Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Physician assisted suicide should be legal
Physician assisted suicide should be legal
Case study of physician assisted suicide
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Physician assisted suicide should be legal
People have their own beliefs on certain topics like abortion, right to die assisted-suicide, and the stand your ground laws. These beliefs are either conservative or liberal. Liberal thinkers believe that a woman has the right to do whatever she wants to do with her body and that a person has the right to die if they want to. Conservative thinkers believe that a baby is a human being and that a loved one or doctor should not help a loved one kill itself. I am on the conservative side for these different types of murders:abortion,right to die assisted-suicide,and stand your ground laws. We in America have our freedom and we can do almost anything we want, but just because we can do something doesn’t mean we should do it for example …show more content…
Mancini gave her 93 year old father his bottle of morphine and then went unconscious. He was found by nurse, Barbara Klattermole, who then called the ambulance” (Cnn News,2013). Mancini does not see it as assisted-suicide by as giving her father his medicine. Liberal thinkers believe that a person has a say in when s/he wants to die. Only five states in the America have legalized physician-assisted suicide, which means a doctor knows a person is going to commit suicide and he is going to give him a prescription for the lethal drugs. A doctor or loved one should not have the right to help someone commit suicide, the only person who has the power to take a life away is God, not doctor or any family member. How is it legal for a doctor to kill a person just because it thinks they should die ? I understand that people may be suffering but that does not mean they should kill themselves. I disagree with the five states that have legalized physician-assisted suicide, because a doctor should not give someone that medicine that will take their live away. Liberals believe that we have the right to do whatever we want to ourselves because it 's our life. Just because we can do something doesn’t mean we should do it anyway. Our live is very special, if a doctor gives you lethal medicine to end your live, you are being selfish because you 're not thinking about your family members and what they will …show more content…
Zimmerman shot Trayvon on March 26, 2012, and Zimmerman was charged for two degree murder “(Biography, 2015). The stand your ground law states that if you feel like you’re in danger and you kill somebody in self defense then you will not go to jail because of the stand your ground law. The stand your ground law is in 23 states, Indiana is one of those states that has legalized the stand your ground law. Liberals do not believe anybody besides the Nation Guard should carry guns. “Liberals believe more guns more violence but to be honest it’s not the guns but the people who have the guns. Conservatives believe we should carry guns but only use them if we really need to use them for self defense” ( StudentNewsDaily, 2005). The stand your ground law is a good law, if people use it for the right thing. People need to use this law when they are really in danger, not just because it’s legal in your state. Many innocent people are dying from this law. Another example is the Michael Brown case, which is well known in Ferguson. “Michael Brown, eighteen years of age, was walking down the street with a friend. Then Officer Wilson tried to stop the two men by
Imagine a family member being extremely ill and suffering from day to day. When they decide they cannot take the pain any more, would you want them to pull through for you or would you fulfill their dying wish and let the doctor pull the plug? Could you even make a decision? Many people would not allow such an event to happen because with all the pain and confusion the patient is enduring may cause confusion and suicidal tendencies. However, there are people who believe otherwise. This is called physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is a controversial topic that causes much debate. Though it is only legal in the three states Oregon, Washington and Montana, there are many people who are for it and think it can be necessary. Even with morals put aside, Physician-assisted suicide should be illegal because it will be a huge violation of the oath every doctor must abide by, there would be no real way to distinguish between people who are suffering and the people who are faking or depressed, and it causes a lot of confusion to people with new diseases or new strands of disease that does not have a clear cure.
There are many convincing and compelling arguments for and against Physician Assisted Suicide. There are numerous different aspects of this issue including religious, legal and ethical issues. However, for the purpose of this paper, I will examine the ethical concerns on both sides. There are strong pro and con arguments regarding this and I will make a case for both. It is definitely an issue that has been debated for years and will continue to be debated in years to come.
