Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The continuing cold war
Essay on the new cold war
A change in the cold war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The continuing cold war
In the article, “The New Cold War is Already More Dangerous Than Was Its Predecessor,” Cohen explains how, in our current day and age, that a new cold war is brewing it and it is already more deadly than its predecessor. In my opinion, I agree with Cohen, about the new Cold War , because of the tensions building between communist and noncommunist ideologies. In recent years, the article explains that “Russia is “isolated” in world affairs.” The induced isolation that Russia has brought upon itself has closed off any foreign ideologies and foreign influence. This is worrying, in terms of another cold war, because this will cause many citizens to believe in Putin’s propaganda and follow his customsm blindly. Another valid point that Cohen makes
The Cold War was a period of dark and melancholic times when the entire world lived in fear that the boiling pot may spill. The protectionist measures taken by Eisenhower kept the communists in check to suspend the progression of USSR’s radical ambitions and programs. From the suspenseful delirium from the Cold War, the United States often engaged in a dangerous policy of brinksmanship through the mid-1950s. Fortunately, these actions did not lead to a global nuclear disaster as both the US and USSR fully understood what the weapons of mass destruction were capable of.
...oved to be singularly influential and daunting. This is, perhaps, the greatest obstacles to achieving true democracy in Russia—the authoritarian and repressive traditions that refuse to die out with the passage of time.
Odd Arne Westad, Director of the Cold War Studies Centre at the London School of Economics and Political Science, explains how the Cold War “shaped the world we live in today — its politics, economics, and military affairs“ (Westad, The Global Cold War, 1). Furthermore, Westad continues, “ the globalization of the Cold War during the last century created foundations” for most of the historic conflicts we see today. The Cold War, asserts Westad, centers on how the Third World policies of the two twentieth-century superpowers — the United States and the Soviet Union — escalates to antipathy and conflict that in the end helped oust one world power while challenging the other. This supplies a universal understanding on the Cold War (Westad, The Global Cold War, 1). After World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union opposed each other over the expansion of their power.
There have been many attempts to explain the origins of the Cold War that developed between the capitalist West and the communist East after the Second World War. Indeed, there is great disagreement in explaining the source for the Cold War; some explanations draw on events pre-1945; some draw only on issues of ideology; others look to economics; security concerns dominate some arguments; personalities are seen as the root cause for some historians. So wide is the range of the historiography of the origins of the Cold War that is has been said "the Cold War has also spawned a war among historians, a controversy over how the Cold War got started, whether or not it was inevitable, and (above all) who bears the main responsibility for starting it" (Hammond 4). There are three main schools of thought in the historiography: the traditional view, known alternatively as the orthodox or liberal view, which finds fault lying mostly with the Russians and deems security concerns to be the root cause of the Cold War; the revisionist view, which argues that it is, in fact, the United States and the West to blame for the Cold War and not the Russians, and cites economic open-door interests for spawning the Cold War; finally, the post-revisionist view which finds fault with both sides in the conflict and points to issues raised both by the traditionalists as well as the revisionists for combining to cause the Cold War. While strong arguments are made by historians writing from the traditionalist school, as well as those writing from the revisionist school, I claim that the viewpoint of the post-revisionists is the most accurate in describing the origins of the Cold War.
The Cold War: A New History is written differently than other books of the same genre. The book is divided into chapters each consisting of different themes and ideas by Gaddis’ choice. Gaddis wrote the book in a way that it would not be a general overview of the Cold War; rather a scope of the ideas imp...
The Development of the Cold War in Europe after 1945 After World War Two, there was an increasing interest in the idea of a United Europe. Soviet Russia and Western European Capitalist states had no common interests despite the wartime alliance, which was no longer valid. There was growing hostility between the United States and Soviet Russia that developed in to a Cold War. This essay will suggest that the development of the Cold War in Europe was a result of differences in political ideologies and a lack of compromise and agreement. It will discuss the ideals of Western Europe and that of Soviet Russia; the United States in support of liberty and freedom, and Communist Russia, who had shown a dislike towards Capitalism.
A Cold War is not a war involving physical combat, but rather a war of political aggression between various countries involving threats, military build ups, and spying. After World War two, tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union impacted other countries around the world. This conflict eventually became known as the Cold War. During this time, two conflicting political philosophies, communism and capitalism, became global and had long lasting effects on many countries, including Cuba. In general, the Cold War lasted from 1945 to 1991 when the Soviet Union collapsed, but Cuba remains negatively impacted until this day. Understanding the international tensions of that time period in history is necessary for understanding how Cuba became so affected by the Cold War. Economic sanctions by the United States caused an embargo on products imported into and exported from Cuba. These embargoes limited Cuba’s ability to provide social services such as education and health care. Cuba was adversely impacted by the Cold War because of international tensions, economic sanctions, and a decrease in
Consequently, Russia offers U.S. businesses both high risk, and potentially high rewards. Russian firms and customers admire U.S. technology and know-how, and generally are interested in doing business with U.S. companies. At the same time, there is a tendency in some quarters to suppose that the U.S. is responsible for the changes which have occurred in Russia, especially those which have caused most hardship to individuals and to industry. This sentiment has attracted the support of some political leaders, and in given credence by a significant proportion of the populace. At the same time, a strong U.S. commercial presence is viewed in the Russian Far East as a counterbalance to other regional economic powers.
