Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The merits and demerits of globalisation
The pros and cons of globalization
The merits and demerits of Globalisation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The merits and demerits of globalisation
I. INTRODUCTION
The fast pace of globalization is creating serious issues and questions for many developing countries to deal with, such as should they join a free trade bloc or not? What will they gain by being a member and what will they lose?
Since the creation of the European Union, first formed by 15 Western European countries and most recently expanded to 10 additional European nations, have influenced many countries around the world to follow the European example and worked together in order to expand their marketplace and increase economical and political power. NAFTA, Mercosul, CAFTA, CARICOM, and CAN are good examples of such economic blocs. The North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is formed by United States, Canada, and Mexico. Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, and Brazil form Mercosul, the South America Common Market. The Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) is formed by El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Panama, and Costa Rica. The Caribbean Community (CARICOM) is formed by the 20 Caribbean nations. Finally the Andean Community (CAN) formed by Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela, and Peru.
The latest of these economic blocs is the proposed implementation of the FTAA by December 31, 2005, which will be the world’s largest economic bloc. The FTAA is planned to include all 34 countries on the North and South America continents, except for Cuba. In contrast to the European Union, in which the majority of its initial member countries had highly developed economies with the exception two or three countries, the majority of the FTAA country members are third world countries except for the United States and Canada. The main problem behind the FTAA is how secretively and quickly the whole process is being developed and scheduled to be implemented. It took a couple of decades for the European Union to become a reality. The FTAA timetable is supposed to be implemented in less than 10 years.
The implementation of the FTAA will have some benefits to those small economies in South American, Central America, and Caribbean nations, which are desperate to reach the NAFTA market. However, to countries like Brazil, which have a larger industrial park and compete directly with U.S., Canada, and Mexico, the implementation can cause serious problems to its country economy.
BACKGROUND
Globalization
Transnational Corpo...
... middle of paper ...
...t, the only economical sector in Brazil and Argentina that can compete with the United States and Canada is the agricultural sector. However, the United States and Canada have already stated that they would not agree to stop their heavy subsidies of their agriculture sectors. Therefore, with nothing else to compete equally with the developed nations of the north, Brazil and Argentina best option is to stay out of the proposed FTAA plan.
References
Multinational Monitor, (Dec 2003). Retrieved June 20th, 2004 from InfoTrac database
Brazil’s Central Bank, (2004). Retrieved June 19, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.bcb.gov.br/
FTAA. Retrieved June 20, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.corpwatch.org/
Methanx (2004). Retrieved June 27, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.globalexchange.org
Free Trade Area of the Americas, Retrieved June 20, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://ftaa.org/
Free Trade Area of the Americas Summit, Retrieved June 20, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://stoptheftaa.org/ftaa
Sindicato Mercosul. Mercosul: General Information. Retrieved June 20, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.sindicato.org.br/mercosul/
Our global world is becoming more connected as we become integrated politically, socially and even economically. Due to the Bretton Woods agreement, different countries have been economically dependent on each other in fear of war to erupt. From then on, different organizations and policies tied more countries into being economic globalized. This economic globalization has then given us many opportunities in trade and more access to natural resources in other countries. Unfortunately, there are some negative effects that are brought to less developed countries.
"North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)." Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2011. Web. 23 Nov. 2011. .
After three years of debate NAFTA was established in 1994. Fears concerning NAFTA included job creation, loss and transfer, wages and infrastructure. (Ganster/Lorey 188-189) However, with the implementation of NAFTA the economy grew. Ganster and Lorey reveal that bilateral trade increased by $211.4 per year from 1989 to 2004. Commerce grew by 20 percent in the first six months of 1994. There were advantages and disadvantages of NAFTA, nevertheless, NAFTA “intensified the integration of the two economies rather than distancing them.” (Ganster/Lorey 190)
The North American Free Trade Agreement—NAFTA—was an important agreement signed between three countries—the U.S., Mexico and Canada. NAFTA played an important role between each of these countries’ relations with one another through imports and exports. Throughout the presidential elections throughout the years, NAFTA has been highly debated on whether or not it has helped benefit the economy of these countries or if it has caused a lot detrimental issues. NAFTA promised many benefits for these countries, but not all of their promises were carried through; many views across the political spectrum also have their indifferences about NAFTA.
