Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Euthanasia legal and ethical issues
Physician assisted suicide right or wrong
Ethical principles applied to physician assisted suicide
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Euthanasia legal and ethical issues
Disguised as Mercy
He is suffering from a terminal illness. He is bed ridden and in pain. You have heard the statistics and all the unpleasant details- you know that small cell lung cancer is incurable, but all you can do is helplessly watch him suffer. For all its advances, modern medicine has failed him with its lack of a cure or even relief from the suffering. There is such a small chance for your loved one’s survival. The only hope there seems to be is that death will overcome him and relieve him from his suffering. But death continues to evade him. And he continues to suffer.
She is in a coma. It’s no terminal illness, but she has been unresponsive for a long time. Almost six months ago, she had a stroke and lapsed into unconsciousness…she
…show more content…
never woke up. You have been told that there is only a slight chance that she will ever wake from her coma, so you wait. Death. We all must face the fact that it comes for every man. But is it our right to decide when and how death takes us into eternity? Euthanasia is the practice of intentionally and painlessly ending a life.
It is also known as Mercy Killing. In most cases, it is at the request of the patient. But when it’s not asked for by the patient and, instead, someone else decides, say for a coma patient, it is called passive euthanasia. There is also the prospect of physician-assisted suicide. The difference between the two is that physician-assisted suicide specifically has the backing of a controlling, legal authority.
As of this moment, Belgium and the Netherlands are the only countries to have legalized euthanasia. And currently in the United States, Oregon, Washington, California, Vermont, Montana and the District of Columbia have legalized physician-assisted suicide.
At the moment, these methods of death are offered primarily to those with terminal illnesses. But is it wrong to respond to a terminal diagnosis with “how about you kill yourself?” Of course, that’s not how you would comfort someone who is ill. You would rather present that the next couple months are going to be very painful; that there is little chance that he will survive the illness; and that he will die anyway so why not die with some dignity… You would offer a quicker and easier
death. If you listen to an advocate for euthanasia, you will often find the phrases “right to die”, “end of life options”, and “death with dignity.” These are merely terms used to dress up euthanasia and assisted suicide and make them look acceptable. “Death with Dignity” merely implies that one cannot obtain honor in death. Yet what rule book ever said that a patient can’t find their own dignity? ‘End of life options’ suggests that life is no longer the option. At what point did we decide that we didn’t want to find a way to live? And a “right to die”? It is only a concept that is based on the idea that a human being is entitled to end their own life. When someone wants to die, something is wrong and they are not using reason when making this decision. Those proposing legalization of suicide and euthanasia are taking advantage of the tunnel vision of a patient who cannot see past the pain that plagues him. Euthanasia may not be one of the leading factors of death in the United States- but suicide is the tenth, and the first for my generation. Suicide? I’ve mentioned physician-assisted suicide, but suicide in general is a very different topic. However, in both cases, they are suffering- mentally or physically, it shouldn’t matter! Being suicidal and reaching out with the intent of killing oneself should not be met with assistance, but instead, help should be acquired for the one suffering. If someone, even a random stranger, confesses that he feels the need to kill himself, you should automatically seek someone who can remind him that there is more to life than this pain that he is feeling and that his life means something and has value. I understand that you want to relieve your loved one from the pain. But I would like to remind you that no one wants to die. He may wish for an escape from the pain, but death is a very permanent cure for a terminal illness. Instead, be with him, support and love him. A little love goes a long way. If he is going to die, celebrate the life he lived. Value his last moments here on earth and thank God for his time with you. And leave what ‘is’ in God’s will. Psalms 34:17 says “[The righteous] cry, and the LORD hears, and delivers them out of all their troubles.” At this moment, euthanasia may not be a serious issue in America; but I promise you that the day is coming when another Roe v. Wade trial reaches the Supreme Court, dragging up medically assisted suicide with it. We have all heard the statistics on abortion; before the 70’s, did we have any clue how catastrophic legalizing abortion would be? Just think for a moment on how the situation will be if euthanasia is legalized nationally. It’s true that guidelines have been placed on physician-assisted suicide in the United States: currently, U.S. law requires that the patient be a resident of the state and terminally ill, they must ask for the procedure, and there must be a doctor willing to prescribe the pill that will end the patient’s life. The safeguards outlined in the laws made by the acts that those five states have passed are strict. But what stops the same people who put these laws into practice from changing them and allowing easier access to voluntary death? We don’t have to search for long to see what consequences will ensue if euthanasia does pass. As previously mentioned, Belgium and the Netherlands have legalized euthanasia and assisted suicide. They have seen to it that multiple groups can obtain these procedures; it is no longer reserved for the terminally ill elders, but infants with terminal illnesses and even those who have been diagnosed as mentally ill are open to assistance as well. Ever since euthanasia has been legalized, these nations have reportedly seen multiple cases of doctors literally killing their patients without consent with little to no repercussions. Since the Netherlands legalized euthanasia in 2002, these countries have descended down a slippery slope. And it is one we must not let the United States follow. By allowing legalized death, we endanger the respect for human life, particularly concerning the defenseless. And through assisting in suicide, we disregard our judgement on self-destructive behavior which is often a cry for help. We will only weaken ourselves and become vulnerable in ways that will only end in tragedy. Instead of forming a group full of disabled and dying that we only see as weak and expendable, we need to remember that we are just as frail and just as likely to die in the next moment. Also, we should recall how much the world has been improved by people who are disabled mentally and physically, such examples would be: Stephen Hawking with ALS, Albert Einstein who had autism, and Helen Keller who was blind and deaf- and there are so many others. We have been greatly influenced by those that, in general, are seen as mostly nuisances. With this in mind, we also need to accept that pain is a part of life. We need to bring the world’s focus to a place of hope that is centered on God and His Will. And we need to reinforce the ideas of contentment- to be happy with what we are given. It is important that we reinforce the awareness that we are here for a purpose and not just to suffer fruitlessly or even to freely enjoy our lives. Life is sacred. And we all must resolve to protect it.
