Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of assessment in education that drives curriculum and teaching (classroom related)
The importance of assessment in education
Importance of performance based assessment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of assessment in education that drives curriculum and teaching (classroom related)
For an assessment to have validity that indicates that the assessment accurately measures what is intended to measure (Frisbie, 2005). For example, if a scientist measures 30 grams of sugar on a scale and the scale shows that the sugar weighs 21 grams, then the scale did not provide an accurate measurement of what was claimed to be the measurement. This is quite similar to an assessment validity because if an assessment intends to measure something in particular, but ends up measuring something that is completely unrelated, then the assessment is not valid (Frisbie, 2005).
Content, criterion and construct validity are the three types of validity that should be considered when determining the validity of an assessment (Frisbie, 2005). Say
…show more content…
For example, in the cell analogy poster presentation, a performance assessment will be used to assess student’s performance. It is important to acknowledge how student’s emotions about science can have an impact on how well they present their cell analogy poster. Students who already lack confidence about their abilities in the area they're being tested on or even students who have anxiety with speaking in front of the whole class can have a hard time articulating their knowledge and comprehension of the topic to the class (Frisbie, …show more content…
There also needs to be evidence that the test does not measure irrelevant aspects (Frisbie, 2005), such as the pace of their presentation, whether they were confident throughout, and whether it was noticeable that students were nervous.
In a classroom, the validity of the cell analogy presentation assessment can be proven in several ways. For example, high scores on the performance assessment will validate that the intended learning outcomes have been met. In other words, students have mastered their objectives and high percentages will indicate that their learning and mastering the intended contents. In addition, I can also prove the validity of my assessment by having another teacher look at my assessment and compare it to the intended learning
8. Validity - Validity is the degree to which a test measures what it is supposed to measure.
The purpose of assessment is to ensure that the tutor has a clear understanding of their learners and their individual needs. In education there are two different terms of assessment Norm-referenced and criterion-referenced assessment. An example of Norm-referenced assessment is an A-level or GCSE format which compares other candidates with each other and the marks being compared with the norm or average.
Validity is how well a test or measurement tool measures what it purports to measure. Traditionally validity is conceptualized into three categories content validity, construct validity, and criterion-related validity (Cohen, 2013). Content validity measures the validity based on an evaluation
Validity refers to ability of an instrument to measure the test scores appropriately, meaningfully, and usefully (Polit& Beck, 2010). The instrument has been developed to serve three major functions: (1) to represent a specific universe of content, (2) to represent measurement of specific psychological attributes, (3) to represent the establishing of a relationship with a particular criterion. There are three types of validity; each type represents a response to one of three functions
Internal validity, unlike external and construct validity, deals with causal relationships. In other words, the question is whether any additional research that is found is actually associated with the study that is being conducted. The question, again, is whether we can be confident that the outcome of the study is a result of the experiment itself. What this means is that internal validity is the extent to which a change in a given variable is caused by the change in another variable.
Tests cannot always measure everything that needs to be measured on a course or what a st...
Validity is when the method used measures what it is suppose to measure. Validity is a true picture of what is being studied. Validity is important because it helps the data results achieve accuracy (Cherry, 2015). To ensure and achieve validity researchers should make sure the data collected is evidence of what it claims to be, and not just data which is not accurate or random (Classroom notes, 2015). Unstructured interviews are much more likely to be valid because the interviewer can explain the question to the participant, therefore the participant is not left to interpret the question if they do not understand.
Validity is essentially the degree to which a conception is founded and parallels accurately to the real world. Validity is the tool that measures what the particular research was anticipated to measure (Schmitt & Brown, 2012). There are several different types of validity but the ones that will be discussed in this paper are concurrent and predictive. Concurrent validity is taking an already validated point and testing it with another measurement tool. This means that there was already a hypothesis proven right or wrong and now the researcher will be testing this same hypothesis but will being using another type of tool to see if the result...
