Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Play versus movie romeo and juliet
Play versus movie romeo and juliet
A comparison of two film versions of william skakespear's romeo and juliet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Play versus movie romeo and juliet
What was better; the book or the movie? That is a question that is asked about movies based off a story. However, in the two movies based off Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet” they have introduced two different and unique representations of this legendary tragedy. One of the films perspectives is set in modern day, yet at the same time it keeps the original script used for the play. Likewise, the film from the 1980’s still keeps to the true version of Romeo and Juliet as Shakespeare wrote it. Even though the movies were sensational, the original work by Shakespeare was more superior to the others.
The first movie taken in the 1980’s was not as good at the original. This is due to the acting in the movie that took away from the original characters and their characterization. One example of this can be seen with Friar Lawrence, and it is seen when he leaves Juliet with Romeos body. What happens is that he seems more courageous, and tries to get Juliet out of there. However, he simply offers her little to no help in the original, and then ditches her with giving her no help what so ever. The next flaw compared to the original by Shakespeare is in the themes, and that the original focuses more on true love while the other focuses on the consequences of forbidden love. This can be seen by how dramatic and painful Romeos death is by poison and Juliet’s gory death by stabbing herself. This emphasis the consequences that are created by dangerous love. Likewise, in the original they do it gently and fast to make it seem like less of a sacrifice. The final way the Shakespearian version is better is due to the setting. The reasoning for this is because in the original the setting was open to the reader’s interpretations. While the movie just ...
... middle of paper ...
...original is better than both films can be seen in the music. What the music does in both the films is it creates an atmosphere not created by the text. This can be seen in the older version with the music is too uptight making the viewer focus too much on the moments in the story. One example of this is in this is in the tense sound track during the fight scenes in the market. Overall, both the movies truly do not compare to the original story because is takes away from the atmosphere created by the costuming and music.
In the end the original stands out much more compared to the movies of it. It takes away from the movies from the theme presented to the music chose for it. These flaws and many more take almost the whole experience away. Truly in the end the far superior best telling of Romeo and Juliet is in the origional, and it truly provides the best experience.
As a lover of books, I am often very disappointed by the movies based off of books. This was the case with both of the Romeo and Juliet movies we watched in class because it differed from the play Romeo and Juliet quite a bit. The 1968 and the 1996 movies based off of William Shakespeare's play, Romeo and Juliet, are alike in few ways but they deviate from each other very much. A few examples of how they veer from the actual play include the balcony scene, Tybalt’s death, and even the letter that was sent to Romeo by Friar Lawrence.
In conclusion, Romeo and Juliet, is the perfect of Shakespeare plays to be done as a film, both filmmakers had different interpretation of the story. It is a film, which can reach the masses, everyone is familiar with it, and it is a great story.
a major step in life. Because the play is not entirely trying to make the two look bad, it is the better product. & nbsp; Another major difference in the mood of the play and the movie is in the funeral scene. The funeral scene of the play is a very serious event. Juliet's family is very upset and thinks that they are the cause of her "death". Also, the Friar. soothes the family of the loss of young Juliet (Act IV, Scene 5, Line 65). However, in the movie version of the funeral scene, again everyone is sad but This time the Friar lets out a giggle as he pretends to pray for Juliet. This is a major difference because if someone had seen the Friar giggle, it may have. changed the entire play. They may have questioned him why he giggled but since he would not have a reason he may just spill what he knows. Since the movie was once again unrealistic, the play is the better production in this scene as well. & nbsp; Some other major differences between the play and the movie occurred in the plot. details. One example of this is in the beginning of the story.
Zeffirelli and Luhrmann are two very contrasting directors with very different tastes. The two movies are comparable in the aspect of being based on Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, but reveal their version of love in polar opposites. Luhrmann thrusts the movie into the modern spotlight. It is more relatable, even enjoyable, taking Shakespeare's script and supplying a well adapted motion picture for the younger generation. Although, Zeffirelli conveyed what would have been the best adaptation of Shakespeare gaining yet another, final round-of-applause from The Bard.
Characterization of both Romeo and Juliet impact the mood. Some differences that changed the ending in the play and the movie is how they pursue
To conclude, the characters in “Romeo and Juliet” are all different in the text and film. Also the setting is different and there a main and minor points in both text and film. In my opinion, I prefer the Luhrman’s film as it is modern and simple to understand. This is because Luhrman’s film is modern which makes it more interesting because there are guns and cars which shows us the technology in the 21st century whereas in the text there are traditional settings, props etc. This doesn’t appeal to a wide range of audience in the 21st century because no one uses a sword and a horse for transport.
