Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance between state and local government
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance between state and local government
State and local governments influence the federal legislature by: All state governments are modelled after the federal government and they comprise of Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. Most state and local government officials usually seek to influence the content of national policies especially in generating intergovernmental lobby (Steier, 1985). There is increase of professionalism in state and local governments which give units the basic knowledge and ability to meet with the legislators and provide information which may influence legislation. Also, the growth in federal grants to state and local governments enables programs to have potential for the federal government to regulate the behavior of the state and local governments. In addition, many regulations and requirements that federal programs impose on the states and localities are sometimes open to modification, give discretion, and power to state and local officials.
Local government is commissioned to its state constitution and it is subject to the legal environment created by the state’s structure and laws just like the way the state government should not conflict with the federal law. State governments is a reflection of the federal government since it has an elected head of the executive branch who is the governor, a self-governing judiciary, and a commonly elected legislative division.
In whether justices be elected to office or appointed is: Justices should be elected instead of appointed. This is because members of congress usually engage in agenda setting since they want to satisfy their constituents (Arnold, 2004). Therefore since many constituents are concerned with crime, it is easy to please the constituent by focusing on crime. For elected offic...
... middle of paper ...
...tes approves appointments of judges. 2) May remove judges through impeachment, and 3) Creates lower courts. The Executive Branch is given the power to carry out the laws and has some checks over the Legislative Branch like: 1) Ability to call special sessions of Congress. 2) Can recommend legislation, and 3) can appeal to the people concerning legislation (Arnold, 2004). The Judicial branch has the power to interpret the laws and check over the Executive branch like: Courts can judge executive actions to be unconstitutional through the power of judicial review
References
Arnold, A. (2004). About America. How the United States Is Governed
Marion, N & Oliver, W. (2012). The Public Policy of Crime and Criminal Justice, Second Edition.
Steier, R. (1985). Computer Crime and Security: A Congressional Retrospective. Communications Of The ACM, 28(12), 1275-1276.
An example of this would be that the federal government has control over the military, foreign policy, our postal system and the monetary policies. The state government has the responsibility for the police/law enforcement, road building and the schools.
Hickey, T. J. (2010). Taking Sides: Clashing Views in Crime and Criminology, 9th Edition. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
national government, Congress is the legislative branch. The Executive branch is led by the President and the judicial branch is run by the Supreme Court (SCOTUS). Each branch of the national government has power over each other and can check each other. Congress makes laws for the entire country. The president (executive branch) carries out the laws that congress makes. The judicial branch interprets how the law should be read. Each branch has separate jobs (separation of powers). For the state, governors have the authority to issue executive orders. This means that they can veto the legislation they enforce state laws instead of national laws. In the state, the legislation branch consists of two houses which are considered bicameral. The judiciary branch of the state government is the state courts. The state and national level of government basically check each other in the same ways at the legislative
To define the terminology of federalism to a simplistic way is the sharing of sovereignty between the national government and the local government. It is often described as the dual sovereignty of governments between the national and the local to exert power in the political system. In the US it is often been justified as one of the first to introduce federalism by the ‘founding fathers’ which were developed in order to escape from the overpowered central government. However, federalism in the United States is hitherto uncertain where the power lies in the contemporary political system. In this essay I will outline and explain how power relationship alternates between states and federal government. Moreover I will also discuss my perspective by weighing the evidence based upon resources. Based on these resources, it will aid me to evaluate the recent development in the federal-state relationship.
Daly, Kathleen, Goldsmith, Andrew, and Israel, Mark. 2006, Crime and Justice: A guide to criminology, third addition, Thomson, Lawbook Co.
Then there is the state government which are responsible for governing affairs within their borders, and carrying out federal laws and programs at the state level. They are governed by their own constitutions and retain any rights that the U.S. Constitution does not exclusively grant to the federal government. The state government is limited as they cannot form alliances with other states and must honor and respect the laws and institutions of the other states. And finally there is the federal government which is the central and highest level of government in the U.S. It is divided into three branches and each branch has its own rights and power to check and balance the powers of each branch. The federal government has the power to regulate taxes, establish federal welfare programs and make laws in the interest of the nation as a whole. There are also limitations set to the federal government’s authority, as they cannot ask local law enforcements agencies to do minor administrative jobs. Although all levels of government have their own responsibilities there are limits to interfering with other governments
Muncie, J., and Mclaughin, E. (1996) The Problem of Crime. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publication Ltd.
One way the federal government gains more power is by giving grants to states. Although the money is free in reality it not. The ...
Schmalleger, F. (2009), Prentice Hall, Publication. Criminal Justice Today: An introductory Text for the 21st century
Federalism enables states to be autonomous in their approach making while likewise coordinated inside the government framework. This framework enables the states to control their own particular issues while likewise remaining associated through the government framework. The appointment of littler government substances likewise permits the necessities of particular gatherings and nearby portrayal to be more open to the general population that they are speaking to. This takes into account all states to have portrayal that is more particular to their necessities and needs than expansive speculations and separation in different types of government.
will typically only have control over their specific geographical region, and cannot pass or enforce laws that will affect a wider area.” While the issue is very complex, many have strong feelings about whether local governments are the right way to manage cities and counties or not.
Guidelines for the relationship between the federal government and the state governments are easily accessible through the Tenth Amendment in the United States Constitution. Adversely, the relationship between local governments and state governments are not written anywhere in the U.S. Constitution. In addition to states being granted the powers not explicitly given to the federal government, they are both considered to be equal in power. Local governments do not have this advantage so are more restricted in what they are able to do. The legal doctrine known as Dillon’s Rule was created in order to express the division of powers between the local governments and the state governments. Simply put, Dillon’s Rule states that, “local governments
There are two kinds of municipalities (city/town). General- Law powers are defined by the states Government code. City government establishes municipal policy and enacts and implements local ordinances. City governments are responsible for providing services which directly affect the lives of their residents like police ...
Federalism is a legal concept that is centered around the concept that law is best handled as a two layered responsibility. Federalism is also built on a belief that sharing power with the local government is key to a successful governance. According to the text book, “the United States was the first nation to adopt federalism as its governing framework” (pg83). The following are a few examples of some advantages, as well as disadvantages of Federalism.
The federal government has a steady and reliable revenue stream due to federalism. Dual sovereignty is also a stronghold of federalism. While the national government can govern states, the individual states also have the right to govern what they feel works best for them. The leaders of a state generally know what is best and most beneficial for their state. For example, California needs very different laws than Wyoming due to the different in population size, geographic location, diversity of people, etc. Federalism also allows states to experiment laws for the national level. One instance is when Colorado passed a bill allowing the recreational use of marijuana. This can act as a test to observe what would happen if a similar bill was passed on the national level. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has even stated that she wants to wait and see the long-term effects in Colorado and other states before acting on a national level. Here in Kansas, Brownback implemented his controversial tax policy. When introduced, he called it a “real live experiment”. These state-level experiments can cause a state to benefit or suffer. This allows other states and the national government to look at the states and decide what path is the best to