Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Canada's healthcare system and united states healthcare system
Principles of the Canadian healthcare system
Canada's health care model
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction
Many people in the world may think that Canada has the ideal system of healthcare for it's citizens, but that may not be entirely correct. Although the healthcare system in Canada has excellent features such as the standard of care and acceptance of all it's residents, it is quite often misconstrued. Each province in Canada is different, but they all run with basically the same set of rules and regulations, each required by law for the basic health care services to be provided. Canada's healthcare system is based upon five main principles, those being universality, portability, comprehensiveness, accessibility, and public administration. These principles are usually enforced, however, what some people do not realize is that there are a few negative aspects of the way healthcare is
…show more content…
provided in Canada.
Some of these aspects include long wait times, uneven distribution of care, and most importantly, the various costs. Canada's system is certainly not the worst, but it is not the best either. The provision of care for Canadians is not flawless, however it is significantly better than some of the forms of care in other parts of the world. In contrast to the United States, Canada's healthcare system is thought of as a shining example of what they wish to achieve, but there are a few holes that need to be filled before any country can look up to Canadian healthcare. One of the issues that need to be address in Canada's healthcare system is about delivery, as there can be some bias as to who is eligible for things like proper treatments and surgeries. Another example could be being referred to a specialist that is not covered under a patient's insurance, resulting in possibly high costs. Lest Canadians be forgetful of no hospital bills or be ungrateful for the quality of the care and facilities, many still need to be educated on why the healthcare system is not entirely perfect. Therefore, this paper will outline why Canada's healthcare system has
various flaws. Why This Is An Issue Canada's healthcare system is provided to it's citizens by public fundings. This means that through taxes, Canadians can receive a basic form of care services without being charged for hospital bills. However, some features are not completely available through this scheme, which results in additional costs for patients and residents. This is an issue because citizens that are living with low income support or the homeless cannot afford to keep up with these costs, which puts their lives at risk. It can also be an issue for those who are not government assisted as well, because the extra costs can really add up and quickly become extremely overwhelming. These costs can include ambulance or air lift fares, travel costs to see specialists, drug prescriptions, etc. Pape (2014) explains how after the age of 65, the average for additional costs for necessities partially covered or even not covered at all by medicare is approximately $5,391. This number is actually realistic because it takes into consideration things like dental work, eye glasses, wheelchairs and canes, hearing aids, and assisted living costs, all which come most of the time with old age, when there is only a pension plan and no additional income to support these needs. The history of healthcare in Canada started in Saskatchewan in 1944 with the introduction of universal hospital insurance. This idea later went on to inspire the creation of medicare in 1962. Brown and Taylor (2012) explain that medicare would be the first government controlled medical insurance program that would be universal, comprehensive and single-player. At first, the idea of medicare was opposed, with many different issues and fears raised, but medicare eventually made it's way across Canada and is still enforced today. However, according to Simpson (2012), the founding principles of medicare are not being met, and Canada's healthcare system has turned into high costs, strict rules, rapidly developing technologies, and social inequalities, which can all lead to poor health. Who Is Affected Canada's flawed and changing healthcare system is affecting many people in the country. The affecting factors can include wait times, restrictions, and inequalities. Wait times in Canada are perhaps some of the longest as opposed to other countries. Wait times in hospitals can take long hours, and wait times for doctor's or specialist appointments can be weeks or months, which affects many people. If someone is in dire need of medical attention, it can be a long wait for them depending on the situation, which can lead to further injury for the patient. Life-threatening cases are handled immediately, but if the patient has a non-urgent need, then they will face sitting in a crowded hospital waiting room. Although trips to the hospital are free of charge, many people abuse this privilege and check themselves into the hospital with a slight cold, which then increases the wait times of the people who actually need serious attention.While wait times are more likely to affect the sick and dying, issues like restrictions and inequalities affect many other people. As stated before, needs like dental and eye care, mobility devices, hearing aids, long term care, and alternative medicine are not covered under medicare and are at additional costs to Canadians. However, if citizens have benefits with their place of employment or union, then they are eligible to receive extra coverage. Employee benefits are provided in addition to their normal salaries, and can cover things like disability income, daycare, vacation and sick time, retirement benefits, tuition reimbursement, and insurance for dental and other health care. While this is fortunate for those who have employee benefits, those who do not could most likely be struggling. If someone is homeless or government assisted, they are not eligible for this increased coverage, and are forced to pay for their essentials themselves, which many of them cannot do. This type of inequality affects many people, as government assistance only covers a limited amount of care, and the homeless are not able to pay for these rising costs on their own.
