Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cons of universal health care
Pros and cons of universal healthcare in the US
Case against universal healthcare in us essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cons of universal health care
Free universal healthcare has been a debate for many years with two sides providing pros and cons. With these two arguments, we have an opportunity to analyze both sides and make a well informed opinion on whether or not free universal healthcare is necessary. By providing statements supported by factual evidence, both arguments supply readers with an effective debate and leaves them to make their decision to have their own thoughts and opinions on the issue. On one side of the argument we are given the idea of how universal healthcare can benefit society more than it can hurt it. For example, "With 45 million American uninsured, and CNN reporting 45,000 American are dying per year because they don't have access to health care because costs, a universal health care system would remedy the problem of affordability." (Ireland, Kay). Kay addresses the idea of how many Americans suffer from the lack of proper healthcare and the neglecting actions taken by the government resulting in death and sickness being the social norm. In addition, healthcare costs are constantly inflating more and more while we wait for …show more content…
a solution. Instead of waiting around for a solution to just appear, we need to look at the examples given to us from other countries. The website, LiveStrong.com, explains Germany, Switzerland, Canada and Taiwan all have successful government-run insurance or health care for all lawful residents, while America still struggles to give this problem a solution that is sitting right in front of them. On the other hand, side two provides reasoning on why free universal healthcare would harm more than help America.
By looking at other places with universal healthcare, we have found major flaws in their systems such as lack of importance and misplacement of people files, information leaked to the government about medical records, and the overall cost of it all. According to the Commonwealth Wealth Fund study, some countries with universal health care struggle to sustain efficiency and in addition, Canada and Australia were ranked lowest in accessibility of physician appointments and wait times for basic medical services, as well as specialist care, tests, and elective surgery. By providing examples of other countries failing with the system of free healthcare, readers get the clear concept of the negative effects the system could have on our society as a
whole. Now that both arguments have been analyzed, the side of healthcare being beneficial provides a more effective reason than the side of not having free healthcare. Providing Americans with free universal healthcare means providing basic rights to human beings. Everyone deserves the proper care and treatments when they are sick or in need of medication. If we cut off that line of medical help, more and more civilians will be so sick and have to wait too long for help. It will be too late for some to get properly treated and more and more deaths will rise. By denying necessary healthcare to individuals. we are denying basic human rights to our society. The idea of not providing everyone with healthcare is opening new doors for severe diseases being spread because of lack of medical attention, and increase in the amount of people effected by it. In conclusion, the debate of whether or not free universal healthcare is necessary will forever continue until we provide a real solution. While free universal healthcare provides evidence of its positive effects, evidence also shows that it can have negative effects as well. The decision of whether or not the system will be put into our society will not come until the clear answer of how and when we will be able to afford it is found credible.
People who are in favor of universal health care in the U.S. use the argument that the U.S. was built upon the basic ideals, the “unalienable Rights” of “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness” and that we all have the right to at least a minimum standard of living. To deny universal health care is to deny these basic ideals and rights to the people and therefore unconstitutional. Not only is it unconstitutional, it is also immoral. It is immoral to deny people health care, allowing them to suffer and even die, just because they cannot afford it and to force people to pay so much money that they go bankrupt for a basic right. In 2007 about 62% of all U.S. bankruptcies were related to medical expenses. If the U.S. had universal health care, medical bankruptcies would no longer be an issue (Top 10 Pros & Cons). Universal health care would also be beneficial to the economy. Businesses and employers would no longer have to pay for health insurance for their employees and the government wouldn’t waste as much per capita on health care as it does now without a universal health care system. It would also allow people to be more willing to take entrepreneurial risks because they won’t fear having to go without health insurance (Why The U.S.
According to editorial one, universal health care is a right that every American should be able to obtain. The author provides the scenario that insurance companies reject people with preexisting conditions and that people typically wait to receive health care until it's too much of a problem due to the extreme costs. Both of these scenarios are common among Americans so the author uses those situations to appeal to the readers' emotions. Editorial one also includes logical evidence that America could follow Canada's and Europe's universal health care systems because both of those nations are excelling in it.