Summary of the. John Gaddis' The Cold War: A NEW HISTORY provides a thorough, unbiased, fair, and detailed account of the Cold War, which was a complex battle. Gaddis’s overview spans from the end of World War II to the eventual collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Gaddis analyzes and presents some of the key events of the Cold War, including the arms race, development of nuclear weapons, space race, and many more. Throughout the book Gaddis does not only focus on the military and political aspect of the war but he explores the cultural and societal impacts the war had, additionally Gaddis examines how war influenced the pop. culture, and literature of the time. In Gaddis’s research he dove deep and not only examined one side of the battlefield but both, he researched the effects of the war on not only people in the United States but also in the Soviet
Lafeber, W. (2002), America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945-2000. 9th edn. New-York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Russia's actions in foreign affairs the European in the next 10 to 20 years will change the world in a comprehensive way. The European Community's disregard for Russia will lead them to find new allies abroad. Russia will ally itself with two of the world's up-and-coming super powers. These will be China and India, the two most populated countries in the world. This tripartite alliance will dominate world affairs because of Russia's technology and political leadership and India and China's will to pursue military and economic agreements with Russia. Russia will not choose to ally itself with these countries but will be forced too because of the European Community's and N.A.T.O.'s treatment of it s a defeated nation. The European Community's lack of respect for Russia in foreign affairs will be the driving force in Russia for it to ally with its Eurasian neighbors. Due to E.U. enlargement eastward, Russia is forced to look east of itself for expansion and opportunities as it faces severely decreasing influence in Europe.
The Russo-Chechen war that ended in 1996 should have given the Russian government a feel of things to come when they decided to attack in late September of last year. Triggered by security challenges to the State, Russia decided that the democracy would be in danger if they didn’t act. Russia was in a politically unstable situation right now with the resignation of Yeltsin, and the current Presidential elections looming. Also looming on the political horizon was the concern over rampant corruption in the government. If they had done nothing Yeltsin’s party would have stood to lose, yet Putin, (Yeltsin’s successor) succeeded in focusing the medias attention on the war rather that the domestic corruption.
As the constructivism ontology states, “Anarchy is what the states make it”, the meaning behind the mix of history, ideas, norms, and beliefs are different nowadays than before. Consequently, the states would behave a different way than before. Thus, the US and Russia have grown more accepting of each other and neither side would like to experience the cold war all over again. These two reasons alone would have changed the countries behaviors and make the cold war impossible to happen again. Governed by the past experience, both countries are more willing to cooperate and be guided away from the dark old past. Russia is not the old USSR and the social norms, beliefs, and history are all different from the 20th century. It is undeniable that there is a conflict between the US and Russia. However, the conflict now is different from the past. It is no longer about Nuclear weapons and technology. Thus, there could be possibilities that there is a new kind of war arising from Russia and the US. This new conflict could simply be a culture and ideology rivalry. Despite globalization and the new developed acceptance between Russia and the US, the core beliefs of those countries did not change and there remains an ideological conflict. However, this rivalry in beliefs happens all the time. People’s beliefs are constantly challenged by their peers. Yet, they have been able to coexist peacefully together. In the case of Russia and the US, both countries managed to coexist peacefully for many years after the cold war. Therefore, under the right leadership and the current open-mindedness in the world, this rivalry will not escalate into a war. It will simply be a standoff to exchange values and beliefs much like globalization.
In 1945, once the end of the World War II appeared, the world was shaken, crumbled, and spat out into a new emerging order. The United States and the Soviet Union faced the inevitable. No other state was capable of dominating the great regions devastated by the war. Nevertheless, alongside this new order appeared a new conflict - the Cold War. The clash of two titans has been an important milestone for many historians, political scientists and international relations specialist.
Similarly, the Russian Revolution could not have been seen as aggressive since the United States had a policy of isolationism.) One country forced the other out of their isolationist shell while the other taunted the former with a weapon of tremendous magnitude. Conclusively, the Cold War was not caused by the single-handed actions of a country, nor both countries; it was a slow collapse of trust that accelerated with each county’s act of