Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Health care issues in america
Health care issues in america
Health care issues in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Thesis Introduction: Throughout the years, universal health care has certainly been a debatable topic among Americans, the debate being whether we should stay true to the current system of private health insurance companies, covering only those wealthy enough to afford it, or if we should have a government-run system that covers all Americans. Currently, there are two programs to help support those without health insurance: Medicare and Medicaid. They are both government-sponsored programs designed to help cover healthcare costs. The first, Medicare, is a federal program that is attached to Social Security and is made readily available to all U.S. citizens of or above the age 65 and also the disabled. The other, Medicaid, is a joint federal and state program that helps low-income individuals and families pay for the medical costs and long-term care. It requires more nitty-gritty details than only being of a certain age; these details are determined by each individual state. Both programs work together to help provide coverage for the elderly and the poor. Unfortunately the rest of the population, over 45 million Americans, are left uninsured. Without changes in our policy, there will be a growing number of people, mainly under the age of 65, which will lack health insurance. The United States government should provide universal health care to its people, as proven by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), a nonpartisan federal agency that provides valid economic data, who estimate that the average number of nonelderly people alone that are uninsured will rise from about 45 million in 2009 to about 54 million in 2019. This is not anything new; again, health care has been a problem for years, beginning in the 1930s during the great... ... middle of paper ... ...014”, which when this part of the law occurs, it is estimated that “30 million of the current 50 million uninsured Americans will receive coverage” (“Health Care Reform”). Despite what critics say about forcing “people to buy private insurance plans that they cannot afford”, if more people go to buy health insurance, the cost of health care will drop, ultimately making it much more affordable. Supporters of the new law say that the U.S. will be a far better country with more citizens covered. The new system is not perfect, but it is definitely a step forward towards providing universal health care, something that this country is in desperate need of. “In order to form a more perfect union” and in order to be the great nation the United States is supposed to be, the government must provide health care coverage to all Americans through a universal health care plan.
According to editorial one, universal health care is a right that every American should be able to obtain. The author provides the scenario that insurance companies reject people with preexisting conditions and that people typically wait to receive health care until it's too much of a problem due to the extreme costs. Both of these scenarios are common among Americans so the author uses those situations to appeal to the readers' emotions. Editorial one also includes logical evidence that America could follow Canada's and Europe's universal health care systems because both of those nations are excelling in it.
Within the previous four years, the number of uninsured Americans has jumped to forty five million people. Beginning in the 1980’s, the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) has been trying to fix this problem of health insurance coverage for everyone with a basic reform. The AAFP’s plan imagined every American with insured coverage for necessary improved services that fall between the crucial health benefits and the surprising costs. (Sweeney) They expect by fostering prevention, and early prevention, with early diagnosis with treatment, the program would result in decreased health system costs and increased productivity through healthier lives. The way to achieve health care coverage for all is pretty simple. This country needs the United States congress to act out legislation assuring essential health care coverage for all.
The World Health Organization defines universal health care as, “ensuring that all people can use the promotive, preventive, curative, rehabilitative and palliative health services they need, of sufficient quality to be effective, while also ensuring that the use of these services does not expose the user to financial hardship.” This means that every citizen of a country will have access to health care; if someone cannot attain it themselves, then the government will provide it. This topic is controversial because the state provides health care funding for every citizen; it can easily be described as being socialistic. Also, without state provided care, every citizen may not have access to the level of care needed due to costs. This topic is especially relevant because thirty two of the thirty three developed nations have universal health care with the United States as the exception. However, recently the United States has adopted the Affordable Care Act, which possess traits of universal health care. Universal health care is not a good choice for society for three reasons. The first is that it lowers quality of care. Also, the whole system and the way it is set up could certainly be a burden on taxpayers and the government which could lead to some major debts. Third, it would be easy for people to abuse the system.
More than one-third of Americans who are between the ages of nineteen and twenty-four are uninsured. This is because most insurance is provided through a person’s job, and entry-level jobs which isn 't available for all young students. In addition, healthcare costs are currently rising faster than inflation, which means that salary increases cannot compensate for the higher prices of health care. Government regulation and a universal system could help keep costs affordable. A universal system would guarantee that everyone could receive health care regardless of preexisting conditions. Consequently, more people would be able to seek preventative services, like checkups, to maintain good health and detect problems early. Too frequently, people avoid taking preventative health measures until something is too late because of how expensive it is. While there 's a debate over how the U.S. should pay for a universal healthcare system, a good idea is to study the ways several other countries have successfully implemented such a system. Europe has a system in which all residents pay into a common fund that creates a pool of money and provides benefits to all. We must figure out a way to effectively adopt a universal healthcare system that provides care to all
Our previous health care system has many flaws the most predominant problem is that it left many American’s without insurance. A segment aired on PBS reported that “44 million Americans are uninsured and 8 out of 10 of those are workers or their dependents.” I happen to be one of the millions who worked full time—by full time I mean at least 70 hours a week—whose employer didn’t offer employees health insurance. I was not able to afford private insurance yet; I made too much to receive any kind of government subsidies, even after I was laid off, collecting unemployment. Even if you are insured it’s likely you are one of the 38 million (PBS) living with inadequate insurance. Many uninsured people will delay going to doctor or not at all because they can’t afford the ou...
