Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on nonviolent resistance best means of effecting changes in a society
Essays on nonviolent resistance best means of effecting changes in a society
An Essay on Human rights violations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Human rights for all will never be met fully. There are always going to be people who will be deprived of these rights, or have them taken away by others. Humanity has barely even scratched the surface of using these rights, and haven’t even started on enforcing them for all. There is no way to enforce human rights. There will always be those who turn a blind eye to what others may be going through. In Elie Wisel’s speech “The Perils of Indifference”, he gives an example of someone as important as a leader of a country can be one of these people, “And that ship, which was already in the shores of the United States was sent back” (The Perils of Indifference 80-81). With this as a problem there is another one that walks with turning a blind eye to others. The time it takes. Human rights for everyone will take more time than Humanity would like. Generation Z won’t even live to see it begin to happen, “And yet my friends, good things …show more content…
have also happened in this traumatic century: the defeat of Nazism, the collapse of Communism, the rebirth of Israel on its ancestral soil, the demise of the apartheid, Israel’s peace treaty with Egypt, [and] the peace accord in Ireland” (The Perils of Indifference 93-95). Knowing that these things can change is relieving to people as a whole, but the amount of time this takes is crucial to how as people may or may not have human rights for all. With the discussion of human rights, there will always be those to take away at least one of those rights as a human in one way or another, “It was over.
I had not realized it, but I had fainted. I came to when they doused me with cold water. I was still lying on the crate. In a blur I could see the wet ground next to me. Then I heard someone yell. It had to be the Kapo” (Elie Wiesel “Night” 58). Some humans by nature are cruel, and don’t care if they torture, starve, or even kill another human life. Some of this is even carried out on some of the most primitive rights. Even now these rights are being taken with brute force, “Due to her increased prominence, both in Pakistan and around the world, the Taliban target Malala. A masked gunman boards Malala’s school bus and asks for her by name. He shoots Malala in the head, neck and shoulder” (Malala’s Story Malala Fund, www.malala.org/malalas-story?). Just for going to school she was almost killed. It is an easy right to enforce, but people like Malala’s assailants will always
exist. Some people will say that there is evidence that people have already started enforcing human rights for everyone. An example is now all the marches and peaceful protests, numerous people are taking a part of as their right to. With that, it took until now to start using and implementing that right. Yet, while humanity is gaining more and more rights, there are primitive ones that are not being met that are crucial to survival. The right to shelter and food is one of them. There is still a vast amount of homelessness and starvation all over the world, but no one has thought to enforce this right on a global scale. In conclusion, Humanity has a great deal of work to do. Even then everyone’s rights will never be perfectly met. There will always be someone who will be left hungry, homeless, and beaten. For human rights to truly take effect it must take the voices of everyone in this world.
Malala Yousafzai, a young Pakistani girl, was shot and wounded by the Taliban. At eleven years old, Malala, and all other Pakistani women were told they could no longer receive any sort of education. Malala would not remain quiet, she wanted to be taught, and she made sure everyone knew the cruelty of the situation. On October 8, as Malala and many other children were riding a bus home, the bus was stopped by a masked Taliban gunman who shot Malala in the head and neck. Malala survived the shot and even wrote a book later on. This situation is much like what some of the characters in Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mockingbird, and Rebecca Skloot’s The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, go through. Lee and Skloot demonstrate that restriction from society and others leads to injustice.
Indifference is seductive, inhumane, and the line between good and evil. Indifference is helping the enemy, it is death. Writer and Holocaust Survivor, Wiesel Elie in his speech, “The Perils of Indifference”, argues that being indifferent to those who are suffering assists the enemy. He supports his claim by first defining and describing indifference as “seductive”, “tempting”, and “easier.” Wiesel goes on to illustrate the dangers of indifference by using personal experience and historical events as examples. Finally, the author creates awareness of indifference from the past, present, and future. Wiesel’s purpose is to describe why indifference is inhumane in order to persuade people not to be indifferent. He establishes a serious tone, critical, and somber tone for Politicians, Ambassadors, Mr. President, and members of congress.