An analysis of the US and Canada’s systems reveals advantages and drawbacks within each structure. While it is apparent that both countries could benefit from the adoption of portions of the others system, Canada’s healthcare system offers several benefits over the US system.
The Canadian health care system promises universality, portability, and accessibility; unfortunately, it faces political challenges of meeting pub...
The basic values of fairness and equity that are demonstrated by the willingness of Canadians to share resources and responsibility are displayed in Canada 's healthcare system, and have been reflected in the modifications and major reforms made to the system since its initiation. The system has been and continues to be modified as the country 's population and circumstances change, and as the nature of health care itself evolves. Health care in Canada is delivered through a publicly funded health care system, which is mostly free at the point of use and has most services provided by private entities. It is guided by the provisions of
It is an assumption by many that Canada has one of the best healthcare systems in the world. But do they really? There are numerous health services in Canada which should be part of the universal care nonetheless are not. These include but are not limited to: dental care, vision care, physiotherapy, occupational therapy and prescription drug coverage. This report will solely focus on why basic dental care should be a part of the Canadian universal healthcare. Dental care is predominantly delivered in the private sector on a fee-for-service basis, with approximately 62.6% of Canadians paying for care through employment-based insurance and 31.9% through out-of-pocket expenditures and only a small amount of the Canadians, 5.5%, are qualified for public funding through government assistance programmes (Ramraj and Quinonez, 2012). It was seen that by 2009, dental coverage affordability became a problem not just for the low income families but also impacted middle-income earners as a result of their lack of, or decreased access to comprehensive dental insurance (Ramraj, 2013). It is stated by the World Health Organization that universal health care coverage should reassure access to necessary care and protect patients from financial hardship, and that the governments are obligated to
LaPierre, T. A. (2012). Comparing the Canadian and US Systems of Health Care in an Era of Health Care Reform. Journal of Health Care Finance, 38(4), 1-18.
Being a Canadian citizen, it is hard for me to think of life without any health insurance. I have had public health insurance all my life growing up and have been free to go to any hospital at any time and get some form of health care. Residing in the United States off and for the last 7 years I have experienced health care from both sides. I feel that private health care has huge advantages over public health care. In the following essay I will explain in three points why I feel strongly about private health care as opposed to public. What is better is always subjective, and I will not try to argue the point of health for all, but instead for the individual who is seeking the best health care possible, and is willing to put the resources into obtaining that. I will be addressing efficiency and quality, not inclusion of everyone (free health care), I will be addressing the root of this and not just that one argument, which would detract from my focus. I will not be getting into the political debate of socialism vs. capitalism, as that is a separate argument in itself, and this country is currently running under capitalism. Again coming from living in both a socialist and then a capitalist society, I feel I can do so in an unbiased manner.
Brian Lindenberg, “Canadian Healthcare: What Works and What Doesn’t | Benefits Canada,” accessed February 14, 2014, http://www.benefitscanada.com/benefits/health-wellness/canadian-healthcare-what-works-and-what-doesn%E2%80%99t-27647.
Canada’s Health Care system is gradually growing to be a major concern in today’s society with providing Canadians with the standard of care they deserve. Health care has become an issue because of the shortage of doctors in Canada; many of them are either going to the U.S.A. or going to other countries to practice in hospitals and clinics. The earning cap imposed by the government has forced doctors to work fewer hours than are necessary to serve the public. Many Canadians are without a doctor to help them with their needs and emergency rooms are filled to capacity with no available beds for those who have to be admitted to the hospital. Waiting time for specialist and specialty tests have become so long that someone diagnosed with a major illness may die before they can be properly treated. Nurses and others in the medical field are overworked and understaffed because the government has made cut-backs to the Health Care System. We live in a country where our health care is a privilege to have, but getting ill is becoming a problem if there is not adequate facilities and professionals to care for the sick. Today’s society is aging longer than ever and will need health care longer than before; patients recovering from hospital stays are being sent home more quickly than ever before, and terminal patients are being sent home for their last days.
