Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Healthcare systems in canada vs the usa
Canadian healthcare vs us healthcare essays
Healthcare systems in canada vs the usa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Healthcare systems in canada vs the usa
Every countries’ governments seek to deliver high quality health care and reasonable cost to all citizens. However, all nations have not equality health care service and reasonable cost. Canada government provides equality health care services and public facilities to the citizens. However, Canada Health Care System has been the subject of controversies compared to the United States Health Care System. Some people may agree with the idea because people should not wait longer for surgeries or examinations, patients have high quality of medicals and better services. However, if change the health care system, Canada government cannot intervene in the health care system, Canada citizens pay higher medical cost and do not get equality services. …show more content…
Hospitals and insurance companies want to earn money. Hospital cost will expensive to citizens. According to Ed cooper and Liz Taylor (1994), Provide by the provincial governments through taxes to patients free to choose doctors and physicians on a fee for service basis. Compared to Unite State, the government does not have a purposeful health care system. Therefore, hospitals make marketing for their business profits and charge to citizens smaller pay because uninsured and reduced fees by large payers. Furthermore, Private Health Insurances cost will expensive to citizen. According to Odette, under the Canada Health Act, the provinces provide publicly insured, but except dental care, cosmetic surgery and additional hospital room amenities not covered by their provincial plan. Therefore, Canada private health insurance are not expensive compared to US. Consumer Reports said (2014), US private health insurances are getting expensive because insurances dose not fully protect to citizens and people want to get premiums health insurance for their coverage. The cost of health care in the US is the highest per person in the industrialized world and growing the fastest. Last, Cooper, Taylor (1994) said, “Financial incentives encourage expensive high-tech diagnosis, treatment, and specialization; there is not enough primary care” (paragraph 8). Hospitals and doctors want to easy to cure and does not want to see many …show more content…
Elaine Bernard (n.d) observes, “All Canadians, rich and poor, regardless of state of their health, age, or employment status, are covered by the same comprehensive system.” (Paragraph 7). However, if change the health care system in Canada, Poor people cannot go to hospital. Canada health care provide equality healthcare to poor people and rich people. However, if change the health care system, people should have some insurance of health coverage or have a lot of money. For example, when I visited in Philippines for three months, I went to a hospital because of stomach ache. I received a treatment fast, but a woman still waiting a doctor with hold her son. The boy was bleeding head because he got a car accident. However, doctors refuse to cure the boy because a mother did not have money. Doctors and hospitals want to accept rich people and move to rich place. The US physicians are disappeared in low-income areas instead move into high-income areas for the wealthiest and privately funded patients (Cooper, Taylor, 1994). Increase medical services gap between rich and poor. Rich people want to get premium services and high quality doctors and medicines. However, poor people cannot provide primary health care because doctors move to rich place. According to Health Insurance (2016), four-fifths of all Americans have private health insurance, but a sizable people cannot
Neighboring countries, United States and Canada have close ties to one another, share the same language and have many of the same fundamental and religious beliefs. It is an interesting debt as to which provides a superior healthcare system. In order to better understand the strengths and weakness of the two systems, this paper will review four important structural and functional elements of each system.
While most countries around the world have some form of universal national health care system, the United States, one of the wealthiest countries in the world, does not. There are much more benefits to the U.S. adopting a dorm of national health care system than to keep its current system, which has proved to be unnecessarily expensive, complicated, and overall inefficient.
On a global scale, the United States is a relatively wealthy country of advanced industrialization. Unfortunately, the healthcare system is among the costliest, spending close to 18% of gross domestic product (GDP) towards funding healthcare (2011). No universal healthcare coverage is currently available. United States healthcare is currently funded through private, federal, state, and local sources. Coverage is provided privately and through the government and military. Nearly 85% of the U.S. population is covered to some extent, leaving a population of close to 48 million without any type of health insurance. Cost is the primary reason for lack of insurance and individuals foregoing medical care and use of prescription medications.
Some of these aspects include long wait times, uneven distribution of care, and most importantly, the various costs. Canada's system is certainly not the worst, but it is not the best either. The provision of care for Canadians is not flawless, however it is significantly better than some of the forms of care in other parts of the world. In contrast to the United States, Canada's healthcare system is thought of as a shining example of what they wish to achieve, but there are a few holes that need to be filled before any country can look up to Canadian healthcare. One of the issues that need to be address in Canada's healthcare system is about delivery, as there can be some bias as to who is eligible for things like proper treatments and surgeries. Another example could be being referred to a specialist that is not covered under a patient's insurance, resulting in possibly high costs. Lest Canadians be forgetful of no hospital bills or be ungrateful for the quality of the care and facilities, many still need to be educated on why the healthcare system is not entirely perfect. Therefore, this paper will outline why Canada's healthcare system has
The U.S. healthcare system is very different from Canada’s; in the U.S., most of the citizens within the US are un- insured or under-insured. The U.S. healthcare system operates mostly by the private sector. The U.S. provides a mixture of private insurance, employee-funded, and government programs. As for any direct federal government, funding of health care needs for any of its citizens is limited to programs that include Medicaid, Veteran’s Health Administration Medicare, and Children’s Health Insurance Program, which generates from the taxpayers (McGrail, van Doorslaer, Ross, & Sanmartin, 2009).
