The Pros And Cons Of Drone Strikes

900 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Military drones and their effects on counter terrorism

Terrorism is a force of unlawful intimidation imposed on a country through an act of violence and is being faced by countries all over the world. America has been fighting against terrorism but one main controversy debated between people whether or not America is being restricted by the laws written under the Constitution and international agreements. The Constitution and international agreements hinder the ability to fight terrorists by establishing the extent of the actions taken by the United States based on legality issues, humanitarian concerns, and national reputation. Legality is a major issues because many people think that the Constitution has too many rules which restrains America from fighting terrorists effectively. One legality issue is privacy rights for citizens because non-citizens will not be allowed freedom …show more content…

One concern the people have is why America is one of the only countries using drone strikes because many believe that they are not necessary since so many countries can win wars without drone strikes. Drone strikes do not defy the laws of the Constitution, however they challenge the morals made by the nation, and the government tries to resolve this by saying, “taking strikes only when we face a continuing, imminent threat, and only where there is … near certainty of no civilian casualties” (Is Obama’s Drone War Moral?). If using drone strikes is the most efficient way of eliminating terrorists, then making it a last resort only if there is a “continuing, imminent threat” is not necessary because the main goal is to eliminate terrorists as fast as possible with minimal amount of collateral

Show More
Related

  • Pros And Cons Of The War On Terror

    217 Words  | 1 Pages

    There had been Pros and Cons since President George W. Bush officially declared the "Global war on Terror"(GWOT) on September 20, 2011.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Drones

    696 Words  | 2 Pages

    Those who oppose the use of drones in warfare claims it violates international law. They believe that the strikes have no justification therefore violating international law. (Moskowitz) They claim that the benefits of the usage of drones do not outweigh the cons of using drones. The opposition claim that civilian casualties make up 2-10% of total fatalities from drones firing on wrong targets or the civilians are collateral damage.(Globalresearch) The dissentient think it causes more unrest than peace in some regions due to the collateral damage caused to buildings and civilians and is another sign of American arrogance. (ABC News)Even though their points are valid, these reasons do not warrant the cease of drone activity.

    Read More

  • Drones: Peace Keeper or Terrorist Teacher

    1614 Words  | 4 Pages

    Controversy has plagued America’s presence in the Middle East and America’s usage of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) contributes vastly to this controversy. Their usefulness and ability to keep allied troops out of harm’s reach is hardly disputed. However, their presence in countries that are not at war with America, such as Pakistan and Yemen, is something contested. People that see the implications of drone use are paying special attention to the civilian casualty count, world perspective, and the legality of drone operations in non-combative states. The use of drone technology in the countries of Yemen and Pakistan are having negative consequences. In a broad spectrum, unconsented drone strikes are illegal according to the laws of armed conflict, unethical, and are imposing a moral obligation upon those who use them. These issues are all of great importance and need to be addressed. Their legality is also something of great importance and begins with abiding to the Laws of Armed Conflict.

    Read More

  • Analysis of Daniel Byman´s Why Drones Work and Majorie Chohn Killer Drone Attacks Illegal, Counter- Productive

    1611 Words  | 4 Pages

    Byman’s first argument is that US drone strikes are extremely efficient in their purpose: eliminating high value targets in foreign countries that pose a threat to national security. He cities a study done by the New America Foundation, which found that “U.S. drones have killed an estimated 3,300 al Qaeda, Taliban, and other jihadist operatives in Pakistan and Yemen” (Byman 1). Of these 3,300 militants, over 50 were senior leaders of either Al Qaeda or the Taliban. Additionally, drone strikes indirectly hinder communication between terrorist leaders and their operatives. In an effort to avoid detection, many foreign militants have stopped using cell phones and other electronic forms of communication. Although the elimination of technology makes it harder to find high value targets, it also significantly impacts their ability to communicate, which reduces the amount of organized attacks. Without considering the cost of civilian casualties or other negative impacts associated with the drone strikes, it is clear that UAV drones have been effective in eliminating foreign threats.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Terrorist Attacks

    420 Words  | 1 Pages

    What are terrorist attacks? Terrorist attacks are unexpecting attacks using violence against innocent people. Terrorists Cause harm to others in a cruel manner or kill people in cold blood giving them no mercy or feeling no pity for people who sit hopelessly begging for their lives.Terrorists also destroy many infrastructures or civilian population to prove they are high in political and social strength. Terrorists attack people to attain political or religious aims.

    Read More

  • Just War Theory Essay

    1077 Words  | 3 Pages

    It’s important to acknowledge that yes, drone strikes have brought about a completely different type of warfare, one which the original thinkers behind just war theory probably could not fathom. As put by Yemeni activist Farea al-Muslimi, “When there is a normal war, people can hide, or they can stay away from the military – they can make choices and be careful, but when drones come, you just don’t know when you’ll be next. The fear is incredible.” Drone usage comes at a great cost; the psychological effect of constantly being on guard on Yemen’s civilians are perhaps a new aspect of war that should be considered when considering the behaviors considered ‘just’ during

    Read More

  • Future Terrorism

    744 Words  | 2 Pages

    Over the past Century, terrorism has advanced from random killings to enormous plans for terrorist groups. To understand terrorism you must first define it. Terrorism as we all know it is hard to define and understand, and has many different definitions as it is used widely. The word "terrorism" stems from the word "terror", which means to instill fear in. People become terrorists when they take the actions towards instilling fear and terror upon people to prove a certain point or agenda. Some terrorists may have the motivation of proving something political, while some may just inflict terror to keep control over a group, people or country. Then there are terrorists who act under the notion that they are showing support for something, as in religious regions, while others do so to show disdain for something they don't agree with. Government, individual agencies, private agencies, and academic experts have all developed, proposed, designed, and analyzed what constitutes acts of terrorism. The meaning of terrorism has definitely changed and acquired new definitions over the years. The million dollar question is how will the future of America be affected by this act of terrorism?

