Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive and negative effects of social media on writing skills essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Clive Thompson asserts in his essay, The New Literacy, that people today are writing more than ever as they socialize online. Nowadays, almost everybody uses social media, but it is more popular amongst younger people. Teenagers text and tweet every little thought that pops up in their head. However, numerous scholars can argue that texting and tweeting defiles the serious academic writing with slang and “text speak.” By way of contrast, Thompson claims that using shortened language and smileys online does not degrade a person’s abilities to write well in an academic paper. Furthermore, composing texts and tweets online can help an individual with their writing. By communicating online, we are able to learn grammar and writing through our own
In the article “Clive Thompson on the New Literacy,” writer Clive Thompson argues that the widespread use of technology and social media does not make kids illiterate and unable to form coherent sentences, but instead, keeps them actively writing and learning. Thompson’s article is based off of a study done by Andrea Lunsford, a writing professor at Stanford University. Thompson agrees with Lunsford that the use of social media and the Internet allow students to be creative and get better at writing. In his article, Thompson quotes John Sutherland, an English professor at University College of London, to inform the audience of the opposite side of the argument. He states, “Facebook encourages narcissistic blabbering, video and PowerPoint have
While preparing for one of his college lectures, Dennis Baron, a professor and linguistics at the University of Illinois, began playing with the idea of how writing has changed the world we lived in and materials and tools we use in everyday life. This lecture slowly transitioned into “Should Everybody Write?” An article that has made many wonder if technology has made writing too easy for anyone to use or strengthens a writer's ability to learn and communicate their ideas. Baron uses rhetorical strategies in his article to portray to his audience his positive tone, the contrast and comparison of context and his logical purpose.
Michaela Cullington, a student, wrote a paper “Does Texting Affect Writing?” in 2010 for an English class. The paper is an examination of texting and the belief that it negative effective student’s writing. Cullington goes into detail about textspeak- “language created by these abbreviations”- and their use in formal writings. She organizes the paper in a way that is confusing to understand at first (pg. 1). At the end of the paper, she discusses her finding in her own research which comes to show that texting does not affect writing. But this is contradicting to the information she received from the teachers. The students and the teachers were seeing differences in the use of textspeak in formal writing. Cullington has good support for her
In the article, “Does Texting Affect Writing?”, the author Michaela Cullington conveys her speculation that texting does not correlate to how students write formal essays. At the beginning of the article Cullington introduces the term texting and the convenience texting brings. Later expressing her concern that the texting language “Textspeak” is actually affecting students writing; then contradicts these views by using primary and secondary sources (news articles, books, her own surveys and research). In addition, she uses an anecdote to tell of her own experience with texting and writing. Together with other evidences and research put together, she uncovers the debate between textspeak and formal writing. On the basis of her research, she concludes that the state of texting does not interfere with writing or writing abilities.
I have very few recollections of my early years and the exact age I was able to read and write. Some of my earliest memories are vague on the topic of my literacy. However, I do remember small memories, such as, learning how to write my name in cursive, winning prizes for reading, and crying over every assigned high school essay. Over the last twelve years my literacy grew rapidly with the help of teachers, large school libraries, my family, and so on. There is always room for my literacy skills to grow, but my family’s help and positive attitude towards my education, the school systems I have been a part of, and the horrible required essays from high school helped obtain the level, skills, habits, and processes that I use as part of my literacy
Unlike Mr. Gopnik, I would be lying if I referred to myself as “smartphone-loving” or claimed I have a Twitter account—I’m afraid merely checking my email and reading the news online are the upper limits of my internet capabilities. But what I do have is grandchildren, and as I have observed, Twitter and online chatting in general is simply destroying the beauty of the English language and replacing it with a multitude of abbreviations and slang. On the internet, a fast reply which makes you sound cool is more important than a well-written one with correct spelling and grammar. The issue has deteriorated so much that ‘textspeak’ has transferred from online to real life, and to my horror you may often hear young people today say “LOL” instead of actually laughing, or “hashtag YOLO” instead of something which sounds remotely
The story of my history as a writer is a very long one. My writing has come full circle. I have changed very much throughout the years, both as I grew older and as I discovered more aspects of my own personality. The growth that I see when I look back is incredible, and it all seems to revolve around my emotions. I have always been a very emotional girl who feels things keenly. All of my truly memorable writing, looking back, has come from experiences that struck a chord with my developing self. This assignment has opened my eyes, despite my initial difficulty in writing it. When I was asked to write down my earliest memory of writing, at first I drew a blank. All of a sudden, it became very clear to me, probably because it had some childhood trauma associated with it.
