Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Historiography on globalisation
Origins of globalisation essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Historiography on globalisation
Globalization has become one of the most influential forces in the twentieth century. International integration of world views, products, trade and ideas has caused a variety of states to blur the lines of their borders and be open to an international perspective. The merger of the Europeans Union, the ASEAN group in the Pacific and NAFTA in North America is reflective of the notion of globalized trade. The North American Free Trade Agreement was the largest free trade zone in the world at its conception and set an example for the future of liberalized trade. The North American Free Trade Agreement is coming into it's twentieth anniversary on January 1st, 2014. 1 NAFTA not only sought to enhance the trade of goods and services across the borders of Canada, US and Mexico but it fostered shared interest in investment, transportation, communication, border relations, as well as environmental and labour issues. The North American Free Trade Agreement was groundbreaking because it included Mexico in the arrangement.2 Mexico was a much poorer, culturally different and protective country in comparison to the likes of Canada and the United States. Many members of the U.S Congress were against the agreement because they did not want to enter into an agreement with a country that had an authoritarian regime, human rights violations and a flawed electoral system.3 Both Canadians and Americans alike, feared that Mexico's lower wages and lax human rights laws would generate massive job losses in their respected economies. Issues of sovereignty came into play throughout discussions of the North American Free Trade Agreement in Canada. Many found issue with the fact that bureaucrats and politicians from alien countries would be making deci... ... middle of paper ... ...tenham: Edward Elgar, 2011. Lipsey, Richard G.. "Will there be a Canadian-American Free Trade Association? ." The World Economy 9 (2008): 218-238. McDougall, John N.. Drifting together: the political economy of Canada-US integration. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 2006. Mckinney, Joseph. "US-Canadian Economic Relations, Twenty Years after the USA-Canada Free Trade Agreement." British Journal of Canadian Studies 23 (2010): 233-246. Rao, S. , P. Sharma, and R. Acharya.Canada–U.S. trade and foreign direct investment patterns. Calgary: Calgary University Press, 2003. Thomas, David M.. Canada and the United States: differences that count. Third ed. Toronto: Broadview Press, 2008. Weintraub, Sidney. NAFTA: what comes next?. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1994. Wise, Carol. "The North American Free Trade Agreement." New Political Economy 14 (2009): 133-148.
Today Canada and the United States are major trading partners, allies, and two neighboring countries with a long history of cooperation with each other. But is it possible for Canada to protect its independence and culture living next door to the country so powerful and rich as the United States. Since the Canadian confederation, Canada started developing relations with the U.S. As the years passed by, Canada began to relay on the United States in the national defense. Many Canadians think that the military, political and economical dependence would not make a difference to their daily life. But today more then even Canadian culture is affected by the American influence. Media, American artists, economic dependence, American propaganda and political pressure from the United States is making Canada too Americanized. All of these factors reflect on the social life of ordinary Canadians threatening the heritage and the traditions that define Canada as independent country.
...an business world at odds with the free trade agreement that was drafted in 1987, with the aim of encouraging better trading through pulling back the different trade barriers that are used in international trade. The softwood lumber dispute is however straining relations between Canada and the Unites states. It has put the 1987 agreement into the background and dashed any hopes of better trading relations between the two countries. Canada is a major supplier of softwood and the united state is a major market, which it is at risk of losing. Therefore the achievement of Canadian objectives remains elusive at best. Bibliography US-Canada Free Trade Negotiations (II): The Canadian Dilemma, http://www.ksgcase.harvard.edu/case.htm?PID=862 Keith Jones, (7 September 2001) “Lumber dispute strains Canada-US relations, http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/sep2001/lumb-s07.shtml
Free trade and economic integration have been implemented by the Canadian government as it allows the Canadian economy to grow stronger, reduce trade barriers and improv...
Newman, Garfield et al. Canada A Nation Unfolding. Toronto: Mc Graw – Hill Ryerson Limited, 2000.
The United States is Canada's largest trading partner and is the largest market for Canadian goods. The Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (1989) and the North American Free Trade Agreement (1994) have both been crucial to increasing market opportunities for Canadian exporters in the U.S.