    Read More

  • Understanding Terrorism: International and Domestic Perspectives

    1108 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Module one, I learned that terrorism is a result of physical harm or deadly acts of force with the intent of a political outcome by the use of terror for coercion. There are various types of terrorism such as international terrorism and domestic terrorism. International terrorism occurs outside of the United States with a purpose to influence the policy of a government by intimidation. International and Domestic terrorism both involve violent acts dangerous to human life that violate federal and state laws. Domestic terrorism occurs within the United States with the intention of coercion or intimidation by way of mass destruction, etc. Some forms of terrorism include Improvised explosive devices (IED), kidnappings, suicide bombings and

    Read More

  • Drones Argumentative Analysis

    1508 Words  | 4 Pages

    (Custom Reader 104) This topic intrigued me because I haven’t really thought about if the American citizens had to run in fear for their lives, knowing a drone flying around your safe territory could randomly eliminate you at any time. This made me wonder if situations like this created enmity or jealousy towards the safeguarded citizens belonging to the aggressor. The article highlights O’Connell’s dismay that the misuse and misplacement of drones within ethical bounds has fanned fire into the flames, only making those opposed to the United States angrier. (106) While O’Connell’s argument is definitely sincere in caring for the well-being of other beings, I believe that there can definitely situation in which another hostile would resort to hiding within the safe zones, which would endanger those who are immediately surrounding him and those who he may be plotting against. While this does not intrinsically warrant deployment of drones to search for and eliminate the target, it forces a great burden on to the shoulders of the CTU and the government that I’m sure no person would

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The American Invasion Of Iraq

    968 Words  | 2 Pages

    This assertion from a primary source indicates that American forces intervened in an attempt to quell terrorist movement and ultimately reduce the number of potential casualties. Consequentially, the inferred notion that terrorist groups are purely interested in seeking unwarranted revenge against western civilisation, an idea that US forces feel the need to suppress, becomes evident. Additionally, this statement is representative of the pro-war American government that unleashed themselves upon Iraq in 2001. It gives the perspective of the US regime and their belief that the Iraqi war was justified, in that it began in self-defence and for the wellbeing of America and Iraq alike. This statement directly opposes the view that their attack

    Read More

  • What is the Definition of Terrorism?

    420 Words  | 1 Pages

    The U.S. Department of State defines terrorism as, “The calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological”. Whereas the Belgium Red Cross says that terrorism is committed “for the purpose of intimidating the population, forcing a third party to act or destablishing or destroying the fundamental structures of a country or of an international organization”.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Cyber Terrorism

    1724 Words  | 4 Pages

    The term “cyber terrorism” refers to the use of the Internet as a medium in which an attack can be launched such as hacking into electrical grids, security systems, and vital information networks. Over the past four decades, cyber terrorists have been using the Internet as an advanced communication tool in which to quickly spread and organize their members and resources. For instance, by using the instantaneous spread of information provided by the Internet, several terrorist’s groups have been able to quickly share information, coordinate attacks, spread propaganda, raise funds, and find new recruits for their cause. Instantaneous and unpredictable, the technological advantages these terrorists have obtained from using the Internet includes

    Read More

  • The Ethical Use Of Drones

    1148 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...only imagine how hazardous this world we live in become. Amongst countries this can become an international competition to make drones to be used as a factor. When other nations see this particular country is using some type of technology to improve their military system then they would want part of it as well. The drone practice can cause to escalate if other countries adopt to this new technology for their own reason of protection. There will be no turning back because the government of that country would take advantage of these drones to use it towards the citizens instead of using for “terrorist”. The use of these drones is definitely immoral and unethical but some may argue that the of drones as protection against “terrorist” even though as we can see it kills innocent people, creates more terrorists, causes psychological disorders, and violates privacy. (Cole)

    Read More

  • Political Violence

    2055 Words  | 5 Pages

    Terrorism has many forms, and many definitions. “Elements from the American definitional model define terrorism as a premeditated and unlawful act in which groups or agents of some principal engage in a threatened or actual use o...

    Read More

  • The Methodology of Terrorism

    4279 Words  | 9 Pages

    Terrorism is one of the most extensively discussed issues of our time and at the same time it is also one of the least understood. The term itself “terrorism” means many different things to different people, cultures, and races. As a result, trying to define or classify terrorism with one universal definition is nearly impossible. The definition of terrorism used in this research is a reflection of much of the Western and American way of defining it. The definition of terrorism is,

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Drone Strikes

Open Document