The Pros and Cons of Crime Prevention

2756 Words6 Pages

Advantages and Disadvantages of Crime Prevention

Within this assignment I will attempt to discuss the advantages and the disadvantages of the current emphasis which is placed upon the scientific evaluation of crime prevention.

I will explore the many different ways in which crime prevention is addressed. The first part of this assignment is looking into the emergence of crime prevention and community safety and why it is required in today’s society.

Within the last decades of the twentieth Century, nation-states have been unable to meet their core responsibility to provide communities with security, especially when it comes to physical security from criminal attacks. This has lead to a ‘fear of crime’ within today’s society. (Hughes 2002 P3)

Punishment did not appear to work and the prisons were bulging with convicted criminals, who time after time re-offended. There were also problems and issues with the costs and the influences of the traditional criminal justice system.

(Huges and Lewis, 1998: Clarke et al, 2000)

Martinson 1974 cited in Tilley 2002 summed it up by saying, “Nothing Works”.

The major influence for the Government was money. They had to limit expenditure, and containment was not an option as this was very expensive. The only possible way forward was prevention.

This lead the Government to rethink their idea’s, which saw a shift from the pursuit of the criminal to the prevention of crime (Stevenson 2000b cited in Hughes 2002 p3)

Since 1980 crime prevention has become a significant concern for any Government.

For example the Conservative Government’s policy on their commitment to “Safer Communities” And their campaign on the “War on Crime and Disorder”

(Tim Hope 2000, p.xiii cited in Hughes 2002 p2)

Crime prevention finally became centre stage as a result of rising crime figures. Crime was on average rising 5.7% per annum.

(Tilley 2002 p15)

Although it has been argued that some of the Conservative Partys economic polices were liable to have the unintended effects on the raising crime rates, through unemployment and reducing the perceived prospects for young people and producing greater relative deprivation.

(Field, 1990; Sampson and Laub, 1993 cited in Tilley 2002 p15)

Since the 1980’s there has been a rise in neo -liberal modes of Governance and the moving away from “social” strategies of collective risk managem...

... middle of paper ...

... Crossroads, Cincinnati, OH, Anderson Publishing, and Highland Heights, KY, Academy of Criminal Justice

Crawford, A. “Evaluating Crime Prevention and Community Safety” Chapter 6 in Crawford, A (1998) Crime Prevention and Community Safety; Politics and Practices, London and New York, Longman.

Hope, T. “Community Crime Prevention”, pp 66-89 in Tonry, M. And Farrington, D.P. (eds) (1995) Building a Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention / Tonry, M. (ed.) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol 19 Chicago, IL and London, The University of Chicago Press.

Huges, G et al (2002), “Crime Prevention and Community Safety, New Directions.” Sage, London.

Sherman, L et al. “Preventing Crime: what works and what doesn’t, what’s promising”. Chapter 2 in Hope T. (ed.) (2000) Perspectives in Crime Reduction, Aldershot, Ashgate Dartmouth

Wilson, J. “Crime and the Criminologists”. Commentary, vol 58, no.1, July 1974, pp. 47-53

Standing Conference on crime Prevention, Safer Communities: The Local Delievry of Crime Prevention Through the Partnership Approach (August 1991), London, Home Office.

www.crimereduction.gov.uk/toolkits/p010301 28.12.04 Word Count: 2450

Open Document