Empiricists and rationalists have proposed opposing theories of the acquisition of knowledge, which appear unable to coexist. Each theory holds its own strengths but does not demonstrate a strong argument in itself to the questions, “Is knowledge truly possible?” and “How is true knowledge obtained?”. Immanual Kant successfully merged the two philosophies and provided a convincing argument with his theory of empirical relativism, or what some may call constructivism. His theory bridges the gap between rationalism and empiricism and proves that empiricists and rationalists each present a piece of the full puzzle. In order to truly understand Kant’s epistemology, one must first review and understand both empiricism and rationalism on an impartial basis.
There are many ways in which teachers can test their students to see where they are at and what still needs to worked on. These can be broken down into two distinct categories. First there is summative testing. Summative assessments are formal tests that are constructed by professionals to compare students with other students. Summative tests are used to measure outcomes of learning over time and can be criterion or norm referenced. Comparatively assessments can also be informal. Informal assessments also known as formative are generally constructed by the student's teacher. Formative assessments are a great resource to see where a student is at and measure what needs to be learned and help prepare a student for the summative assessment.
This meta-synthesis research analyzed 17 primary data sets to investigate the impact of a VCoP on the professional development of online instructors. The findings unveiled an interesting discernment of the faculty experiences and how learning through social constructivism can occur within a VCoP. Based on the research findings and 10 emergent themes, five overarching dimensions were compiled to synthesize and discuss the results further. These are (1) social nature of online learning; (2) faculty participation in a VCoP; (3) acquisition of knowledge and skills; (4) enhanced teaching and learning practices; and (5) overall impact of a VCoP on FPD. These overarching dimensions specifically accentuate on my theoretical framework, independent
Validity is the extent to which a test measures what it claims to measure. It is essential for a test to be valid in order for the results to be accurately applied and interpreted. Validity isn’t determined by a single statistic, but by a body of research that demonstrates the relationship between the test and the behavior it has set out to measure.
In the context of education, testing refers to “a method to determine a student’s ability to complete certain tasks or demonstrate mastery of a skill or knowledge” (Danuri 2012). Assessment is “the process of gathering information to monitor progress and make any decisions necessary” regarding curriculum and teaching (Danuri 2012). Assessment is a process that measures growth over time whereas testing is a form of evaluating what a student knows at...
Through assessment students and teachers are able to determine the level of mastery a student has achieved with standards taught. Both formative and summative assessment should be purposeful and targeted to gain the most accurate data to drive further instruction (Ainsworth, 2010). While this syllabus does a good job of identifying the need for both formal and informal assessments, the way in which this is communicated does not provide enough detail for understanding. Simply listing assessment types does not give any insight into how these assessments fit in the learning process of this course. While some of the assessments mentioned could be common assessments chosen by the school or district to gain insight into the effectiveness of instruction, the inclusion of authentic assessments is most beneficial to students and demonstrates learning in a context closer to that of a work environment (Rovai, 2004). Unfortunately, this particular course, according to this syllabus, relies heavily on quizzes and traditional tests and essays to form the bulk of assessment opportunities. While other activities, such as formative assessments, journaling and discussions are mentioned as possible avenues for scoring, they are given a very low percentage of the overall grade. This shows that they are not valued for their ability to show progression and mastery. If this is indeed the case, this puts the students as a
As I reflect on my past assessment process, I realized how much my assessments have changed over the years. In my early years, I used tests for informational recall as my assessments. I felt these were appropriate guidelines in which I needed to follow in order to substantiate a student’s grade. Every assignment or tests was given a point value and then based on the amount of points, a grade was given. Every student’s assessment was exactly the same, and the assessments did not contain any subjectivity. I felt confident in giving the grade based on a valid point system. However reflecting back, I see that I did not include any performance-based assessments or individual learning styles in my early assessment. I also did not take into consideration the individual needs of my students. My assessment approach was awful. I am embarrassed that I use to assess students in this manner.