Healthcare professionals want only to provide the best care and comfort for their patients. In today’s world, advances in healthcare and medicine have made their task of doing so much easier, allowing previously lethal diseases to be diagnosed and treated with proficiency and speed. A majority of people in the United States have health insurance and enjoy the luxury of convenient, easy to access health care services, with annual checkups, preventative care, and their own personal doctor ready to diagnose and provide treatment for even the most trivial of symptoms. Many of these people could not imagine living a day without the assurance that, when needed, medical care would not be available to themselves and their loved ones. However, millions of American citizens currently live under these unimaginable conditions, going day to day without the security of frequent checkups, prescription medicine, or preventative medicines that could prevent future complications in their health. Now with the rising unemployment rates due to the current global recession, even more Americans are becoming uninsured, and the flaws in the United States’ current healthcare system are being exposed. In order to amend these flaws, some are looking to make small changes to fix the current healthcare system, while others look to make sweeping changes and remodel the system completely, favoring a more socialized, universal type of healthcare system. Although it is certain that change is needed, universal healthcare is not the miracle cure that will solve the systems current ailments. Universal healthcare should not be allowed to take form in America as it is a menace to the capitalist principle of a free market, threatens to put a stranglehold on for-...
Health care can benefit everyone and their different income values. Health care should be required and the risk of spending on insurance should be taken even if many Americans believe they do not need health insurance. There are always possibilities of emergencies occurring and in need of insurance for the high costs of medical care. I personally believe and argued my opinion that health care needs to be required for everyone. To conclude my argument, I have argued that there are more benefits to have healthcare insurance required and that everyone in America deserves a happy and healthy
In recent years, the number of Americans who are uninsured has reached over 45 million citizens, with millions more who only have the very basic of insurance, effectively under insured. With the growing budget cuts to medicaid and the decreasing amount of employers cutting back on their health insurance options, more and more americans are put into positions with poor health care or no access to it at all. At the heart of the issue stems two roots, one concerning the morality of universal health care and the other concerning the economic effects. Many believe that health care reform at a national level is impossible or impractical, and so for too long now our citizens have stood by as our flawed health-care system has transformed into an unfixable mess. The good that universal healthcare would bring to our nation far outweighs the bad, however, so, sooner rather than later, it is important for us to strive towards a society where all people have access to healthcare.
The World Health Organization defines universal health care as, “ensuring that all people can use the promotive, preventive, curative, rehabilitative and palliative health services they need, of sufficient quality to be effective, while also ensuring that the use of these services does not expose the user to financial hardship.” This means that every citizen of a country will have access to health care; if someone cannot attain it themselves, then the government will provide it. This topic is controversial because the state provides health care funding for every citizen; it can easily be described as being socialistic. Also, without state provided care, every citizen may not have access to the level of care needed due to costs. This topic is especially relevant because thirty two of the thirty three developed nations have universal health care with the United States as the exception. However, recently the United States has adopted the Affordable Care Act, which possess traits of universal health care. Universal health care is not a good choice for society for three reasons. The first is that it lowers quality of care. Also, the whole system and the way it is set up could certainly be a burden on taxpayers and the government which could lead to some major debts. Third, it would be easy for people to abuse the system.
Universal healthcare: a term feared by many politicians due to the communist connotation, but is it really all that bad? Over 58 countries have some sort of universal health coverage, such as England and France which have single payer healthcare meaning the government provides insurance for all citizens and pays for all healthcare expenses. The United States of America has insurance mandated healthcare meaning the government requires all citizens to purchase insurance, usually provided through their jobs. In America, over 45 million people are uninsured, 20,000 of which will die by the end of the year compared to England or Frances were all residents, legal or not, are covered.
Luckily under the new health care reform law, most people will receive help paying for their healthcare premiums and cost-sharing expenses that people with insurance have to pay out of pocket for doctor visits, and prescription medicine. Families and individuals will be able to receive this assistance with incomes between one hundred and four hundred percent of the federal poverty line. One hundred to four hundred percent makes up at about $23,000 to $94,000 a year assume this is for a family of four.
