Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short note on war poetry
Short note on war poetry
Short note on war poetry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Short note on war poetry
The Reality of War in Various Poetry
Works Cited Missing
The First World War was unlike any previous was Britain had ever
fought. The horror of both the physical conditions and the reality of
battle moved soldier and officer alike to express their reactions in
verse. The soldiers' shock at the contrast between their experiences
and their previous conceptions of war as described by the propaganda
at home made many soldiers angry and bitter, which is reflected in all
of these poems. The poets intended to shock the complacent and naïve
British public into an awareness of the brutal horrors faced by the
soldiers at the front. The audience's lack of understanding was due to
the propaganda, which had fostered the belief, during previous years
of small colonial wars, that Britain was an indomitable world power.
The country had been brought up to believe 'the Old Lie: Dulce et
decorum est. / Pro patria mori.' It is sweet and honourable to die for
your country. Sassoon, Owen and Rosenberg attempted to dispel this
romanticised illusion of war and to present the British people with
the true horror of what the soldiers in the front line faced.
All eight of the poems describe the horror of both the trenches and
the battlefields although they all emphasise different aspects of the
conditions faced by the soldiers. Owen's 'Exposure' and Sassoon's 'The
Dug- Out' emphasise the cold and boredom of the soldiers. Owen
recounts "the merciless iced winds that knive …" the soldiers in the
front line trenches as described in 'Exposure'. The weather is
portraye...
... middle of paper ...
...see you lights!" which means he won't be blind to
which Owen replies "But ours had long died out." This is a stark,
final note on war and the despair that they are experiencing.
The stark harshness of the imagery incorporated in the poems supported
by the poets uses of literary devices succeed in making the poems
powerful anti-war messages. The power of the poetry still affects the
reader today, although perhaps we view it more dispassionately than
the contemporary audience of the day, nevertheless the words and
images still appal. The last lines of "The Sentry" leaves the reader
with a sense of bleakness at the pointless ruination of this young
man's life. Equally the gassed soldier in "Dulce et decorum est"
evokes a hideous image of his agonising end which, like Owen, could
easily haunt your own "smothering dream".
The two poems, 'Dulce et decorum est' and 'Who's for the game?' are both very different war poems. Although they were both written about the First World War, they both had different purposes. The poems have aspects in which they are similar, but they also have very big differences.
are not free in service, you do what you are told and this is the same
In the poem Dulce et Decorum Est Pro Patria Mori, he shows his feelings of betrayal, pity and the sense of sacrifice of human life due to the war, as the consequences do not result in any good for anyone, especially the family and friends of the victims. The title, when translated to English from Latin, means ‘It is sweet and honourable to die for one’s country’, being very ironic, compared to what he is writing throughout the poem, by his sense of hatred and pity towards war. He starts off with a simile, “like old beggars under sacks”, which does not depict a masculine image, already, ironic to the title, as it is not honourable to die “like old beggars”. Throughout the poem, a very graphical and comfronting image can be pictured in the reader’s head, recounting all of the shocking details of the war, such as the gas, “Gas! Gas! Quick, boys!” which is also a reminder of their youth and innocence, being put into a war where they thought it might be fun. I...
Although war is often seen as a waste of many lives, poets frequently focus on its effect on individuals. Choose two poems of this kind and show how the poets used individual situations to illustrate the impact of war.
Owen opens his poem with a strong simile that compares the soldiers to old people that may be hunch-backed. ‘Bent double, like old beggars like sacks.’ ‘like sacks’ suggests the image that the soldiers are like homeless people at the side of a street that is all dirty. This highlights that the clothes they were wearing were al...
Owen then moves on to tell us how even in their weak human state, the soldiers march on, until the enemy fires gas shells at them. This sudden situation causes the soldiers to hurriedly put their gas masks on, but one soldier did not put it on in time. Owen tells us the condition the soldier is in, and how, even in the time to come, he could not forget the images that it left him with. In the last stanza he tells the readers that if we had seen what he had seen then we would never encourage the next generation to fight in a war. Owen uses imagery constantly to convey the conditions and feelings experienced during this war.
