Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is torture ethical
Torture has been around for thousands of years, and it has always been a debate whether that it is a good or a bad thing. Most people assume that it is always an unbearable and harmful thing, when in fact that is not always the case. While many forms of torture are extremely painful and drawn out, there are others that are really quite harmless. To this day,some people believe that forms of torture that do not result in death or permanent injuries should become legal once again, while others have a very strong opinion that it should forever remain illegal.
Many people have used torture throughout the years as a way of getting information out of people. I believe that the right kind of torture should be legal to be able to get information out of people. If you can save more lives by torturing someone who plans on killing multiple people, then why should good morals stop you from doing so? It would be bad for you not to try to stop him and get the information. While people still believe that torture is bad in all ways, I believe that the right kind of torture is pretty good.
Torture itself can be really gruesome, and many techniques are found to have a relation to the medieval
…show more content…
times and most of the torture back then ended up in death. Torture is like the brazen bull, where they put the person being tortured inside a brass bull and block the door hatch. Then they put a fire under the bull and just let you cook alive. This torture was used in the mid-evil times. There were also fast tortures, like the Guillotine. “Since the decapitation was considered to be an instant and painless event, it was often considered the most humane method of execution” (Pegg). In 520 AD, the Romans considered torture the “highest form of truth” (Green). They believed that information that was not freely given had to sometimes be taken instead. Torture does not always end in death. One example of this is the Chinese Water Torture. It sounds awful, but further research made it seem quite harmless and made me believe that it could possibly become legal in certain circumstance. It consists of someone being strapped down to a table where they are restrained from moving. Next, water is dripped on the forehead of the person who is being tortured. The water is dripped slow enough to make the person go crazy, and they will eventually give up any information that may have. The place on the forehead where the water is dripped will get really raw and sore, but it will not kill the person. The Chinese Water torture is a psychological torture, meaning it messes with your mind.
White Torture is psychological torture, which includes many other tortures such as Sensory Deprivation which is when someone is forced to lose a sense. This can be done in many different ways such as putting a blindfold over someone’s eyes, plugging up someone’s ears so they can’t hear, and even the use of drugs to lose sense of taste and smell. Sensory Deprivation tanks are something people use to feel good and relax while sleeping. These tanks are like enclosed tanning beds. They are beds that completely close and are filled with room temperature water with Epsom salt in it. The person lays naked in the water, closes the lid, and tries to relax in the dark. Cienna Madrid talks about her
experience: The water is delightfully buoyant. It's a struggle to hold your arms under the water. Lying still feels almost like flying, which is to say, euphoric. And the nice people at the front desk tell you how to avoid getting salt in your eyes and ears. They tell you to count to 300 and they explain the various poses you can float in for optimal relaxation. But they do not warn you about the paranoia (Madrid). What she experienced when the blue light went off in the bed was a terrible fear of snakes. She felt that snakes were all around her and was terrified. She began to hallucinate that hundreds of tiny little snakes were crawling all over her and this only took but a couple minutes to feel this way, which is even less time it takes for the Chinese Water torture to take effect. I am for this torture because it does not harm anyone, but it does make them crazy. Madrid explained later that this was a slightly enjoyable thing to do because it helped her sleep for the next couple of days. But while she was in the tank, so could not stand it. “Floating makes you see crazy shit and sleep great for days” (Gonzalez, Madrid). Through a lot of research, the isolation tank seems to actually be good for the mind and body. There are different way for the isolation tank to be used, but the relaxation part of it is where you just float in water with a ton a Epson salt in it, and you are sitting in a pitch black, sound proof tank. Basically all your senses are now gone and it is so quiet in there that you can hear your muscles tense. Cienna Madrid wrote “they do not warn you about the paranoia”. It is relaxing, but it can also make you lose your mind, especially when you get your legs and arms strapped in where you cannot move hem. “Other investigations have demonstrated that deprivation of even one form of sensory input can have hallucinatory effects” (Gonzalez). People who have gone through this process typically have hallucinations of some sort. Some have even reported to witness extraterrestrial creatures.