"Economy & Trade." Office of the United States Trade Representative. Office of the United States Trade Representative, n.d. Web. 19 Apr. 2014.
Regarding “The Age of Globalization” by Alan Brinkley I thought that the reading selection provides good details on timeline of significant events that significantly affected the global economy. The reading selection from the American History textbook starts off with a summary of event of September 11, 2001, and the role they played in the changes within global economy. On the next page we are presented with a timeline of events that will be described later in the reading selection. The purpose of this section is to illustrate how each of those events contributed to the world we live in today, particularly their influence on the global economy.
THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (. 2013. THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.library.unt.edu/gpo/oca/nafta.htm. [Accessed 01 December 2013].
The United States free trade agenda includes policies that seek to eliminate all restrictions and quotas on trade. The advantages of free trade can be seen through domestic markets and the growth of the world economy. T...
Following the Great Recession, the world has been facing complex global transformations. Dani Rodrik’s “The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy” portrays the challenges of the implications that our current model of globalization relies upon. Rodrik’s work reveals both the implications and connections of the relationships between markets, the states, and globalization in the currently changing world. Throughout the book, Rodrik argues the validity of five key points: markets require regulatory institutions, such institutions take on a variety of forms, societies should orient their market-supporting institutions to their own unique needs, markets that are responsive to democracy can avoid institutional convergence, and a world that is responsive to democracy will not reach full globalization. This book has made me question the long term sustainability of the already evolving economic globalization process. Rodrik explains that the process of globalization must be managed so that the entire world can benefit.
Colombia is one of the oldest democracies in Latin America with solid functioning institutions, progressive laws, an active civil society, and one of the most ecologically diverse countries in the world. Economically speaking, Colombia has had a surprisingly turnaround over the past decade due to the confidence and business opportunities that the investors have found in its emerging market. However, the improvements made in the economy are not sufficient to ensure sustainable economic development. On May 15, 2012, the U.S.-Colombia Free Trade Agreement (FTA) went into effect, and after almost two years its effects have had a negative impact in Colombia’s economy, mainly in its agricultural sector, which constitutes 11.5% of the country’s GDP (Cámara Colombo Coreana). The farmers complain that cheap imports from the United States are hurting their sector leaving some of them almost in bankruptcy. During August and September 2013, the country was in a nationwide strike against the Free Trade Agreement, which had different areas of the country paralyzed specially in Bogota, the capital city.
Lipsey, Richard G.. "Will there be a Canadian-American Free Trade Association? ." The World Economy 9 (2008): 218-238.
Conclusion: The purpose of trade blocs is well-defined: they are made to increase the wealth and standard of living for the citizens of the member nations and to make sure goods and services are available in a hassle free manner. NAFTA and EU both are one of the most powerful alliances in the world, but NAFTA will never be able to compete with the EU, main reason being lack in antiquity, location and developed countries.
The European Union economic and political union is divided between twenty-eight European countries that united to preserve the economy, of the union. This form of economic preservation allowed “an organization spanning policy areas, from climate, environment, and health to external relations and security, justice and migration” (EU 2018). First, to build the European Union every country within the union avoided conflict by trading goods with one another. The act of courtesy in trade amongst the countries promoted peace and economic growth between the European countries (EU 2018).
Due to the distribution of wealth and insignificant legislative assistance, the poor are generally unable to improve their socio-economic status as wealth remains imbalanced. Recently throughout the years the building of foreign-owned factories and plants in some of Mexico’s rural areas has helped draw the population away from Mexico City and redistribute some of the country’s wealth. Since the creation of The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994 it has increased Mexico’s financial ties to the United States and Canada, but the Mexican economy remains fragile. Despite its problems, “the Mexican economy, with its growing industrial base, abundant natural resources and variety of service industries, remains important to Latin America. Mexico has become the Unites States second largest export market and third largest source of import” (CIA, 2017).
According to the Office of the United States Trade Representative, the case for CAFTA is based on the growth, opportunity and democracy of the aforementioned regions. The agreement will eliminate 80% of tariffs on U.S. goods exported to these regions. Even though these countries are small, they represent big consumer markets. Central America and the Dominican Republic heads the second largest U.S. export market in Latin America, closely trailing Mexico. The rest of the tariffs will be phased out over the next decade. This will give American businesses, workers and farmers even greater access to 44 million Central American consumers.