Who should get health care? How should we pay for it? Do we have a responsivity to ensure all our citizens get the same level, health care, regardless of their station in life? These are all questions that have been debated and asked during the history of our government. But what are the answers to these questions? Let us look at the different ways our government has chosen to answer some of these questions over the years. It is a fact that compared to other Western nations, our government has spent more per-capita on health care than any other nation, this shows just how much of an important issue our government believes it to be. People have had many different ideas about how a universal government-run health care plan would look, in their article “Universal Health Care in the US” by Lora Cicconi and Kerri Strug, (Cicconi, Strug May 25, 1999) they believed that
The need for universal health care within the United States has been evident, and needed to be addressed. The old healthcare system was plagued with issues, including expensive premiums that were on the rise, along with an inflated average infant mortality rate and limited average life expectancy, which ultimately led to many people being left uninsured (“Affordable” 2). In the 2012 presidential election, one key issue was how to reform America’s broken health care system, and to instate a successful universal healthcare system that has resolved the previous issues. Being one of the last influential and competitive countries in the world without universal healthcare, the pressure was on for the United States to develop their own system. Since Barack Obama became president, Obamacare, instead of the proposed Romneycare, was born.
Like many college students I have to pinch pennies to make it through school. Every last penny counts when budgeting my monetary supply. As a result of this I have found that I do not have enough to spare to pay for health insurance. Unlike most college students I am over the age of 23 and thus not covered by my parents insurance. Since I am only employed part time I am also not able to obtain it from work. This puts me in the company of the more than 42 million Americans who do not have health insurance. It is past time that the United States join the rest of the industrialized countries that have already decided to provide their citizens with health care. I believe a single payer health care system is necessary. A national health care system would provide a number of benefits. To begin with, it would cut the overall costs of health care. Secondly it would actually decrease bureaucracy by removing the many layers of insurance paper work patients and physicians are forced to go through in our current system. Finally it would increase life expectancy by allowing more money conscious Americans to receive adequate prevention instead of waiting until an illness becomes worse. All of these reasons point towards a national health care program as being the solution we need. Some opponents of single payer sytems, mostly financed by insurance companies that stand to lose billions from such a plan, point to some of the other countries that have enacted such plans as an advisory against our following suit. However they fail to take into account some of the methods unique to those countries and overstate some of the problems while ignoring our own.
While Universal Health Care is viewed as having a positive effect on the world and seems to do only good, it is a thorned rose, that will produce more negative, disastrous, and unforeseen outcomes than positive ones. Universal Health Care is a system in which the government provides financial aid and medical care to everyone within the nation. Canada, Denmark, Taiwan, and Sweden have single-payer systems in which every citizens medicare costs are covered for. Currently in the United States we have private insurance and health care, meaning that if citizens can afford it they pay for their own health care privately. There has been much debate over if the United States should adopt a single payer system or if we should continue on with the system
Free universal healthcare has been a debate for many years with two sides providing pros and cons. With these two arguments, we have an opportunity to analyze both sides and make a well informed opinion on whether or not free universal healthcare is necessary. By providing statements supported by factual evidence, both arguments supply readers with an effective debate and leaves them to make their decision to have their own thoughts and opinions on the issue.
At present, the healthcare system includes two programs, Medicare and Medicaid, and both have different policy designs. Medicare has a universal design, although it is just for the elderly. It guarantees that all seniors in the U.S. receiving social security will have access to it. Furthermore, Medicare has a two-part scheme, A and B. Part A corresponds to the plan for hospital care, the short-term nursing care, the home health care and the hospice care. Also, part A is paid by the working class through taxation. While part B, corresponds to the insurance plan, which is funded by the federal and state government. This part of the programs pays for doctors and outpatient medical costs. The other component of the health care system consists of the Medicaid program which is a targeted insurance plan administered by states and localities. The targeted population are the elderly and the dependents (mothers, disabled and children), which have weak power but a positive construction. (Schneider and Ingram, 1993). Nonetheless the way that the Medicaid program is structured, in which the States have the power to decide who is eligible or who is excluded from the program, significantly alters equality and a fair
Wide-spread healthcare has been a hot topic over the recent years in America. But what do our people really need? Healthcare provides a surplus of benefits if available to everyone, and the benefits highly outweigh the downsides. With a few tiny sacrifices from the masses, the downsides would pale in comparison to the upsides. With a compromise from the population, and from our government, the population itself would benefit and it would help us function as a nation. "it is the direct responsibility of the federal government to ensure medical care for those citizens that lack insurance, even through raising taxes." Our government and our population have a responsibility to each other to provide proper healthcare, in benefit to us all.
There are a few population trends that are particularly important in regards to the planning, financing, and delivery of healthcare in the United States. The first of these trends, which likely has the greatest impact on our health care system for obvious reasons, is the aging of the U.S. population (Williams & Torrens, 2008). The aging Baby Boomer generation is beginning to enter the 65+ age group, and this age group is expected to continue to grow in number at a disproportional rate compared to other age categories in the coming decades (Colby & Ortman, 2015). According to the U.S Census Bureau, approximately 66% of individuals in the United States had private insurance coverage during some part of 2014, while 36.5% had some form of governmental
The absence of the comprehensive scope of coverage and high expenses is personally connected historically and financially. I feel one reason the United States is absent of universal health care is that conservatives believe the government should have limited access to the role of society. Consequently, insurance in which the political groups view as a general scope and generally through fees; helps minimize costs. The administration controls and arranges the value of psychological wellness and medical services, and it kills the requirement for a reliable private medical coverage organization. The second reason is the budget; general human services are tied in with giving a predetermined therapeutic services bundle which will be of advantage to each from the general public to the point of providing budgetary hazard security, enhanced wellbeing results and enhanced access to wellbeing administrations.
Would it be just great governance, the ability to provide health care for all Americans or do our nation’s leaders see the country as just all for one, and not one for all. This nation would not function effectively if poorer Americans were to die out. Yet the insurance, pharmaceutical corporations, greedy lawyers and companies are more concerned with filling their pockets. Without a middle and lower sector of society, America would collapse. Therefore America can do more to supply healthcare for all Americans and develop a systems to provide universal coverage just as many nations have.