Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Martin Heidegger the origin of the work of art
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Martin Heidegger the origin of the work of art
In The Origin of the Work of Art, Heidegger attempts to the answer the question of what art is, as well as try to find the origin of art itself. In his attempt Heidegger distinguishes between his ideas of “Work” and “Equipment”. While, central to his argument within The Origin of the Work of Art, these ideas are important within themselves in Heidegger’s Philosophy. In this essay I will define as well as compare and contrast these two concepts. I will also explain the ideas of “Earth” and “World” presented by Heidegger in order to facilitate this goal. Finally, I’ll conclude the paper by summarizing the key concepts and their relationship to one another.
In order to accomplish the goal of defining and explaining both “Equipment” & “Work”; I’ll need to introduce and explain two other prevalent concepts in Heidegger’s work. These are the concepts of “World” and “Earth”. First I’ll start with the notion of “World”.
Heidegger writes, “The world is not the mere collection of the countable or uncountable, familiar and unfamiliar things that are at hand” (Heidegger, pg.170). Heidegger is stating that the “World” isn’t merely an ontical concept that most of us perceive of, a totality of matter existing within the material conception of “World”. Heidegger clearly explains, “The world worlds, and is more fully in being than the tangible and perceptible realm in which we believe ourselves to be at home” (Heidegger, pg 170). Heidegger defines “World” as an ontological concept, in which a web of significant relations exists between Dasein and all that is ready-at-hand. For example, a coffee table exists in a web of significant relations for it points to those who regularly sit at it, which then can branch of to the various conversations ha...
... middle of paper ...
...e work lets the earth be an earth” (Heidegger, pg 172). He then adds, “The opposition of world and earth is strife” (Heidegger, pg 174). We finally have the criteria of what “Work” is. Heidegger explains that work sets up a world and sets forth the “Earth”. “The work is an instigating of this strife” (Heidegger, pg 175). That strife opens truth or as Heidegger puts it, “Aletheia” to the observer of the “Work”. The struggle or “Strife” is the process of a work of art taking place within the art work itself.
In conclusion, the concepts of “Work” and “Equipment” that Heidegger presents in The Origin of the Work of Art can be summarized as follows. “Equipment” defines itself by its use and “Work” is grounded upon the “Earth” and “World” it was created on. Whose essential importance cannot be understated in order to understand Heidegger’s message within the text.
Maniates’ views on what he refers to as work are effectively mirrored by Woodhouse’s article. Maniates’ concept of “quality of Work” refers to how individuals inherently care about various aspects of their job, such as “questions about job security, worker satisfaction, downsizing, overtime, and corporate responsibility” (47). He also relates this concept more directly to environmental issues by claiming that when workers feel powerless in their jobs, they prefer to wield their power as consumers instead of attempting to resolve issues in a vocational capacity (48). Woodhouse relates to the first point by discussing the working conditions of engineers. “Engineers work within a web of constraints created by employers,
The term, work can have several meanings and interpretations. Some people view work as a necessity and a social norm, others might view it with a negative perspective, giving how people are so dependent on it. Benjamin Franklin, Henry David Thoreau, and Walt Whitman all have a similar interpretation of work. Your encounters with society affects your actions, yielding a specific outcome. They all acted accordingly to what they observed around them, and the actions hey took was to yield a result of change.
What does the work consist of? Who authored it, and how? What is it based on, and how does it relate? What is it, and what will become of it? The answers to these questions, collectively, form an important response to a bigger question: What is art? What does it mean to describe a piece as “a work of art”?
Work is a word that one hears on a daily basis on multiple different levels; work out, work at school, go to work, work at home, work for change. Society today is made of people that work hard every moment of their day from sunrise to twilight, these workers work for food, housing, family, education, and transportation. Essentially in today’s world if one wants something they must work for it, gone are the days where handouts are common and charity is given freely. The question then arises, who speaks for these voiceless workers that are often working so hard they have no time to voice an opposition? The authors Levine and Baca speak very well for these workers and for society in general, their narrators speak of not only work but of the world
Heidegger’s idea of how we have to realize ourselves, by saying that we are in a state of falleness and that during this we are the slaves to the one or human drama. Heidegger explains that we are included in this creature and for that we are categorized. This leads us to being constricted to Daesin and this will not lead us to reach our full potential as beings. We are part of this public creature and we are categorized for being as such.
Currently, human beings are thinking more on the line of they need work in order to make a living. For that reason, work has become meaningless, disagreeable, and unnatural. Many view work as a way to obtain money and not a meaningful human activity that one does for themselves. The author states that there are two reactions of the alienated and profoundly unsatisfactory character of the modern industrial work. One being the ideal of complete laziness and the other, hostility towards work. Fromm believes the reason why people have animosity regarding work is due to their unconscious mind. Subconsciously, a person has “a deep-seated, hostility towards work and all that is connected to it” says Fromm. I believe what Fromm is saying to be true, after all I witness it everyday. Millions of people each day goes to a work which they are dissatisfied with and that can negatively impact their attitude
Spanish painter Salvador Dali was undeniably one of the most eccentric personalities of the XX century. He is well known as a pioneer of surrealist art whose production has had a huge influence on media and modern artists around the globe . By bringing surreal elements into everyday objects he pushed surrealism forward. It is partly to his credit that surrealism is this popular today. In "M...
