the old Tsarist regime as well as those of the Provisional Government after the Tsars abdication. Lenin, as leader of the Bolsheviks took many measures to try and solve these problems, each with varying degrees of success. This essay will, therefore, go on to look at and discuss the various measures that Lenin and the Bolshevik party took, and, whether these measures created more problems for Russia in the end or in fact made significant progress towards the communist society that Lenin had prophesised for Russia. In the early days of Bolshevik rule, there were many problems facing Lenin.
" The real meaning of the New Economic policy is that we have met a