Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative sides of self - driving cars
Analyzing trolley problem
Impact of technology on automotive safety
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative sides of self - driving cars
More than 1 million people die every year worldwide due to human error while driving, but autonomous vehicles may be the solution to these deaths because they are consistent, have a greater vision of the road, and open a new market for transportation. One of the great reasons self-driving cars are beneficial is the fact that they will save thousands of lives. With these autonomous cars, human error is taken out of the equation. This does bring about many moral dilemmas that need to be answered before any mass production begins. The trolley problem, being one of the most well known moral dilemma, is such an important question to answer. People also fear the idea of every car being connected, but by doing so, thousands of lives will be saved …show more content…
A solution that many people fear is a giant, shared network where all of the cars are connected and communicating. People fear this because they don’t trust one big network controlling their ride, however, it may be the solution to traffic. From 1990 to 2010, total car miles traveled grew by 38%, and the roads only grew by 6%, thus, traffic is considerably worse than it used to be (Urmson). The fact is that if all the automated cars were connected, they would all be able to travel at the same speed, and if any car were to be in danger, every other car on the road would be aware, giving them the ability to avoid the danger. They would also see what every other car sees, resulting in much greater vision of the road, and much less chance of an accident. In an article by Rob Verger, he stated that the best way to save energy and help the environment would be using autonomous cars in “shared fleets”, so the efficiency of connected cars goes beyond time saving and to energy and environmental benefits (Verger). The question of one shared network is important to consider because it must be precise and accurate at all times or else it would result in dangerous
Companies like Google, Tesla and Nissan, among others, have announced over the past few years that their companies are trying to develop self-driving or autonomous cars [Ref. 1 and 2]. Self-driving cars can provide many benefits to the average consumer. Studies have shown that because computers can react and process information many times faster than a human being, crashes on streets and roads can be decreased with quick and consistent evasion maneuvers by the autonomous car. They can also help maximize fuel economy by calculating the most direct and fastest routes. When the driving of an autonomous car demonstrates that the computer can safely and reliably transport the passengers to their destination, this frees up the passengers to do other things that they would not normally be able to do if they were driving the car manually. For this reason, self-driving cars can help maximize productivity of their passengers.
The goals behind self-driving cars are to decrease collisions, traffic jams and the use of gas and harmful pollutants. The autonomous automobile is able to maneuver around objects and create swift lines of cars on roadways (How Google’s self-Driving Car Works, 2011). The autonomous vehicle can react faster than humans can, meaning less accidents and the potential to save thousands of lives. Another purpose and vision for these cars is that vehicles would become a shared resource. When someone needed a car, he or she could just use his or her Smartphone and a self-sufficient car would drive up and pick him or her up.
It might be hard to see where the self-driving car could have issues with safety but an interesting question arises when an accident is unavoidable. The question posed is “How should the car be programmed to act in the event of an unavoidable accident? Should it minimize the loss of life, even if it means sacrificing the occupants, or should it protect the occupants at all costs? Should it choose between these extremes at random?” (ArXiv). This is a very interesting question surrounding ethics. I’m not sure if there is a right answer to the question, which could stall the self-driving car industry. Before self-driving cars are mass produced a solution needs to be found to the question about unavoidable accidents. Although this question is a problem, there may not be a need to address the problem. It is said that “"driver error is believed to be the main reason behind over 90 percent of all crashes" with drunk driving, distracted drivers, failure to remain in one lane and falling to yield the right of way the main causes.” (Keating). Self-driving cars could eliminate those problems entirely and maybe with all cars on the road being self-driving cars, there would be no “unavoidable accidents”. Safety is the main issue the self-driving car is trying to solve in transportation and seems to do a good job at
Inventors hope to help people with autonomous cars because “autonomous cars can do things that human drivers can’t” (qtd. in “Making Robot Cars More Human). One of the advantages that driverless cars have is that “They can see through fog or other inclement weather, and sense a stalled car or other hazard ahead and take appropriate action” (qtd. in “Making Robot Cars More Human). Harsh weather conditions make it difficult and dangerous for people to drive, however, the car’s ability to drive through inclement weather “frees the user’s time, creates opportunities for individuals with less mobility, and increases overall road safety” (Bose 1326). With all the technology and software in the car, it can “improve road traffic system[s] and reduces road accidents” (Kumar). One of the purposes for creating the driverless car was to help “make lives easier for senior citizens, people with disabilities, people who are ill, or people who are under influence of alcohol” (Kumar). It can be frightening to know that that we share share our roads with drivers that could potentially endanger our lives as well as other people’s lives. How can people not feel a sense of worry when “cars kill roughly 32,000 people a year in the U.S.” (Fisher 60)? Drivers who text while driving or drink and drive greatly impact the safety of other people, and Google hopes to reduces the risk of accidents and save lives with the
Self-driving cars are the wave of the future. There is much debate regarding the impact a self-driving car will have on our society and economy. Some experts believe fully autonomous vehicles will be on the road in the next 5-10 years (Anderson). This means a vehicle will be able to drive on the road without a driver or any passengers. Like any groundbreaking technology, there is a fear of the unforeseen problems. Therefore, there will need to be extensive testing before anyone can feel safe with a vehicle of this style on the road. It will also take time for this type of technology to become financially accessible to the masses, but again alike any technology with time it should be possible. Once the safety concern has been fully addressed
Technology is evolving faster than ever these days, however there is one technology that could revolutionize the transportation industry. This technology is called autonomous cars, also known as self-driving cars. Autonomous cars can be defined as a vehicle that is capable of sensing its environment, and navigating without human input. Using different techniques such as GPS and radar, autonomous cars can detect surroundings, thus removing the human element in driving. This would have a positive effect in more ways than we could ever imagine. Research suggests that self-driving cars will become more abundant in the future because they will be more cost-effective, enhance safety, and decrease traffic congestion.