The public health care system in Canada is still flawed, proven through the wait times that many patients have to go through. Canadians may wait up to six to nine months for “non-urgent” MRIs . The waiting list is dreary for Canadians, unlike Americans who can get their services immediately through paying out-of-pocket, the long public sector in Alberta waits up to a year for services, the wait for cataract surgery was six weeks ; these waits for some patients put the public health care system to shame, and helps push the idea of the privatized health care system a bettering option for the future of the nation. Additionally, 41 percent of adult Canadians said they experienced a difficulty in accessing hospital and physician care on weekday nights and weekends . Furthermore, it is still evident that Canadians in fact pay a higher income tax compared to Americans, due to the fact that they are paying the fund the health care system through their taxes; however, it is still significantly less to pay for a public health care system than it is privatized . Privatization is further proved as a superior choice with regards to the discharge situation many Canadians face. In Canada, it is common to see patients discharged earlier than recommended due the rising amount of patients using the free-of-charge public health care system, patients are released “quicker and sicker” because of this . Additionally, when discharged, the public health care system does not cover home care and private nurse care ; further proving the notion that there is still some forms of privatization already in the health care system in
“Health is the state of complete physical, mental, social and intellectual well-beings not merely an absence of disease”(WHO,1998).Good health is essential in life as people’s career will be affected if they fall ill.. In the developed countries like Australia, People who are not involved in the healthy lifestyle are suffering from a range of health disorders like overweight, high blood pressure, obese, heart diseases, obesity, diabetes, high cholesterol, kidney problems, liver disorders and so many. To overcome these health issues Australian government introduced health care system. This essay will firstly, discuss the Australian health care system and secondly, compare Australia with other countries around the world in relation to different consideration on health.
Today’s Canadian Health System is not prefect. I believe that Health care is an issue that should be taken care of as soon as possible, because today’s constant budget cuts won’t do any good to anyone. I believe that we all should pay the same fee that will cover any time of injury or operation. It’s don’t think that it all should be about the money; after all we are saving people’s lives. I mean if you have a liver cancer and you simply don’t have money to pay for the surgery, I don’t think that money should that as an issue between life and death.
Primary health care is the essential step to the Canadian health system. It is often associated with other specialized health care sectors, and community services. Many patients visit various services under primary health care such as family doctors' offices, mental health facilities, nurse practitioners' offices; they make phone calls to health information lines, for example, Tele-health; and receive suggestions from physicians and pharmacists (First Ministers; meeting on healthcare, n.d.). This service can prevent patients from visiting the emergency department, when all that is required is some guidance and advice. Having primary care services can reduce the consumption of acute beds, where only seriously ill patients can use the acute beds when it is available. Primary care not only deals with sickness care, but it helps patients receive preventable measures; it promotes healthy choices (Primary health care, n.d.). The focus on appropriate health care services, when and where they are needed, enhanced the ability of individuals to access primary care in various settings: at home, in a hospital or any number of family health care venues, such as Family Health Teams (FHTs), Community Health Centres (CHCs), or Nurse Practitioner- led clinics. This paper will look at the litigious heated argument in the Romanow Report concerning primary care. It will begin with a discussion of the outcome of the Accord on Health Care Renewal (2003) and The First Ministers' Meeting on the Future of Health in Canada (2004), both referring to primary care, which will then be followed with an assessment and analysis of the different ways in which the accords have been addressed in support of primary care. Followed by a discussion about the changes on ...
While understanding the future of health care first one must understand the following aspects of health care which include: how does the health care system work, how is it funded, how we understand the supply and demand of health care and its relation to the Canadian health care system, and the future impact of the health care market in Canada. First and foremost one needs to understand that the demand of health care is a derived demand from the demand of health. Douglas McCready has stated in his lesson that, “in the case of health care, there is no direct demand for health care.” From what we have learned in economics there are some products or services that are the cause of the demand for other products, also known as derived demand (McCready, Lesson 4). With respect to the Canadian health care system one should know that it is funded by the gove...
Canadian health care is commonly known as Medicare. The system is designed to be universal, portable, publicly administered, accessible and comprehensive. The governance, organization and delivery of health care services are very much decentralized in Canada. Most of the provinces and territories administer Medicare and plan health care services to their people. The last few years has experienced few pan-Canadian health reform initiatives however specific provinces have engaged much of their resources in reorganizing and refining their regional health care systems. Most of the territories have improved on quality and have focused on timely delivery of
“ America’s healthcare system is neither healthy, caring, nor a system.” There are many forms of profit making in health care. These activities appear in different ways in Canada and in the United States. For an example, this works in Canada in a context of universal healthcare while in the U.S it operates in a free market context. Canada is subtly moving away from universal healthcare, towards free market healthcare. The balance of private and public options in the U.S favour private options: “ In 2014, large sectors of the health care landscape are corporatized” (Churchill & Perry, 2014: 409). This is problematic for the conflict of interests that arise because “ Special interest groups are motivated not by any obligations to physicians or