When comparing and contrasting Zeffirelli's and Luhrmann's Romeo and Juliet to Shakespeare’s play, Zeffirelli's adaptation is seen as more accurate to Shakespeare’s play than Luhrmann’s movie adaptation. Zeffirelli sets the scenes and designs costumes that are consistent with the play and portrays Juliet as a heroine that Shakespeare depicts in his play. An original and classic story like Romeo and Juliet should be left untouched to feel the full effect of what a great story should
Shakespeare's is one of the most read writers ever and his writing was so successful that not just one group of people liked it. He did this by relating to his audience using universal truths. . Human emotions are not something that change over time and they are also known as universal truths; love, hate, revenge, and envy are all examples of universal truths. This play was so successful that many other movies have copied the plot but changed the scenery. Over the past 400 years since this play was written the world has changed drastically, but the emotions and feelings in this play have withstood the test of time. This is why the movies, Romeo and Juliet (1996) and West Side Story (1961) were so successful. Shakespeare's play and the two movies modeled after it have many similarities and many differences, but one thing remains constant in all of them, They all use universal truths to relate to their audiences.
William Shakespeare wrote his ever famous play, Romeo and Juliet, in 1595. Like many of Shakespeare’s plays, the story of Romeo and Juliet is timeless and has proven to remain perhaps the most popular story of tragic love. In 1968, 373 years after the play was originally written, a new movie was released and hailed as a new and futuristic Romeo and Juliet. This film is directed by Franco Zeffirelli and stars Leonard Whiting as Romeo and Olivia Hussey as Juliet. Then, in 1996, a mere 401 years after Shakespeare’s original production, Baz Luhrmann directed a new Romeo and Juliet that features Leonardo Dicaprio as Romeo and Claire Danes as Juliet. This film is extremely futuristic compared to any other version that has been produced. The two films differ from Shakespeare’s original play in some respects, but most viewers would agree that these films both follow Shakespeare’s story with adaptations to the time at which they were produced.
Romeo and Juliet is a very dramatic story that hasn’t been remade since shakespeare published it. The movie and book had very few differences, which surprised me quite a bit, but they had a lot of similarities for example in the movie that I found there wasn’t any sound. Which made it difficult to understand what was going on during multiple scenes. The book was more enjoyable considering it had more details and it’s more accurate than the movie.
Even though the themes were similar, the plot of the movie and the play were rather different. In the movie, Mercutio, Romeo’s friend, got an invitation to Lord Caplet’s ball where Romeo and Juliet meet, but in the movie Romeo and this friends go to Lord Capulet’s party uninvited. What's more, is that when Romeo was at the ball he was recognized by Tybalt, Juliet’s cousin, from the sound of his voice in the play, but in the movie Tybalt sees him. In addition to that one scene where Juliet was hysterical because she thought Romeo was dead was completely absent in the movie.
Although William Shakespeare was only 52 years old when he passed, he managed to write 37 plays and over 150 sonnets. His most famous play was Romeo and Juliet, which now has over 15 different versions and adaptations. These adaptations have a wide variety of different styles, ranging from movies to television shows, that often are changed so that people can further relate to it. I believe, though, that Franco Zeffirelli’s 1968 film version of Romeo and Juliet rather than Baz Luhrmann’s 1996 version, Romeo + Juliet is more effective, as a result of its music and its setting.
There are many differences between Luhrmann’s 1996 and Zeffirelli’s 1968 versions of Romeo and Juliet. One of these differences is the setting and time era. Zeffirelli’s version is more fitting of Shakespeare’s idea of the time era – it is all very renaissance. They start out with a tournament, they use swords, and they dress to their part. Another difference is culture. In the new version, the movie starts in the city, and it is a fight between the Montague’s and the Capulets. Perhaps the most important between the two versions is the religions and beliefs of the people as a whole.
There are many differences and similarities between Romeo and Juliet and Romeo + Juliet. One similarity was the Old English used in both the play and the movie. The director kept this the same to keep some people interested with the weird uncommon language used. There were also two differences the first being the guns used in the movie, and the swords used in the play. The
The modern version of Romeo and Juliet’s love is more believable than the on depicted in the original movie. This is because the modern version uses scenes such as the meeting, balcony and death scene to portray a sense of true love. From beginning to end many scenes in the modern movie have the ability to bring viewers to tears and make them feel as if they are apart of the couples love themselves.