The Quest for Knowledge

1251 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Humanities vs sciences summary

In order to be convinced by a statement, I require solid evidence that yields the truth of that statement. Upon speculating how to go about finding this evidence, I examine how the rest of society does so. A vast amount of credit is given toward theories found in the human and natural sciences. Scientists are recognized as authoritative figures with the recent development of inventions, medicine and scientific discoveries in the past century. This poses the question of how science has influenced and shaped the world with the credibility of its theories. This knowledge issue will be studied by analyzing how these two areas of knowledge approach a conclusion, assessing common reasons for high value placement of scientific theories, comparing science to another area of knowledge, and exploring problems with this method of gaining knowledge. I shall attempt to explain why and to what extent scientific theories are convincing to the general world.

Natural sciences and human sciences possess different approaches to arriving at a conclusion. Natural sciences use the “scientific method”. We trust natural scientists to reason while asking a question, perform background research, construct a hypothesis, test said hypothesis through experimentation, review data to draw a conclusion, and communicate the results. A widely known example of previous natural sciences: the Catholic Church deemed the earth as the center of the universe for hundreds of years. However, human scientists use a different approach. While water can undoubtedly be expected to freeze at 32 degrees Fahrenheit, humans do not show a definite pattern of behavior. Studies in human sciences cannot be investigated solely through means of sensory perception as natural sciences. H...

... middle of paper ...

...d for these theories is to provide knowers with a basic set of ideas on which they can base their set of beliefs and lifestyles. Although, one must be careful as to how much credibility he/she places on theories of science. Scientific theories are not the ultimate truth and can lead to many misconceptions. One must learn to question, reason, and investigate on their own in order to avoid being led astray by science.

Works Cited

1. "Steps of the Scientific Method." Science Fair Project Ideas, Answers, & Tools. Web. 14 Dec. 2011. .

2. "Heliocentric." Vibrationdata. Web. 14 Dec. 2011. .

3. "Geocentric Theory." Universe Today — Space and Astronomy News. Web. 14 Dec. 2011. .

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of Motivated Rejection Of Science

    1285 Words  | 3 Pages

    The most successful approaches to the public’s acceptance of scientific information are the cues from political leaders, persuasive syntax, the use of narratives, and research into a scientific source’s

    Read More

  • Sex, Drugs, Disasters, and the Extinction of Dinosaurs by Stephen Jay Gould

    771 Words  | 2 Pages

    Any hypothesis, Gould says, begins with the collection of facts. In this early stage of a theory development bad science leads nowhere, since it contains either little or contradicting evidence. On the other hand, Gould suggests, testable proposals are accepted temporarily, furthermore, new collected facts confirm a hypothesis. That is how good science works. It is self-correcting and self-developing with the flow of time: new information improves a good theory and makes it more precise. Finally, good hypotheses create logical relations to other subjects and contribute to their expansion.

    Read More

  • Science versus Religion in Cat’s Cradle

    1425 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...on are used by all people to try to explain the world. Some people believe that science explains life with true facts, and some people believe in a supernatural god who created the world and all life in it. Either way, people use these ideas to explain why they are here on this earth and what their purpose is.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Dr. Michael Shermer's The Moral Arc

    1967 Words  | 4 Pages

    Dr. Michael Shermer is a Professor, Founder of skeptic magazine, and a distinguished and brilliant American science writer to say the least. In His book The Moral Arc: How Science Makes Us Better People he sets out to embark on the daunting task of convincing and informing the reader on sciences’ ability to drives the expansion of humanity and the growth of the moral sphere. Although such a broad and general topic could be hard to explain, Shermer does so in a way that is concise, easy to understand, and refreshing for the reader. This novel is riddled with scientific facts, data, and pictures to back up shermers claims about the history of science, humanity and how the two interact with one another.

    Read More

  • the false consensus effect

    746 Words  | 2 Pages

    the scientific method. If they participate, they will be asked to answer six questions about

    Read More

  • The Forbidden Fruit of Knowledge

    1433 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Romantic Era followed the Age of Enlightenment, a time of scientific discovery, political changes, and philosophical advancement. Romanticism challenged the rationality of the Enlightenment (Britannica). Romantic artists placed emotions above reason. In keeping with the Romantic tradition, Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley challenges the benefits of science, education, and knowledge. In Frankenstein, Dr. Frankenstein, his creature, and Robert Walton are all ambitious; they have a desire for knowledge. However, this quest for knowledge brings about destruction to Dr. Frankenstein, misery to the monster, and danger to Walton. Shelley draws parallels to the Biblical story of the Fall; a catastrophe which befell mankind because of a desire for knowledge.

