Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Five paragraph essay about christopher columbus
A essay on christopher columbus
Christopher columbus professional life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
For generations upon generations, students have been taught about the “hero” Christopher Columbus who had discovered our new world. However, to say he was a hero would not exactly be the truth; Columbus was an eccentric man who cared much more about his profits than the well being and even lives of the natives. It is documented in journals that he and his crew had slaughtered entire villages at a time, and that he had even killed people just for the point of testing how sharp his sword was. Not only did Columbus and his crew have a thing for violence, on multiple accounts crew members wrote down every single successful rape of women; and used the voyage to help begin a slave export for the royalty of Spain. Right from the beginning of …show more content…
his journey, Columbus’ morality and goals were questionable. On October 12, 1492, the first day Christopher Columbus arrived, he had written this: “They should be good servants .... I, our Lord being pleased, will take hence, at the time of my departure, six natives for your Highnesses." This statement written directly by Columbus shows some of the ulterior motives that were really in this journey; and it was not solely about discovering some new land. Only one year later, Columbus’ exports were not personal exports for the queen to have, it began to be a full-blown slave trade with him stating: "their Highnesses may see that I shall give them as many slaves as many as they shall order to be shipped." Following his actions, just a few years less than two decades after his journey Columbus had indirectly created “The Requirement”, a document stating that all Natives must convert to and practice Catholicism, with the first line of that document being this: “We shall take you and your wives and your children, and shall make slaves of them…”. Not only was Columbus and the Spanish royalty interested in slaves, they were also greatly interested in finding gold. Now Columbus’ crew was not particularly looking for gold to mine, rather they were looking for gold that they could loot. Only on the second day of his journey, he had written how he saw natives “Hanging small pieces of gold from a hole in their nose.”. Then within the first week of being in the new world, Columbus captured some natives, in hope that they would tell them where to find gold. He wrote in his journal “ I am beginning to believe that all they want to do is escape and they will tell me anything I want to hear.”, showing how he had no care for treating these people ethically and only had interest in where he could loot gold off of people. After this did not work for him, he began taking the women from the families of natives in hope that he could force them to show him the better trade route. Stealing and making slaves out of natives was not all that Columbus had did, the voyagers performed far worse deeds.
He and his crew raped countless Taino women, often even describing the act in detail in a journal. They even began what could be seen as a prostitution ring, although not exactly prostitution as it was completely involuntary on the women’s side. An excerpt from “A Short account of the Destruction of the Indies” Writes: he Christians punched them, boxed their ears and flogged them in order to track down the local leaders, and the whole shameful process came to a head when one of the European commanders raped the wife of the paramount chief of the entire island.” Then, in a letter to a friend Columbus directly wrote "A hundred castellanos are as easily obtained for a woman as for a farm, and it is very general and there are plenty of dealers who go about looking for girls; those from nine to ten (years old) are now in demand.”, showing exactly the morals of Christopher Columbus and his …show more content…
men. Violence, is something one could say that Columbus and his men were best at.
They would kill people for seemingly no reason; they would even make games and bets from it, making their own games. “They even laid wagers on whether they could manage to slice a man in two at a stroke, or cut an individual's head from his body, or disembowel him with a single blow of their axes.”- An account from “A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies”. This was not even the worst of it. “They forced their way into native settlements, slaughtering everyone they found there, including small children, old men, pregnant women, and even women who had just given birth. They hacked them to pieces, slicing open their bellies with their swords as though they were so many sheep herded into a pen.”. Yet, these are still not perhaps even the greatest atrocities committed by the European invaders of
Hispaniola. The expedition of Christopher Columbus was responsible for thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of deaths; both directly and indirectly. When Columbus first arrived at the Caribbean island of Hispaniola, it was estimated to have over 1,000,000 inhabitants. A mere twenty years after Columbus’ expedition, more than one third of the population had died. Many of these deaths were caused by columbus and his original crew slaughtering, torturing or starving the native settlers, but in reality that only made up a small percentage. In the years after his first voyage, many more Spaniards had came to the island, essentially recreating what columbus had did to them, yet only on a much larger scale. However, murder and torture were not the main culprit of all these deaths, there was a much larger, or rather smaller culprit at hands. This was smallpox. At the time of Columbus, europeans knew of smallpox but they had built immunities of it, so it was not an epidemic. However, when Columbus and his crew originally introduced this indirectly to the natives, it did not treat them well. Having never been exposed to this disease before, the people of Hispaniola were ravaged by the disease, with it spreading quickly, killing people left and right. Since the europeans had a strong immunity to the disease, they however thought nothing of this even as they saw it occur right in front of them.