After a lengthy negotiation of over 3 years, Canada, the United States, and Mexico reached an agreement on trilateral trade ― the North American Free Trade Agreement (Scaliger). Commonly referred to as NAFTA, it came into effect on the first day of 1994. Covering 450 million people and reaching $17 trillion in combined GDP, NAFTA proudly ranks the first among the world’s free trade agreements (USTR). It is usually seen as a remarkable success for the countless benefits it brings to the member countries. The goal of NAFTA was to promote closer trade relationships, eliminate trade barriers, and increase market opportunities among all three countries in the agreement. However, the United States has indeed benefited the most from NAFTA economically through expansion of American culture and access to natural and human resources.
Thompson, John Herd, and Mark Paul Richard. "Canadian History in North American Context." In Canadian studies in the new millennium. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008. 37-64.
Quinlan, Don, Doug Baldwin, Rick Mahoney, and Kevin Reed. The Canadian Challenge. N.p.: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Hauss, Charles. Comparative Politics: Domestic Responses to Global Challenges : A Canadian Perspective. 7th ed. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2011.
Globalisation brought new relationships for Canada, helping their economy to become more successful. Initially, when the Second World War ended, countries were attempting to build up their own economies before embracing globalisation. Eventually, as tensions started to rise with the “Cold War”, countries started to make alliances and began strengthening their militaries. These alliances would eventually become trade relationships in the late 20th century, when globalisation was much more effective with cheaper travel, easier communication and fewer international disputes. Causing the movement of many international companies to expand to Canada. Leading to today, where intercontinental companies own over 60% of Canadian manufacturing facilities. In the past decades, countries in these automotive trades have made trade agreements with Canada to reduce tariffs. For example, Britain recently signed a free trade agreement that is expected to expand exports from 13,000 per year to 100,000 per year! This allowed Canadian companies to grow their market and caused a boost to the economy. Its effect can be seen in today’s growing economy with many companies posting annual record highs in 2017. These intercontinental trade agreements are in the midst of doubling the value of the Canadian automotive
Pierce, J. C. (2000). Political culture and public policy in Canada and the United States: only a border apart?. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
Britain has always been Canada’s main trading partner but in the 1920s, this changed completely. American industries started buying raw materials, such as wood and minerals from Canada. By the end of 1926, Canada’s trade value was much greater with the United States than that of its trade with Britain. The positive relationship between Canada and the United States grew increasingly over the years; economic investments and American branch plants established during the 1920s, the expanding on foreign trade and the Auto Pact trade agreement after World War 2, and the Free Trade Agreement of 1989 and NAFTA. The events from the 1920s-1990s has created a relationship between Canada and the United States that has worked to benefit both countries.
It is necessary to maintain this relationship of successful trade as it is an important aspect of Canada’s economy. It is important to understand the repercussions if a deal with the US is not arranged and how damaging it would be the Canadian economy. A free trade deal will include a plan that is motivated sustain bilateral trade, integrated manufacturing, supply chains, business interest, and economic growth within a two-way system that enables both countries to benefit. Ultimately, a Free Trade Agreement would eliminate barriers between Canada and the US, allow fair competition established by the agreement, increase and sustain conditions for investment, and create the foundation for expanded bilateral trade benefits. The exact ramifications are hard to quantify in the agreement, and ultimately depend on the value between each currency. With that being said, increase trade between Canada and the US will stimulate the economy and allow for further growth and
It is noted that the positive projections advanced prior to a free trade agreement being established have now been discredited as being based on a poor methodology and flawed results (Grinspun & Shamsie, 2007, pp. 3-53). One of the reasons that many Canadian industries have not benefitted from free trade is the presence of continued barriers limiting the capacity of Canadian firms to be competitive in U.S. markets (Grinspun & Shamsie, 2007, pp. 3-53). Canadian exporters of beef, lumber, and a range of other commodities have been unable to compete successfully in U.S. markets, thanks to ongoing efforts by American producers to engage in different forms of protectionism (Grinspun & Shamsie, 2007, pp.
Due to the recent global financial crisis, such concepts as economic partnership and trade policies had to be changed with some governments around the world. While some of the economies adopted protectionist policies, others sought growth through facilitating trade with the objective of proceeding towards investigating new opportunities among current allies, as well as making future trade deals with the countries that are opening up to the global economy. Both large and small national economies as well as advanced and emerging markets looked for the means to diversify their international activities and gaining access to markets in Asia, Africa and the Middle East. As a result, the deepening of the EU-Canada economic and trade relations does not only follow the common trend but contributes also to enhancing competitiveness and prosperity of the both parties.