A health care system that provides free health care services to its entire citizen can be termed as universal health care. This is a situation where all citizens are protected from financial costs in health care. It is recognized around the globe as it provides a specific package of benefits to all citizens in the entire nation. For instance, free health care can result to improved health outcomes. In addition, it provides financial risk protection and an improved access to health services. There is an increasing debate on how citizen should be provided with free medical services. Although United State does not permit free health care services it should have free health care for all citizens. This is due to the fact that healthcare is the largest industry in United State. Due to the fact that United State is a rich country, it should have a healthcare system that provides free services such as treatment for its entire citizen. This will play a significant role, as it will stop medical bankruptcies in...
Universal health care is an ongoing debate that we still cannot decide whether or not to be for or against. In the article for universal healthcare, states that we should use it because it is a constitutional right because citizens are granted life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. the argument against universal healthcare states that it can increase our countries debt. In conclusion, if we were to have universal healthcare it could either help our country immensely or not help at all. In the argument for universal healthcare, states that it is a constitutional right.
Health care reform was a major part of President Obama’s campaign when he was first running back in 2008. The primary objectives of the reform are to provide healthcare coverage for all uninsured Americans and decrease the costs of healthcare services and coverage.
The cost of running the health care is might be very expensive. Never the less, guaranteeing citizens of basic and improved health care is more than unbearable to many countries, not to mention the expensive medical technologies that some countries cannot afford. I remember the time when i’m sick in Thailand, the cost was about 1500, my dad pull out his 1000 baht (Thai money) handing to cashier at the hospital back in Thailand saying this is all he have. The cashier looked at him sadly, she then only took 500 instead of 1000. She say come back and pay whenever you got the money but guess what? We moved here to United State before paying off our debt but my dad go back and pay twice he own when he visited Thailand last year. I believe that the government should provide everyone with health care. Though I think President Obama is making a solid effort given the nature of the American people, I do not think his healthcare plan goes far enough. He has the right idea in mandating that all people have health insurance, however, I think removing the public option was a bad idea. The public option should have been kept so that people can afford to buy health insurance. But again, it must be noted that this is not a perfect solution. I think the only real solution that is likely to make a big difference to those who need it would be a universal health care plan provided by the government. I had always had trouble with this idea because though I believed that everyone should have health care, I didn’t know if I could deem it a right. I had always felt that access to health care was a very important thing, especially because I come from a place where proper health care is not only difficult to find, but also impossible to pay for if found. However, health care had seemed less of a basic need than happiness or
The implementation of a universal health care system in the United States is an important challenge that needs to be overcome. There are numerous amount of editorial that argue on both sides of the debate. Some people argue that a universal health care system would bring costs down and increase access to care while others argue that a universal health care system would be too expensive and reduce the quality of care. The correct answer requires intensive understanding and economics to overcome, the arguments must be examined for a proper answer.
One of the most commonly debated topics in recent American history has been that of health care. Would Americans be able to reap more benefits if individuals continue to be independent in their pursuits of health care, or would it be beneficial for all if the government introduced more regulations regarding health care, changing our system to resemble those of other developed countries? As more solutions are offered, it becomes harder for people to reach a consensus on the best way to approach this issue. Despite this, America must decide what system of healthcare will benefit the most citizens and improve the quality of life the most. It is becoming increasingly apparent that a universal healthcare system would be the most effective and
Should the United States have universal healthcare? Universal healthcare means that everyone has access to the health services they need without financial hardship when paying for them. “The United States is the only wealthy, industrialized nation that does not provide health care to all its citizens” (Institute of Medicine). The United States is one nation and every citizen should have access to affordable healthcare. Under universal healthcare it should help reduce spending on healthcare, improve the public health, and increase in economic productivity. There will also be a brief overview on the opposing viewpoint of why universal healthcare is a bad idea for America following the details in the sentence above.