Throughout my childhood I was never very good at reading. It was something I always struggled with and I grew to not like reading because of this. As a child my mom and dad would read books to me before I went to bed and I always enjoyed looking at the pictures and listening. Then, as I got older my mom would have me begin to read with her out loud. I did not like this because I was not a good reader and I would get so frustrated. During this time I would struggle greatly with reading the pages fluently, I also would mix up some of the letters at times. I also struggled with comprehension, as I got older. My mom would make me read the Junie B. Jones books by myself and then I would have to tell her what happened. Most
Today, most people live surrounded by technology. Everyday people are creating more new and advance technology with different programs, websites, and ideas to share with everyone. Connecting with people around the world is becoming effortless, instantaneous, and accessible with the technology that has been developed. Clive Thompson, a writer for the New York Times Magazine and Wired, points this out well in a passage within his book, Smarter Than You Think, called “Public Thinking”. Since technology made it easier to connect with others, people have been writing their thoughts, ideas, and opinions online and on their phone. Thompson believes that people have been able to improve their writing because the technology they use daily. With all
Several decades ago, “Ain’t ain’t a word” was a favorite litany of English teachers everywhere, and they sang it whenever that offending word cropped up in a student’s speech or writing. Today, however, ain’t is a word firmly entrenched in dictionaries, nonstandard, but a word nonetheless. Now, looming on the horizon is something which may make language arts teachers long for the days of ain’t – text talk. Text talk, or text speak, is the language of abbreviations, acronyms, and emoticons people use when communicating through short message service (SMS) on their cell phones, or when instant messaging and emailing each other, and it is beginning to creep into students’ formal writing. Teachers, not just language arts teachers, hate seeing this, and many claim SMS communication is responsible for a decline in overall student writing, so they are trying to come up with ways to fight this disturbing trend. However, with the typical teen sending 80 text messages a day (Hafner, 2009), the problem is not just going to go away, so rather than fighting an uphill, and perhaps unwinnable, battle, teachers can use their students’ language to teach them formal English.
Over the past several hundred years, our society has transitioned from an oral communicating world to a mostly literate culture. Only recently have we been exposed to the phenomenon of communication that utilizes both orality and literacy, better known to us as social media. With help from Walter Ong’s vast research, we are able to explore social media as a form of communicating and disseminating information. Ong’s thoughts of our embrace of a written-based society, coupled with our long history of orality, can help to explain the blending of both of these concepts under the umbrella of social media – the central communication tool of ideas, thoughts, and information in our modern world. Thesis Statement????
Literary skills that haven’t been seen since the Greek era. Which is what believes Andrea Lunsford a professor of writing and rhetoric at Stanford University; she believes that with the help of Twitter updates, that there is instead a “literacy revolution.” How young people are now writing more than ever before, because of texting and socializing there is online. Being compared to earlier dates where students wouldn’t write at all outside of the walls of school. Though nowadays all students ever do is write online. (Source
The understanding of writing today in today’s society is very different than the understanding of it in the past. It is constantly changing daily as people change, due to experiences and events. Language and writing are the communication between human beings, either spoken or written. True thoughts and emotions cannot always be expressed through words and this is when the importance of writing is embraced. Peter Elbow addresses writing in his book Writing with Power, as having “magic” within each word (Elbow 358). Slang has developed within writing and language, adapting to the current generation; this allows it to change generation to generation. Peter Elbow and Orwell give examples about the decline of language and the understanding of writing
Firstly, it is very common for people to believe that Social Media has had a negative impact on the use of language by teenagers . This is because of a variety of reasons. The first being that communicating online is almost like a 'mid-ground between spoken language and written language for communication' [1] The term used for this is 'written-speak' or 'spoken-writing' [2] If young people are continuously using this form of communication, it may have severe ramifications on young people’s communication and literacy skills, as it can lead to the learning of...
We cannot escape human contact by hiding behind separate screens and keyboards, communicating via messages, emails, and status updates, as anchored in social media usage. Despite the fact that we’re hidden, true verbal communication and oral culture is not totally lost. As Walter Ong put it in the introduction of his book Orality and Literacy, “Our understanding of the differences between orality and literacy developed only in the electronic age, not earlier.” Social networks and the activity that occurs on them is an extension of orality, though many could argue that status updates and tweets are literary due to their written form. However, the digital age is an age of ‘secondary orality’, a resurgence of orality if you will. The orality of telephones, television, and the Internet depend on writing and print for their existences and content (Ong, Orality and Literacy 2). Additionally, the activity and communication that occurs on social networking websites displays multiple of Ong’s characteristics of orality. On Twitter, specifically, from the instantaneous replies to tweets and speaking agonistically, sans a verbal filter to redundant and repetitive hashtag usage and malicious subtweeting, Twitter has become a battleground of new-age orality.