    Read More

  • the body of knowledge

    563 Words  | 2 Pages

    The authors of the essence of our being compares the body of knowledge as the “head, heart and soul” of family consumers science (Anderson, C. L., & Nickols, S. Y. 2004). The article also quotes that “Basic human needs are central to the concepts in the family and consumer sciences body of knowledge” (2004) but not everyone accumulates this basic human needs the text book defines as “food, clothes, shelter and relationships.” (Kato, S.L., & Elias, J.G. 2013) But in my opinion the two most important needs are food and cloths. It is accurate that Having a relationship is part of the process of evolution and through interaction a community is established, but in other to from this interaction we need means of survival, which is food and clothes, thence the article I chose for this research “Faith in Values: How to Reduce Poverty and Save Taxpayers $4.6 Billion Per Year” by Sally Steenland (3/19/2014) explains why certain people are unable to obtain this needs. The body of knowledge relates to this article because it shows specific issues that prevents people from getting basic needs. Due to poverty families’ break apart, communities fight over resources, overpopulation, and low paying wages. According to the article, people with high income do not like the fact that they are being taxed more to help those who are pay below minimum wage when the easiest option would be to increasing minimum wage. “I find it irritating that my tax dollars are subsidizing corporations whose wages are so low that their workers qualify for basic government assistance”(Steenland.S. 2014) if companies don’t want to increase income wage and the rich don’t want more taxes, then what happens to the middle man? How does he survive?

    Read More

  • Steven Shapin's The Scientific Revolution

    980 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mistakes are made and something can easily go wrong if one looks at a fellow scientist’s report and misreads the information. Shapin examined and observed what people did when studying science to better his interpretations of it. In Shapin’s third and final chapter, he focuses on the new science and what people hoped to get out of it. This part of his writing talks about religion and the effect it had during both the current and previous situations in the world.

    Read More

  • Science in Modern European History

    1307 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout modern European history science has gradually developed into “the dominant representation of the social world”. Intellectuals are continually discovering new approaches of explaining and viewing the world. Previously, the common belief was the medieval view of nature, or that nature could be explained simply by appearances. As stated in Perry, “the Scientific Revolution brought a new, mechanical concept of nature that enabled westerners to discover and explain the laws of nature mathematically” (401). During this course of modern European history science has signified knowledge, power, and a challenge of religion; challenging religion also typically involved challenging authority. Science has developed by various intellectuals, scientists, and philosophers reworking and expanding on each other’s previous ideas over the course of modern European history.

    Read More

  • Scientific Method Essay

    916 Words  | 2 Pages

    resolve problems. With the scientific method you have four steps to follow which include defining the

    Read More

  • Is Scientific Progress Inevitable?

    980 Words  | 2 Pages

    "We often think of science as something inescapably linked to progress, and of progress as continually marching forward. We assume that there is something inevitable about the increase of knowledge and the benefits this knowledge brings" (Irvine & Russell). Provide humanity with wisdom and speculative enjoyment. This enjoyment of the public is through reading, learning and thinking. But scientists are met with the real research work.

    Read More

  • The Difference Between Scientific Knowledge and Other Types of Knowledge

    1407 Words  | 3 Pages

    The issue shall discuss the various differences between science and other types of knowledge and discuss the argument whether the science can rely without the separate theories posted by non-scientific educational bodies. ...

    Read More

  • Epistemology: Reflecting on Knowledge

    1213 Words  | 3 Pages

    Truth and beliefs contribute in building the knowledge of a person. Cogent reasons for the beliefs convert the beliefs into knowledge. However, sometimes the beliefs are actually assumption, so they may be wrong. Truth is the facts known from different sources. Something can be considered as knowledge, only if it is true. The word epistemology refers to studying the source of knowledge. The epistemology helps in understanding the process of development of knowledge, sources of knowledge and makes distinctions between belief and actual truth. I critically examined and analyzed the origin and the process of acquiring the knowledge for the two essays I wrote earlier. One essay, an analytical one, was written on the subject of increasing prison population and improper justice system. The second essay was written on the subject of human resource management. To develop the knowledge and understanding I demonstrated in the essays, I had to search for resources, rationalize the information gained and evaluate it in conjunction with my personal beliefs.

    Read More

  • Scientific Theory Essay

    1950 Words  | 4 Pages

    A scientific theory is an explanation that is well- substantiated explanation in regards to some aspect of the natural world that is attained through scientific method and is tested numerous times and usually confirmed through vigorous observation and experimentation. The term theory can be seen as a collection of laws which allow you to show some kind of phenomenon. The strength of a scientific theory associated with the diversity of phenomena can explain its elegance and simplicity. However when new evidence is gathered a scientific theory can be changed or even rejected if it does not fit the new findings, in such cases a more accurate theory is formed. Scientific theories are used to gain further

    Read More

  • Should There Be A Health Expert Opinions Or Proof Or Knowledge?

    1148 Words  | 3 Pages

    The opinions of experts are handy in the search of knowledge; however their opinions are a double edge sword – The knowledge of experts act as building blocks to our own thoughts, but sometimes the experts may be incorrect, and their beliefs lead seekers down the wrong path. Experts often do this when new ideas are purposed. They may disprove newer ideas in order to stay relevant, like when evolution was purposed. The benefits that experts can provide in the search for knowledge can be important but often times are more a hindrance. Experts act in some ways as a neighbor shouting to you as you walk around the block but are not as fundamental emotion, sense, perception, and language in the search for knowledge. The opinions are useful when reasoning especially in regards to the History, Human Science and Natural Science Areas of Knowledge.

    Read More

More about The Quest for Knowledge

Open Document