Ransby believes “Columbus 's image has been scrubbed clean and sanitized by many generations of American historians so that he can now be offered up as a sterling example of the glorious era of discovery.” (Ransby, 1992/2015, p.14). Objective evidence is also a major component in this article. Columbus’s journal proved he wanted to exploit, and enslave the Indians. A population of 300,000 dwindled to a mere one by 1540. (Ransby, 1992/2015, p.12). Many scene of rape, murder and beating were also described in journals of sailors that travelled with
“They attacked the towns and spared neither the children nor the aged nor pregnant women nor childbed, not only stabbing them and dismembering them but cutting them into pieces…” (40) Continuous killings became a game to the Spanish, as if they would see who could kill the most natives with the slice of one sword. These men showed no grace or mercy. Yes, the natives had already been exposed to cold hearted killing, because of their own chiefs, but never had these happenings occurred to their supreme authorities as well. This behavior was only used for subjects that deserved it, such as prisoners, but never the innocent or potentially harmless. Without factual evidence or motive, the Christian men would do these radical acts of terror. If the natives were not put to death by inhumane torture, they were put to work countless hours of hard labor, until their demise, searching for pearls. Pearl fishing was one of the hardest labors because these individuals had to be submerged into the water for an extended period of time, with no breathing breaks. To demonstrate, “…if the pearl diver show[ed] of wanting to rest, he is showered with blows, his hair pulled, and he is thrown back into the water, obligated to continue the hard work…” (42) Most men that dived into the water would not reach the opportunity of one last breath; the waters were inhabited by sharks that could swallow a man in one gulp. No matter what these people were put through, death would always be the final
Although Columbus was increasing the wealth and strength of Spain, he was “a catastrophe for the indigenous inhabitants of the lands” (Belasco 67). He had no remorse for the natives as he proceeded to establish plantations, enslave them, slaughter them, and create a new colony called Espanola on their lands. According to Schuman, Howard, Barry Schwartz, and Hannah d’Arcy, Christopher Columbus “deserves condemnation for having brought slavery, disease, and death...
Among the many flaws American history textbooks have, one that stands out above the rest is heroification. Heroification is, according to Loewen "A generative process that makes people over into heroes.”(pg.19) Through heroification national heroes such as Christopher Columbus are always portrayed as perfect individuals, with only the best intentions and absolutely no flaws. Textbooks use heroification to inspire, and instate a sense of national pride in students. Though it may instate a sense of national pride in students, it does not present the truth. Heroification leaves out important details of these "heroes" lives, and only presents trivial melodramatic details. By doing this students will never really fully understand why our "heroes" did what they did, and will never know the truth.
Who is Christopher Columbus? You may already have prior knowledge of him, but if you do not, Christopher Columbus was a Spanish explorer who made four voyages to the Americas. His voyages led to the Columbian Exchange and colonization. Many cultures, ideas, technology, and foods were spread between the Americas, the “New World,” and Europe, Africa, and Asia, the “Old World”. Even though many great things were exchanged between the Old World and the New World, many diseases from Europe were introduced to the Natives. Does this make Christopher Columbus a hero, or a villain? The answer is not that debatable. A closer look must be taken at Christopher Columbus 's life to be able to judge such things. This essay will take a look at his life,
What he and his men did to the Indigenous people is told in horrifying detail by the Dominican priest Bartolome de Las Casas, “whose writings give the most thorough account of the Spanish-Indian encounter.” Las Casas witnessed firsthand Columbus’ soldiers stabbing Natives for sport, dashing babies’ heads on rocks, and sexually abusing Indigenous women. His testimony was corroborated by other eyewitnesses, such as a group of Dominican friars, who addressed the Spanish monarchy in 1519, hoping to bring an end to the atrocities. At the very least, Columbus was complicit in the actions of his men. He cared so little for the welfare of the Indigenous people that he let his soldiers commit reprehensible acts that would be considered crimes against humanity in the present day. Christopher Columbus’ actions suggest he had no issue with serving as an enabler of the horrifying actions committed by his men against the Indigenous
First, Columbus was a cruel man who enslaved, raped, and murdered the natives of the countries he sailed to. According to an article by John Margolis entitled "Goodbye Columbus", Columbus "oversaw the killings of some (Indians) and ordered the enslavement of others." Margolis goes on to say that Columbus did not prevent his crewmen from raping the innocent natives, and even that he himself raped an Indian women after beating her "with a piece of rope". If these actions do not constitute villainy, I don't know what does.