Until there is a credible way to determine whether or not torture is in fact effective, I pass judgment that the practice should be discontinued. The question as to if the torture policy is a human rights violation or if it holds crucial necessity, is not answered in the essay. Applebaum explores the reality that torture possesses negative implications on the inflictor. After presented with the compelling stance and evidence, Applebaum raises the interesting question as to why so much of society believes that torture is successful. I agree that the torture policy is wrong, a point emphasized by Applebaum, contrary to the popular attitude surrounding the topic.
What do you consider to be cruel and unusual punishment? Most people when asked this question think of medieval torture devices, burning people alive, and hard slave labor. However, cruel and unusual punishment, which is a protected against right by the eighth amendment, stretches far beyond these cliches and is still occurring in modern society. The case Miller v. Alabama and a parallel case, Jackson v. Hobbs deals with such punishments and brings up the questions of what, in current times, is to be considered cruel and unusual punishment. Miller v. Alabama addresses with the debate that arose surrounding the mandatory sentence of life without parole for a juvenile when two boys, fourteen-year-old Evan Miller and sixteen-year-old Colby Smith,
In order to assess the morality of torture, one needs to define it. According to the Tokyo Declaration of 1975 torture is “the deliberate, systematic, or wanton infliction of physical or mental suffering by one or more persons acting alone or on the orders of any authority, to force another person to yield information, to make a confession or for any other reason.” This definition’s generality severely limits harmless interrogations by police. The United Nations changed the definition to include severe physical suffering, deliberate intentions, and also added that the action cannot be part of a lawful sanction. The US later revised the definition “to include only the most extreme pain” in 200...
My topic is about cruel and unusual punishment. I picked this topic because I wanted to learn about cruel and unusual punishment and why people do it. The eighth amendment was started 1791 which is cruel and unusual punishment. The term cruel unusual punishment means people that committed a crime have the right to be free of cruel and unusual punishment while in prison. It means if a prison did something bad the constitution still acts to guarantee his or her personal safety and not to be tortured.
On the opposite side, there are people very much in favor of the use of torture. To them, torture is a “morally defensible” interrogation method (8). The most widely used reason for torture is when many lives are in imminent danger. This means that any forms of causing harm are acceptable. This may seem reasonable, as you sacrifice one life to save way more, but it’s demoralizing. The arguments that justify torture usually are way too extreme to happen in the real world. The golden rule also plays a big rol...
Torture lite is a form of torturing someone without leaving a mark. These techniques include “waterboarding”, submersion in water or dousing to produce the sensation of drowning, and denying food, water or sleep for days or weeks on end.
Several other punishments of the medieval period were also rather gruesome. If you were charged with treason, but you were a noble person otherwise, you were to be simply hanged and buried. If you committed murder, and were found guilty of attempted murder, you’d be tied up, near the scene of the crime and left to starve to death. If you were convicted of a successful murder, you’d be hung for a little while, have your hands cut off, and then led to where you’d be executed. Rouges were to be sent to the stockades and whipped, anyone who disturbed the peace were to be continuously du...
Torture is the act of inflicting severe pain or suffering, mental or physical, on an individual to obtain information, to intimidate or for punishment. Torture is expressed in many ways, for example, rape, hard labour, electric shock, severe beatings, etc, and for this reason it is considered as cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment. Therefore, it is a violation of human rights and is strictly prohibited by international law. Michael Davis and many other individuals have stated that torture is worse than murder. He claims, “Both torture and premature death are very great evils but, if one is a greater evil than the other, it is certainly torture”. With that being said, there are three major reasons to discuss, in which, torture is not morally acceptable. However, in many cases it is considered very beneficial, but the disadvantages outweighs the benefits. Firstly, bullying is a form of torture but to a lesser extent, in which it results in an individual suffering from low self-esteem, suicidal thoughts, self-harm, etc. In addition, torture is mainly used as a means to obtain information, however, it is an ineffective interrogation tool in which, the data given could be falsified. Lastly, torture is sometimes utilized to shatter the autonomy of individual, that is, the right to their freedom and independence, forcing the victim to succumb to the torturer’s way of thinking.