On March 12, 2012 Bill Lee, the Chief of Police for Sanford Florida, explained Zimmerman had not been arrested because the police found no evidence to refute Zimmerman’s self-defense claim (Timeline of events: Trayvon Martin shooting case). Then the media decided to bully the state of Florida into bringing Florida by influencing public opinion. One of the ways the media achieved this was by making it seem like the reason there was no evidence to refute Zimmerman’s claim of self-defense, and Zimmerman’s eventual acquittal, was because of the controversial law in several states, including Florida, known as “Stand-Your Ground.”
The “Stand Your Ground” law was first adopted in the state of florida in 2005. This law did not gain national attention until the shooting death of unarmed teenager, Trayvon Martin, in Sanford, florida, where the shooter, George Zimmerman used the “Stand Your Ground” law as his basis for defending himself against Trayvon Martin to the Sanford Police Department. However, George Zimmerman’s legal defense team did not utilize the law to argue his innocence during his trial. But the damage had been done because soon after other cases in florida began to sprout up with “Stand Your Ground” as the driving force.
Physician assisted suicide, is it ethically right or morally wrong? The global controversy becomes emotional as some argue that physician assisted suicide contradicts moral reasoning to preserve life. Others argue that it is acceptable for a dying person to choose to escape unbearable suffering and to alleviate their pain. In order to choose a side of the controversy one must understand the meaning of physician assisted suicide and what a terminally ill patient is. Physician assisted suicide occurs when a physician supervises a patient’s death by providing the necessary means for the patient to enable the death. Terminally ill as stated in CNN news is a person with a life threatening illness that has a prognosis of 6 months or less to live.
Euthanasia - Pro and Con & nbsp; Abstract & nbsp; This paper will define Euthanasia and assisted suicide. Euthanasia is often confused with and associated with assisted suicide, definitions of the two are. required. Two perspectives shall be presented in this paper. The first perspective favor euthanasia or the "right to die," the second perspective. favor antieuthanasia, or the "right to live". Each perspective shall. endeavor to clarify the legal, moral and ethical ramifications or aspects of euthanasia. & nbsp; Thesis Statement & nbsp; Euthanasia, also mercy killing, is the practice of ending a life so as to.
¨ If I cannot give my consent to my own death, whose body is this? Who owns my life?- Sue Rodriguez. If one cannot choose when they die and how they go out, then are we really the owner of our life and body? Physician assisted suicide is the practice of providing a competent patient with a prescription for medication for the patient to use with the primary intention of ending his or her own life. When the patient is terminally ill and is in a lot of pain they should be able to end their own life instead of waiting for it to end itself. Even though some argue that physician assisted suicide is not a humane way of dying it still stops the patient´s suffering and gives them peace of mind.
Medical science has made great strides to allow us to save more lives than ever before. Through modern medicine, procedures, and technology we have the power to cure or reduce the suffering of people with conditions and diseases that were once thought to be fatal. We have discovered or much rather, we have created the so-called “fountain-of-youth”. Even so, modern medicine cannot treat all forms of pain and suffering. This technology that is seemingly beneficial for us today is also bringing about pain and distress to those who wish to end their prolonged life. One of the most controversial topics discussed this past decade has been that of assisted suicide.
Liberal are people who want to help society, and also want to make the world less violent. “Should lawmakers tighten firearm restrictions?” author spoke from a liberal Point of view. The article was published three months after the sandy hook shooting. After the sandy hook shooting and a couple months later the shooting in the Movie Theater and restaurant legislators was concerned about people safety and gun control. The debate was rather to keep the laws as is or control who get a gun by making harsher stipulations such as mental illness people not prohibited to carry one, or people with violent behavior in their past among other things.
