Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why did conflict in russia chechnya occur
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why did conflict in russia chechnya occur
Chechnya The Continuing Conflict
Chechnya is situated in the Caucasus Mountains, between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea. It is surrounded by Dagestan to the east, Georgia and South Ossetia to the south, Russia to the north and North Ossetia in the west. Chechnya is rich in mineral oil and produced twenty million tons per year before the disintegration of the Soviet Union. The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 created the opportunity for the Russian provinces to declare their independence. The Russian government managed to keep its control of all states apart from Chechnya, which, under the new president Dzhokhar Dudayev, declared independence in October 1991.
The Russian Government did not approve this and President Yeltsin declared war against the newborn regime in 1994. Yeltsin feared that if they had not declared war the other Caucasus states may have followed suit, to prevent this they preferred to curb it at the out set. The second Chechen war, which began in September 1999, was a result of the actions taken by Russia in the first war and was a product of the same policies. The fight for independence for Chechnya has been ongoing since the Bolshevik Revolution and is one that will be fought well into the future if something is not done about it now.
The Russo-Chechen war that ended in 1996 should have given the Russian government a feel of things to come when they decided to attack in late September of last year. Triggered by security challenges to the State, Russia decided that the democracy would be in danger if they didn’t act. Russia was in a politically unstable situation right now with the resignation of Yeltsin, and the current Presidential elections looming. Also looming on the political horizon was the concern over rampant corruption in the government. If they had done nothing Yeltsin’s party would have stood to lose, yet Putin, (Yeltsin’s successor) succeeded in focusing the medias attention on the war rather that the domestic corruption.
This war has given rise to a huge influx of racial hatred that has again helped Putin. Because the majority of the Chechen’s are Muslim, and not of the same ethnic background as Russians, racial discrimination has helped to boost the wars popularity and subsequently Putins. The security of oil in the southern Caucasus states and its transportation routes are the main influential factors in the...
... middle of paper ...
...the task of the US and their European allies to bring the case to the European Court of Human Rights; the charge, a violation of its international treaty rights. Russia should also be required to conduct peace negotiations with the Chechens under the guidance of the various European Groups with a vested interest in the preservation of the borders of the surrounding countries. Threats of this can be conveyed to Russia, but this action, and anything that may come of it will not necessarily by abided by Russia. Russia has already shown that it will do what it wants concerning this issue. The US and its European allies are in apposition where threatening Russia with action is the only thing that they can do. Russia will not respond to these threats and will best only give them lip service. That this conflict be resolved in a manner favourable to Russia is essential. Russia cannot permit the secession of any part of its territory because it will lead to actions by other regions and the access to Caucasus oil fields cannot be lost. Any other action taken by a third party will only result in destabilization of Russia and termination of diplomatic relations between Russia and the west.
International politics as one may imagine includes foreign affairs. This is why the topic and focus of this paper revolves around the current event within Eastern Europe. It will focus on both Russia, Ukraine, and the world, and from it, it will be analyzed by using the resources provided within class. After all it is a International Politics course, and one of the best ways to effectively put the skills and knowledge to use is to focus on an event or current event. The paper will attempt to go over in a chronological order of the events that has happened, and what is happening currently over in Ukraine. Afterwards, an analyzed input will be implemented providing reasoning behind Russia's actions, and actions of the world, and potentially some solutions.
While many see Russia’s movement to admit Crimea as an attempt recreate a communist USSR-like ‘supercountry’ and the Russian government and their Pro-Russian Ukrainian counterparts have committed multiple crimes against humanity, the United States should not intervene in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Tight sanctions risk severing ties with Russia and military intervention may very well ignite World War III. This may be seen as even more democratic imperialism, which the United States has been trying to avoid recently.
The Soviet system of forced labor camps was first established in 1919 under the Cheka; however, in the early 1930’s camps had reached outrageous numbers. In 1934 the Gulag had several million prisoners. The prisoners ranged from innocent pro-Bolsheviks to guilty Trotsky’s. Conditions were harsh, filthy, and prisoners received inadequate food rations and poor clothing. Over the period of the Stalin dictatorship many people experienced violations of their basic human rights, three in particular were Natasha Petrovskaya, Mikhail Belov, and Olga Andreyeva.
The crisis was getting so far out of hand that the US and the EU had to figure out how to help, so they got involved in the crisis. The Ukraine conflict was triggered by Yanukovych declining the EU deal, and when everything was getting settled down in Ukraine, Russia invades Ukraine. In Ukraine, there are people that are gathering at the Independence Maiden Square in Kiev. They all gathered at the square to rally against their President Yanukovych because he was not doing what they were hoping they would do. The government launched an attack against their own state because of the rallies that are happening.
Russia failed, maybe because of their pride, which led to their no deals with terrorists policy. Barriers were set by Russians, their negotiations were poor, lacked strategy, obviously provocations were not useful. Because of their unilateral thinking they could not find or tried to find a peaceful solution. Maybe they did not negotiate to prevent other terrorism acts, and by refusing coming to terms they showed the terrorists that raiding a central theather and taking hostages was not enough to solve problems. The need of security and feeling of distrust brought up a bigger emotion, resentment. Unfortunately after an incident like this especially Putin does not seem to appercieve.