(C) It's ironic how some people think that America has put a stop to barbaric punishments, if anything we have just made them worse as the years go by(especially in our legal force). For example we are especially cruel to our enemies, we torture them, kill them and then we don’t even treat prisoners like people after we're done with them. It's not like American prisoners get too much slack either. The death penalty can be applied to any state if they choose so, and there aren't too many peaceful options. You can pick from a variety of executions from electric chair, gas chambers, even hangings! Sometimes we can't even get prisoners in jail without killing them; police have killed 400 people in this year alone. Just because these tragedies aren't
Cesare Beccaria discusses the issue of torture in his work An Essay on Crimes and Punishments. He states that either a crime is certain or uncertain, and in either circumstance, torture is not a legitimate punishment (Beccaria 530). When a crime has certainly been committed and already has a punishment assigned to it by law, it is useless to torture because you do not need to torture the convicted person to get a confession. If the proof is insufficient to convict the person in question of committing the crime, “it is wrong to torture an innocent person, such as the law adjudges him to be, whose crimes are not yet proved” (Beccaria 530). Torture, therefore, is not acceptable in any case of punishment and should not be used.
If someone asks you to think about the devices of torture you will probably imagine some insane medieval invention. And it will not even occur to you that torture is not just a relic of time. Nowadays nobody is being tortured because it is completely unacceptable, right? Apparently, this is not entirely true. Two academics at Deakin University, Mirko Bagaric and Julie Clarke, argue that it is justified to use torture when thousand of lives of the innocent are at stake.
Eduardo Galeano once said, “The purpose of torture is not getting information. It’s spreading fear” (BrainyQuote). Torture is used when individuals are forced to answer questions through various kinds of abuse. Torture happens due to the government and the belief that torture is a benefit because it saves innocent lives. Torture is wrong and should not be legalized as a means of interrogating terrorists because it causes physical and psychological damage and it produces false information.
Its use in counterterrorism efforts by the United States to extort details about terrorist plots is unacceptable. It is a violation of the ideologies outlined by the Declaration of Independence, “certain inalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” (Jefferson 1776) It strips these right from victims and they are forced to face a “living death.” (Sussman 2006) Torture defies the right to life by inflicting severe pain. Torture defies the right of liberty by exploiting a defenseless and non-consenting victim. Torture defies pursuit of happiness by breaking the victim’s will. (Lecture 17, Moser 2015) The best way, and only way, to respect these rights is to put an absolute ban on torture. Notably, the Geneva Conventions, of which now includes every country in the world, require the prosecution of acts of torture. (Mayerfield 2008). This is respected universally, a moral standard that the whole world agrees upon. This being so, there is no right, nor excuse, for any country to make any exceptions to
In conclusion, the convention against torture, has brought many people together, and has informed many people of the horrible tortures which go on everywhere from the US to Syria. It has tried to set fine lines which prohibit torture under all circumstances. However, since there is no governing body over countries, it remains difficult to enforce the human right standards sought after by the Convention against torture. The convention has therefore done a good job at identifying the torturers. This has in turn lessened the amount of those persecuted. It will remain a gradual process to eliminate torture from all countries, but nevertheless a necessity, in the quest for universal human rights. Torture will continue until all countries decide for themselves, and not from a third party convention that freedom from torture is a human right everyone deserves.
Society claims to be pro- human rights, yet the same individuals amongst society are prone to torture others. Torture is an act of giving one excruciating pain, either physically or physiologically, in the means of getting information or simply being cruel enough to feel pleasure by someone else’s pain. Torture is an act that was used many hundred years ago by empowers who brutally used such techniques to governance their empire. Although humans have moved out of that era, many feel as though this cruel system should and can still be used. Many individuals amongst society believe that torture is absolutely necessary in extreme conditions but what they fail to realize is that regardless of how intense the situation may be, torture cannot be justified. Torture is a vindictive and inhumane act because it can be misused on innocent people, there are many physiological affects afterwards, the interrogators are negatively affected, and the information extracted from individuals is unreliable.