More handpicked essays just for you.
No child left behind act in america
Impact of the no child left behind act
Impact of the no child left behind act
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Current Event Outline
I. What is NCLB?
A. New education law made to
1. improve academic levels of minorities and all students
2. improve teacher qualification
II. Purpose of NCLB (according to the educational institute of South Dakota)
A. Ensure that all children have
1. Fair
2. equal
3. Significant opportunity to a high quality education.
B. Meet educational needs of low achieving children
C. Close the achievement gap between high and low scoring children
D. Hold schools and local educational agencies accountable for improving the academic achievement of all students.
E. Provide children an enriched and accelerated educational program
F. Affording parents substantial and meaningful ways to participate in their children’s education.
III. Provisions of the Bill ( according to Mary lord from u.s. news and world report; feburaury,4,2002)
A. Testing
1. State must create and give annual standard reading test in grades 3rd -8th starting in 2005 –2006.
2. Reports will be given to educators and parents to see how kids and schools are doing.
B. Accountability
1. Scores must show annual improvement and all students are to reach proficiency in 12 years.
2. Schools that are behind will receive $1,000 per child, if don’t improve after 3 years. Child can transfer to another school.
C. Reading
1. Will triple federal funding for reading programs, they only can be spend it on proven programs.
2. Require annual reading test for academic reasons
D. Teacher quality ( according to educational institute of Iowa)
1. must put a highly qualified teacher in every class by 2005
2. reduce class size if not assigned a high quality teacher
IV. Affects this has on Dubuque (according to Des Moines AP)
A. City wide watch list
1. a warning
2. doesn’t mean schools are failing
3. fail to meet state requirements
4. testing procedures are not funded
B. Schools on area watch list
1. Senior high school
2. Hempstead high school
3. Central
4. Washington junior high
5. Jefferson junior high
6. Fulton elementary
7. Table mound elementary
8. Prescott elementary
C. Also All students in the state are to be or above proficient level by 2014.
D. Most schools were on list because they failed to test at least 95% of their students.
E. Academic levels should score at an average of 95% per school
(No child left behind Cartoons) thanks to Jerry King
Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 27, Issue 2 (Fall 2011), pp. 347-360 Volokh, Eugene 27 Const. Comment. 347 (2010-2011)
- HFHS HR. "Annual Mandatory Education." Annual Mandatory Education Policy No: 4.24 (n.d.): n. pag. Web. 25 May 2014. .
93). Therefore, accountability became the central focus to improve education in America. Schools and teachers would now be judged or held accountable by their performance, and schools that failed to meet certain standards would be closed; this was a basic principle in the business sector (Ravitch, 2011, p. 8). Furthermore, NCLB mandated that every school must be 100 percent proficient in reading and mathematics by 2014; consequently schools that failed to perform would suffer punitive consequences. However, by 2007, the evidence was becoming clear that the mandates of the new law were not increasing student achievement in learning. According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), the federal testing program reported that only one-third of students met the federal standard for proficiency (Ravitch, 2011, p. 103). Ravitch argued that 100 percent proficiency in reading and mathematics was unattainable by the projected year. Not only did the law allow for each
(1956 ). The. Congressional Record (pp. 1). 4459 - 4460 ). Washington, D.C.:
3. COMPASS test with a minimum score of 25 on Pre-Algebra/Numerical, 62 on Reading, and 32 on Writing, all completed in one test session, or
U.S. Congress. Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to Senate Judiciary Committee S-158, 97th Congress, 1st Session 1981. p.7
Even with material being taught incessantly, standardized tests can not accurately measure a student’s ability. The tests are “single-target—meaning that every student, no matter what level of achievement or ability, course selection, or cu...
"Senate Joint Resolution No. 232." Legislative Information System. Legislative Information System, 08 Mar. 2012. Web. 25 Oct. 2013.
Provide a high-quality education with appropriate resources and support to ensure equal opportunity for all students in order to eliminate the achievement gap between Hispanic students and other students on appropriate state assessments and other indicators.
The bill was debated and negotiated for nearly six years in Congress, and finally passed amid unusual circumstances. Several times in the legislative process the bill had appeared to have failed, but each time was saved when a couple of Congressmen and Senators switched positions on the bill. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives early on June 25, 2003 as H.R. 1, sponsored by Speak Dennis Hastert. All that day and the next the bill was debated, and it was apparent that the bill would be very divisive. In June 27, a floor vote was taken. After the initial electronic vote, the count stood at 214 yeses an...
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is currently the educational policy in the United States. Prior to NCLB the educational policies in effect were “A Nation at Risk, in 1987 America 2000, and a few years later with Goals 2000” (Eisner, 2001, p.21). No Child Left Behind is a test based accountability system used in schools to measure their performance holding the districts, administrators and teachers liable and accountable for the outcomes. Supovitz (2009) States that No Child Left Behind was a major reform initiative intended to bring about widespread improvements in student performance and reduce inequities between ethnic groups and other traditionally under-served populations like economically disadvantaged students, students from major racial
The current debates surrounding the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 are both positive and negative. Many politicians and people that previously supported the Act are now standing against it. In the beginning many supported the new Act because everyone was aware that a change needed to happen in the education system and the proposal of No Child Left Behind seemed like the answer we were looking for. As the No Child Left Behind requirements began to be felt in the school systems across America and the assessments results started coming in, everyone took a step back and really began to look at the new law. The results were not what everyone expected, what was once considered an answer was now becoming the problem.
The need for basic literacy skills is vital in order for our nation to continue to operate successfully. With approximately 5 million students, graduating below the National Standard for Literacy and unable to read, we must take a look at the curriculum and teaching techniques to assess whether the current systems need to be revised to better assure ALL students are successful. (Adolescent Literacy: A Policy Research Belief p. 1) The issue begins first with the definition of “Literacy”, and the fact that there are several aspects of literacy which are not currently included in the curriculum. Another issue is the “old” standards which are in place do not support the level of diversity which is now seen in many school systems. Then comes the issue of funding for schools and many schools in better neighborhoods obtain the highest level of private, and public funding and therefore are able to provide the higher level of education. However, in “The Literacy Education for All, Results for the Nation (LEARN) Act”, Senator Patty Murray states, “Research also shows that low income children are less likely to have access to high quality, literacy rich environments. These same children perform 40% lower on assessments of literacy achievement even before they start kindergarten.” (Murray) So, whose responsibility is it to ensure the success of the upcoming generations? Will the Federal Government step in to create a better system for the generations to come? There are quite a few solutions which have been used by Teachers, but with such an “old” system in place the issues of diversity, financial demand, inflexibility of the curriculum to assist individual students, classroom sizes increasing on a yearly basis, pressure to achieve sp...
The No Child Left Behind Act, a federal social program that tries to encourages after school programs should be eliminated and the extra funds given to schools to decide where it goes.
B. There are many problems associated with academic pressure on the college level. Consistently poor academic performance