Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hamlet movies comparison
Hamlet movies comparison
Hamlet movies comparison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Hamlet movies comparison
In this essay I will compare and contrast “Romeo and Juliet” by William Shakespeare. Romeo and Juliet is one of William Shakespeare’s most famous works. I will compare and contrast the 1968 film by Franco Zefferilli and 1996 Baz Luhrman’s film. It has been adapted into screenplays, and remade countless times. Baz Luhrman’s and William Shakespeare’s versions of Romeo and Juliet are similar in theme, but are different in setting, mood, and character personalities.
The character of Romeo is a lovesick man who keeps changing his mind about the lady he fancies. To compare both text and film, Romeo doesn’t care about the feud between the Capulet’s and Montague’s until he meets Juliet. When Romeo sets eyes on Juliet he fall in love instantly which means that he doesn’t love Rosaline anymore. In the text of “Romeo and Juliet”, Juliet falls in love with Romeo while wearing a mask and they do not see each other’s faces and fall in love whereas, in the film by Luhrman, Romeo is wearing an armour and Juliet is dressed as a fairy which gives the impression that Romeo is Juliet’s knight and has come to rescue her. Furthermore, Romeos fight with Tybalt. In the text Romeo uses a sword to fight Tybalt in act 2 scene 1 alternatively, in Luhrman’s film; Romeo shoots Tybalt with a gun into a lake.
The character of Juliet is a young 13 year old who is soon to be pulled into a forced marriage. In both text and film, Juliet is told by her parents that she has to marry a man named Paris. You could also compare how Juliet doesn’t like Paris and lies to her parents about whom she really likes. When there is the Capulet’s ball, Paris and Juliet are supposed to get to know each other. In the text, Juliet spots Romeo behind a pillar whereas; in Luhrman f...
... middle of paper ...
...n Luhrman’s film. The second main contrast is the Capulet and Montague meeting. This is because the meeting tells us how they died and who is involved in the incident but in the Luhrman’s movie the meeting is cut out. This means only Romeo, Juliet, Mercutio and Tybalt died.
To conclude, the characters in “Romeo and Juliet” are all different in the text and film. Also the setting is different and there a main and minor points in both text and film. In my opinion, I prefer the Luhrman’s film as it is modern and simple to understand. This is because Luhrman’s film is modern which makes it more interesting because there are guns and cars which shows us the technology in the 21st century whereas in the text there are traditional settings, props etc. This doesn’t appeal to a wide range of audience in the 21st century because no one uses a sword and a horse for transport.
Comparison Between Act 3 Scene 1 in Franco Zeferelli's Romeo and Juliet and in Baz Luhrman's Romeo and Juliet
Comparing Zefferelli's production of Romeo and Juliet with Luhrman Production. In this essay I am going to write about the production of Romeo. In Franco Zeffirelli's production of Romeo and Juliet, the setting and language are of a traditional, realistic nature. This is complete.
However, the largest thing changed was the fate. In the end, when Romeo was about to die, Juliet wakes up but doesn’t have time to stop Romeo from taking the poison; whereas the King production, Romeo dies before Juliet wakes up. The purpose of Juliet to wake up before Romeo dies is to engage the audience and leave the audience with a sense of pity for the two lovers. In this scene, Romeo, crying, says “The doors of breath, seal with a righteous kiss…” From the quote, fate was highlighted due to the reason that Romeo says that he will seal the doors of breath, meaning that he will kill himself; yet, after he has said this, Juliet’s hand moves, but Romeo did not see. What engages the audience more is the dramatic irony, when the audience knows that Juliet is alive but Romeo doesn’t. This is the major method that the Luhrmann production recontextualises the
The Major Differences Between Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet The major differences between the two movies Romeo and Juliet who were
Romeo and Juliet presents an ongoing feud between the Montague and Capulet families whose children meet and fall in love. Markedly, the meeting scene depicting love at first sight continues to be praised by today’s critics. Romeo and Juliet then receive the label of star-crossed lovers whose tragic demise is written in the stars. In fact, Shakespeare 's work is well received and its numerous adaptations have made it one of his most enduring and notorious stories. The cinematic world brings to the screens a disastrous approach by Baz Luhrmann to do the play justice. A glance at Baz Luhrmann’s productions allows audiences to assume he delivers movies which are unlike those of any other filmmaker today, or perhaps ever. Therefore, blending a delicate
In conclusion, Lurhmann uses a lot of modern filming techniques to make Romeo and Juliet appeal to a contemporary audience. By relating certain aspects to situations in modern society, it makes the audience understand the ideas behind the original play and he simplifies the complicated old English of Shakespeare by adding exciting and dynamic visuals. Lurhmann tried to create a modern version of Romeo and Juliet and he was completely successful in his aims. Lurhmann defied all odds by making his film appeal to a modern audience and not only is this film very clever, it is a must see for any film lovers.