Before reading the different articles on the “American Dream”, I did not know anything about the American Dream. But now I have a better understanding of it. We are living the American Dream. The American Dream is the ideal that every US citizen should have an equal opportunity to achieve success and prosperity through hard work, determination, and initiative. None of this applies to us because nothing is equal in America. The reasons why I believe that we are not living the American Dream in the 1960s is because we are still living with “Discrimination” according to the Mike Brown case. “Indifference” has a lot to do with the way the society is today. Finally, “Economic Indifference” is also evidence that we are not living
A Taliban leader said that if girls did not stop going to school within a month, there would be repercussions. Instead of capitulating, this proclamation only made Yousafzai more passionate and courageous. She continued to attend school, despite the numerous threats and causes for fear. As an education activist, she was in more danger than most of her classmates, so it was not safe for her to walk anywhere, instead she had to take a car or bus. One day, while aboard a school bus with her classmates and friends, two men entered asking which girl was named Malala. The other girls looked at Yousafzai which unintentionally gave away her location. The men shot 15 year old Yousafzai in a defining moment in history. This not only had consequences for her and her family, but it also had consequences for the citizens of Pakistan and people living around the world. This was a turning point because people began to realize that the Taliban would target anyone with opposing views, even teenage girls.
Yousafzai, M. (2013). I Am Malala: The Schoolgirl Who Stood Up to the Taliban. London, UK: Orion Publishing Group.
In protest to this, Malala Yousafzai, a Pakistani girl, refused to follow these rules, and even began a blog for the British Broadcasting Corporation, detailing her life under Taliban rule. In response to her protest, a gunman approached her, and shot her three times. This assassination attempt started a global movement in support of Yousafzai and her beliefs. Like Thoreau, Gandhi, King, and Yousafzai, one must realize when others are being oppressed and take action against those in power who oppress the people they rule. Otherwise, there will never be change, and the world will never see justice.
People, including children, are still being forced to work to death, innocent civilians are still suffering the consequences of war, and families are struggling to stay firm together. Despite the efforts of the people, IGOs, and NGOs, in the year 2100, human rights abuse will not end. All around the world people and countries are continuing the efforts to end Human Rights Violations. Human rights violations are a big problem in the world today.
Do you think that indifference is evil? This is the controversy that Elie Wiesel has brought to the world's eyes. Indifference is evil because it can cause harm not only to others, but to them themselves.
“The Perils of Indifference” is a speech that Elie Wiesel delivered in Washington D.C. on April 12, 1999, exactly 54 years after his release from the Nazi concentration camp Buchenwald by American troops. Both Congress along with President Clinton and Mrs. Clinton were present to hear the speech. Wiesel spoke briefly about what it was like in the concentration camps, but he focused mostly on the topic of Indifference. His speech was effective in its use of rhetoric to convince the audience that as individuals and as a world culture we cannot afford to become indifferent to the suffering around us.
"Taliban Gun Down Girl Who Spoke Up for Rights." New York Times. N.p., 9 Oct. 2012. Web. 10 Apr. 2014.
Another typical characteristic of Wiesel’s pieces is employing logos as definition and description. Throughout The Perils of Indifference, Wiesel uses an extended and multifaceted definition of the term indifference. The author starts out by stating that “Etymologically, the word means ‘no difference’”, or in other words the most common definition of indifference is uniformity (The Perils of Indifference 1). Wiesel then further qualified this definition as an unfamiliar state of opposing ideas. Qualification. as known as clarification, of Wiesel’s definition of is vital to the development of Indifference in his piece is vital because it pinpoints exactly what the author want the audience to understand from his speech. By stating exactly what
"Malala Yousafzai, 16, and Her Miraculous Story of Surviving Being Shot by the Taliban." ABC News. ABC News. Web. 17 Nov 2013. .
Human rights are regarded as the keystone of modernity. There are various international bills to entrench the modern ideas of human rights, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Human beings are entitled to civil and political rights against violation by the state, as long as the social, economic and cultural rights.
Proponents of human rights argue that the concept’s universality rests in its non-discriminatory character- human rights are meant for every human being- rich and poor, white and black, men and women, young and old, leaders and followers, elites and illiterate, etc- and are all treated equally.
The universal declaration of human rights declared that all people have equal rights, regardless of race, gender, religion, language, culture, birth status, national origin, or opinion. We are all equally entitled to our human rights without discrimination. Universal human rights are often expressed and guaranteed by law, in the forms of treaties, customary international law, general principles and other sources of international law. International human rights law lays down obligations of Governments to act in certain ways or to refrain from certain acts, in order to promote and protect human rights and fundamental freedoms of individuals or groups. (ohchr.org) The universality of human rights is a concept that allows everyone to have the same basic human rights no matter where the location. If that concept is true then why are people being tortured and ostracized. Why are people still afraid of going against their leaders, fearing that they will be found and killed. It is because some leaders