The Pros And Cons Of Columbus

640 Words2 Pages

In 1492 Columbus set sail from spain, in 1493 he was the first european to discover the Western Hemisphere. He arrived in the Bahamas or, as he called it, San Salvador. He came across the Arawaks and he was treated with much respect and received gifts, blessings and was seen as a god. Columbus, Pizarro, Cortez and many other Spaniard Commanders accepted the warm welcome all over America, but when the Natives couldn’t provide all the gold, which was their primary goal, the Spaniards needed they were killed, tortured and beaten. Villages, pillaged, ransacked and burned to the ground. Women and children chopped to pieces and the spaniards did not show the slightest bit of mercy. Columbus and his fellow Spaniards massacred the native population of the Americas; showing no mercy and leaving an everlasting hole in the native population. The voyages destroyed the Western Hemisphere as a whole, by; destroying cultures and populations while the Eastern Hemisphere gained a newfound source of exploitable people and rare resources. Later throughout history Columbus is seen as a hero who lead to creations of new countries, colonies and new cultures, but his intentions were quite the opposite. He was a dark and cynical “explorer” set on murdering and exploiting innocents. …show more content…

In many Spaniard ruled regions, men were taken away from their families and sent to work in mines where conditions were awful and ⅓ of all miners would die within a few months. Women were sent to work long days out in the fields and were highly mistreated. Families only saw each other once a year if even that. Spiritual celebrations were outlawed as well as any religious prayings other than ones relating to

Open Document