known works, The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. But is it so simple? How do these two compare,
The complete contrast of this is the Luhrmann’s version. It is a modern day film set in Los Angeles. This film starred Leonardo Di. Caprio as Romeo and Clare Danes as Juliet. This version was much more.
Zeffirelli’s ultimate goal for his version of Romeo and Juliet was to capture Shakespeare’s original intentions for the play while targeting the teenage audience of his generation. Luhrmann’s intentions were different however; he changed the way an audience looks at Shakespeare’s masterpiece by modernising the props, costumes, and sets. Obviously, to match film time quotas Zefirelli and Luhrmann has both cut many lines out of the play.
Luhrmann modernised Romeo and Juliet through regular amendments of the props and costumes. In updating these aspects of the film, Luhrmann makes the play more relevant to our everyday modern environment. The actors in Luhrmann’s version carry guns instead of swords. Luhrmann, in an act of ingenious brand the guns with titles such as “Sword,” thus, enabling the original Shakespearean language to be preserved. Costumes differ dramatically between both versions of the film. In Luhrmann’s depiction of the motion picture, the Montagues have buzz cuts and pink hair whereas, the Capulets’ dress in vests and mainly dark clothes. All of these adjustments to the original play contribute to the popularity of the fil...
Romeo and Juliet - Movie vs. Book & nbsp; Often times people say that William Shakespeare was and still is a legend. They are correct. It is amazing how Shakespeare's play Romeo and Juliet was written. centuries ago can be better than Franco Zefferelli's movie production of Romeo. and Juliet, which had much better technology to work with only decades ago. Although the movie appeared better, it left out some major parts. The play had better mood and plot details which made it much more dramatic and by far a better presentation of the. & nbsp; One major difference between the play and the movie occurs in mood. An example of this is the marriage scene. In the marriage scene of the play, Romeo and Juliet is very serious. The reader can tell this by the way the two speak. Romeo says that the Holy Words the Friar speaks can make something without an equal (Act II, Scene 6, Line 4).
Luhrmann’s 1996 Romeo and Juliet is compelling when communicating the main ideas of the play by providing the audience with a modern translation of the play using the motifs in the film which correlate to the play.
Paramount aspect of the movie and the play, the theme, were the same, and the overall messages in both were the same. For example, one main message in the stories was that love conquers all. This was demonstrated in both the play and the film when Romeo and Juliet kept secretly meeting each other even though they knew it was against their families’ wishes. In one scene of both the movie and the play Romeo and Juliet even got married and died together so that even if they could not be together on earth they would be together in death.
Baz Luhrman used filming techniques much more efficiently then Carlei and also used characterisation much better to relate to a modern audience. Luhrman Used clear changes in music and camera shots to convey his point of view on the tragedy making it much easier for the audience to pick up on. Although the language used is more supportive in Carlei’s version, I still think that Luhrman has provided a better balance of modern context to fulfil the audience’s needs while providing insight of William Shakespeare’s love Tragedy of Romeo and
The movie adds a musical twist to the original Romeo and Juliet, which gives the story a lighter look than the original. Instead of bloody fights, the movie puts in dance and singing scenes. The characters are also different because some of them are in relationships, while others even completely change their roles. For example, Bernardo is Maria’s brother in the story, while in the original play Tybalt plays her cousin. The nurse is also not in a relationship with anyone, while Anita is in a relationship with Bernardo and that fact drastically changes the storyline.