ABSTRACT: The discussion of Heidegger's “destructive retrieve” of Aristotle has been intensified in recent years by the publication of Heidegger's courses in the years surrounding his magnum opus. Heidegger's explicit commentary on Aristotle in these courses permits one to read Being and Time with Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics and Metaphysics. My paper analyzes a network of differences between the two thinkers, focusing on the relationship between theory and praxis. From Aristotle to Heidegger, there is: (1) a shift from the priority of actuality to the priority of possibility. This shift, I argue, is itself the metaphysical ground of: (2) a shift from the priority of theory to the priority of praxis. This shift is seen most clearly in the way in which (3) Heidegger's notion of Theorie is a modification of his poíesis. The temporal ground of the reversal is seen in (4) Heidegger's notion of transcendence towards the world, and not towards an eternal being.
Introduction Upon my first encounter with Kandinsky's painting, my eyes and indeed my mind were overcome with a sense of puzzlement, as it seemed impossible to decipher what lay beneath his passionate use of colour and distorted forms. Kandinsky hoped by freeing colour from its representational restrictions, it, like music could conjure up a series of emotions in the soul of viewer, reinforced by corresponding forms. Throughout this essay, I will follow Kandinsky's quest for a pure, abstract art and attempt to determine whether his passionate belief in this spiritual art and his theories on its effects on the soul, can truly be felt and appreciated by the average viewer, who at first glance would most likely view Kandinsky's paintings as simply abstract. Kandinsky was indeed a visionary, an artist who through his theoretical ideas of creating a new pictorial language sought to revolutionize the art of the twentieth-century. Regarded as the founder of abstract painting, he broke free from arts traditional limitations and invented the first painting for paintings sake, whereby the dissolution of the object and subsequent promotion of colour and form became means of expression in their own right.
In these three sections he tackles the relationship we currently have with objects and people and the type of relationship we should have. He expands on this idea, explaining that we have been engaging the world through the objectification of things and people in the way we interact with them. He then gives a different perspective on how we should engage the world in a healthier way, which does not macro-objectively rob anyone or anyone we engage with. The first section of the book examines the condition of humans through the psychology of the individual man. Buber, through his writing, forms his theory that man has two ways in which they engage the world.
The soul is the creative essence, while all of creation, including art which is human unity with natural things, is said to as Nature. In Nat...
Even to those void of a formal art background, the world of traditional art is a realm held in high regard by nearly all. This elevation of art and artists is engrained into our culture, evident even in our own language – with common phrases such as ‘a work of art’ or ‘masterpiece’ used to express utmost skill and admiration. Yet, when asked to define art most would be clueless as where to begin, other than to perhaps describe feelings of awe at the skill of artists. However, admiration is a subjective matter so is clearly not a solid foundation for such a definition. To truly explore the definition of art, a fitting example would be to examine the work of French artist Marcel Duchamp and his famed ‘readymades.’ By placing these ordinary articles of life under the spotlight of a gallery, Duchamp shattered the traditional process of producing art that had existed for centuries, and subsequently triggered thinking about what constitutes as art.
The first activity Arendt identifies is labor, which relates to the human condition of life. In Arendt’s definition, labor encompasses the making of something meant to be consumed and is necessary for sustaining life and corresponds with the biological process of life. Labor items experience a brief length of stay in the world and are made by routine processes. These are products that are consumed and made by routine process, which includes the production of food and reproduction. An example of labor would be the making of bread. Arendt thinks that labor has been the same for 2500 years and is comprised of four aspects. The first aspect of labor is its purpose, which is to keep the body alive. The second is the ability of bodies. Labor depends on bodily effort or “human labor power”. The third aspect of labor regards natural productivity. This involves t...
Over the years many artists and art historians, such as Giorgio Vasari, Pablo Picasso, Paul Rand and Marcel Duchamp, have explored the definition of art. This essay will look at the opinions of these individuals and explore the concept of art by looking at various art movements, such as Dadaism and Cubism, which have influenced the definition of art, as we know it today. In this essay, I will also discuss the two elements of art; form and content, as well as how they are key to any discussion about what makes “good art” and “bad art”.
Heidegger, the founder of the hermeneutic paradigm, rejected the traditional account of cultural activity as a search for universally valid foundations for human action and knowledge. His main work, Sein und Zeit (1927), develops a holistic epistemology according to which all meaning is context-dependent and permanently anticipated from a particular horizon, perspective or background of intelligibility. The result is a powerful critique directed against the ideal of objectivity. Gadamer shares with Heidegger the hermeneutic reflections developed in Sein und Zeit and the critique of objectivity, describing the cultural activity as an endless process of "fusions of horizons." On the one hand, this is an echo of the Heideggerian holism, namely, of the thesis that all meaning depends on a particular interpretative context. On the other hand, however, this concept is an attempt to cope with the relativity of human existence and to avoid the dangers of a radical relativism. In fact, through an endless, free and unpredictable process of fusions of horizons, our personal horizon is gradually expanded and deprived of its distorting prejudices in such a way that the educative process (Bildung) consists in this multiplication of hermeneutic experiences. Gadamer succeeds therefore in presenting a non-foundationalist and non-teleological theory of culture.