Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why charter schools are important
Charter schools pros and cond
Are charter schools better than public schools? + example
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why charter schools are important
Charter Schools: Pros and Cons
The success of students may not depend on school’s governance model, but rather families that nurture their children’s academic ambitions, teachers who inspire the children to excel, school management that creates a positive and learning-friendly environment, and communities that value education. All these factors affect the academic outcomes in the same way, regardless of whether the student is in the private, charter or traditional public school. However, while traditional public and private schools have been in existence, someone may get curious as to why charter schools are on the rise in various countries. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of charter schools will assist parents, educators, and
…show more content…
Charter schools are schools opted by parents or communities that choose to approach the public education using a different method (Johnson, 2016). As such, charter schools become the best option for parents, who may feel that traditional public schools are not fit for their kids. In some cases, parents prefer schools that are neither too big nor too small, excessively academically ambitious or those that risk their children to negative peer influence (Mack, 2012). Because charter schools are formed by parents with a common goal, this is good for a closely-knit membership among all the stakeholders. Besides, the schools are usually small in size, and this is beneficial in achieving a close community participation where the teachers can know their students better (Johnson, 2016). Moreover, the strong links between the community and the charter schools encourage parental involvement, a necessary practice when it comes to achieving high standards of …show more content…
For example, the funding of charter schools depends on the student enrollment (Mack, 2012). As Dower (2017) wrote, charter schools rely heavily on families and communities for funds to run their daily activities, for example, funds to finance locations, build or rent classes among other expenses. As a result, if the student enrollment is high, those expenses are taken care of; however, if the student enrollment decreases the tuition may increase or the administration will have to seek other funding options.
Additionally, some charter schools lack diversity (Johnson, 2016). While some charter schools are located in the inner city, poor areas or serve mostly African-American students, others tend to operate by racial and economic grounds (Johnson, 2016; Mack, 2012). Moreover, most charter schools operate on a very rigorous curriculum which academic slackers may not put up with. As such, it becomes a serious burden or unaffordable to the low income earning families when some charter schools make it a requirement that parents pay for transportation and volunteer for a given number of hours. Similarly, it is a usual case for charters to suffer space limitations and as a result, some of the schools discriminate against disabled students, citing their lack of resources to suit the needs of these
Another school in the same district is located “in a former roller-skating rink” with a “lack of windows” an a scarcity of textbooks and counselors. The ratio of children to counselors is 930 to one. For 1,300 children, of which “90 percent [are] black and Hispanic” and “10 percent are Asian, white, or Middle Eastern”, the school only has 26 computers. Another school in the district, its principal relates, “‘was built to hold one thousand students’” but has “‘1,550.’” This school is also shockingly nonwhite where “’29 percent '” of students are “‘black [and] 70 percent [are]
... middle of paper ... ... 13 Feb. 2014. Pascua, Psyche "Public vs. Private vs. Charter Schools" Great School. Web.
Wilson, Steven F., and Research American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy. Success At Scale In Charter Schooling. Education Outlook. No. 3. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 2009. ERIC. Web. 11 Nov. 2011.
Charter Schools are best known for combining traits and features of both public and private schools. Charters schools are not restricted to many of the rules and policies put on other public schools (Gale 1). For example teachers are given more free reign in charters, and they are not expected to stick to a certain curriculum. Because there is no specific criteria in place for teachers of charter schools, pay scales do not have to be followed for teachers and administrators. Also, charters are publically funded and have specialized accountability for producing certain results.
Schools may not be equally available to all students and thereby result in unequal treatment for those not eligible to attend or not selected. Public schools could become "dumping grounds" if the "good" students were to leave and go to charter schools. The drain of funds from the public schools could also present a problem. Transportation issues would arise as well as a reexamination of state athletic association rules and regulations. Choices to attend may not be made on the basis of attending a better school or district but because the school is closer to childcare, it's perceived as easier, more convenient or has better extracurricular activities. Lawsuits could arise due to the fact that the schools would make promise regarding school performance and/or educational offerings that might not materialize. Schools could file for bankruptcy. Other issues include possible discrimination toward students and violation of state of federal laws.
In order to develop a better job with school finances the administrator had to dedicate time, and consider many factors not just the monetary aspect, but also, an administrator has to have are where to allocate the funds, the amount available, and resources provided. Also, the importance that the financial system sees public education as an important source for the future of the children and their investments are guide tours the education (Rose, 2013). Finances at schools allows them to obtain programs to enhance the education and encourage to keep a good attendance. All schools and districts need to be somewhat strong financially in order to provide students with a higher quality education as well the technology advantages.
