Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Psychology in christian perspective an analysis of key issues notes
Integration of psychology and Christianity
Secular psychology, christian psychology, and christian
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The main topic of this topic is to tackle whether Christian lordship should take a place within the field of psychology. In the modern day counseling, most psychologist influence both Christian and science belief. Otherwise many believe that psychology is based on science and theories (cm. Atkinson, Atkinson, Smith, and Ben, 1990; Kalat, 1993; Wade and Travis, 1993) therefore, Christian belief should not have a place in psychology. In my option I believe the counselor should not take the first step in approaching a Christian method unless the clients request it or ignite it first. Also I believe that the counselor should not focus more on the Christian view of a person problem if that person is not a Christian. If that person doesn’t have the knowledge of a Christian life, then what the counselor speak on will began to feel as if they are preaching and that would be harmful towards the client. With that being said counselors are not to teach certain beliefs or values that they believe is doing right (Corey, 1993).
Christ’s lordship can be applied in psychology, but it is the matter of creating a balance between science and belief. They both must share positivism, relativism, individualism, and secularity ( Buss, 1979; Danziger, 1990; Evans, 1998; Farnsworth, 1985; Gross, 1978; Lasch,1979; Toulmin &Leary, 1985; Vander Goot, 1986; Yankelovich, 1981). Psychology and therapy must not be overlooked because the situated in a particular time of mankind. Therapy is a cry for help in guiding him/her in life or someone to just listen to help pin point the time in someone life which something may have affected them. The psychology part is to study this person and find a solution or theory to their situation. Between the two I find it very...
... middle of paper ...
...e for them, because everyone has different beliefs or only responds to certain methods to overcome an issue. More people should see this as a way to expand research instead of excluded anything because what it teaches. If it benefis that person than it really shouldn’t matter rather science or Christ. As long as that person is help in a positive matter than the job is well accomplished.
Works Cited
Benner, D. G. (1998). Psychotherapy and the spiritual quest. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
Buss, A.R. (1979). The emerging field of the sociology of psychological knowledge. In A. R. Buss (ED.), psychology in social context (pp. 1-23). New York: Irvington.
Calvin, J. (1960). Institutes of the Christian religion (F. L. Battles, Trans.). philadelphia: westminster. (Original work published 1556)
Danziger, K. (1979). The social orgins of modern psychology. In A. R. Buss (ED),
In the first chapter of Psychology in Christian Perspective by Harold W. Faw the author talks about psychology as a subject, the different aspects of the subject and how psychology fits into the Christian world. Faw begins the chapter by describing what others think psychology and his views on psychology as well. He describes that “psychology can be described as a systematic attempt to understand human behavior and conscious experience” (Faw, 1995, p. 12). He then goes on to describe the many different types of specialties of psychology which include, neurobiological, behavioral, cognitive, humanistic, and psychoanalytic. These specialties are then integrated into the Christian worldview. They are all different so they all fit into
Myers, David G. “Chapter 14: Social Psychology.” Psychology. 10th ed. New York, NY US: Worth
David Entwistle’s (2010) is the author of the Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity. In the book Entwistle embarks on a journey to explore Psychology and Christianity. As the title suggests several approaches that are used to define the relationship of Phycology and Christianity. In the book Entwistle begins to takes us on shows that psychology and Christianity go in two different directions and meet up someplace in the middle. This allows them to provide different approaches to understanding and studying the human behavior. Entwistle, (2010) took a new approach that has rarely been used in other books that discussed the topic of integration. Entwistle, (2010) began to talk about the relationship of psychology and Christianity
This paper will be reviewing the book “Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity: an introduction to worldview issues, philosophical foundations and models of integration, by David N. Entwistle. As the title states, this book discusses how to integrate psychology and theology. It also dives into why it is so important to be able to integrate the two. Entwistle explains that just because the two are different does not mean they should be separated, and that we have to use both our worldviews. “Weaving together perspectives from psychology and Christian theology can help us understand and appreciate humanity more fully than we could either perspective alone.”