Google plans to make the cars able to connect with each other this way it would be almost impossible for an accident to happen. Cars sharing their knowledge to each other is also very important so they know where’s traffic or where a policer is. Each car will have every traffic signal in their mapping program. These cars use the cameras that are on top of them to see where they are going. The car will also share all its information with its owner. And the owner will know what the car will do before the car do it. The drivers can have the chance to regain control of their car just in case of an
Eliminating the need for car insurance seems at first advantageous to the consumer, but to those who rely on selling insurance as a job would be left shorthanded. Even though the autonomous car may be able to drive safely and smarter than the average driver, it still may experience trouble in unique situations. Blending information from different sensors demands very complex algorithms another issue is in the form of affordability. Currently, the driverless car is not monetarily feasible for the vast majority of the population. If driverless cars become commonplace in society, service industries like taxis and limousines will surely take a large loss.
Driverless cars are the future of roads and transportation, but there has been much debate about if they are safe enough to be on public roads. The technology however, is more prestigious than needed to be implemented onto roads all over the world. Computers today are already faster than human minds, so having them behind the wheel calculating all the ways to avoid accidents. There are 1.2 Million deaths worldwide from traffic accidents that could be easily prevented by automated drivers. Governments and corporations should invest into self-driving cars because its sensors are more precise than our senses, they are safer than human drivers, and computers learn faster than any human driver.
In October 2010, Google had already built a fleet of self-driving cars that had managed to collectively traverse some 140,000 miles of California roads (Vanderbilt P2). While the notion of autonomous cars may seem like a dangerous idea, since they bring up ethical questions, commuters have to realize how beneficial they can be for anyone living in the modern age. Driverless cars can improve vehicular transportation because they take the human error which causes accidents, out of the equation, they provide more recreational time for the passengers, they allow for more efficient cargo transportation, and they are more cost effective to insure and refuel.
Ethical Dilemmas Facing Autonomous Automobiles In our current age of technology, it seems every day there are new ethical dilemmas in the information technology field. Living in Phoenix I hear about one, almost daily, especially with the recent death of a pedestrian who was hit and killed by an autonomous Uber car. Autonomous cars are no doubt the way of the future. However, with these leaps and bounds of self-driving cars, new ethical questions arise.
Among the development of self driving vehicles, traffic congestion could be improved in numerous ways. The advanced programs that operate in self-governing automobiles can precisely detect distances between vehicles, and are able to preserve certain distance at the suggested rate. Which would assist the distance between cars can be significantly shortened which would reduce traffic during rush hour. Self automotive vehicles would ensure a quicker reaction time in comparison to humans which would result in speed limits increasing. Since self driving cars will be able to communicate with each other, they will decelerate through intersections at stable rates without causing in crashes.
The results of the first study show that people approve of sacrificing the AVs passenger in order to save pedestrians. In addition, the results show willingness to see this sacrificing legally enforced when the decision is made by the car than by a human driver. In the second study, participants have generally thought that the AVs should be programmed to save their passengers at all cost. This study has also shown that the participants generally supported others to buy cars that will be programmed to self-sacrifice, but when they were asked about themselves they were less willing to buy these cars.
When it comes to motor vehicle transport, driverless cars ARE the way of the future. The automotive industry continues to advertise safer and safer car designs, but ultimately the responsibility for the safety of themselves and the other around them, is not the cars, but the drivers. Autonomous cars are much safer than that of cars manually driven, as they remove human error from the equation. Human error being the key factor in road accidents and fatalities. Driverless cars allow people who are either incapable of driving cars for a variety of reasons, including old age and physical impairment. Would now be able to travel freely, and acquire a sort of self-independence that they did not have prior to driverless cars. Furthermore, the convenience
Technology is an ever-changing subject and has proved to be monumental in shaping the way a generation lives their life. With the rise of Uber and Lyft, automakers are racing to make autonomous vehicles the number one choice of transportation. Will autonomous vehicles be the next big breakthrough for the next generation or will automaker struggle to solve the ethical quandaries? The country is pretty much 60/40 with this matter, with 64% of Americans feeling uneasy about sharing the road with autonomous vehicles (Simon). But are they not considering all the other factors dealing with the ethicality of these vehicles, and the possible benefits? Despite the controversies surrounding autonomous vehicles, they prove to be an efficient, safe and