In the year 2012- 2013, though several 3.1 public high school students or 81 percent, graduated on time (Public High School Graduation Rates), how many students in that number truly gain the full education. Nowadays, education is necessary, which becomes a controversial issue between parents and the school. Either Charter or Public school encourages the development or improvement of the educational system to our young, beloved children. There are further charters out there which children can stay home, however, still learn enormous things. “Lottery” documentary film is about the controversy between public and charter schools, which tells the stories of four families who tried to find a better educational
“Many charter schools segregate students along the racial and class lines and that they may also tend to lack services for students with disabilities or limited English proficiency, which leads to less diversity in Charter schools. Charter schools have their own school boards and are typically free to experiment with instructional and disciplinary methods, Charter schools are privately run by boards that are appointed by charter organizations rather the public which means less local accountability and
Charter schools are public schools of choice, meaning that families choose them for their children. They operate with freedom from some of the regulations that are imposed upon school districts. Charter schools are accountable for academic results and upholding the promises made in their charters.
Rotberg, Iris C. (2014, February 1). Charter schools and the risk of increased segregation. Phi Delta Kappan, Vol.95 (5) pp.26-30. http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=6aa05956-5bfe-43eb-9eec-b90be0fefa60%40sessionmgr113&vid=11&hid=125
Through programs that directly fuel desegregation in schools, our educational systems have become a melting pot of different races, languages, economic status, and abilities. Programs have been in place for the past fifty years to bring students that live in school districts that lack quality educational choices, to schools that are capable of providing quality education to all who attend. Typically the trend appears to show that the schools of higher quality are located in suburban areas, leaving children who live in “black” inner-city areas to abandon the failing school systems of their neighborhoods for transportation to these suburban, “white” schools. (Angrist & Lang, 2004). This mix of inner-city and suburban cultures creates new challenges for students and teachers alike.
America demands that all youth receive an education and that its educational system is free and open to all—regardless of class, race, ethnicity, age, and gender. However, the system is failing. There is still inequality in the educational system, and minorities’ experience with education is shaped by discrimination and limited access, while white people’s experience with education is shaped by privilege and access. The educational experience for minorities is still segregated and unequal. This is because the number of white children that are withdrawn from school by their parents is higher than the number of people of color enrolling. White parents are unconsciously practicing the idea of “blockbusting,” where minorities begin to fill up a school; whites transfer their children to a school that has a small or no minority population. They unconsciously feel like once their child is in a school full of minorities that school would not get the proper funding from the federal government. Bonilla-Silvia (2001) states that “[i]nner-city minority schools, in sharp contrast to white suburban schools, lack decent buildings, are over-crowded, [and] have outdated equipment…” (97). The “No Child Left Behind” Act, which holds schools accountable for the progress of their students, measures students’ performance on standardized tests. Most white children that are in suburban schools are given the opportunity to experience education in a beneficial way; they have more access to technology, better teachers, and a safe environment for learning. Hence, white students’ experience with the education system is a positive one that provides knowledge and a path to success. Also, if their standardized testing is low, the government would give the school...
Even when low-income schools manage to find adequate funding, the money doesn’t solve all the school’s problems. Most importantly, money cannot influence student, parent, teacher, and administrator perceptions of class and race. Nor can money improve test scores and make education relevant and practical in the lives of minority students. School funding is systemically unequal, partially because the majority of school funding comes from the school district’s local property taxes, positioning the poorest communities at the bottom rung of the education playing field. A student’s socioeconomic status often defines her success in a classroom for a number of reasons.
[The school where I teach is the only high school within a city school district that is located within the confines of a larger metropolitan area. The school receives Title 1 funding, with 56 % of the students being eligible for free or reduced lunches. This high school offers a variety of degree programs and coursework, such as, advanced placement coursework and exams, international baccalaureate and culinary arts certification, technical and college prep diplomas, one of the largest Air Force ROTC programs in the area, and alternative programs through which students have the ability to earn credit for the courses that they had previously failed. This school is very diverse, of the 2,291 students 46.0% are African American, 30.0% are Hispanic, 18.0% are White, 3.0% are Multiracial, and 2.0% are Asian. The area surrounding the school is just as diverse as the students that attend the school. A majority of the homes within this school district are single-family homes and can range from small-scale mansions to unmaintained older homes. There are also a large number of apartment complexes and condos in the area as well. A portion of the student population comes from outside of the district in order to participate in the high school’s international baccal...
School community relationship helps to improve the quality of education for all children. It helps parents and other citizens recognize their responsibility for the quality