Analysis Of Smarter Than You Think

Today, most people live surrounded by technology. Everyday people are creating more new and advance technology with different programs, websites, and ideas to share with everyone. Connecting with people around the world is becoming effortless, instantaneous, and accessible with the technology that has been developed. Clive Thompson, a writer for the New York Times Magazine and Wired, points this out well in a passage within his book, Smarter Than You Think, called “Public Thinking”. Since technology made it easier to connect with others, people have been writing their thoughts, ideas, and opinions online and on their phone. Thompson believes that people have been able to improve their writing because the technology they use daily. With all

He explains audience effect more thoroughly with a study from Vanderbilt University, which shows how having an audience can change a person’s thought process, reasoning, and actions. Another example was when he went to China and met some young bloggers and what their experience is like with the social networks and how they created their audience among other online communities. It gives him more credibility towards how it also affects people’s writing pieces. People are aware of the audience they have and can adjust their writing to appeal to those who will see the work. Audience effect is not always good. It can put unnecessary pressure on a person. There is a possibility that it also takes away a person’s courage in their writing and that is never a good thing. They will start to believe that their writing isn’t good enough and stop. This happens online and “doesn’t necessarily require a big audience to kick in.”(Thompson 56) Everyone is different at when look out for how many people will see their writing, so the effect can come in at big or small audiences. People will want their writing good enough to be presentable to an audience and with that; their writing skill will improve. Thompson adds this scientific research to add credibility to his argument, so it builds up his reader’s trust. Thompson has more examples to support his sub-claim, which adds more credibility to his