A Canadian Dermatologist who once worked in the United States breaks down the pros and cons of Canada’s health care system and explains why he thinks the Canadian system is superior to America’s. Canada runs a single payer health care system, which means that health care is controlled by the government rather than private insurance companies. One of the main pros of the Canadian health care system is that everyone is insured. He says that in the province of Ontario, the Ministry of Health insures all of its citizens, all important health needs such as physician visits, home nursing and physical therapy are covered. Since every resident is covered under the government plan the problem of patients being turned away due to lacking medical coverage
LaPierre, T. A. (2012). Comparing the Canadian and US Systems of Health Care in an Era of Health Care Reform. Journal of Health Care Finance, 38(4), 1-18.
Canada’s health care system is one of the top in the world; due to the federal legislation for publicly funded health care insurance. Requiring provinces and territories to follow certain conditions and guidelines to maintain universal health care, which is known as the Canada Health Act passed in 1984. There are five main principles within the Canada Health Act; public administrations, comprehensiveness, universality, accessibility, and portability. Moreover there are three aspects within the principles, equity, access and undeserved. Several marginalized populations do not receive the adequate health care even though the Canada Health Act is in place to help “protect, promote and restore the physical and mental well-being of residents of
In the past, Canada’s government-funded, universally accessible, health care system has been praised and admired both at home and abroad as one of the finest in the world. A great source of pride and comfort for many Canadians is that it is based on five fundamental principles. Principles that are a reflection of the values held by Canadian citizens since the formation of Medicare in 1966. These principles were reinforced in the Canada Health Act, (CHA), of 1984 and state that the Canadian system is universal, accessible, portable, comprehensive and non-profit.
Health care has become an issue because of the shortage of doctors in Canada. Many of them are either going to the U.S.A. or going to other countries to practice in hospitals and clinics. The earning cap imposed by the government has forced doctors to work fewer hours than are necessary to serve the public. Many Canadians are without a doctor to help them with their needs, and emergency rooms are filled to capacity with no available beds for those who have to be admitted to the hospital. Waiting time for specialist and specialty tests has become so long that someone diagnosed with a major illness may die before they can be properly treated.
The public health care system in Canada is still flawed, proven through the wait times that many patients have to go through. Canadians may wait up to six to nine months for “non-urgent” MRIs . The waiting list is dreary for Canadians, unlike Americans who can get their services immediately through paying out-of-pocket, the long public sector in Alberta waits up to a year for services, the wait for cataract surgery was six weeks ; these waits for some patients put the public health care system to shame, and helps push the idea of the privatized health care system a bettering option for the future of the nation. Additionally, 41 percent of adult Canadians said they experienced a difficulty in accessing hospital and physician care on weekday nights and weekends . Furthermore, it is still evident that Canadians in fact pay a higher income tax compared to Americans, due to the fact that they are paying the fund the health care system through their taxes; however, it is still significantly less to pay for a public health care system than it is privatized . Privatization is further proved as a superior choice with regards to the discharge situation many Canadians face. In Canada, it is common to see patients discharged earlier than recommended due the rising amount of patients using the free-of-charge public health care system, patients are released “quicker and sicker” because of this . Additionally, when discharged, the public health care system does not cover home care and private nurse care ; further proving the notion that there is still some forms of privatization already in the health care system in
Canadian health care system is well developed, highly efficient, and even with drawbacks it provides Canadian resident the best health care they deserve.
The U.S. expends far more on healthcare than any other country in the world, yet we get fewer benefits, less than ideal health outcomes, and a lot of dissatisfaction manifested by unequal access, the significant numbers of uninsured and underinsured Americans, uneven quality, and unconstrained wastes. The financing of healthcare is also complicated, as there is no single payer system and payment schemes vary across payors and providers.
Even if we lived in a capitalist society where everyone had access to the same basic healthcare program, the rich would arguably still be able to afford better care. The wealthy are able to pay more in co-payments, prescription costs, and the ability to go outside of the healthcare system and travel elsewhere to seek help. When you have disposable resources then the sky is the limit, where the poor have very limited options. Th...
Privatisation means transferring the control of an enterprise from the government sector to the private sector. Generally, but not always, this also means transferring ownership of the Public sector enterprise as well as control.