Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Topics on Intellectual property
Limitations on intellectual property protection
Topics on Intellectual property
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Topics on Intellectual property
The P2P Piracy Prevention Act Attacks Consumers
Peer-to-peer (P2P) networks have had a staggering growth in the past few years. Since Napster, dozens of P2P networks have been created in its imitation. Due to the growing accessibility of broadband, which increases the speed of downloads, P2P networks generate nearly 1.8 billion downloads per month. Popularity and acceptance is still continually growing.
As many users see P2P software as just file sharing, entertainment industries and other big companies see it as copyright infringement and stealing from copyright owners without their rightful authorization or compensation. These companies complain that P2P file sharing threatens the survival of the industries and believe that there should be a law passed to protect the livelihood of the copyright holders.
For some time now companies, copyright owners and Congress have tried to develop a security standard to protect copyrighted works from unauthorized reproduction and distribution, but they have not yet found a thoroughly effective solution. They know that shutting down all P2P networks is not the right response since file sharing is valuable to some extent since its method of sharing and transferring information supports a variety of efficient business models. Instead they want to deal with the copyright infringements that P2P networks facilitate.
An option that copyright owners have considered toward protecting their works from circulating in P2P networks is to use a variety of technological tools to prevent piracy. Such tools would be capable of blocking, decoying and redirecting the connections of unauthorized copyrighted file transfers. However, federal and state laws such as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of ...
... middle of paper ...
...ew models and adapting to newer ideas than trying to save their old ones. It is also up to the consumers to persuade these companies that they are willing to pay for entertainment as long as they can keep up with their demands.
Works Cited
Delio, Michelle. Wired News. July 27, 2002. The Dark Side of Hacking Bill.
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,54153,00.html
Frequently Asked Questions about the P2P Piracy Prevention Act
http://www.house.gov/berman/p2p_faq.html
Maguire, James. Opinion: P2P War Gets Nasty. Yahoo! News. May 13, 2003.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nf/20030512/tc_nf/21489
P2P Piracy Prevention Act. Be Spacific.
http://www.bespacific.com/mt/archives/002639.html">http://www.bespacific.com/mt/archives/002639.html
Regan, Keith. Report: Many File-Swappers Buying Legit Music. E-Commerce Times. May 8, 2003
Along with the development of a file format (MP3) to store digital audio recordings, came one of the new millennium’s most continuous debates – peer-to-peer piracy – file sharing. Internet companies such as Napster and Grokster became involved in notable legal cases in regards to copyright laws in cyberspace. These two cases are similar in nature, yet decidedly different. In order to understand the differences and similarities, one should have an understanding of each case as well as the court’s ruling.
Before the 1990’s, if people want to listen to music, they just visit a music store and pick up a CD and then put it into a stereo equipment. However, the development of MP3 file format gradually changed the way people listen to music. This format lets everyone download music easily and it can be converted to CD as well. But, there is still a problem: searching MP3 files on the internet is maddening and people seldom can find the music they want. Therefore, the birth of Napster solved this problem, creating a virtual music community in which music fans could use the Web as a “swap meet” for music files. More importantly, Napster is easy to use and it’s free, which expands the range of audience in age. Bandwidth also contributed to Napster’s success. The greater the bandwidth, the faster the file can be transferred. So, Napster really changed the way people listen to music, discover music and interact with music.
Poe, Edgar Allan. The Fall of the House of Usher. 8th ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2013. 702-714. Print.
Much of Rose's argument for the retention of current copyright laws stems from the faulty belief that copyright infringement will remain much of an underground practice. In his article Rose asserts that "Net users who aren't at least mildly familiar with the [file-sharing] underworld will never even hear about such systems before they are dismembered" [1]. While file-sharing might not have been an important issue in 1995, the word "underworld" does not accurately describe the flourishing file sharing situation today.
Patterson, Arthur. "The Fall of the House of Usher." Notes presentation of the Folio Club 1996 Online. Google Online. Retrived on April 5th 2005. http://www.watershedonline.ca/literature/Poe/pousher.html.
"In the modern and technologically advanced times that we live in, access to the internet is a human right and necessity to the developed world. It often helps to promote sociopolitical awareness and understand the rights that we deserve as human beings.
Long, J.C., (2008). Botticelli’s Birth of Venus as wedding painting. Aurora, The Journal of the History of Art, 9, p.1. ISSN 1527-652X.
Long, J.C., (2008). Botticelli’s Birth of Venus as wedding painting. Aurora, The Journal of the History of Art, 9, p.1. ISSN 1527-652X.
Magistrale, Tony. "The Art of Poetry." Student Companion to Edgar Allan Poe. Westport, Conn. ;London: Greenwood, 2001. 39-41. Print.
There is a growing problem on the Internet with people infringing on the intellectual property rights of their rightful owners. The copying of such property goes back some time, starting in the 1500’s, and has continued until today. Lots of people do not care about rules on the Internet, doing whatever they wish to do, or they just do not care. There are numerous solutions to this problem; some of them involving increased monitoring of the Internet. The illegal downloading and distribution of copyrighted materials on the Internet should be more closely monitored and punished by the government, ensuring that the intellectual property rights of their owners are not violated.
Internet's Role in Strengthening National and Global Governance. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Vol. 5, No. 2 (Spring 1998), pp. 423-442. Retrieved from
With the popularity of the Internet, sales for CDs, DVDs, Movies, and many other products have increased. Along with the increase of sales has brought forth an ever increasing problem of illegal media being downloaded. Programs such as Bittorent, Kazaa, and other direct-connect networking programs have allowed the transferring of such illegal media. Downloading song files from the Internet over a free peer to peer network is the moral equivalent of shoplifting music CDs from the local mall.
Stewart, William. Key Internet Features - Freedom of Speech. Living Internet. Retrieved 20 April 2004.
Meinrath, S. D., Losey, J., & Lennett, B. (2011). A growing digital divide: Internet freedom and the negative impact of command-and-control networking. IEEE Internet Computing, 15(4), 75-79. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2011.85
In 2012 the United Nations released a report declaring the internet access as a human right (United Nations, 2012). The way people use the internet today across the world makes it an extraordinary force. We can see its