Along the Columbus journey bits of gold were found amongst the Native Indians which led to Columbus concluding that there was more (Zinn, 2009, p.481). The Native’s were turned into servants looking for a certain amount of gold for Columbus. If they had not met the daily quota their arms were to be cut off (Zinn, 2009, p.481). This is just part of the brutality that Columbus had put upon the Natives. More cruelty can be seen when Columbus sent five hundred Natives as slaves to the King and Queen in Spain. Also stabbing of Indians was done as a sport and those that resisted against the Spaniards were hunted down as animals (Zinn, 2009, p.482). Zinn shows that the Columbus story is one of the many myths of Western civilization. All the stories about Columbus especially in the USA since, it is a celebration are seen as a heroic adventure. However, many teachers argue that children should not be told such a violent story filled with horrific history (Zinn, 2009, p.485). It is important to teach children at a young age the truth about the Columbus story, so that they know what a monster he
Though a vast majority of students learn about Columbus’ great conquests and celebrate him as a hero, very few know of the horrible atrocities he caused when he first landed in America. While considered a hero by most in the United States, Zinn argues that people should think twice about Columbus’ actions, and question whether his behavior to the Indians was necessary. In quotes one and five, Zinn clearly depicts his thoughts on the atrocities done by Columbus and other colonists to the natives living in America.
Although this essay is historically accurate it lacks important details, which might paint a different view of Columbus. Boorstin writes favorable of Columbus and depicts him as a heroic and determined figure who helped shape history, but he neglects to include Columbus’ unethical acts committed in the world that was not supposed to exist, the Americas. When Columbus first discovered the New World, he took care that the royal standard had been brought ashore and he claimed the land for Spain in front of all, including the indigenous population who had been sighted even before Columbus made landfall. According to the medieval concepts of natural law, only those territories that are uninhabited can become the property of the first person to discover them. Clearly this was an unethical act. Thus, the first contact between European and non-European worlds was carried out through a decidedly European prism, which ensured Spanish claim to the islands of the Americas. Faced with a colony in an inhospitable area, the Spanish soon inaugurated the practice of sending regular military parties inland to subdue the increasingly hostile natives. Members of the indigenous population were captured and enslaved to support the fledgling colony. The object of Columbus’ desire changed from exploration and trade to conquest and subjugation.
However, people tend to forget the other side of Columbus, the side that lusted after gold and resources that often belonged to the native inhabitants he came across in his exploration. In his insatiable greed, he and his crew committed countless atrocities, such as torture and killing of defenseless natives. Columbus’s discovery of these new lands has profound and negative effects as future colonists arrive. “Zinn estimates that perhaps 3 million people perished in the Caribbean alone from raids, forced labor and disease” (Zinn, 1980). Columbus was seen as a cruel man, who saw the peaceful inhabitants as right for the conquering and lead to the devastation of the native population, yet is celebrated every October.
For more than five centuries Americans have lifted Christopher Columbus to heights of greatness and god-like. We celebrate his life as though he was a man that had done us a great favor. In resent years Christopher Columbus has come under scrutiny, his life and works being questioned more than celebrated. There have be many great men and women that contributed to the building of our great nation but they do not receive anywhere as much recognition as Columbus. When a person begins to study the actual accounts of the "finding of the New World" they begin to wonder if Columbus should adored or hated for his actions. As a child I was taught that Columbus was a great man that had accomplished great things for the sake of humanity, but in reality his agenda was not to better humanity but to better himself. He found the Americas by mere chance and he did not even know of what he found. We give him credit for "finding" the Americas but history tells of the people, that he called Indians, already inhabiting the foreign land. So you decide whether or not Christopher Columbus should be revered a hero.
Have you ever been forced to do something you don’t want to do? Well maybe you have,but have you ever had your hand cut off because you didn’t do the thing that people made you want to do? I’m asking these questions because Christopher Columbus did these things to the Natives of America.That’s why I think we shouldn’t celebrate Columbus Day at all.He enslaved Natives to mine gold and if they didn’t he’d cut there wrists.Columbus also spread disease(such as smallpox) throughout America killing even more Natives. Finally though Columbus had butcher's cut the Native people up,to just feed their own dogs.On that same gruesome note Columbus ordered his men to cut the Natives in half to test the sharpness of their blades.
Christopher Columbus unintentionally discovered America, when he landed in the Caribbean Islands. He had left Spain in search of Asia and India. When he and his crew arrived at what now is Haiti for his second voyage, they demanded food, gold, and anything else they wanted from the Indians, even sex with their women. Columbus punished those who committed offenses against him. Rape and enslavement had been brought upon the natives. When the natives of the land, known as the Arawaks, tried to fight back, it led to a massacre of their people in which by Columbus? order, meant crossbows, small cannons, lances, and swords to destroy them. Even wild hunting dogs were released to rip up the Arawaks, whom by the end of the day were dead or ready to ship to Spain as slaves. None of this was ever taught to students.
Epidemic disease undeniably contributed to the carnage, but in many volumes of testimony the European explorers detail their murderous intentions and actions. The slave drivers of the day calculated that it was cheaper to work people to death by the tens of thousands and then replace them than it was to maintain and feed a permanent captive