The Perils Of Indifference Summary

466 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Perils of indifference elie wiesel

Jewish writer, Elie wiesel in his heroic speech, The Perils Of Indifference, states that indifference is a bad thing, a sin, because not anyone wants to be one person. No one would be able to choose how they want to be, they wouldn't have the freedom to do anything. He supports his claim that indifference is inhumane, and shows everyone that it is perfectly fine to be different and take your own path.To also convince all the people to be unique and be your own person.Ultimately to show that the only person that can define us is you only.Wiesel's purpose is to inform individuals that indifference is a low self of steam and a lack of confidence to us human beings.He creates an informative tone for the readers by using stylistic devices and rhetorical devices such as imagery,syntax and advanced word choice in order to lead us to his message. …show more content…

This is was one of the major genocide of the 20th century.Millions of people were killed by the devestatting war. This happened because they wanted to purge the land of non turks.Once when world war 1 broke out in 1915 laws were set to depopulate turkey of the armenian minority. Villages were burned down and many individuals were left in desert to die. Furthermore 2.5 million armenians lived in turkey before 1915, 1.5 million were killed.During that time around 450,000 greeks were killed and 300,000 assyrians were killed as well which end all three cultures in the region. Ultimately, this genocides related to wiesel's speech applying to how the armenians had no say on the laws that were set.They couldn't save their homes or their personal stuff. Overall, indifference and they very little freedom they had shows that they couldn't do what they wanted but someone else had to do it for

Show More
Related

  • Elie Wiesel's Speech Ethos And Logos

    323 Words  | 1 Pages

    Thesis- Elie Weisel argued his stance on indifference, successfully to his audiences, utilizing pathos, ethos, and logos.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference

    1163 Words  | 3 Pages

    Speeches are given for a purpose. Whether it is for persuasion, or education, or even entertainment, they all target certain parts of people’s minds. This speech, The Perils of Indifference, was given by Elie Wiesel with intention to persuade his audience that indifference is the downfall of humanity, and also to educate his audience about his conclusions about the Holocaust and the corresponding events. He was very successful in achieving those goals. Not only was the audience enlightened, but also President Bill Clinton, and the First Lady, Hillary Clinton, themselves were deeply touched by Wiesel’s words.

    Read More

  • Inhumanity in Night

    793 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thus the theme of inhumanity can be seen through discrimination, fear and survival. Discrimination is seen when the Hungarian police beat the Jewish people because of their religion. Also, fear can be seen when Elie is whipped because Idek is afraid Elie would tell everyone of his affair. Lastly, survival is seen when the men beat each other for food. The reader can therefore conclude that what Elie Wiesel was trying to say about inhumanity was that other people are capable of treating other humans like animals and that it makes this victims feel less like people. This has implications about the real world and everyday life because there are maybe many instances throughout one’s life when they are being treated inhumanly. Additionally, many countries today suffer people are not being treated well, and the author seems to suggest that it should be stopped.

    Read More

  • Elie Wiesel Reflection For Night

    714 Words  | 2 Pages

    It was the end of the war and he no longer has a family after he was relocated and wiesel is basically a walking corpse. “And in spite of myself, a prayer formed inside me, a prayer to this God in whom I no longer believed.” was written in page 91 which clearly states that he no longer believed in God. Now the last piece of evidence to prove that he doesn't care for others anymore would by when his father left the land of the living. On page 112 Wiesel writes how he felt about his passing ‘And deep inside me, if I could have searched the recesses of my feeble conscience, I might have something like: Free at

    Read More

  • Loss of Faith and Religion in Ellie Wiesel’s Night

    1731 Words  | 4 Pages

    Wiesel’s loss of religion becomes the loss of identity, humanity, selfishness, and decency.... ... middle of paper ... ... This man is obviously beside himself and does not trust anyone except Hitler, his archenemy.

    Read More

  • Similarities and Differences Between the Holocaust and the Armenian Genocide

    581 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even though there are differences the Armenian Genocide and the Holocaust are very similar in the ways people were convinced to follow the government. Both of these genocides started with a change in government. The “Young Turks” who wanted one religion and one language told people that the Armenians were a threat to their national security and called all of them spies (Beecroft). They started with the intellectuals and the leaders. Taking their possessions away and not allowing them certain rights (Beecroft). This is similar to how Hitler told the people of Germany that Jewish people were the reason the war was going bad and they were the reason Germany was in such a weak state. Just like the Turks the Nazis wanted everyone to be the same but in a little bit of a different way. In the Holocaust they started with the political opponents (“Holocaust”). The Nazis also took away the Jews jobs and possessions (Bard 13). The taking of possessions and killings relate to another similarity between the two genocides. The Armenian Genocide was during World War 1 and the Holocaust during World War 2 (“Armenian” History.com). The fact the Arme...