The ethical issues of physician-assisted suicide are both emotional and controversial, as it struggles with the issue of life and death. If you take a moment and imagine how you would choose to live your last day, it is almost guaranteed that it wouldn’t be a day spent lying in a hospital bed, suffering in pain, continuously being pumped with medicine, and living in a strangers’ body. Today we live in a culture that denies the terminally ill the right to maintain control over when and how to end their lives. Physicians-assisted suicide “is the voluntary termination of one's own life by the administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician” (Medical Definition of Physician-Assisted Suicide, 2017). Physician-assisted
What would you do if you were faced with an untreatable terminal illness? Which path would you choose: life or death? Many people around the world have encountered this choice, yet many wish to speed up the process. Hoping to end their life with dignity, these patients believe that they should be offered the choice of suicide while in the hospital. But physician assisted suicide is ethically wrong and should not be allowed in the world of health care.
Doctors prefer to never have to euthanize a patient. It is a contradiction of everything they have been taught for a doctor to euthanize someone, because a doctor’s job is to do everything in their power to keep the patient alive, not assist them in suicide. The majority of doctors who specialize in palliative care, a field focused on quality of life for patients with severe and terminal illnesses, think legalizing assisted suicide is very unnecessary. This is due to the fact that if patients do not kill themselves, they will end up dying on a ventilator in the hospital under the best possible care available, with people around them trying to keep them as comfortable as possible. Legalized euthanasia everywhere has been compared to going down a slippery slope. Officials believe that it could be done over excessively and the fear of assisted suicide numbers rising greatly is a great fear. This is why euthanasia is such a controversial subject worldwide. But, even though it is a very controversial subject, euthanasia is humane. Every doctor also has a say in whether or not they choose to euthanize a patient or not, leaving only the doctors who are willing to do this type of practice, for euthanizing patients. Medicine and drugs prescribed by a doctor for pain or suffering can not always help a person to the extent they desire, even with the help of doctors
Throughout the course of history, death and suffering have been a prominent topic of discussion among people everywhere. Scientists are constantly looking for ways to alleviate and/or cure the pain that comes with the process of dying. Treatments typically focus on pain management and quality of life, and include medication and various types of therapy. When traditional treatments are not able to eliminate pain and suffering or the promise of healing, patients will often consider euthanasia or assisted suicide. Assisted suicide occurs when a person is terminally ill and believes that their life is not worth living anymore. As a result of these thoughts and feelings, a physician or other person is enlisted to “assist” the patient in committing suicide. Typically this is done by administering a lethal overdose of a narcotic, antidepressant or sedative, or by combining drugs to create an adverse reaction and hasten the death of the sick patient. Though many people believe that assisted suicide is a quick and honorable way to end the sufferings of a person with a severe illness, it is, in fact, morally wrong. Assisted suicide is unethical because it takes away the value of a human life, it is murder, and it opens the door for coercion of the elderly and terminally ill to seek an untimely and premature death. Despite the common people’s beliefs, assisted suicide is wrong and shouldn’t be legalized.
Assisted suicide brings up one of the biggest moral debates currently circulating in America. Physician assisted suicide allows a patient to be informed, including counseling about and prescribing lethal doses of drugs, and allowed to decide, with the help of a doctor, to commit suicide. There are so many questions about assisted suicide and no clear answers. Should assisted suicide be allowed only for the terminally ill, or for everyone? What does it actually mean to assist in a suicide? What will the consequences of legalizing assisted suicide be? What protection will there be to protect innocent people? Is it (morally) right or wrong? Those who are considered “pro-death”, believe that being able to choose how one dies is one’s own right.
These patients are accessing their autonomy to do so their cognitive function has to be working properly. Patients suffering from complete paralysis or are on life support measure also seek this because for them it 's hard to deal with physical symptoms such as breathlessness, incontinence, difficulty swallowing, nausea, and vomiting or psychological factors like depression, feeling loss of control and dignity and overall dislike of being a burden or dependency on family members while other argue that suicidal ideation or lack of decent palliative care can be a reason for asking for assisted suicide. (Annadurai, Danasekaran, & Mani, 2014).