‘Poetry can challenge the reader to think about the world in new ways.’ It provokes the readers to consider events, issues and people with revised understanding and perspectives. The poems Dulce Et Decorum Est (Wilfred Owen, 1917) and Suicide in the Trenches (Siegfried Sassoon, 1917), were composed during World War One and represented the poets’ point of views in regards to the glorification of war and encouraged readers to challenge their perspectives and reflect upon the real consequences behind the fabrications of the glory and pride of fighting for one’s nation.
Wilfred Owen’s poem “Dulce et Decorum Est” makes the reader acutely aware of the impact of war. The speaker’s experiences with war are vivid and terrible. Through the themes of the poem, his language choices, and contrasting the pleasant title preceding the disturbing content of the poem, he brings attention to his views on war while during the midst of one himself. Owen uses symbolism in form and language to illustrate the horrors the speaker and his comrades go through; and the way he describes the soldiers, as though they are distorted and damaged, parallels how the speaker’s mind is violated and haunted by war.
The next line expresses the way in which he has no grave stone, just a
The poetic techniques used in Wilfred Owen’s war poetry sweep the reader from the surface of knowing to the essence of truly appreciating his ideas. Through sonnets, Para rhymes, ironic titles, voices and strong imagery, not only is the reader able to comprehend to the futility and the horrors of the Great War, but also they can almost physically and mentally empathise with those who fought. Through the three poems examined, it is evident that Owen goes to great effort to describe the conditions and thoughts of the First World War, thus his works are considered an invaluable asset to the modern literature.
There are many things in this world that are impossible to understand without first hand experience.This can be especially irritating for people who have the knowledge, but see everyone else with the wrong idea. Philip Larkin and Wilfred Owen show this in their poems about the common misconception of war glorification. Through imagery and the use of similes, they explain what it's really like for a person to go into battle. To outsiders, fighting in war is a noble cause worthy of envy and praise, but from the inside perspective the only thing war does is take away the innocence of
The romanticism of war is separate and opposite of romanticism for life. They cannot exist at the same time. War stands for death and destruction and life is the opposite. There is a constant clash between the love of decency: courage and devotion to your fellow men, and the love of life free of the horrors of war. War, and all things that propel war, is inherently evil. Beliefs in heroism, honor, and dignity are all idealistic. To the soldier on the field of battler their sole purpose is self-preservation. The only way that soldiers can persevere through the God awful shitty mess of war is through the brotherhood between the soldiers. This bond does not negate the hypocrisy of war; instead, it allows the men to survive it. The brotherhood is love for the sake of self-preservation. At its core, war dehumanizes people and one cannot have love for life if they are less than human.
He may have used this technique to make war seem if it had made men
War consumes the youth of young men and completely alters a person. From numerous poems, it is made clear that war exhausts the youth of young men, and has left their lives with no meaning. These poems are “Dulce Et Decorum Est” and “Mental Cases” written by Wilfred Owen. Similarly, they both employ the same techniques, such as similes and metaphors. However, a somewhat different perspective is projected through the poem “In Flanders Field” by John McCrae, which dissimilitudes yet intensifies the main message. Whether from a more emotional perspective or from a physical view, war has devastated the prime time of many young men in multitudinous ways.
Owen who experienced the war himself writes the truth about war through his poems without dramatizing it. A powerful argument against the complacency of those who believe war to be a glorious patriotic duty is mounted by Owen. He is also succeeded in portraying the reality of the war—the boredom, the helplessness of the people in the war through his writings. Instead of direct description of the anger and frustration of the people due to the devastation of war, Owen euphemistically delivers his messages by painting vivid imaginaries through his tonal, point of view, sentence struct...