    Read More

  • Three Aspects of Night by Elie Wiesel

    514 Words  | 2 Pages

    The tone of the novel is greatly influenced through the fact that the story is autobiographical. There seems to be only one agenda utilized by Elie Wiesel in regards to the tone of the story as he presents the information for the readers’ evaluation. The point of the story is to provide the reader with an emotional link to the horror of the Holocaust through the eyes of one who experienced those horrors. Wiesel speaks from a distance that is often found in autobiographies. He presents the facts as to what he saw, thought, and felt during those long years in the camps.

    Read More

  • Ethos, Repetition, And Pathos In The Perils Of Indifference

    708 Words  | 2 Pages

    In “The Perils of Indifference” Elie Wiesel uses several techniques to get his point across. Three of them in the speech are Ethos, Repetition, and Pathos. He uses a combination of the three elements throughout the paragraphs of his speech to attract the readers. The combination of these elements help draw the reader’s emotions and interest towards his subject. He focuses on word choice that would pertain to his audience’s level of vocabulary.

    Read More

  • Elie Wiesel The Perils Of Indifference

    1733 Words  | 4 Pages

    To the people in the concentration camps, apathy is a “harsher punishment” (Wiesel) than anger or rage, because anger has feelings in it, while indifference just makes a suffering person feel even smaller and more insignificant. Indifference in humans potentially goes against religion, because it blurs the lines between “light and darkness” (Wiesel). Throughout his speech at the Millennium Lectures, Elie Wiesel both enlightens on the consequences of apathy towards those who need help, and inspires hope for a better future.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of The Perilsdifference

    195 Words  | 1 Pages

    Well-known Noble Peace prize winner, Elie Wiesel, in his speech, The Perils of Indifference, admonishing indifference and history in his time. Wiesel’s purpose is to impress upon the audience that being indifferent is as bad as committing the wrong doing. He creates warm, sentimental tone to convey to the audience his experience in the Holocaust and how he was treated. As well as making the point about the people who were indifferent and how they could’ve made a difference just by lending a helping hand.

    Read More

  • The Perils Of Indifference

    838 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the speech, “The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel states, “Indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger and hatred. Anger can at times be creative. One writes a great poem, a great symphony, one does something special for the sake of humanity because one is angry at the injustice that one witnesses. But indifference is never creative. Even hatred at times may elicit a response. You fight it. You denounce it. You disarm it. Indifference elicits no response. Indifference is not a response.” Being indifferent isn't responding because it is not doing anything at all so it is practically not being there and therefore can't be counted as the only way to respond or the only option. Therefore, indifference is evil and can not be the correct way to respond for the sole reason that it is not a

    Read More

  • The Perils Of Indifference Summary

    1729 Words  | 4 Pages

    Another typical characteristic of Wiesel’s pieces is employing logos as definition and description. Throughout The Perils of Indifference, Wiesel uses an extended and multifaceted definition of the term indifference. The author starts out by stating that “Etymologically, the word means ‘no difference’”, or in other words the most common definition of indifference is uniformity (The Perils of Indifference 1). Wiesel then further qualified this definition as an unfamiliar state of opposing ideas. Qualification. as known as clarification, of Wiesel’s definition of is vital to the development of Indifference in his piece is vital because it pinpoints exactly what the author want the audience to understand from his speech. By stating exactly what

    Read More

  • Dbq Armenian Massacres

    841 Words  | 2 Pages

    Beginning in 1915, the Armenian massacre was an attempt to create a new compatible Turkish state. The prior religious and ethnic diversity within the Ottoman Empire had disappeared. The Ottoman Empire went from being diverse with multiple religious, now converted to a practically Muslim empire. The empire was now almost entirely Muslim, as well as a Turkish state. Turkish leaders soon realized that the only way to make up for the lost land and territories was to spread eastward and form a pure Turkish state. The Christian non-Turkish Armenians were an obstacle that would have to be faced in the process. In order to fulfill this was to force conversion of minorities in the country when that did not turnout, results quickly turned to massacres

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference

    752 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Holocaust was a plan to eliminate all indifferent people, such as, Jews, homosexuals, and intellectually disabled. In Elie Wiesel's, “The Perils of Indifference”, the author explains the pain of indifference and the struggles of the groups of people throughout history that have lived with indifference. For example, the Jewish people had all of their rights, freedom, and happiness taken away from them. This cruel act of dehumanization resulted in the people being treated like farm animals led to a slaughter.

    Read More

  • The Perils Of Indifference Summary

    611 Words  | 2 Pages

    Human rights for all will never be met fully. There are always going to be people who will be deprived of these rights, or have them taken away by others. Humanity has barely even scratched the surface of using these rights, and haven’t even started on enforcing them for all.

    Read More

More about The Perils Of Indifference Summary

Open Document