Imagine a family member being extremely ill and suffering from day to day. When they decide they cannot take the pain any more, would you want them to pull through for you or would you fulfill their dying wish and let the doctor pull the plug? Could you even make a decision? Many people would not allow such an event to happen because with all the pain and confusion the patient is enduring may cause confusion and suicidal tendencies. However, there are people who believe otherwise. This is called physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is a controversial topic that causes much debate. Though it is only legal in the three states Oregon, Washington and Montana, there are many people who are for it and think it can be necessary. Even with morals put aside, Physician-assisted suicide should be illegal because it will be a huge violation of the oath every doctor must abide by, there would be no real way to distinguish between people who are suffering and the people who are faking or depressed, and it causes a lot of confusion to people with new diseases or new strands of disease that does not have a clear cure.
There are many convincing and compelling arguments for and against Physician Assisted Suicide. There are numerous different aspects of this issue including religious, legal and ethical issues. However, for the purpose of this paper, I will examine the ethical concerns on both sides. There are strong pro and con arguments regarding this and I will make a case for both. It is definitely an issue that has been debated for years and will continue to be debated in years to come.
Euthanasia comes from the Greek word that means “good death” (“Euthanasia” literally). In general, euthanasia refers to causing the death of someone to end their pain and suffering, oftentimes in cases of terminal illness. Some people call these “mercy killings”. There are two types of euthanasia: passive and active. Passive or voluntary euthanasia refers to withholding life-saving treatments or medical technology to prolong life.
In March of 1998, a woman suffering with cancer became the first person known to die under the law on physician-assisted suicide in the state of Oregon when she took a lethal dose of drugs. This law does not include people who have been on a life support system nor does it include those who have not voluntarily asked physicians to help them commit suicide. Many people worry that legalizing doctor assisted suicide is irrational and violates the life-saving tradition of medicine and it has been argued that the reason why some terminally ill patients yearn to commit suicide is nothing more than depression. Physician Assisted Suicide would lessen the human life or end the suffering and pain of those on the verge of dying; Physician Assisted Suicide needs to be figured out for those in dire need of it or for those fighting against it. The main purpose for this paper is to bring light on the advantages and disadvantages of physician-assisted suicide and to show what principled and moral reasoning there is behind each point.
Euthanasia - Pro and Con & nbsp; Abstract & nbsp; This paper will define Euthanasia and assisted suicide. Euthanasia is often confused with and associated with assisted suicide, definitions of the two are. required. Two perspectives shall be presented in this paper. The first perspective favor euthanasia or the "right to die," the second perspective. favor antieuthanasia, or the "right to live". Each perspective shall. endeavor to clarify the legal, moral and ethical ramifications or aspects of euthanasia. & nbsp; Thesis Statement & nbsp; Euthanasia, also mercy killing, is the practice of ending a life so as to.
mere $35.00 for drugs in an assisted suicide,” (Economic Aspects). This is a very cost effective choice if a patient is approved. It cuts down on thousands of debt for a patient and their family. Although this option is extremely affordable, it also has its cons. Many people worry that because it is a more affordable option that doctors will try and persuade a patient into the direction of physician assisted suicide. This is not true though, a doctor has to give the patient all their options not matter the cost. Also if the patient is directed into believing physician assisted suicide is their best option, they have to go through a different doctor and convince them that physician assisted suicide is what they really want.
