I and Thou, by Martin Buber

1010 Words3 Pages

I and Thou was written by Martin Buber and published in 1923. His work was translated to English in 1937 and reprinted in 2010. Buber was a German religious thinker. He was born in Vienna, Austria in 1878. This book is considered a nonfiction, philosophical book. In my opinion, the book was written for students of religious studies along with philosophy and psychology students.
I and Thou is written in prose format, similar to a poetry book, which containing short reflections and the writings seem to be repetitive and somewhat esoteric.The book is a series of long and short sayings, similar to the book of Proverbs, and it’s divided into three sections. These short sayings are not meant to be read as a linear progression of a larger argument but like Proverbs, they are reflections or thought that are related to each other that point to or speak to the larger argument. Buber’s larger argument can be decipher as we consider all three section of his book. In these three sections he tackles the relationship we currently have with objects and people and the type of relationship we should have. He expands on this idea explaining that we have been engaging the world through the objectification of things and people in the way we interact with them. He then gives a different perspective on how we should engage the world in a healthier way, which does not objectify anything or anyone we engage with.

The first section of the book examines the condition of humans through the psychology of the individual man. Buber, through his writing, forms his theory that man has two ways in which they engage the world. The first mean or mode in which man engages the world, according to Buber, is through “experience” or the “I-it.” This method would be the...

... middle of paper ...

...
I must say that this book is a hard read. I am sure that there are many nuances and ideas that I missed along the way. It does take sometime to get accustom to the style of writing since we are some use to the linear approach to reading and seldom do we engage a book written in a poetic or prose structure. I am sure that if I read the book two or three times again, I will find new things that I missed on the first read. This book, in my opinion, is not a book that is written for public consumption, rather I think that this is a niche book and finds a home in the hands of philosophy or religion students who are looking for a challenging yet thought provoking read. For those who might have a hard time understanding the book and the ideas within it, researching the author before reading the book might prove beneficial and add context and background to the readings.

Open Document