A framework of five models is shared: Enemies, Spies, Colonialists, Neutral Parties, and Allies. The Enemies model either associates no relationship between Christianity and psychology. The Spies model focuses on what works best for them from both Christianity and psychology. Colonialists use psychology only to the degree that it fits theology. Neutral Parties model holds that psychology and theology are independent with possible correlation between findings of the two, however that is about as far as one discipline may encroach on the other. Allies, the model considered by Entwistle, acknowledges that while psychology and theology are separate, they are still dependent, based upon the underlying unity of truth of God’s written word and His Works (Entwistle, 2010). The underpinning of the integrative approach to psychology and Christianity appears to be that of anthropology; this may be seen in the two books, God g...
As mentioned, psychotherapy is not thought to be value-free or value-neutral any more, and therapists are required to be aware of their own values and to hold them back while treating clients. Nevertheless, according to Patterson (1998), some psychologists claim the legitimacy of imparting certain values. Understandably, it is more so among psychologists with religious orientation as in pastoral counseling. However, Patterson (1986) also listed psychologists who instruct certain values without religious affiliat...
Meister, Chad, and Stump. Christian Thought a Historical Introduction. 1st ed. New York: Routledge, 2010. Print.
The field of psychology is a discipline, originated from many branches of science. It has applications from within a complete scope of avenues, from psychotherapy to professional decision-making. The flexibility and versatility of this field reflects its importance and demands in-depth analysis. Psychology was a division of philosophy until it developed independent scientific disciplines. The history of psychology was a scholarly study of the mind and behavior that dates back to the beginning of civilization. There are important details from previous theory psychologist, research have contributed to behaviorism approaches and have contributed towards specific current behavioral practices. Contemporary behavior therapy began to emerge into distinct practical and core learning theories concerning the needs and knowledge engaging cultural and professional differences.
Barth, Karl . The Theology of John Calvin. Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1995.
McNeill, John T., and Ford Lewis Tr. Battles. Calvin: Institutes of the Christian Religion. Phil.: Westminster, 1960. Print.
There are many different perspectives from which to investigate the study of psychology. The intermittent theories of psychology cover a broad spectrum of ideas and concepts. Some views of psychology support the bible. However, most of the topics covered in psychology do not fit in the Biblical perspective and often goes against what the bible says. It stands to reason that many of the foundational theorists of psychology did not include biblical concepts in their works since a major portion of psychologists were atheists themselves. There are numerous biblical ideals with which psychology as a whole does not agree. One idea that does not agree with the Bible is the Freudian view that man is inherently evil. Another view that does not fit in the Biblical perspective of things is the subject of behaviorism. The last psychological idea that does not fit in the biblical view is how we change bad behavior and why we sin. Though most of these views go against the Bible, some psychological views concur with the Bible. Most of these arguments oppose the Biblical idea of free will and furth...
According to Sahker, (2016) “Understanding nonreligious clients is important for psychologists because the ethical considerations have not yet been discussed in the area of nonreligiousness, religious struggle, and deconversion” (p. 295). This means that the religious counselor has a much larger grey area to contend with than does a nonreligious counselor. Classes that teach ethics, psychology and religious integration, multicultural competence, and this one as well provide the foundation for addressing the nonreligious population. Sahker further states that “to work with the nonreligious [we] should be aware of our own religious and spiritual values” (p. 298). Questions such as yours and this class assist us in becoming self-aware of these values and defining them
the theories, and the techniques dealing with Christian and secular counseling will require different tactics and approaches for it to be effective
Hergenhahn, B.R. (2009). Social and Theoretical Psychology: Conceptual and Historical Issues 1. An introduction to the History of Psychology. 1 (1), p1-28.
Contemporary literature on the subject of counseling is abundant in quantity, but not always in quality. Awareness of the content and intent of these forms of literature is critical for the integrity, competency, and faith of today’s Biblical counselors. Integration has taken many deceptive forms, but none more dangerous than literature. This paper will summarize, compare, and contrast the content and intent of five of the leading examples of Christian journals that address counseling ministry; Christian Counseling Today, The Journal of Biblical Counseling, The Journal of Modern Ministry, The Journal of Psychology and Christianity and The Journal of Psychology and Theology.