Should people have the right to kill themselves if they’re on the verge of dying? People are allowed to kill themselves in everyday life, so why can’t a person who knows that there is no way he will be able recover from his illness choose to end his life on his own terms? Many people don’t support and agree with assisted suicide. Even though many people don’t believe in physician assisted suicide, there are people suffering when they shouldn’t have too. A person who is terminally ill should have the right to choose to die if they choose.
Assisted suicide is becoming increasingly more common. Arguing the topic is extremely hard because it means the the life or death of a human being. Today, assisted suicide is legal in multiple countries, but only a few states in the US support this. Therefore, creates a struggle for any person wanting to go through this process. Being this is a broad topic, most people are torn between one side, I personally believe there should be a compromise in between the middle. For instance, not just someone going through a troublesome time in their life should have the ability to up and kill himself. That in my perspective is taking an easy way out for something that is worth a tremendous amount. However, the few people with a deadly illness or cancer that can no longer fight the pain or perhaps unresponsive should be given that option. Just because we have the ability to be euthanized does
Although widely condoned around the world, only one nation, the Netherlands has made physician assisted suicide legal. Five states tried Washington in 1991, California in 1992, Michigan in 1998,and main in 2000, Oregon in 1994 approved the “Death with Dignity Act” it won 51 percent to 49 percent. 91 people committed suicide with the aid of a physician in the first four years the law was in effect.
People have their own beliefs on certain topics like abortion, right to die assisted-suicide, and the stand your ground laws. These beliefs are either conservative or liberal. Liberal thinkers believe that a woman has the right to do whatever she wants to do with her body and that a person has the right to die if they want to. Conservative thinkers believe that a baby is a human being and that a loved one or doctor should not help a loved one kill itself. I am on the conservative side for these different types of murders:abortion,right to die assisted-suicide,and stand your ground laws. We in America have our freedom and we can do almost anything we want, but just because we can do something doesn’t mean we should do it for example
Euthanasia is debated globally about whether or not it should be illegal or become legalized. Some will say that it is wrong, that it is taking the life of a human being; however, others will say that it is just taking the life of a human who is already terminally ill, and suffering. Euthanasia is legal in the Netherlands, Belgium, Columbia, and Luxemburg. Assisted suicide; which is another form of euthanasia is legal in Switzerland, Germany, Japan, Canada, and in some parts of the U.S: Washington, Oregon, Vermont, Montana, and California. Despite many beliefs of euthanasia being morally wrong, it provides terminally ill patients an alternative to the painful suffering they are to experience before their death.
A person that is suffering from a terminal illness decides that life is not worth living because there is too much pain involved and ends his own life, would that be wrong of him? That is the question that is at hand. Many supporters of the “right to die movement” can justify euthanasia. First, because terminal illness causes pain that is unbearable for that individual. That is the main reason why people seek self-induced death.
“Euthanasia is defined as a deliberate act undertaken by one person with the intention of ending life of another person to relieve that person's suffering and where the act is the cause of death.”(Gupta, Bhatnagar and Mishra) Some define it as mercy killing. Euthanasia may be voluntary, non voluntary and involuntary. When terminally ill patient consented to end his or her life, it is called voluntary euthanasia. Non voluntary euthanasia occurs when the suffering person never consented nor requested to end a life. These patients are incompetent to decide because they are either minor, in a comatose stage or have mental conditions. Involuntary euthanasia is conducted when it is against the will of the patient (Gupta, Bhatnagar, Mishra). Euthanasia can be either passive or active. Passive euthanasia means life-sustaining treatments are withheld and nothing is done to keep the patient alive. Active euthanasia occurs when a physician do something by giving drugs or substances that ends a patient’s life. (Medical News Today)
So one is going about your business, doing your normal routine and it’s time for a doctor’s visit. You go in there, the doctor performs his regular examine and sends you home. The next phone call you get from your doctor is a tragic one. They have just diagnosed you with a disease that has a low survival rate. And so begins the medical treatments. These treatments could last weeks, months, or years, during which you will face some of the most difficult choices. Some of our family members or friends have heard these words before and unfortunately doctors can only do so much to help, and the cost of treatments are on the rise. According to the NY Times, you could be paying up to a million dollars in one year just to pay for treatments, drugs,
Euthanasia is a medical procedure which speeds up the process of dying for people with incurable, painful, or distressing diseases. The patient’s doctor can stop treatment and instead let them die from their illness. It come from the Greek words for 'good' and 'death', and is also called mercy killing. Euthanasia is illegal in most countries including the UK . If you suffer from an incurable disease, you cannot legally terminate your life. However, in a number of European countries it is possible to go to a clinic which will assist you to die gracefully under some very strict circumstances.