...h development of Russia, and the West’s involvement in that task. Russia must feel as though it is being treated as if it is a major player on the world scale, which it is. If it feels that it is being regarded lightly, it will shut itself off from the rest of the world and positive change will not occur. This means that using Russia to augment the United States’ security needs at no benefit to Russia needs to end. The West must recognize the differences in Russia and work around those differences in order to find a system that works for them. A realist approach is clearly not the answer as it only fuels negativity, and does nothing to encourage Russia to fix their internal problems which are hindering the country. If the West can engage productively with Russia, an era of cooperation will ensue which will be essential in solving the globes security problems.
To understand why the fighting continues to present day, we must first look at the historical events, which led to the first conflict. With, the incorporation of Chechnya into Russia by Alexander the II, the Nazi invasions of World War II, Chechen deportation by Stalin, the presidency of Dzhokar Dudayev with in Chechnya, and the Russian Federation Treaty by Yeltsin will all show evidence of the multi-century build up of hate.
...ty on the Black Sea peninsula. “Some Crimean Tatars denounced the proposal for autonomy as a betrayal of Ukraine. Others insisted it prevented another mass exodus and said safeguarding their right to live on the land they consider home was a priority” (Higgins, 4/02/2014). While the minority make up less than fifteen percent of Crimea’s population, it has been overwhelmingly opposed to Russia’s annexation of the peninsula. Russia claims Crimea is an inalienable part of Russia; however, Russia’s legacy of control remains for many Tatars a bitter one of trampled cultural beliefs and language, deportation, and general lack of recognition for the Crimean Tatars’ territorial rights. Russia’s unjustifiable annexation of Crimea is paved by its cultural identity, racism, and sense of place. The Crimean Tatars should not be forgotten or overlooked during the current crisis.
... ethnic discriminatory practices. One of the noted differences of Kazakhstan’s ability to maintain ethnic pluralism has been its ability to create a system that does not differentiate base on individual ethnic origins. Even though linguistic difference did create a system of discrimination, the measure of socioeconomic achievement amongst groups was minimal. Today, titular elite’ control of the government has enforced the use of korcnizatsiya policy. The defined differences as well as control that come from such political agendas have created a security threat to Kazakhstan’s new statehood by other ethnic groups receiving help from their homelands. This creation of a system were noted difference between ethnic groups’ opportunities and resources become apparent, has left many experts skeptical if Kazakhstan will be able to maintain ethnic pluralism and harmony.
We the people, are declaring our independence from Russia for the goal of freedom of speech, equal rights, protection from attack, and fair trial. Our previous rights have been violated, and are now nonexistent. We are now forming our own country to prevent future issues.
Even with Russia’s vast amount of land only, a small percentage can produce crops, as the rainfall is inconsistent and the northern tundra are not able to support growth. None the less fishing industry, livestock, and grain have been a staple for feeding the Russian people. Due to this family close, and extended have banded together to take care of each other on a larger scale. Another issue Russia faces is the rise of insurgency and could potentially destabilize the region, by Islamist. There is also the unrest and intervention in the Ukraine. Civil consideration
The conflict between the Ukraine and Russia is the Ukraine's most long-standing and deadly crisis; since its post-Soviet independence began as a protest against the government dropping plans to forge closer trade ties with the European Union. The conflict between Russia and the Ukraine stems from more than twenty years of weak governance, the government’s inability to promote a coherent executive branch policy, an economy dominated by oligarchs and rife with corruption, heavy reliance on Russia, and distinct differences between Ukraine's population from both Eastern and Western regions in terms of linguistics, religion and ethnicity (Lucas 2009).
The Ukrainian crisis was a result of social upheaval against the former president, Mr. Yanukovich, who decided to pull out of the association with the European Union (BBC News, 2014). The upheaval that lasted for about two months resulted in more than 100 people killed (NY Times, 2014). In February 22 Mr. Yanukovich disappears and the opposition takes control over the government in Ukraine (BBC News, 2014). Upon learning that Mr. Yanukovich is currently residing in Kazakhstan, the new government of Ukraine requests from Kazakhstan the extradition of the overthrown president, who is accused of crime against the Ukrainian citizenry.
Bhutan is a small country located in the Himalayas. It does have a richly scenic land though. There are broad, grassy valleys; forested mountain ranges, and heavily wooded jungle areas. There are three geographic regions in which the country is divided. Northern Bhutan lies in the Great Himalayas where the mountains reach as high as 24,000 ft. and the weather is cold. Central Bhutan is in the middle of the Himalayan region where there are several fertile valleys. The Duars plain, along the southern border of Bhutan is a hot, humid, and rainy area. This jungle region is filled with malaria infested swamps. (Karan, 224)